| Literature DB >> 30925916 |
Mahrou Vahabi1,2, Claudio Pulito1, Andrea Sacconi1, Sara Donzelli1, Marco D'Andrea3, Valentina Manciocco4, Raul Pellini4, Paola Paci5,6, Giuseppe Sanguineti3, Lidia Strigari7, Giuseppe Spriano8, Paola Muti9, Pier Paolo Pandolfi10, Sabrina Strano1, Shahrokh Safarian11, Federica Ganci12, Giovanni Blandino13.
Abstract
BACKGROUND: Head and neck squamous cell carcinoma (HNSCC) is the sixth leading cancer worldwide. They are typically characterized by a high incidence of local recurrence, which is the most common cause of death in HNSCC patients. TP53 is the most frequently mutated gene in HNSCC and patients carrying TP53 mutations are associated with a higher probability to develop local recurrence. MiRNAs, which are among the mediators of the oncogenic activity of mt-p53 protein, emerge as an appealing tool for screening, diagnosis and prognosis of cancer. We previously identified a signature of 12 miRNAs whose aberrant expression associated with TP53 mutations and was prognostic for HNSCC. Among them miR-96-5p emerges as an oncogenic miRNAs with prognostic significance in HNSCC.Entities:
Keywords: Chemotherapy; Head and neck cancer; Local recurrence; Migration; PI3K-Akt signalling pathway; PTEN; Radiotherapy; TP53 mutations; miR-96-5p; miRNAs
Mesh:
Substances:
Year: 2019 PMID: 30925916 PMCID: PMC6440033 DOI: 10.1186/s13046-019-1119-x
Source DB: PubMed Journal: J Exp Clin Cancer Res ISSN: 0392-9078
Fig. 1miR-96-5p upregulation is stronger in TP53 mutated HNSCC and predicts local recurrence in HNSCC patients. a Box plot showing expression level of miR-96-5p in the tumoral and normal tissues from IRE cohort. b Box plot of the expression level of miR-96-5p in the tumoral and normal tissues from TCGA cohort. c Kaplan–Meier (KM) analysis showing correlation between the expression level of miR-96-5p and recurrence-free survival in the HNSCC patients from IRE cohort. d-e Comparison of miR-96-5p expression between TP53 mutated and wild type tumors from matched samples IRE cohort (d) and from matched samples TCGA cohort (e). N: number of samples, FC: Fold change, p: p-value
Fig. 2High expression of miR-96-5p promotes cell migration in HNSCC cell lines carrying mutant p53 protein. Two HNSCC cell lines (Cal 27, FaDu) were transfected with miR-96-5p mimic and inhibitor. The efficiency of transfection was evaluated by RT-qPCR in Cal 27 (a-c) and FaDu (e-g) cells. b, d, f, h Representative micrographs of transwell migration in Cal 27 (b-d) and FaDu (f-h) cell lines, DAPI staining was used to quantify the migrated cells on the outer surface of the filter. Histogram shows the number of migrated cells after using miR-96-5p mimic (b, f) and miR-96-5p inhibitor (d, h) in the Cal 27 and FaDu cell lines. Bars show the means of at least two experiments performed in triplicate. The p-value refers to matched control versus miR-96-5p mimic and miR-96-5p inhibitor transfected samples.*P < 0.05; **P < 0.001; ***P < 0.0001. NC: Negative control
Fig. 3miR-96-5p expression affects radiosensitivity of Cal 27 and FaDu cells. Cal 27 and FaDu cells were transfected with miR-96-5p mimic and inhibitor. After 48 h, cells were treated with 2Gy dose of irradiation. a-d RT-qPCR analysis showing efficiency of miR-96-5p mimic transfection in Cal 27 cells (a) and in FaDu cells (c). Cell viability after transfection and radiation of Cal 27 (b) and FaDu (c) cells has been assessed by ATPlite assay. e-h RT-qPCR analysis showing efficiency of miR-96-5p inhibitor transfection in Cal 27 cells (e) and in FaDu (g) cells. Cell viability after transfection and radiation of Cal 27 (f) and FaDu (h) cells has been assessed by ATPlite assay. i-j Colony formation assay of Cal 27 (i) and FaDu (j) cells after transfection with miR-96-5p inhibitor and radiation treatment at 2Gy dose. Histogram bars show the means of at least three experiments performed in triplicate. *P < 0.05; **P < 0.001. NC: Negative control
Fig. 4miR-96-5p expression affects the sensitivity of Cal 27 cells to chemotherapy. Cal 27 cells were transfected with miR-96-5p mimic and inhibitor. After 48 h cells were treated with different concentration of cisplatin (0.5,1,2,4,8 μg/ml). a RT-qPCR data showing efficiency of miR-96-5p mimic transfection. b Cell viability analysis of Cal 27 cells treated with miR-96-5p mimic and different concentrations of cisplatin in comparison with the negative control. c RT-qPCR data showing efficiency of miR-96-5p inhibitor transfection. d Cell viability analysis of Cal 27 cells treated with miR-96-5p inhibitor and different concentration of cisplatin in comparison with the negative control. e Colony formation assay performed on Cal 27 cells treated with miR-96-5p inhibitor and different concentration of cisplatin in comparison with the negative control. Histogram bars show the means of at least three experiments performed in triplicate.*P < 0.05; **P < 0.001. NC: Negative control, CDDP: Cisplatin
Pathways enrichment analysis of genes correlated to miR-96-5p in a mutant TP53 context
| Pathway | |
|---|---|
| Focal adhesion - | 2.10E-05 |
| Focal Adhesion | 3.02E-05 |
| Signaling by Receptor Tyrosine Kinases | 3.29E-05 |
| Regulation of actin cytoskeleton- Homo sapiens (human) | 0.00016 |
| Extracellular matrix organization | 0.000163 |
| PI3K-Akt signaling pathway - Homo sapiens (human) | 0.000829 |
| Cytokine-cytokine receptor interaction - Homo sapiens (human) | 0.001243 |
| Signal Transduction | 0.001871 |
| PI3K-Akt Signaling Pathway | 0.002061 |
| Human papillomavirus infection - Homo sapiens (human) | 0.004174 |
| Pathways in cancer - Homo sapiens (human) | 0.008498 |
| Axon guidance | 0.008829 |
| Hemostasis | 0.023744 |
| Post-translational protein modification | 0.028931 |
P < 0.05 was considered significant
Fig. 5miR-96-5p targets PTEN and affects PI3K activation. a PTEN distribution in tumoral samples with altered PTEN (mutated or deleted), with not altered PTEN and in normal samples. b PTEN distribution in tumoral samples with altered PTEN or with down-regulation of PTEN higher than 0.5 log2 folds and in normal samples. c Position of the miR-96-5p target site in the 3’UTR of PTEN predicted by miRwalk 3.0. d Luciferase activity of PTEN-3’UTR-WT reporter gene in H1299 cell line. Cells were transiently transfected with miR-96-5p mimic or control mimic. The histogram bars show the means of three experiments performed in duplicate, **P < 0.001. e Luciferase activity of PTEN-CDS-WT reporter gene in H1299 cell line which were transiently transfected with miR-96-5p mimic or control mimic. Bars show the means of two experiments performed in triplicate. f RT-qPCR graph showing miR-96-5p expression level in Cal 27 cell line after miR-96-5p inhibitor transfection, **P < 0.001. g Western-blot analysis of PTEN, p-AKT and AKT protein expression level in Cal 27 cells that were transfected with miR-96-5p inhibitor or control inhibitor. NC: Negative control, T: tumor
Fig. 6PTEN silencing mimics the biological effects of miR-96-5p overexpression in Cal 27 cells. a Western-blot analysis of PTEN protein expression level in Cal 27 cells transfected with siPTEN and scrambled siRNA as negative control. b Representative histogram of transwell migration assay of Cal 27 cells treated with siPTEN and scrambled siRNA and co-transfected cells with miR-96-5p inhibitor and siPTEN or control inhibitor and scrambeld siRNA. Bars show the means of at least two experiments performed in triplicate. The p-value refers to matched control inhibitor and scrambled siRNA versus miR-96-5p inhibitor and siPTEN transfected samples.*P < 0.05; **P < 0.001; ***P < 0.0001. c Colony formation assay of Cal 27 cells treated with siPTEN and scrambled siRNA. Histogram shows the number of migrated cells after using siPTEN and scrambled siRNA. Bars show the means of at least two experiments performed in triplicate. The p-value refers to matched control versus siPTEN transfected samples.*P < 0.05; **P < 0.001; ***P < 0.001. d-e Cell viability (d) and cell colony (e) analyses of Cal 27 cells transfected with siPTEN and treated with radiation at the dose of 2Gy. f Cell viability analysis of Cal 27 cells transfected with siPTEN and treated with different concentration of cisplatin in comparison with the negative control. siSCR: SCR siRNA, siPTEN: PTEN siRNA
Fig. 7Proposed model depicting the oncogenic effects of the miR-96-5p/PTEN alterated expression in HNSCC . As shown in the miRNAs-validated targets interaction networks, PTEN is a direct target shared by both miRNA signatures in the tumoral and peritumoral HNSCC tissues. In particular, the oncogenic miR-96-5p directly binds to PTEN 3’UTR then commences the signaling cascade and leads to down regulation of the expression level of PTEN therefore, cell migration and resistance to radiotherapy and chemotherapy increase