Literature DB >> 29805640

miR-96 promotes invasion and metastasis by targeting GPC3 in non-small cell lung cancer cells.

Xiubin Fei1, Jingang Zhang2, Yunwei Zhao3, Meijia Sun1, Haifeng Zhao1, Shuang Li3.   

Abstract

Lung cancer is a major cause of death worldwide, and non-small cell lung cancer (NSCLC) is the most common type of lung cancer. The aim of this study was to investigate whether miR-96 mediated the invasion and metastasis of NSCLC by targeting glypican-3 (GPC3). Reverse transcription-quantitative PCR (RT-qPCR) was employed to detect the level of miR-96 and GPC3 mRNA. We applied western blot analysis to measure the protein expression level of GPC3 gene. The luciferase reporter assay was employed to confirm that GPC3 was a target gene of miR-96. The Transwell assay was used to detect migration and invasion. The results revealed that miR-96 was upregulated in NSCLC tissues and lung cancer cells (A549 and H460) compared with corresponding paracancerous tissues and normal epidermic MRC-5 cells. Overexpression of miR-96 promoted invasion and migration in A549 cells. GPC3 was a direct target of miR-96 and regulated by miR-96. GPC3 could reverse partial fuction of miR-96 on proliferation. In conclusion, miR-96 was able to promote the migration and invasion of lung cancer cells by targeting GPC3 gene. The newly identified miR-96/GPC3 axis may provide a therapeutic method for the treatment of NSCLC.

Entities:  

Keywords:  glypican-3; invasion; miR-96; migration

Year:  2018        PMID: 29805640      PMCID: PMC5958666          DOI: 10.3892/ol.2018.8507

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Oncol Lett        ISSN: 1792-1074            Impact factor:   2.967


Introduction

Cancer is caused by the genetic mutations induced by various carcinogenic factors (1). Lung cancer is the leading cause of death worldwide (2). The incidence of lung cancer is related to smoking, and it is reported that 85% of male patients and 47% of female lung cancer patients are smokers (3,4). Non-small cell lung cancer (NSCLC) is the most common type of lung cancer which accounts for >75% of all lung cancer cases (5). Lung cancer is a highly complicated and heterogeneous disease with intricate genetic mutations (6). Therefore, further investigation of the underlying mechanism of NSCLC is urgently needed. MicroRNAs (miRNAs) are 21–28 nucleotides in length and are highly conserved small non-coding RNAs that bind to mRNAs of their target gene at their 3′-UTR to regulate target gene expression at post-transcriptional (7,8). miRNAs play an important role in various biological processes, such as proliferation, metastasis, and apoptosis (9). In NSCLC, multiple miRNAs have been identified as tumor suppressors, including miR-16, miR-23b, and miR-143 (10–12). miR-96 is a member of the miR-183 family, which constituted a polycistronic paralogous miRNA cluster (13). In breast cancer, miR-96 promoted cell invasion, migration, and proliferation in vitro by silencing PTPN9 (14). Ress et al reported that miR-96 promoted cell proliferation and predicted poor prognosis in colorectal cancer (15). Recently, miR-96 has been reported to be upregulated and acts as an oncogene in many cancers, including NSCLC (16). The reversion-inducing-cysteine-rich protein with kazal motifs (RECK) is the functional target of miR-96 (17). The majority of human miRNAs were imprecisely bound to mRNA of target genes (8). Thus, we considered there could be other unknown targets of miR-96 in NSCLC. Jalvy-Delvaille et al have shown that glypican-3 (GPC3) is a potential target of miR-96 in hepatocellular carcinoma (HCC) cells (18). GPC3, heparan sulfate proteoglycans (HSPGs) which are the major part of extracellular matrix, play a pivotal role in the regulation of heparin-binding growth factor and various intracellular signaling pathways (19,20). It has been found that GPC3 functions as a tumor suppressor in various tumors. GPC3 was significantly downregulated in human malignant mesothelioma cell lines and the ectopic expression of GPC3 suppressed the colony formation of human MM cells in vitro (21). White et al reported that GPC3 may participate in the tumorigenesis of some WT cases (22). In the present study, we investigated the role of miR-96 and GPC3 in NSCLC. We found that miR-96 was upregulated in lung cancer cells and NSCLC tissues compared with normal epithelium cells and paracancerous tissues. The miR-96 overexpression significantly promoted the migratory and invasive ability of lung cancer cell lines. Moreover, we identified that GPC3 was a direct target of miR-96 and miR-96 regulated the expression of GPC3. GPC3 was decreased in lung cancer cell lines and a low expression of GPC3 suppressed the proliferation of lung cancer cells.

Materials and methods

Tissue samples and cell lines

In total, 57 human NSCLC samples and corresponding paracancerous tissues from the patients who underwent surgery at the First Affiliated Hospital of Jiamusi University (Jiamusi, China) between January, 2012 and December, 2016 were collected. The above experimental samples were obtained with informed consent of the patients and verified by the Ethics Committee of the First Affiliated Hospital of Jiamusi University. Human lung cancer cells A549 and H460 and normal lung epithelium cells MRC-5 were purchased from the American Type Culture Collection (ATCC, Rockville, MD, USA) and cultured at 37°C in a humidified atmosphere with 5% CO2 using RPMI-1640 medium (Gibco; Thermo Fisher Scientific, Inc., Carlsbad, CA, USA), and supplemented with 10% fetal bovine serum.

Western blot analysis

Total proteins were extracted from the cells and tissues using the cell lysis buffer (Takara Biotechnology Co., Ltd., Dalian, China) according to the manufacturer's instructions. The proteins were quantified using the Bradford assay kit (Takara Biotechnology Co., Ltd.). The proteins were separated by SDS-PAGE, and then transferred onto a PVDF membrane (Bio-Rad Laboratories, Inc., Hercules, CA, USA). The membrane was blocked in Tween-20 containing 5% skimmed milk for 1 h and then incubated with primary antibody (GPC3 rabbit polyclonal antibody, P51654; Santa Cruz Biotechnology, Inc., Santa Cruz, CA, USA) at 4°C overnight. After the membranes were washed three times (10 min each) with PBST, the anti-rabbit secondary antibody (1:3,000; sc-362280; Santa Cruz Biotechnology, Inc.) was incubated with the membranes for 1 h at room temperature. The protein bands were visualized using the Bio-Rad Gel Doc XR instrument (Bio-Rad Laboratories, Inc.). Each experiment was performed three times in duplicate.

Plasmid construction and cell transfection

miRNA vectors, including miR-96 mimic and LNA anti-miR-96 and their control vectors were designed and purchased from Shanghai GenePharma Co., Ltd. (Shanghai, China), which were employed to overexpress or knock down miR-96. pcDNA3.1-GPC3 and siRNA-GPC3 plasmids (purchased from Shanghai GenePharma Co., Ltd.) were utilized to overexpress or knock down GPC3. A549 cells were seeded onto 6-well plates and when the confluence was ~70%, the plasmids were transfected using Lipofectamine 2000 and RNAiMAX (Invitrogen; Thermo Fisher Scientific, Inc., Carlsbad, CA, USA) according to the manufacturer's instructions. Plasmids or Lipofectamine 2000 were diluted with Opti-MEM Reduced-Serum Medium and set aside. After mixing the two dilutions, and allowing to stand for 20 min, the dilutions were added onto the 6-well plates containing cells. After transfection for 4–6 h, fresh RPMI-1640 medium was added.

Total RNA extraction and reverse transcription-quantitative PCR (RT-qPCR)

The total RNA was extracted using the RNAprep Pure Tissue kit (Tiangen Biotech Co., Ltd., Beijing, China) according to the manufacturer's instructions. The cDNA was synthesized using the FastKing RT kit (with gDNase) (Tiangen Biotech Co., Ltd.). GAPDH mRNA levels were used for the normalization of GPC3. The primer sequences were as follows: miR-96 forward, 5′-GCCCGCTTTGGCACTAGCACATT-3′ and reverse, 5′-GTGCAGGGTCCGAGGT-3′; GPC3 forward, 5′-CAGACTCGAGCTGCCTGGTGCCCAGC-3′ and reverse, 5′-GAGAGGTACCCAAAGAAATCCATGCAAAGAG-3′; GAPDH forward, 5′-CCACTCCTCCACCTTTGAC-3′ and reverse, 5′-ACCCTGTTGCTGTAGCCA-3′; and U6 forward, 5′-CTTCGGCAGCACATATACT-3′ and reverse, 5′-AAAATATGGAACGCTTCACG-3′. RT-PCR was performed using the Roche LightCycler 480 instrument (Roche Diagnostics, Basel, Switzerland). The U6 snRNA levels were used for the normalization of miR-96.

Luciferase reporter assay

TargetScan website (www.targetscan.org) was used to predict the target gene of miR-96, GPC3 was identified to be a potential target of miR-96 and the binding site of GPC3 for miR-96 was at the 3′-UTR. The 3′-UTR sequence of GPC3 was amplified and cloned into the pGL3 vector (pGL3-GPC3-WT; WT). The binding site of GPC3 for miR-96 was mutated and cloned into the pcDNA3.1 vector (pGL3-GPC3-MT; MT). Lipofectamine 2000 (Invitrogen; Thermo Fisher Scientific, Inc.) was used to perform the luciferase activity assay.

Migration and invasion assays

The migration of lung cancer A549 cell lines was tested using Transwell chamber (8 µm pore; Corning, Inc., Corning, NY, USA). Approximately 1×106 cells were added into the upper chamber and cell medium was added into the lower chamber. Cells were incubated for 24 h at 37°C. Crystal violet was used to stain the migrated cells, which were visualized using an inverted microscope. The upper chamber was filled with Matrigel (BD Biosciences, San Jose, CA, USA) for the invasion test.

Cell proliferation assay

The 3-(4,5-dimethylthiazol-2-yl)-2, 5-diphenyltetrazolium bromide (MTT) was employed to investigate cell proliferation. Before the experiment, the cells were seeded onto 96-well plates, cultivated with RPMI-1640 medium for 24 h to adherence and then MTT solution was added and incubated for 4 h at 37°C. After the supernatants were removed, the formazan crystals were dissolved using DMSO (200 µl/well). The absorbance at 490 nm was tested using the Thermo Scientific Evolution 300 instrument (Thermo Fisher Scientific, Inc., Waltham, MA, USA).

Statistical analysis

SPSS 18.0 software was used for statistical analysis. Student's t-test or ANOVA and Scheffe's test were employed to carry out the comparison between means of two groups or multiple groups. Results were considered significant at P<0.05.

Results

miR-96 is significantly upregulated in NSCLC, the opposite of GPC3

In this study, we investigated the miR-96 expression level in tissues and cell lines by RT-qPCR. The results showed that miR-96 was significantly upregulated in NSCLC tissues compared with the corresponding paracancerous tissues (P<0.0001; Fig. 1A). We also found that miR-96 was upregulated in A549 (P=0.0003) and H460 (P=0.0001) lung cancer cell lines compared with normal lung epithelium MRC-5 cells (Fig. 1B). GPC3 mRNA expression was observed in 53 cases of NSCLC samples and their matched normal paracancerous tissues. We noted a trend of lower expression in NSCLC samples compared to matched paracancerous tissues (Fig. 1C). Fig. 1D shows normal lung epithelium MRC-5 cells with the A549 and H460 lung cancer cells, depicting decreased GPC3 mRNA in A549 (P=0.0009) and H460 (P=0.0039) lung cancer cells compared to matched normal lung epithelium MRC-5 cells.
Figure 1.

miR-96 is significantly upregulated in NSCLC, the opposite of GPC3. (A) miR-96 expression levels of NSCLC tissues and corresponding paracancerous tissues were confirmed by RT-qPCR. (B) miR-96 expression levels of lung cancer cells A549, H460 and normal lung MRC-5 cell line were confirmed by RT-qPCR. (C) The expression of GPC3 mRNA in NSCLC tissues and corresponding paracancerous tissues were determined by RT-qPCR. (D) GPC3 levels in A549, H460 and MRC-5 were quantified by RT-qPCR. NSCLC, non-small cell lung cancer; GPC3, glypican-3; RT-qPCR, reverse transcription-quantitative PCR. **P<0.01; ***P<0.0001.

Overexpression of miR-96 promotes cell migration and invasion in vitro

In order to investigate the influence of miR-96 on cell migration and invasion, we transfected the miR-96 mimic, LNA anti-miR-96 or negative control plasmid into A549 cell lines. The effect of transfection of miR-96 mimic (P<0.0001) and anti-miR-96 (P=0.0022) into the A549 cell line was confirmed by RT-qPCR (Fig. 2A). The effect of miR-96 on lung cancer cell migration and invasion was analyzed by Transwell assay. The migratory and invasive ability of the transfected cells was measured and compared with that of NC at 24, 48, 72 and 96 h post-transfection. As shown in Fig. 2B, upregulation of miR-96 significantly promoted the migration (P=0.0043) and invasion (P=0.0023) of A549 cells, conversely, downregulation of miR-96 inhibited the cell migration (P=0.0018) and invasion (P=0.0010).
Figure 2.

Overexpression of miR-96 significantly promotes cell migration and invasion of NSCLC cells in vitro. (A) A549 cells were transfected with miR-96 mimic or LAN-anti-miR-96 and the expression of miR-96 was confirmed by RT-qPCR. (B) Transwell assay was used to analyze migratory and invasive ability of A549 cells. NSCLC, non-small cell lung cancer. **P<0.01; ***P<0.001.

GPC3 is a target of miR-96 and is downregulated by miR-96

By the TargetScan online tool (www.targetscan.org/vert_71/), we identified GPC3 as a potential target of miR-96. The binding site on GPC3 of miR-96 locates at its 3′-UTR with binding site 5′-GUGCCAA-3′ (Fig. 3A). After mutated the 3′-UTR from 5′-GUGCCAAA-3′ (WT) to 5′-CACGGAA-3′ (MT), we constructed the Psicheck™-2-GPC3-WT and Psicheck™-2-GPC3-MT plasmids. The luciferase reporter assay demonstrated that the luciferase activity was significantly inhibited when the A549 cell line was co-transfected with miR-96 mimic and Psicheck™-2-GPC3-WT (P=0.0116), while there was no obvious change in transfection of miR-96 mimic and Psicheck™-2-GPC3-MT (P=0.826) (Fig. 3B). By contrast, the luciferase activity was increased when the cell lines were co-transfected with miR-96 inhibitor and Psicheck™-2-GPC3-WT (P=0.0218), whereas there was no obvious change in transfection of miR-96 inhibitor and Psicheck™-2-GPC3-MT (P=0.574) (Fig. 3B). These results indicated that the GPC3 was a target of miR-96.
Figure 3.

GPC3 is a target of miR-96 and downregulated by miR-96. (A) The binding site of GPC3 for miR-96 is located at its 3′-UTR. The mutated nucleotides are indicated in red. (B) miR-153 significantly suppressed the luciferase activity that carried WT but not MT 3′-UTR of SNAI1. Anti-miR-153 led to a marked increase in luciferase activity of WT 3′-UTR of SNAI1. (C) GPC3 protein level was determined by western blot analysis, when A549 cell line was transfected with miR-96 mimic or LNA anti-miR-96. GPC3, glypican-3. *P<0.05.

We also investigated the GPC3 protein levels when changed by the expression of miR-96. The results showed that GPC3 was significantly decreased when A549 cell line was transfected with miR-96 mimic. By contrast, the GPC3 protein level was increased when the A549 cell line was transfected with LNA anti-miR-96 (Fig. 3C).

GPC3 reverses partial fuction of miR-96 on proliferation

To investigate whether miR-96 may promote NSCLC tumorigenesis by silencing GPC3, we assessed the role of PTPN9 on cell proliferation. In order to knock down GPC3 gene, the siRNA-GPC3 or negative control (siRNA-NC) was transfected into A549 cell lines. The efficient knockdown of GPC3 mRNA in A549 cells (P=0.0048) is shown in Fig. 4A. The proliferation assay demonstrated that knockdown of GPC3 could significantly promote the proliferation of A549 cell lines (P=0.0352; Fig. 4B). This indicated that GPC3 was a tumor suppressor in NSCLC.
Figure 4.

GPC3 reverses partial fuction of miR-96 on proliferation. (A) The expression of GPC3 was detected by RT-qPCR when transfected siRNA-GPC3 or siRNA-NC into A549 cells. (B) The proliferative ability was measured after A549 cells were transfected with siRNA or negative control. (C) The cells transfected with both miR-96 mimic and pcDNA3.1-GPC3 exhibited a lower GPC3 mRNA level compared with the cells transfected with pcDNA3.1-GPC3. (D) The proliferative ability was measured after A549 cells were co-transfected with miR-96 mimic and pcDNA3.1-GPC3 or only transfected with pcDNA3.1-GPC3. GPC3, glypican-3; RT-qPCR, reverse transcription-quantitative PCR. *P<0.05; ***P<0.001.

To explore whether miR-96 regulation of cell proliferation is executed in a GPC3-dependent manner, we co-transfected A549 cells with miR-96 mimic and pcDNA3.1-GPC3 plasmid. Compared with cells transfected with pcDNA3.1-GPC3, the cells transfected with both miR-96 mimic and pcDNA3.1-GPC3 exhibited a lower GPC3 mRNA level (P=0.0003; Fig. 4C). Consequently, the cells transfected with both miR-96 mimic and pcDNA3.1-GPC3 exhibited an obviously lower proliferation (P=0.0131; Fig. 4D), suggesting that miR-96-resistant GPC3 can attenuate the proliferative effect of GPC3 on lung cells. The results indicate that miR-96 may regulate the proliferation of lung cancer cells in a GPC3-dependent manner.

Discussion

Lung cancer is the leading cause of mortality in men, and the second leading cause of mortality in women worldwide. NSCLC is one of the most common histological subtypes of lung cancer, which can be divided into three subtypes, which are large cell carcinoma (LCC), lung adenocarcinoma (LAD), and lung squamous cell carcinoma (LSCC) (23). Although cancer treatments have improved in recent years, the outcomes of patients with GC remain unsatisfactory. Thus, to find new and effective therapeutic methods for treatment of NSCLC is imperative. miRNAs have been found to play an important role in the development of diverse diseases, including cancer. As reported in previous studies, several miRNAs play an important role in tumorigenesis of human NSCLC due to their overexpression in tumor tissues. miR-96 is a member of the miR-183 family, which constituted a polycistronic paralogous miRNA cluster (13). miR-96 was found to be highly upregulated in different kinds of tumors, including breast cancer (14), and colorectal cancer (15). Similarly, in our study, miR-96 was found to be upregulated in 53 pairs of NSCLC tissues and lung cancer cells. Upregulation of miR-96 could promote lung cancer cell A549 migration and invasion, while downregulation suppressed A549 cell migratory and invasive ability. In addition, GPC3 was found to be downregulated in NSCLC tissues and lung cancer cells. Hong et al reported that miR-96 promoted cell invasion, migration, and proliferation in breast cancer (14). Considering these results, we strongly believe that the impact of miR-96 on migration and invasion may be through direct inhibition of GPC3. GPC3 is an HSPG playing a pivotal role in the regulation of heparin-binding growth factor and various intracellular signaling pathways (24). The glypican proteins use a glycosylphosphatidylinositol anchor to link to the cytoplasmic membrane (25). GPC3 was significantly downregulated in human malignant mesothelioma cell lines and ectopic expression of GPC3 suppressed colony formation of human MM cells (21). In accordance with these reports, we identified that knockdown of GPC3 by siRNA promoted proliferative ability in lung cancer A549 cell line. In HCC, GPC3 is a transcriptor target of c-Myc and GPC3 can also regulate the expression of c-Myc (26). In the present study, we found that GPC3 was a direct target of miR-96 and regulated by miR-96. Moreover, when GPC3 was overexpressed, the cell proliferative ability increased. In co-transfection of GPC3 and miR-96 mimic, proliferative ability was reduced compared with only transfection with GPC3. Thus, we propose that miR-96 and GPC3 had a relationship with NSCLN proliferation. There still exist some disadvantages in our research. For example, the number of patient samples was small. Our research did not refer to the clinical experiments. In our further study, we will perform the above experiments. Taken together, we identified that miR-96 promoted migration and invasion of lung cancer cells by targeting GPC3. miR-96 functioned as an oncogene in NSCLC and GPC3 could reverse partial fuction of miR-96 on proliferation. The identified miR-96/GPC3 axis may provide a meaningful therapeutic method for the treatment of NSCLC.
  26 in total

Review 1.  Functions of cell surface heparan sulfate proteoglycans.

Authors:  M Bernfield; M Götte; P W Park; O Reizes; M L Fitzgerald; J Lincecum; M Zako
Journal:  Annu Rev Biochem       Date:  1999       Impact factor: 23.643

2.  Expression of GPC3, an X-linked recessive overgrowth gene, is silenced in malignant mesothelioma.

Authors:  S S Murthy; T Shen; A De Rienzo; W C Lee; P C Ferriola; S C Jhanwar; B T Mossman; J Filmus; J R Testa
Journal:  Oncogene       Date:  2000-01-20       Impact factor: 9.867

Review 3.  The functions of animal microRNAs.

Authors:  Victor Ambros
Journal:  Nature       Date:  2004-09-16       Impact factor: 49.962

4.  MicroRNA (miRNA) transcriptome of mouse retina and identification of a sensory organ-specific miRNA cluster.

Authors:  Shunbin Xu; P Dane Witmer; Stephen Lumayag; Beatrix Kovacs; David Valle
Journal:  J Biol Chem       Date:  2007-06-27       Impact factor: 5.157

Review 5.  Genome analyses identify the genetic modification of lung cancer subtypes.

Authors:  Yong Zhang; Diane C Wang; Lin Shi; Bijun Zhu; Zhihui Min; Jianjun Jin
Journal:  Semin Cancer Biol       Date:  2016-11-11       Impact factor: 15.707

6.  Downregulation of miR-16 promotes growth and motility by targeting HDGF in non-small cell lung cancer cells.

Authors:  Yang Ke; Weiyong Zhao; Jie Xiong; Rubo Cao
Journal:  FEBS Lett       Date:  2013-08-13       Impact factor: 4.124

7.  MicroRNA expression profiles classify human cancers.

Authors:  Jun Lu; Gad Getz; Eric A Miska; Ezequiel Alvarez-Saavedra; Justin Lamb; David Peck; Alejandro Sweet-Cordero; Benjamin L Ebert; Raymond H Mak; Adolfo A Ferrando; James R Downing; Tyler Jacks; H Robert Horvitz; Todd R Golub
Journal:  Nature       Date:  2005-06-09       Impact factor: 49.962

8.  Safety, activity, and immune correlates of anti-PD-1 antibody in cancer.

Authors:  Suzanne L Topalian; F Stephen Hodi; Julie R Brahmer; Scott N Gettinger; David C Smith; David F McDermott; John D Powderly; Richard D Carvajal; Jeffrey A Sosman; Michael B Atkins; Philip D Leming; David R Spigel; Scott J Antonia; Leora Horn; Charles G Drake; Drew M Pardoll; Lieping Chen; William H Sharfman; Robert A Anders; Janis M Taube; Tracee L McMiller; Haiying Xu; Alan J Korman; Maria Jure-Kunkel; Shruti Agrawal; Daniel McDonald; Georgia D Kollia; Ashok Gupta; Jon M Wigginton; Mario Sznol
Journal:  N Engl J Med       Date:  2012-06-02       Impact factor: 91.245

9.  MiR-96-5p influences cellular growth and is associated with poor survival in colorectal cancer patients.

Authors:  Anna Lena Ress; Verena Stiegelbauer; Elke Winter; Daniela Schwarzenbacher; Tobias Kiesslich; Sigurd Lax; Stefan Jahn; Alexander Deutsch; Thomas Bauernhofer; Hui Ling; Hellmut Samonigg; Armin Gerger; Gerald Hoefler; Martin Pichler
Journal:  Mol Carcinog       Date:  2014-09-25       Impact factor: 4.784

10.  miR-96 promotes cell proliferation, migration and invasion by targeting PTPN9 in breast cancer.

Authors:  Yeting Hong; Hongwei Liang; Yanbo Wang; Weijie Zhang; Yong Zhou; Song'an Chen; Mengchao Yu; Sufang Cui; Minghui Liu; Nan Wang; Chao Ye; Chihao Zhao; Yanqing Liu; Qian Fan; Chen-Yu Zhang; Jianfeng Sang; Ke Zen; Xi Chen
Journal:  Sci Rep       Date:  2016-11-18       Impact factor: 4.379

View more
  7 in total

1.  Evaluating antitumor activity of antiglypican-3 therapy in experimentally induced skin cancer in mice.

Authors:  Abdullah Alyoussef
Journal:  Arch Dermatol Res       Date:  2020-07-07       Impact factor: 3.017

Review 2.  MicroRNA-96: A therapeutic and diagnostic tumor marker.

Authors:  Hamid Reza Rahimi; Majid Mojarrad; Meysam Moghbeli
Journal:  Iran J Basic Med Sci       Date:  2022-01       Impact factor: 2.532

Review 3.  The Role of Glypican-3 in Regulating Wnt, YAP, and Hedgehog in Liver Cancer.

Authors:  Aarti Kolluri; Mitchell Ho
Journal:  Front Oncol       Date:  2019-08-02       Impact factor: 6.244

4.  MiR-96 induced non-small-cell lung cancer progression through competing endogenous RNA network and affecting EGFR signaling pathway.

Authors:  Hao Ding; Mingqiang Chu; Jingjing Yue; Huaying Huang; Jian Wang; Li Zhu
Journal:  Iran J Basic Med Sci       Date:  2019-08       Impact factor: 2.699

5.  miR-96 exerts carcinogenic effect by activating AKT/GSK-3β/β-catenin signaling pathway through targeting inhibition of FOXO1 in hepatocellular carcinoma.

Authors:  Nanmu Yang; Jinxue Zhou; Qingjun Li; Feng Han; Zujiang Yu
Journal:  Cancer Cell Int       Date:  2019-02-20       Impact factor: 5.722

Review 6.  Serum and Glucocorticoid-Inducible Kinase 1 (SGK1) in NSCLC Therapy.

Authors:  Ilaria Guerriero; Gianni Monaco; Vincenzo Coppola; Arturo Orlacchio
Journal:  Pharmaceuticals (Basel)       Date:  2020-11-22

Review 7.  EGFR-Dependent Extracellular Matrix Protein Interactions Might Light a Candle in Cell Behavior of Non-Small Cell Lung Cancer.

Authors:  Sarah Sayed Hassanein; Ahmed Lotfy Abdel-Mawgood; Sherif Abdelaziz Ibrahim
Journal:  Front Oncol       Date:  2021-12-15       Impact factor: 6.244

  7 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.