Man Cheng1,2, Heng He1,2, Dongming Wang1,2,3, Luli Xu2, Bin Wang1,2, Kim Myong Ho1,2,4, Weihong Chen1,2. 1. Department of Occupational and Environmental Health, School of Public Health, Tongji Medical College, Huazhong University of Science and Technology, Wuhan, Hubei, China. 2. Key Laboratory of Environment and Health, Ministry of Education and Ministry of Environmental Protection, State Key Laboratory of Environmental Health (Incubating), School of Public Health, Tongji Medical College, Huazhong University of Science and Technology, Wuhan, Hubei, China. 3. Wuhan Prevention and Treatment Center for Occupational Diseases, Wuhan, Hubei, China. 4. Public Health Faculty, Pyongyang Medical College, Kim Il Sung University.
Abstract
BACKGROUND: Shift work is common in many industries. The potential association between shift work and ischaemic heart disease (IHD) remains controversial. AIMS: To conduct a systematic review and meta-analysis of epidemiological evidence and summarize the potential relationship between shift work and IHD. METHODS: We searched all relevant case-control and cohort studies that were published from January 1970 to October 2017 on PubMed, Web of Science and Embase. The random-effects model and the generalized least-squares trend model were, respectively, used to evaluate the pooled relative risk and dose-response relationship between shift work and IHD. Two different authors extracted data and assessed the quality of each study independently. RESULTS: Twenty-one articles with 31 independent results of 19 782 IHD cases in 320 002 participants were included. The pooled relative risk for the association between shift work and risk of IHD was 1.13 (95% CI 1.08-1.20, I2 = 53%, P < 0.001). Further evaluation of dose-response relationship indicated that each 1-year increase in shift work was associated with 0.9% (RR = 1.009; 95% CI 1.006-1.012) increase of the risk of IHD. CONCLUSIONS: This meta-analysis updated the evidence that shift work was associated with the risk of IHD and supported a positive dose-response relationship between the risk of IHD and increasing duration of shift work.
BACKGROUND: Shift work is common in many industries. The potential association between shift work and ischaemic heart disease (IHD) remains controversial. AIMS: To conduct a systematic review and meta-analysis of epidemiological evidence and summarize the potential relationship between shift work and IHD. METHODS: We searched all relevant case-control and cohort studies that were published from January 1970 to October 2017 on PubMed, Web of Science and Embase. The random-effects model and the generalized least-squares trend model were, respectively, used to evaluate the pooled relative risk and dose-response relationship between shift work and IHD. Two different authors extracted data and assessed the quality of each study independently. RESULTS: Twenty-one articles with 31 independent results of 19 782 IHD cases in 320 002 participants were included. The pooled relative risk for the association between shift work and risk of IHD was 1.13 (95% CI 1.08-1.20, I2 = 53%, P < 0.001). Further evaluation of dose-response relationship indicated that each 1-year increase in shift work was associated with 0.9% (RR = 1.009; 95% CI 1.006-1.012) increase of the risk of IHD. CONCLUSIONS: This meta-analysis updated the evidence that shift work was associated with the risk of IHD and supported a positive dose-response relationship between the risk of IHD and increasing duration of shift work.
Authors: Frederick K Ho; Carlos Celis-Morales; Stuart R Gray; Evangelia Demou; Daniel Mackay; Paul Welsh; S Vittal Katikireddi; Naveed Sattar; Jill P Pell Journal: Int J Epidemiol Date: 2022-05-09 Impact factor: 9.685
Authors: Lucy A Barnes; Amanda Eng; Marine Corbin; Hayley J Denison; Andrea 't Mannetje; Stephen Haslett; Dave McLean; Lis Ellison-Loschmann; Rod Jackson; Jeroen Douwes Journal: Ann Work Expo Health Date: 2022-04-22 Impact factor: 2.779