Literature DB >> 30923811

Determining parameters for non-linear models of multi-loop free energy change.

Max Ward1, Hongying Sun2,3, Amitava Datta1, Michael Wise1,4, David H Mathews5.   

Abstract

MOTIVATION: Predicting the secondary structure of RNA is a fundamental task in bioinformatics. Algorithms that predict secondary structure given only the primary sequence, and a model to evaluate the quality of a structure, are an integral part of this. These algorithms have been updated as our model of RNA thermodynamics changed and expanded. An exception to this has been the treatment of multi-loops. Although more advanced models of multi-loop free energy change have been suggested, a simple, linear model has been used since the 1980s. However, recently, new dynamic programing algorithms for secondary structure prediction that could incorporate these models were presented. Unfortunately, these models appear to have lower accuracy for secondary structure prediction.
RESULTS: We apply linear regression and a new parameter optimization algorithm to find better parameters for the existing linear model and advanced non-linear multi-loop models. These include the Jacobson-Stockmayer and Aalberts & Nandagopal models. We find that the current linear model parameters may be near optimal for the linear model, and that no advanced model performs better than the existing linear model parameters even after parameter optimization.
AVAILABILITY AND IMPLEMENTATION: Source code and data is available at https://github.com/maxhwardg/advanced_multiloops. SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: Supplementary data are available at Bioinformatics online.
© The Author(s) 2019. Published by Oxford University Press. All rights reserved. For permissions, please e-mail: journals.permissions@oup.com.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2019        PMID: 30923811      PMCID: PMC6821347          DOI: 10.1093/bioinformatics/btz222

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Bioinformatics        ISSN: 1367-4803            Impact factor:   6.937


  49 in total

Review 1.  How RNA folds.

Authors:  I Tinoco; C Bustamante
Journal:  J Mol Biol       Date:  1999-10-22       Impact factor: 5.469

2.  A range of complex probabilistic models for RNA secondary structure prediction that includes the nearest-neighbor model and more.

Authors:  Elena Rivas; Raymond Lang; Sean R Eddy
Journal:  RNA       Date:  2011-12-22       Impact factor: 4.942

3.  Efficient parameter estimation for RNA secondary structure prediction.

Authors:  Mirela Andronescu; Anne Condon; Holger H Hoos; David H Mathews; Kevin P Murphy
Journal:  Bioinformatics       Date:  2007-07-01       Impact factor: 6.937

4.  The eukaryotic genome as an RNA machine.

Authors:  Paulo P Amaral; Marcel E Dinger; Tim R Mercer; John S Mattick
Journal:  Science       Date:  2008-03-28       Impact factor: 47.728

5.  Globin mRNA sequences: analysis of base pairing and evolutionary implications.

Authors:  W Salser
Journal:  Cold Spring Harb Symp Quant Biol       Date:  1978

6.  A sensitivity analysis of RNA folding nearest neighbor parameters identifies a subset of free energy parameters with the greatest impact on RNA secondary structure prediction.

Authors:  Jeffrey Zuber; Hongying Sun; Xiaoju Zhang; Iain McFadyen; David H Mathews
Journal:  Nucleic Acids Res       Date:  2017-06-02       Impact factor: 16.971

7.  TurboFold II: RNA structural alignment and secondary structure prediction informed by multiple homologs.

Authors:  Zhen Tan; Yinghan Fu; Gaurav Sharma; David H Mathews
Journal:  Nucleic Acids Res       Date:  2017-11-16       Impact factor: 16.971

8.  RNAstructure: software for RNA secondary structure prediction and analysis.

Authors:  Jessica S Reuter; David H Mathews
Journal:  BMC Bioinformatics       Date:  2010-03-15       Impact factor: 3.169

9.  ViennaRNA Package 2.0.

Authors:  Ronny Lorenz; Stephan H Bernhart; Christian Höner Zu Siederdissen; Hakim Tafer; Christoph Flamm; Peter F Stadler; Ivo L Hofacker
Journal:  Algorithms Mol Biol       Date:  2011-11-24       Impact factor: 1.405

10.  Exact calculation of loop formation probability identifies folding motifs in RNA secondary structures.

Authors:  Michael F Sloma; David H Mathews
Journal:  RNA       Date:  2016-10-19       Impact factor: 4.942

View more
  2 in total

1.  Improving RNA Branching Predictions: Advances and Limitations.

Authors:  Svetlana Poznanović; Carson Wood; Michael Cloer; Christine Heitsch
Journal:  Genes (Basel)       Date:  2021-03-25       Impact factor: 4.096

2.  Deep learning models for RNA secondary structure prediction (probably) do not generalise across families.

Authors:  Marcell Szikszai; Michael Wise; Amitava Datta; Max Ward; David H Mathews
Journal:  Bioinformatics       Date:  2022-06-24       Impact factor: 6.931

  2 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.