Ron Brookmeyer1, Nada Abdalla1. 1. Department of Biostatistics, University of California, Los Angeles, Los Angeles, CA, USA.
Abstract
BACKGROUND/AIMS: Clinical trials for Alzheimer's disease have been aimed primarily at persons who have cognitive symptoms at enrollment. However, researchers are now recognizing that the pathophysiological process of Alzheimer's disease begins years, if not decades, prior to the onset of clinical symptoms. Successful intervention may require intervening early in the disease process. Critical issues arise in designing clinical trials for primary and secondary prevention of Alzheimer's disease including determination of sample sizes and follow-up duration. We address a number of these issues through application of a unifying multistate model for the preclinical course of Alzheimer's disease. A multistate model allows us to specify at which points during the long disease process the intervention exerts its effects. METHODS: We used a nonhomogeneous Markov multistate model for the progression of Alzheimer's disease through preclinical disease states defined by biomarkers, mild cognitive impairment and Alzheimer's disease dementia. We used transition probabilities based on several published cohort studies. Sample size methods were developed that account for factors including the initial preclinical disease state of trial participants, the primary endpoint, age-dependent transition and mortality rates and specifications of which transition rates are the targets of the intervention. RESULTS: We find that Alzheimer's disease prevention trials with a clinical primary endpoint of mild cognitive impairment or Alzheimer's disease dementia will require sample sizes of the order many thousands of individuals with at least 5 years of follow-up, which is larger than most Alzheimer's disease therapeutic trials conducted to date. The reasons for the large trial sizes include the long and variable preclinical period that spans decades, high rates of attrition among elderly populations due to mortality and losses to follow-up and potential selection effects, whereby healthier subjects enroll in prevention trials. A web application is available to perform sample size calculations using the methods reported here. CONCLUSION: Sample sizes based on multistate models can account for the points in the disease process when interventions exert their effects and may lead to more accurate sample size determinations. We will need innovative strategies to help design Alzheimer's disease prevention trials with feasible sample size requirements and durations of follow-up.
BACKGROUND/AIMS: Clinical trials for Alzheimer's disease have been aimed primarily at persons who have cognitive symptoms at enrollment. However, researchers are now recognizing that the pathophysiological process of Alzheimer's disease begins years, if not decades, prior to the onset of clinical symptoms. Successful intervention may require intervening early in the disease process. Critical issues arise in designing clinical trials for primary and secondary prevention of Alzheimer's disease including determination of sample sizes and follow-up duration. We address a number of these issues through application of a unifying multistate model for the preclinical course of Alzheimer's disease. A multistate model allows us to specify at which points during the long disease process the intervention exerts its effects. METHODS: We used a nonhomogeneous Markov multistate model for the progression of Alzheimer's disease through preclinical disease states defined by biomarkers, mild cognitive impairment and Alzheimer's disease dementia. We used transition probabilities based on several published cohort studies. Sample size methods were developed that account for factors including the initial preclinical disease state of trial participants, the primary endpoint, age-dependent transition and mortality rates and specifications of which transition rates are the targets of the intervention. RESULTS: We find that Alzheimer's disease prevention trials with a clinical primary endpoint of mild cognitive impairment or Alzheimer's disease dementia will require sample sizes of the order many thousands of individuals with at least 5 years of follow-up, which is larger than most Alzheimer's disease therapeutic trials conducted to date. The reasons for the large trial sizes include the long and variable preclinical period that spans decades, high rates of attrition among elderly populations due to mortality and losses to follow-up and potential selection effects, whereby healthier subjects enroll in prevention trials. A web application is available to perform sample size calculations using the methods reported here. CONCLUSION: Sample sizes based on multistate models can account for the points in the disease process when interventions exert their effects and may lead to more accurate sample size determinations. We will need innovative strategies to help design Alzheimer's disease prevention trials with feasible sample size requirements and durations of follow-up.
Authors: Joshua D Grill; Lijie Di; Po H Lu; Cathy Lee; John Ringman; Liana G Apostolova; Nicole Chow; Omid Kohannim; Jeffrey L Cummings; Paul M Thompson; David Elashoff Journal: Neurobiol Aging Date: 2012-04-13 Impact factor: 4.673
Authors: John C Morris; Catherine M Roe; Chengjie Xiong; Anne M Fagan; Alison M Goate; David M Holtzman; Mark A Mintun Journal: Ann Neurol Date: 2010-01 Impact factor: 10.422
Authors: Maria Vassilaki; Ruth H Cha; Jeremiah A Aakre; Terry M Therneau; Yonas E Geda; Michelle M Mielke; David S Knopman; Ronald C Petersen; Rosebud O Roberts Journal: J Alzheimers Dis Date: 2015 Impact factor: 4.472
Authors: Reisa A Sperling; Dorene M Rentz; Keith A Johnson; Jason Karlawish; Michael Donohue; David P Salmon; Paul Aisen Journal: Sci Transl Med Date: 2014-03-19 Impact factor: 17.956
Authors: Clifford R Jack; David A Bennett; Kaj Blennow; Maria C Carrillo; Billy Dunn; Samantha Budd Haeberlein; David M Holtzman; William Jagust; Frank Jessen; Jason Karlawish; Enchi Liu; Jose Luis Molinuevo; Thomas Montine; Creighton Phelps; Katherine P Rankin; Christopher C Rowe; Philip Scheltens; Eric Siemers; Heather M Snyder; Reisa Sperling Journal: Alzheimers Dement Date: 2018-04 Impact factor: 21.566
Authors: Bridget Teevan Burke; Caitlin Latimer; C Dirk Keene; Joshua A Sonnen; Wayne McCormick; James D Bowen; Susan M McCurry; Eric B Larson; Paul K Crane Journal: Alzheimers Dement Date: 2021-04-26 Impact factor: 21.566
Authors: Kewei Chen; Xiaojuan Guo; Rong Pan; Chengjie Xiong; Danielle J Harvey; Yinghua Chen; Li Yao; Yi Su; Eric M Reiman Journal: Stat Med Date: 2021-11-01 Impact factor: 2.373
Authors: K Pun; C W Zhu; M T Kinsella; M Sewell; H Grossman; J Neugroschl; C Li; A Ardolino; N Velasco; M Sano Journal: J Prev Alzheimers Dis Date: 2021