Joan S Tucker1, William G Shadel2, Daniela Golinelli3, Rachana Seelam3, Daniel Siconolfi2. 1. RAND Corporation, 1776 Main Street, PO Box 2138, Santa Monica, CA 90407-2138, United States of America. Electronic address: jtucker@rand.org. 2. RAND Corporation, 4570 Fifth Avenue, Suite 600, Pittsburgh, PA 15213-2665, United States of America. 3. RAND Corporation, 1776 Main Street, PO Box 2138, Santa Monica, CA 90407-2138, United States of America.
Abstract
INTRODUCTION: Most young people experiencing homelessness smoke cigarettes, but little is known about use of alternative tobacco products (ATPs) such as e-cigarettes or other electronic nicotine delivery systems (ENDS) and little cigars/cigarillos (LCCs). This study examines past month use and correlates of cigarettes and ATP among young tobacco users experiencing homelessness. METHODS: We surveyed a probability sample of N = 469 unaccompanied homeless 13-25 year olds (mean age = 22; 71% male), who reported past month use of any type of tobacco product, from 25 service and street sites in Los Angeles County. RESULTS: Nearly all (90%) participants reported smoking regular cigarettes, and 78% reported using at least one tobacco product other than regular cigarettes. The most commonly used of these other products was natural cigarettes (55%), followed by LCCs (43%), ENDS (34%), cigars (31%), hookah (14%), chewing tobacco (7%), and snus (5%). Multivariable models indicated that correlates of past month use differed by product, but included sociodemographic characteristics, homelessness severity, depression, exposure to other people who used the product, and product perceptions (e.g., relative access, cost, and harm compared to cigarettes). CONCLUSION: Use of cigarettes and ATPs are both widespread among young homeless tobacco users, suggesting that efforts to reduce tobacco use in this population should have a broad focus that includes a variety of products. The effectiveness of these efforts may be enhanced by addressing their considerable exposure to other tobacco users, as well as their perceptions of certain products as being less harmful or more cost-effective options than regular cigarettes.
INTRODUCTION: Most young people experiencing homelessness smoke cigarettes, but little is known about use of alternative tobacco products (ATPs) such as e-cigarettes or other electronic nicotine delivery systems (ENDS) and little cigars/cigarillos (LCCs). This study examines past month use and correlates of cigarettes and ATP among young tobacco users experiencing homelessness. METHODS: We surveyed a probability sample of N = 469 unaccompanied homeless 13-25 year olds (mean age = 22; 71% male), who reported past month use of any type of tobacco product, from 25 service and street sites in Los Angeles County. RESULTS: Nearly all (90%) participants reported smoking regular cigarettes, and 78% reported using at least one tobacco product other than regular cigarettes. The most commonly used of these other products was natural cigarettes (55%), followed by LCCs (43%), ENDS (34%), cigars (31%), hookah (14%), chewing tobacco (7%), and snus (5%). Multivariable models indicated that correlates of past month use differed by product, but included sociodemographic characteristics, homelessness severity, depression, exposure to other people who used the product, and product perceptions (e.g., relative access, cost, and harm compared to cigarettes). CONCLUSION: Use of cigarettes and ATPs are both widespread among young homeless tobacco users, suggesting that efforts to reduce tobacco use in this population should have a broad focus that includes a variety of products. The effectiveness of these efforts may be enhanced by addressing their considerable exposure to other tobacco users, as well as their perceptions of certain products as being less harmful or more cost-effective options than regular cigarettes.
Authors: F Baker; S R Ainsworth; J T Dye; C Crammer; M J Thun; D Hoffmann; J L Repace; J E Henningfield; J Slade; J Pinney; T Shanks; D M Burns; G N Connolly; D R Shopland Journal: JAMA Date: 2000-08-09 Impact factor: 56.272
Authors: Suzanne L Wenzel; Joan S Tucker; Daniela Golinelli; Harold D Green; Annie Zhou Journal: Drug Alcohol Depend Date: 2010-07-24 Impact factor: 4.492
Authors: Chad A Bousman; Elaine J Blumberg; Audrey M Shillington; Melbourne F Hovell; Ming Ji; Stephanie Lehman; John Clapp Journal: Addict Behav Date: 2004-11-11 Impact factor: 3.913
Authors: Koon K Teo; Stephanie Ounpuu; Steven Hawken; M R Pandey; Vicent Valentin; David Hunt; Rafael Diaz; Wafa Rashed; Rosario Freeman; Lixin Jiang; Xiaofei Zhang; Salim Yusuf Journal: Lancet Date: 2006-08-19 Impact factor: 79.321
Authors: Kurt Kroenke; Tara W Strine; Robert L Spitzer; Janet B W Williams; Joyce T Berry; Ali H Mokdad Journal: J Affect Disord Date: 2008-08-27 Impact factor: 4.839
Authors: Daniela Golinelli; Daniel Siconolfi; William G Shadel; Rachana Seelam; Joan S Tucker Journal: Addict Behav Date: 2019-08-13 Impact factor: 3.913
Authors: Joan S Tucker; William G Shadel; Rachana Seelam; Daniela Golinelli; Daniel Siconolfi Journal: Drug Alcohol Depend Date: 2019-12-13 Impact factor: 4.492
Authors: Joanne G Patterson; Allison M Glasser; Joseph M Macisco; Alice Hinton; Amy Wermert; Julianna M Nemeth Journal: Nicotine Tob Res Date: 2022-02-01 Impact factor: 5.825
Authors: Eleanor L S Leavens; Becky R Ford; Olamide Ojo-Fati; Tyler N A Winkelman; Katherine Diaz Vickery; Sandra J Japuntich; Andrew M Busch Journal: BMC Public Health Date: 2020-12-09 Impact factor: 3.295