Literature DB >> 30921236

The epidemiology of coronary artery bypass surgery in a community hospital: A comparison between 2 periods.

Tomer Ziv-Baran1, Rephael Mohr2, Farhang Yazdchi3, Dan Loberman3.   

Abstract

During the last decades, the increased number of percutaneous interventions procedures causes a significant change in the profile of patients referred to coronary artery bypass grafting (CABG). We aimed to study changes in patients' characteristics and procedural outcomes of patients referred to CABG in a community hospital during the first 15 years of the millennium.A historical cohort study of all patients who underwent CABG in Cape Cod Hospital was performed. The period was divided into 2 sub-periods, 2000 to 2008 and 2009 to 2014. Patients' characteristics and procedure outcomes were compared. Data on age, sex, comorbidities, Society of Thoracic Surgery risk scores and surgical adverse outcomes (stroke, coma, and 30-days mortality) were collected.During the study period, 1108 patients underwent CABG; 612 were operated before 2009 and 496 after. Age and sex were similar in the 2 periods. The patients in the later period presented lower risk for mortality and stroke (P <.001). Diabetes (DM) was more common in the later period (P <.001) while peripheral vascular disease (PVD) (P <.001) and left main disease (LM) (P = .017) were more common in the earlier period. Mortality rates were similar between the 2 periods. Post-operative stroke (1.8%) and coma (0.8%) were presented only in the later period. In conclusion, a significant change in CABG patients' characteristics was observed.In conclusion, patients in the later period had lower risk score and were more likely to present with DM and less with PVD and LM. Despite the lower risk, the mortality rate was similar.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2019        PMID: 30921236      PMCID: PMC6455745          DOI: 10.1097/MD.0000000000015059

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Medicine (Baltimore)        ISSN: 0025-7974            Impact factor:   1.889


Introduction

During the last decades, the epidemiology of heart surgery has changed significantly.[ While in its early day's percutaneous interventions (PCI) using balloon angioplasty without stents was used mainly in patients with mild disease, today most PCI procedures include multi-vessel disease and stents are the standards of care.[ Despite the fact that PCI is associated with inferior long-term outcome, it can be considered as a reasonable alternative to coronary artery bypass grafting (CABG).[ This revascularization technique is more popular than CABG due to its less invasive nature. The increase in number of PCI procedures causes a significant change in the profile of patients referred to CABG in recent years. The relative number of lower risk patients is increased. This is also reflected in the lower Society of Thoracic Surgery (STS) risk score of the patients who undergo surgery.[ The purpose of our study is to evaluate changes in patients’ characteristics and procedural outcomes between patients referred to CABG in a community hospital during the early and late periods of the first 15 years of the new millennium.

Methods

Study design and participants

This is a historical cohort study of all patients who underwent CABG surgery in Cape Cod Hospital (CCH) between 2000 and 2014. In our community hospital, patents are referred to CABG after being discussed by a heart team or the attending cardiologist. The indications for referral are similar to those used in other center in the USA. The study period was divided into 2 sub-periods, 2000 to 2008 and 2009 to 2014. We compared patient's characteristics and procedure outcomes between the 2 periods. The study was approved by the Institutional Review Board (IRB) of the CCH.

Setting

CCH is a 259-bed acute care community hospital located in Hyannis, Massachusetts with a 15 beds cardio-thoracic surgery department.

Variables and data source

Data on age, sex, comorbidities (diabetes mellitus [DM], hypertension [HTN], peripheral vascular disease [PVD], congestive heart failure [CHF], recent myocardial infarction, atrial fibrillation [A. fib] or flutter [A. flutter], left main disease [LM], and preoperative stroke), STS risk scores for mortality and stroke and surgical adverse outcomes (stroke, coma, and 30 days mortality) were obtained from review of medical records. We also used the maximal STS risk scores (mortality or stroke) and evaluated a combing outcome of mortality, stroke, or coma (MSC). Baseline patient characteristics and in-hospital outcomes were collected according to the STS Adult Cardiac Surgery Database (Data Collection Form).

Bias

In order to avoid selection bias, all patients who underwent surgery during the study period were included in the study. We used a standard data collection form to avoid misclassification bias.

Study size

A significance level of 5% and a power of 80% were used to calculate the sample size. Since the total period of the study was divided into 2 sub-periods with a ratio of 1:2, the same ratio between the groups was assumed in order to calculate the sample size that needed to identify a small difference between the groups in the continuous variables (effect size Cohen's d = 0.2) and a 10 percent difference in the dichotomous variables. Eight hundred eighty-six and 869 patients were needed to identify differences between the groups in continuous and dichotomous variables, respectively.

Statistical methods

Categorical variables were expressed as number and percentages. Distribution of continuous variables was assessed using histogram and Q-Q plot. Continuous variables were described using mean and standard deviation (SD) or median and interquartile range (IQR). Categorical variables were compared using Chi-square test or Fisher exact test and continuous variables using independent samples t test or Mann–Whitney test. Propensity score was calculated using logistic regression. Age, sex, HTN, DM, PVD, CHF, A. Fib/A. flutter, prior stroke, LM, and recent myocardial infatction were used to calculate the propensity score. Logistic regression was used to evaluate the crude and adjusted odds ratio (OR) for the MSC outcome. The multivariate logistic regression was repeated twice with different variables for adjustment (Maximal STS score, and Propensity score). In further analysis, the patients were matched according to their propensity score. Five percent difference in the propensity score was defined as maximal difference for matching. The matching process was evaluated using absolute standardized difference and difference up to 0.15 was considered as acceptable. The combined outcome was compared between the matched groups using McNemar test. The patients were also matched using their maximal STS score and 1% difference was considered as the maximal difference for matching. A 2-tailed P <.05 was considered statistically significant. Analyses were performed with SPSS (IBM Corp. Released 2016. IBM SPSS Statistics for Windows, Version 24.0. Armonk, NY: IBM Corp.).

Results

The study included 1108 patients who underwent coronary artery bypass surgery. Of them, 612 were operated before 2009 and 496 after. The patients’ characteristics are presented in Table 1. Age and sex distribution were similar in the 2 periods. Patients in the later period had more DM (40.1% vs 29.7%, P <.001) while patients in the former period had more PVD (16.8% vs 9.5%, P <.001) and more LM (46.1% vs 38.9%, P = .017). The patients in the later period presented lower risk for mortality and lower risk for stroke as calculated by the STS score (P <.001). Comparison of the patients’ characteristic is presented in Table 2 and Figures 1 to 3. In the later period, post-operative strokes (1.8%), and coma (0.8%) were documented while no post-operative stroke or coma were documented in the earlier period. Mortality rates were similar between the periods (Table 3). The MSC outcome was more frequent in the later period (3.2% vs 1.1%; OR 2.88, 95% CI 1.17–7.08). After adjustment the OR (late period vs previous period) for MSC raised: maximal STS score adjustment OR 4.16 (95% CI 1.58–10.97, P = .004), propensity score adjustment OR 3.12 (95% CI 1.25–7.78, P = .014). Nine hundred ninety patients were matched (495 in each period) using the propensity score. The matched groups are described in Appendix 1. In the matched groups, the STS risk scores were significantly lower in the later period (mortality: median 1.77, IQR 0.99–3.42 vs median 1.05, IQR 0.59–2.01, P <.001; stroke: median 1.38, IQR 0.87–2.28 vs median 0.91, IQR 0.60–1.36, P <.001). The post-operative adverse outcomes of the matched groups are presented in Table 4. As in the whole cohort, post-operative stroke and coma were presented only in the later period. After matching, post-operative MSC tended to be higher in the later period (P = .052). In further analysis, the patients were matched using the STS score. Four hundred- seventeen matched pairs were evaluated. After this matching, there was no significant difference in the mortality (0.5% in the earlier period vs 1.7% in the later period, P = .125). However, the MSC outcome in the earlier period was significantly lower than that of the later period (0.5% vs 3.6, P = .001).
Table 1

Patients’ characteristics.

Table 2

Comparison of patients’ characteristics between the 2 periods.

Figure 1

Age distribution in the 2 periods.

Figure 3

Preoperative risk for mortality (A) and stroke (B) in the 2 periods according to the STS. STS = Society of Thoracic Surgery.

Table 3

Comparison of post-operative outcomes between the 2 periods.

Table 4

Comparison of post-operative adverse outcomes between the 2 periods in the matched cohorts.

Patients’ characteristics. Comparison of patients’ characteristics between the 2 periods. Age distribution in the 2 periods. Patients’ characteristics in the 2 periods. Preoperative risk for mortality (A) and stroke (B) in the 2 periods according to the STS. STS = Society of Thoracic Surgery. Comparison of post-operative outcomes between the 2 periods. Comparison of post-operative adverse outcomes between the 2 periods in the matched cohorts.

Discussion

In this cohort study, we compared patients’ characteristics and adverse outcomes of patients operated between 2000 to 2008 and 2009 to 2014 in a community hospital. The main finding of our study is the significant change in CABG patients’ characteristics in the later period (2009–2014). We found that DM was more common in the late period (40.1% vs 29.7%, P <.001) while PVD (16.8% vs 9.5%, P <.001) and LM disease (46.1% vs 38.9%, P = .017) were more common in the earlier period. The findings may be related to the global increase of DM and to better DM control or may be related to change in the profile of patients referred to CABG due to advancement in PCI procedures. Recent publication demonstrated the increased number of patients with DM during the last decade.[ Several other studies showed that better DM control is associated with a lower risk for DM complications.[ Patients in earlier and later periods had similar age (mean 68.2 years vs 67.5 years, P = .238) and sex (males: 80.2% vs 80.8%, P = .796). Patients in the later period were at lower risk (less PVD and LM disease) and therefore their STS Score was lower than the STS Score of patients in the earlier period. This change in CABG patients’ characteristics is probably related to advances made in PCI technology and the relatively larger number of patients refereed today to PCI. Patients referred to PCI are the higher risk patients and this selective referral policy is the reason for the relative lower risk of the patients in the later CABG group. Today, most PCI procedures include multi-vessel disease. However, in some institutions, the most severe and complex CAD patients are still referred to CABG which does not necessarily indicate the clinical complexity of the patients. The overall number of adverse events in our cohort was low. Although the mortality rate was similar in both periods (early period 1.1%, late period 1.4%, P = .692), adverse neurological events were more common in the later period (stroke: 1.8% vs 0%, P = .001; coma: 0.8% vs 0%, P = .04). Previous studies reported stroke rates range between 0.8% and 5.2%[ and mortality rates between 1.5% and 6%.[ Those findings were also observed after propensity score matching. They should be evaluated further in prospective studies in order to include more possible predictors for stroke. Our study had several limitations. Due to the historical nature of the study, we could include only data that was available in the patients’ charts (data such as echocardiographic data was not available). Moreover, we have follow-up data only for the first 30 days after surgery. Since the patients in the 2 periods were different in their pre-operative risk level and the adverse outcomes were rare, it was difficult to compare the outcomes between the 2 groups. Therefore, we used propensity score and STS score to control for differences in the baseline characteristics of the patients. In conclusion, a significant change in CABG patients’ characteristics was observed. Patients in the later period had lower risk score and were more likely to present with DM and less with PVD and LM disease. Despite the increased operative risk of patients operated in the earlier period, their mortality is similar to that of patients operated in the later period. The higher rate of post-operative stroke reported in the later period is not different from that reported in the literature.

Author contributions

Conceptualization: Rephael Mohr, Farhang Yazdchi, Dan Loberman. Data curation: Tomer Ziv-Baran, Dan Loberman. Formal analysis: Tomer Ziv-Baran, Farhang Yazdchi. Investigation: Tomer Ziv-Baran. Methodology: Tomer Ziv-Baran, Dan Loberman. Project administration: Dan Loberman. Supervision: Farhang Yazdchi, Dan Loberman. Writing – Original Draft: Rephael Mohr. Writing – Review & Editing: Farhang Yazdchi, Dan Loberman.
  26 in total

1.  Hospital volume and surgical mortality in the United States.

Authors:  John D Birkmeyer; Andrea E Siewers; Emily V A Finlayson; Therese A Stukel; F Lee Lucas; Ida Batista; H Gilbert Welch; David E Wennberg
Journal:  N Engl J Med       Date:  2002-04-11       Impact factor: 91.245

2.  Impact of patient risk on the hospital volume-outcome relationship in coronary artery bypass grafting.

Authors:  Brahmajee K Nallamothu; Sanjay Saint; Timothy P Hofer; Sandeep Vijan; Kim A Eagle; Steven J Bernstein
Journal:  Arch Intern Med       Date:  2005-02-14

3.  Cardiac revascularization in specialty and general hospitals.

Authors:  Peter Cram; Gary E Rosenthal; Mary S Vaughan-Sarrazin
Journal:  N Engl J Med       Date:  2005-04-07       Impact factor: 91.245

Review 4.  Meta-Analysis of Randomized Controlled Trials of Percutaneous Coronary Intervention With Drug-Eluting Stents Versus Coronary Artery Bypass Grafting in Left Main Coronary Artery Disease.

Authors:  Aakash Garg; Sunil V Rao; Sahil Agrawal; Kleanthis Theodoropoulos; Marco Mennuni; Abhishek Sharma; Lohit Garg; Giuseppe Ferrante; Omar A Meelu; Davit Sargsyan; Bernhard Reimers; Marc Cohen; John B Kostis; Giulio G Stefanini
Journal:  Am J Cardiol       Date:  2017-03-29       Impact factor: 2.778

5.  Coronary Artery Bypass Surgery Versus Drug-Eluting Stent Implantation for Left Main or Multivessel Coronary Artery Disease: A Meta-Analysis of Individual Patient Data.

Authors:  Cheol Whan Lee; Jung-Min Ahn; Rafael Cavalcante; Yohei Sotomi; Yoshinobu Onuma; Pannipa Suwannasom; Erhan Tenekecioglu; Sung-Cheol Yun; Duk-Woo Park; Soo-Jin Kang; Seung-Whan Lee; Young-Hak Kim; Seong-Wook Park; Patrick W Serruys; Seung-Jung Park
Journal:  JACC Cardiovasc Interv       Date:  2016-12-26       Impact factor: 11.195

Review 6.  Early and intensive therapy for management of hyperglycemia and cardiovascular risk factors in patients with type 2 diabetes.

Authors:  George Dailey
Journal:  Clin Ther       Date:  2011-06       Impact factor: 3.393

7.  Changes over time in risk profiles of patients who undergo coronary artery bypass graft surgery: the Veterans Affairs Surgical Quality Improvement Program (VASQIP).

Authors:  Lorraine D Cornwell; Shuab Omer; Todd Rosengart; William L Holman; Faisal G Bakaeen
Journal:  JAMA Surg       Date:  2015-04       Impact factor: 14.766

8.  The effect of intensive treatment of diabetes on the development and progression of long-term complications in insulin-dependent diabetes mellitus.

Authors:  D M Nathan; S Genuth; J Lachin; P Cleary; O Crofford; M Davis; L Rand; C Siebert
Journal:  N Engl J Med       Date:  1993-09-30       Impact factor: 91.245

9.  Meta-analysis of four randomized controlled trials on long-term outcomes of coronary artery bypass grafting versus percutaneous coronary intervention with stenting for multivessel coronary artery disease.

Authors:  Hisato Takagi; Norikazu Kawai; Takuya Umemoto
Journal:  Am J Cardiol       Date:  2008-03-04       Impact factor: 2.778

Review 10.  Impact of coronary artery bypass surgery and percutaneous coronary intervention on mortality in patients with chronic kidney disease and on dialysis: A systematic review and meta-analysis.

Authors:  Pravesh Kumar Bundhun; Akash Bhurtu; Meng-Hua Chen
Journal:  Medicine (Baltimore)       Date:  2016-07       Impact factor: 1.889

View more
  2 in total

1.  The epidemiology of coronary artery bypass surgery in a community hospital: A comparison between 2 periods: Erratum.

Authors: 
Journal:  Medicine (Baltimore)       Date:  2019-04       Impact factor: 1.817

2.  The effect of opium addiction on short-term postoperative outcomes after coronary artery bypass graft surgery: A prospective observational cohort study.

Authors:  Mohammad Reza Habibi; Abbas Alipour; Aria Soleimani; Farshad Hasanzadeh Kiabi; Ali Habibi; Amir Emami Zeydi
Journal:  Biomedicine (Taipei)       Date:  2020-12-01
  2 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.