Whitney Moss1, Janet M Shaw2, Meng Yang3, Xiaoming Sheng4, Robert Hitchcock5, Stefan Niederauer5, Diane Packer6, Ingrid E Nygaard7. 1. From the University of Utah School of Medicine, Salt Lake City, UT. 2. Department of Health, Kinesiology, and Recreation, University of Utah College of Health, Salt Lake City, UT. 3. Department of Family and Preventive Medicine, University of Utah, Salt Lake City, UT. 4. College of Nursing, University of Utah, Salt Lake City, UT. 5. Department of Bioengineering, University of Utah, Salt Lake City, UT. 6. Department of Physical Therapy, University of Utah College of Health, Salt Lake City, UT. 7. Department of Obstetrics and Gynecology, University of Utah School of Medicine, Salt Lake City, UT.
Abstract
OBJECTIVE: The aim of the study was to determine whether measures of muscular strength and fitness are associated with pelvic floor muscle (PFM) force 1-year postpartum in a population of primiparous women who delivered vaginally. METHODS: This cross-sectional analysis is an ancillary study to an ongoing prospective cohort study and includes 203 primiparous women. Procedures collected 1-year postpartum included maximal PFM force, grip strength, trunk flexor muscle endurance, percent body fat, intra-abdominal pressure during trunk flexor endurance testing, intra-abdominal pressure during strain, and self-reported physical activity. RESULTS: The mean (SD) age was 29.8 (5.0) years and the mean (SD) body mass index was 24.5 (5.2) kg/m. Nineteen percent were of Hispanic ethnicity. The median (interquartile range) PFM force was 5.05 (2.86-7.94) N. The median (interquartile range) trunk flexor endurance time was 146.0 (78.0-267.0), whereas the mean (SD) grip strength and percent fat were 32.4 (6.4) kg and 29.4% (10.0), respectively.There were no statistically significant associations between PFM force and any of the measures tested on analyses unadjusted or adjusted for self-report of doing PFM exercises. Of other factors evaluated, non-Hispanic ethnicity, increasing age, self-reported family history of pelvic organ prolapse or urinary incontinence, and normal and obese body mass index (both compared with overweight) were associated with lower PFM force. CONCLUSIONS: In primiparous women 1-year postpartum, we found no associations between PFM force and measures of strength and fitness. This study's results are consistent with existing literature that specific, targeted, and consistent pelvic floor exercises are the best way to improve PFM strength.
OBJECTIVE: The aim of the study was to determine whether measures of muscular strength and fitness are associated with pelvic floor muscle (PFM) force 1-year postpartum in a population of primiparous women who delivered vaginally. METHODS: This cross-sectional analysis is an ancillary study to an ongoing prospective cohort study and includes 203 primiparous women. Procedures collected 1-year postpartum included maximal PFM force, grip strength, trunk flexor muscle endurance, percent body fat, intra-abdominal pressure during trunk flexor endurance testing, intra-abdominal pressure during strain, and self-reported physical activity. RESULTS: The mean (SD) age was 29.8 (5.0) years and the mean (SD) body mass index was 24.5 (5.2) kg/m. Nineteen percent were of Hispanic ethnicity. The median (interquartile range) PFM force was 5.05 (2.86-7.94) N. The median (interquartile range) trunk flexor endurance time was 146.0 (78.0-267.0), whereas the mean (SD) grip strength and percent fat were 32.4 (6.4) kg and 29.4% (10.0), respectively.There were no statistically significant associations between PFM force and any of the measures tested on analyses unadjusted or adjusted for self-report of doing PFM exercises. Of other factors evaluated, non-Hispanic ethnicity, increasing age, self-reported family history of pelvic organ prolapse or urinary incontinence, and normal and obese body mass index (both compared with overweight) were associated with lower PFM force. CONCLUSIONS: In primiparous women 1-year postpartum, we found no associations between PFM force and measures of strength and fitness. This study's results are consistent with existing literature that specific, targeted, and consistent pelvic floor exercises are the best way to improve PFM strength.
Authors: Daniel M Morgan; Gurpreet Kaur; Yvonne Hsu; Dee E Fenner; Kenneth Guire; Janis Miller; James A Ashton-Miller; John O L Delancey Journal: Am J Obstet Gynecol Date: 2005-05 Impact factor: 8.661
Authors: Stefan Niederauer; Johanna de Gennaro; Ingrid Nygaard; Tomasz Petelenz; Robert Hitchcock Journal: Biomed Microdevices Date: 2017-08-26 Impact factor: 2.838
Authors: Bruce W Bailey; Annette Perkins; Larry A Tucker; James D LeCheminant; Jared M Tucker; Breckann Moncur Journal: J Nutr Educ Behav Date: 2014-10-17 Impact factor: 3.045
Authors: Tari D Topolski; James LoGerfo; Donald L Patrick; Barbara Williams; Julie Walwick; Marsha B Patrick Journal: Prev Chronic Dis Date: 2006-09-15 Impact factor: 2.830
Authors: Robert Hitchcock; Janet M Shaw; Stefan Niederauer; Jing Zhou; Xiaoming Sheng; Meng Yang; Ingrid E Nygaard Journal: Female Pelvic Med Reconstr Surg Date: 2021-02-01 Impact factor: 1.913
Authors: Ingrid E Nygaard; Janet M Shaw; Jie Wang; Xiaoming Sheng; Meng Yang; Stefan Niederauer; Robert Hitchcock Journal: Female Pelvic Med Reconstr Surg Date: 2021-02-01 Impact factor: 1.913