Literature DB >> 30919510

Methodological consensus on clinical proton MRS of the brain: Review and recommendations.

Martin Wilson1, Ovidiu Andronesi2, Peter B Barker3, Robert Bartha4, Alberto Bizzi5, Patrick J Bolan6, Kevin M Brindle7, In-Young Choi8, Cristina Cudalbu9, Ulrike Dydak10, Uzay E Emir10, Ramon G Gonzalez11, Stephan Gruber12, Rolf Gruetter13, Rakesh K Gupta14, Arend Heerschap15, Anke Henning16, Hoby P Hetherington17, Petra S Huppi18, Ralph E Hurd19, Kejal Kantarci20, Risto A Kauppinen21, Dennis W J Klomp22, Roland Kreis23, Marijn J Kruiskamp24, Martin O Leach25, Alexander P Lin26, Peter R Luijten22, Małgorzata Marjańska6, Andrew A Maudsley27, Dieter J Meyerhoff28, Carolyn E Mountford29, Paul G Mullins30, James B Murdoch31, Sarah J Nelson32, Ralph Noeske33, Gülin Öz6, Julie W Pan34, Andrew C Peet35, Harish Poptani36, Stefan Posse37, Eva-Maria Ratai2, Nouha Salibi38, Tom W J Scheenen15, Ian C P Smith39, Brian J Soher40, Ivan Tkáč6, Daniel B Vigneron32, Franklyn A Howe41.   

Abstract

Proton MRS (1 H MRS) provides noninvasive, quantitative metabolite profiles of tissue and has been shown to aid the clinical management of several brain diseases. Although most modern clinical MR scanners support MRS capabilities, routine use is largely restricted to specialized centers with good access to MR research support. Widespread adoption has been slow for several reasons, and technical challenges toward obtaining reliable good-quality results have been identified as a contributing factor. Considerable progress has been made by the research community to address many of these challenges, and in this paper a consensus is presented on deficiencies in widely available MRS methodology and validated improvements that are currently in routine use at several clinical research institutions. In particular, the localization error for the PRESS localization sequence was found to be unacceptably high at 3 T, and use of the semi-adiabatic localization by adiabatic selective refocusing sequence is a recommended solution. Incorporation of simulated metabolite basis sets into analysis routines is recommended for reliably capturing the full spectral detail available from short TE acquisitions. In addition, the importance of achieving a highly homogenous static magnetic field (B0 ) in the acquisition region is emphasized, and the limitations of current methods and hardware are discussed. Most recommendations require only software improvements, greatly enhancing the capabilities of clinical MRS on existing hardware. Implementation of these recommendations should strengthen current clinical applications and advance progress toward developing and validating new MRS biomarkers for clinical use.
© 2019 International Society for Magnetic Resonance in Medicine.

Entities:  

Keywords:  MRS; brain; consensus; metabolites; semi-LASER; shimming

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2019        PMID: 30919510      PMCID: PMC7179569          DOI: 10.1002/mrm.27742

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Magn Reson Med        ISSN: 0740-3194            Impact factor:   4.668


  120 in total

1.  Very selective suppression pulses for clinical MRSI studies of brain and prostate cancer.

Authors:  T K Tran; D B Vigneron; N Sailasuta; J Tropp; P Le Roux; J Kurhanewicz; S Nelson; R Hurd
Journal:  Magn Reson Med       Date:  2000-01       Impact factor: 4.668

2.  Java-based graphical user interface for MRUI, a software package for quantitation of in vivo/medical magnetic resonance spectroscopy signals.

Authors:  A Naressi; C Couturier; I Castang; R de Beer; D Graveron-Demilly
Journal:  Comput Biol Med       Date:  2001-07       Impact factor: 4.589

3.  Proton T2 relaxation study of water, N-acetylaspartate, and creatine in human brain using Hahn and Carr-Purcell spin echoes at 4T and 7T.

Authors:  Shalom Michaeli; Michael Garwood; Xiao-Hong Zhu; Lance DelaBarre; Peter Andersen; Gregor Adriany; Hellmut Merkle; Kamil Ugurbil; Wei Chen
Journal:  Magn Reson Med       Date:  2002-04       Impact factor: 4.668

Review 4.  Issues of spectral quality in clinical 1H-magnetic resonance spectroscopy and a gallery of artifacts.

Authors:  Roland Kreis
Journal:  NMR Biomed       Date:  2004-10       Impact factor: 4.044

5.  Considerations in applying 3D PRESS H-1 brain MRSI with an eight-channel phased-array coil at 3 T.

Authors:  Yan Li; Joseph A Osorio; Esin Ozturk-Isik; Albert P Chen; Duan Xu; Jason C Crane; Soonmee Cha; Susan Chang; Mitchel S Berger; Daniel B Vigneron; Sarah J Nelson
Journal:  Magn Reson Imaging       Date:  2006-10-18       Impact factor: 2.546

6.  Automated spectral analysis II: application of wavelet shrinkage for characterization of non-parameterized signals.

Authors:  K Young; B J Soher; A A Maudsley
Journal:  Magn Reson Med       Date:  1998-12       Impact factor: 4.668

7.  Atlas-based automated positioning of outer volume suppression slices in short-echo time 3D MR spectroscopic imaging of the human brain.

Authors:  Kaung-Ti Yung; Weili Zheng; Chenguang Zhao; Manel Martínez-Ramón; André van der Kouwe; Stefan Posse
Journal:  Magn Reson Med       Date:  2011-04-05       Impact factor: 4.668

8.  Forecasting the quality of water-suppressed 1 H MR spectra based on a single-shot water scan.

Authors:  Sreenath P Kyathanahally; Roland Kreis
Journal:  Magn Reson Med       Date:  2016-09-08       Impact factor: 4.668

Review 9.  In vivo B0 field shimming methods for MRI at 7T.

Authors:  Jason P Stockmann; Lawrence L Wald
Journal:  Neuroimage       Date:  2017-06-07       Impact factor: 6.556

10.  Sensitivity encoding for fast (1) H MR spectroscopic imaging water reference acquisition.

Authors:  Rebecca Birch; Andrew C Peet; Theodoros N Arvanitis; Martin Wilson
Journal:  Magn Reson Med       Date:  2014-07-07       Impact factor: 4.668

View more
  74 in total

Review 1.  European Society for Paediatric Oncology (SIOPE) MRI guidelines for imaging patients with central nervous system tumours.

Authors:  Shivaram Avula; Andrew Peet; Giovanni Morana; Paul Morgan; Monika Warmuth-Metz; Tim Jaspan
Journal:  Childs Nerv Syst       Date:  2021-05-10       Impact factor: 1.475

2.  Advanced single voxel 1 H magnetic resonance spectroscopy techniques in humans: Experts' consensus recommendations.

Authors:  Gülin Öz; Dinesh K Deelchand; Jannie P Wijnen; Vladimír Mlynárik; Lijing Xin; Ralf Mekle; Ralph Noeske; Tom W J Scheenen; Ivan Tkáč
Journal:  NMR Biomed       Date:  2020-01-10       Impact factor: 4.044

3.  UTE-SPECIAL for3D localization at an echo time of 4 ms on a clinical 3 T scanner.

Authors:  Karl Landheer; Ralph Noeske; Michael Garwood; Christoph Juchem
Journal:  J Magn Reson       Date:  2019-12-21       Impact factor: 2.229

4.  Osprey: Open-source processing, reconstruction & estimation of magnetic resonance spectroscopy data.

Authors:  Georg Oeltzschner; Helge J Zöllner; Steve C N Hui; Mark Mikkelsen; Muhammad G Saleh; Sofie Tapper; Richard A E Edden
Journal:  J Neurosci Methods       Date:  2020-06-27       Impact factor: 2.390

5.  In vivo magnetic resonance imaging and spectroscopy. Technological advances and opportunities for applications continue to abound.

Authors:  Peter van Zijl; Linda Knutsson
Journal:  J Magn Reson       Date:  2019-07-09       Impact factor: 2.229

6.  A Magnetic Resonance Spectroscopy Study of Superior Visual Search Abilities in Children with Autism Spectrum Disorder.

Authors:  David A Edmondson; Pingyu Xia; Rebecca McNally Keehn; Ulrike Dydak; Brandon Keehn
Journal:  Autism Res       Date:  2020-01-07       Impact factor: 5.216

7.  Across-vendor standardization of semi-LASER for single-voxel MRS at 3T.

Authors:  Dinesh K Deelchand; Adam Berrington; Ralph Noeske; James M Joers; Arvin Arani; Joseph Gillen; Michael Schär; Jon-Fredrik Nielsen; Scott Peltier; Navid Seraji-Bozorgzad; Karl Landheer; Christoph Juchem; Brian J Soher; Douglas C Noll; Kejal Kantarci; Eva M Ratai; Thomas H Mareci; Peter B Barker; Gülin Öz
Journal:  NMR Biomed       Date:  2019-12-18       Impact factor: 4.044

8.  Frequency and phase correction of J-difference edited MR spectra using deep learning.

Authors:  Sofie Tapper; Mark Mikkelsen; Blake E Dewey; Helge J Zöllner; Steve C N Hui; Georg Oeltzschner; Richard A E Edden
Journal:  Magn Reson Med       Date:  2020-11-18       Impact factor: 4.668

9.  The clinical utility of proton magnetic resonance spectroscopy in traumatic brain injury: recommendations from the ENIGMA MRS working group.

Authors:  Brenda L Bartnik-Olson; Jeffry R Alger; Talin Babikian; Ashley D Harris; Barbara Holshouser; Ivan I Kirov; Andrew A Maudsley; Paul M Thompson; Emily L Dennis; David F Tate; Elisabeth A Wilde; Alexander Lin
Journal:  Brain Imaging Behav       Date:  2021-04       Impact factor: 3.978

10.  Advanced magnetic resonance spectroscopic neuroimaging: Experts' consensus recommendations.

Authors:  Andrew A Maudsley; Ovidiu C Andronesi; Peter B Barker; Alberto Bizzi; Wolfgang Bogner; Anke Henning; Sarah J Nelson; Stefan Posse; Dikoma C Shungu; Brian J Soher
Journal:  NMR Biomed       Date:  2020-04-29       Impact factor: 4.044

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.