Literature DB >> 30917194

A Critical Appraisal of the Placement of Xiphosura (Chelicerata) with Account of Known Sources of Phylogenetic Error.

Jesús A Ballesteros1, Prashant P Sharma1.   

Abstract

Horseshoe crabs (Xiphosura) are traditionally regarded as sister group to the clade of terrestrial chelicerates (Arachnida). This hypothesis has been challenged by recent phylogenomic analyses, but the non-monophyly of Arachnida has consistently been disregarded as artifactual. We re-evaluated the placement of Xiphosura among chelicerates using the most complete phylogenetic data set to date, expanding outgroup sampling, and including data from whole genome sequencing projects. In spite of uncertainty in the placement of some arachnid clades, all analyses show Xiphosura consistently nested within Arachnida as the sister group to Ricinulei (hooded tick spiders). It is apparent that the radiation of arachnids is an old one and occurred over a brief period of time, resulting in several consecutive short internodes, and thus is a potential case for the confounding effects of incomplete lineage sorting (ILS). We simulated coalescent gene trees to explore the effects of increasing levels of ILS on the placement of horseshoe crabs. In addition, common sources of systematic error were evaluated, as well as the effects of fast-evolving partitions and the dynamics of problematic long branch orders. Our results indicated that the placement of horseshoe crabs cannot be explained by missing data, compositional biases, saturation, or ILS. Interrogation of the phylogenetic signal showed that the majority of loci favor the derived placement of Xiphosura over a monophyletic Arachnida. Our analyses support the inference that horseshoe crabs represent a group of aquatic arachnids, comparable to aquatic mites, breaking a long-standing paradigm in chelicerate evolution and altering previous interpretations of the ancestral transition to the terrestrial habitat. Future studies testing chelicerate relationships should approach the task with a sampling strategy where the monophyly of Arachnida is not held as the premise.
© The Author(s) 2019. Published by Oxford University Press, on behalf of the Society of Systematic Biologists. All rights reserved. For permissions, please email: journals.permissions@oup.com.

Keywords:  Arachnids; Arthropods; ILS; composition bias; long branch attraction; phylogenetics; signal

Mesh:

Year:  2019        PMID: 30917194     DOI: 10.1093/sysbio/syz011

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Syst Biol        ISSN: 1063-5157            Impact factor:   15.683


  30 in total

1.  mPartition: A Model-Based Method for Partitioning Alignments.

Authors:  Thu Le Kim; Vinh Le Sy
Journal:  J Mol Evol       Date:  2020-08-31       Impact factor: 2.395

2.  Ordered phylogenomic subsampling enables diagnosis of systematic errors in the placement of the enigmatic arachnid order Palpigradi.

Authors:  Jesús A Ballesteros; Carlos E Santibáñez López; Ľubomír Kováč; Efrat Gavish-Regev; Prashant P Sharma
Journal:  Proc Biol Sci       Date:  2019-12-18       Impact factor: 5.349

3.  Developing an integrated understanding of the evolution of arthropod segmentation using fossils and evo-devo.

Authors:  Ariel D Chipman; Gregory D Edgecombe
Journal:  Proc Biol Sci       Date:  2019-10-02       Impact factor: 5.349

4.  Developmental gene expression as a phylogenetic data class: support for the monophyly of Arachnopulmonata.

Authors:  Erik D Nolan; Carlos E Santibáñez-López; Prashant P Sharma
Journal:  Dev Genes Evol       Date:  2020-01-11       Impact factor: 0.900

5.  Different phylogenomic methods support monophyly of enigmatic 'Mesozoa' (Dicyemida + Orthonectida, Lophotrochozoa).

Authors:  Marie Drábková; Kevin M Kocot; Kenneth M Halanych; Todd H Oakley; Leonid L Moroz; Johanna T Cannon; Armand Kuris; Ana Elisa Garcia-Vedrenne; M Sabrina Pankey; Emily A Ellis; Rebecca Varney; Jan Štefka; Jan Zrzavý
Journal:  Proc Biol Sci       Date:  2022-07-06       Impact factor: 5.530

6.  StarBeast3: Adaptive Parallelized Bayesian Inference under the Multispecies Coalescent.

Authors:  Jordan Douglas; Cinthy L Jiménez-Silva; Remco Bouckaert
Journal:  Syst Biol       Date:  2022-06-16       Impact factor: 9.160

7.  Comparative analysis of mite genomes reveals positive selection for diet adaptation.

Authors:  Qiong Liu; Yuhua Deng; An Song; Yifan Xiang; Lai Wei
Journal:  Commun Biol       Date:  2021-06-03

8.  New Methods to Calculate Concordance Factors for Phylogenomic Datasets.

Authors:  Bui Quang Minh; Matthew W Hahn; Robert Lanfear
Journal:  Mol Biol Evol       Date:  2020-09-01       Impact factor: 16.240

9.  Increasing species sampling in chelicerate genomic-scale datasets provides support for monophyly of Acari and Arachnida.

Authors:  Jesus Lozano-Fernandez; Alastair R Tanner; Mattia Giacomelli; Robert Carton; Jakob Vinther; Gregory D Edgecombe; Davide Pisani
Journal:  Nat Commun       Date:  2019-05-24       Impact factor: 14.919

10.  The genome of a daddy-long-legs (Opiliones) illuminates the evolution of arachnid appendages.

Authors:  Guilherme Gainett; Vanessa L González; Jesús A Ballesteros; Emily V W Setton; Caitlin M Baker; Leonardo Barolo Gargiulo; Carlos E Santibáñez-López; Jonathan A Coddington; Prashant P Sharma
Journal:  Proc Biol Sci       Date:  2021-08-04       Impact factor: 5.530

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.