Literature DB >> 30914181

Predicting in-hospital mortality of patients with acute kidney injury in the ICU using random forest model.

Ke Lin1, Yonghua Hu2, Guilan Kong3.   

Abstract

OBJECTIVES: We aimed to construct a mortality prediction model using the random forest (RF) algorithm for acute kidney injury (AKI) patients in the intensive care unit (ICU), and compared its performance with that of two other machine learning models and the customized simplified acute physiology score (SAPS) II model.
METHODS: We used medical information mart for intensive care (MIMIC) III database for model development and performance comparison. The RF model uses the same predictor variable set as that of the SAPS II model. We also developed three other models and compared the RF model with the other three models in prediction performance. Three other models include support vector machine (SVM) model, artificial neural network (ANN) model and customized SAPS II model. In model comparison, the prediction performance of each model was assessed by the Brier score, the area under the receiver operating characteristic curve (AUROC), accuracy and F1 score.
RESULTS: The final cohort consisted of 19044 patients with AKI in the ICU. The observed in-hospital mortality of AKI patients is 13.6% in the final cohort. The results of model performance comparison show that the Brier score of the RF model is 0.085 (95%CI: 0.084-0.086) and AUROC of the RF model is 0.866 (95%CI: 0.862-0.870). The accuracy of the RF model is 0.728 (95%CI: 0.715-0.741). The F1 score of the RF model is 0.459 (95%CI: 0.449-0.470). The calibration plots show that the RF model slightly overestimates mortality in patients with low risk of death and underestimates mortality in patients with high risk of death.
CONCLUSION: There is great potential for the RF model in mortality prediction for AKI patients in ICU. The RF model may be helpful to aid ICU clinicians to make timely clinical intervention decisions for AKI patients, which is critical to help reduce the in-hospital mortality of AKI patients. A prospective study is necessary to evaluate the clinical utility of the RF model.
Copyright © 2019 Elsevier B.V. All rights reserved.

Entities:  

Keywords:  Acute kidney injury; Intensive care unit; Mortality prediction; Random forest model

Mesh:

Year:  2019        PMID: 30914181     DOI: 10.1016/j.ijmedinf.2019.02.002

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Int J Med Inform        ISSN: 1386-5056            Impact factor:   4.046


  38 in total

1.  Predicting in-hospital mortality of patients with febrile neutropenia using machine learning models.

Authors:  Xinsong Du; Jae Min; Chintan P Shah; Rohit Bishnoi; William R Hogan; Dominick J Lemas
Journal:  Int J Med Inform       Date:  2020-04-15       Impact factor: 4.046

2.  Application of Machine Learning in Intensive Care Unit (ICU) Settings Using MIMIC Dataset: Systematic Review.

Authors:  Mahanazuddin Syed; Shorabuddin Syed; Kevin Sexton; Hafsa Bareen Syeda; Maryam Garza; Meredith Zozus; Farhanuddin Syed; Salma Begum; Abdullah Usama Syed; Joseph Sanford; Fred Prior
Journal:  Informatics (MDPI)       Date:  2021-03-03

3.  Using Machine Learning to Predict Hyperchloremia in Critically Ill Patients.

Authors:  Pete Yeh; Yiheng Pan; L Nelson Sanchez-Pinto; Yuan Luo
Journal:  Proceedings (IEEE Int Conf Bioinformatics Biomed)       Date:  2020-02-06

4.  Development and validation of clinical prediction models for acute kidney injury recovery at hospital discharge in critically ill adults.

Authors:  Chao-Yuan Huang; Fabian Güiza; Greet De Vlieger; Pieter Wouters; Jan Gunst; Michael Casaer; Ilse Vanhorebeek; Inge Derese; Greet Van den Berghe; Geert Meyfroidt
Journal:  J Clin Monit Comput       Date:  2022-05-09       Impact factor: 2.502

5.  [Predicting prolonged length of intensive care unit stay via machine learning].

Authors:  J Y Wu; Y Lin; K Lin; Y H Hu; G L Kong
Journal:  Beijing Da Xue Xue Bao Yi Xue Ban       Date:  2021-12-18

Review 6.  Data Science Methods for Nursing-Relevant Patient Outcomes and Clinical Processes: The 2019 Literature Year in Review.

Authors:  Mary Anne Schultz; Rachel Lane Walden; Kenrick Cato; Cynthia Peltier Coviak; Christopher Cruz; Fabio D'Agostino; Brian J Douthit; Thompson Forbes; Grace Gao; Mikyoung Angela Lee; Deborah Lekan; Ann Wieben; Alvin D Jeffery
Journal:  Comput Inform Nurs       Date:  2021-05-06       Impact factor: 1.985

Review 7.  Big Data in Nephrology.

Authors:  Navchetan Kaur; Sanchita Bhattacharya; Atul J Butte
Journal:  Nat Rev Nephrol       Date:  2021-06-30       Impact factor: 28.314

8.  Predicting in-hospital mortality in ICU patients with sepsis using gradient boosting decision tree.

Authors:  Ke Li; Qinwen Shi; Siru Liu; Yilin Xie; Jialin Liu
Journal:  Medicine (Baltimore)       Date:  2021-05-14       Impact factor: 1.889

9.  Machine learning predicts mortality based on analysis of ventilation parameters of critically ill patients: multi-centre validation.

Authors:  Behrooz Mamandipoor; Fernando Frutos-Vivar; Oscar Peñuelas; Richard Rezar; Konstantinos Raymondos; Alfonso Muriel; Bin Du; Arnaud W Thille; Fernando Ríos; Marco González; Lorenzo Del-Sorbo; Maria Del Carmen Marín; Bruno Valle Pinheiro; Marco Antonio Soares; Nicolas Nin; Salvatore M Maggiore; Andrew Bersten; Malte Kelm; Raphael Romano Bruno; Pravin Amin; Nahit Cakar; Gee Young Suh; Fekri Abroug; Manuel Jibaja; Dimitros Matamis; Amine Ali Zeggwagh; Yuda Sutherasan; Antonio Anzueto; Bernhard Wernly; Andrés Esteban; Christian Jung; Venet Osmani
Journal:  BMC Med Inform Decis Mak       Date:  2021-05-07       Impact factor: 2.796

10.  Prediction of Multiple sclerosis disease using machine learning classifiers: a comparative study.

Authors:  Sonia Darvishi; Omid Hamidi; Jalal Poorolajal
Journal:  J Prev Med Hyg       Date:  2021-04-29
View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.