Mustafa G Bulbul1,2, Osama Tarabichi1,2, Rosh K Sethi1,2, Anuraag S Parikh1,2, Mark A Varvares1,2. 1. 1 Department of Otolaryngology-Head and Neck Surgery, Massachusetts Eye and Ear Infirmary, Boston, Massachusetts, USA. 2. 2 Department of Otolaryngology, Harvard Medical School, Boston, Massachusetts, USA.
Abstract
OBJECTIVES: To compare local recurrence-free survival (LRFS) in early oral cavity cancer (OCC) patients with positive/close frozen section (FS) cleared with further resection (R1 to R0) or positive FS not cleared (R1) to those with negative margins on initial FS analysis (R0). DATA SOURCES: PubMed, EMBASE, and Cochrane. REVIEW METHODS: We followed the Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic Reviews and Meta-analyses (PRISMA) for reporting in our study. Only English-language articles that included patients with OCC and local recurrence (LR) comparisons between R0 and initially R1 to final R0 or final R1 groups were included. We requested the raw data from the corresponding authors of eligible studies and performed an individual participant data (IPD) meta-analysis of LRFS outcomes across groups. RESULTS: Pooled LRFS data from 8 studies showed that patients in the R1 to R0 group had worse LRFS compared to the R0 group (hazard ratio [HR] = 2.897, P < .001). Patients in the R1 group were also found to have worse LRFS compared to the R0 group (HR = 3.795, P < .001). When compared to final R1 group, the initially R1 to final R0 only showed a trend toward better LRFS. CONCLUSION: Margin revision of initially positive margins to "clear" based on FS guidance does not equate to an initially negative margin and does not significantly improve local control. These findings call into question the effectiveness of the current methodology of intraoperative FS in OCC resections and call for a prospective study to determine what system of resected specimen analysis best predicts completeness of resection.
OBJECTIVES: To compare local recurrence-free survival (LRFS) in early oral cavity cancer (OCC) patients with positive/close frozen section (FS) cleared with further resection (R1 to R0) or positive FS not cleared (R1) to those with negative margins on initial FS analysis (R0). DATA SOURCES: PubMed, EMBASE, and Cochrane. REVIEW METHODS: We followed the Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic Reviews and Meta-analyses (PRISMA) for reporting in our study. Only English-language articles that included patients with OCC and local recurrence (LR) comparisons between R0 and initially R1 to final R0 or final R1 groups were included. We requested the raw data from the corresponding authors of eligible studies and performed an individual participant data (IPD) meta-analysis of LRFS outcomes across groups. RESULTS: Pooled LRFS data from 8 studies showed that patients in the R1 to R0 group had worse LRFS compared to the R0 group (hazard ratio [HR] = 2.897, P < .001). Patients in the R1 group were also found to have worse LRFS compared to the R0 group (HR = 3.795, P < .001). When compared to final R1 group, the initially R1 to final R0 only showed a trend toward better LRFS. CONCLUSION: Margin revision of initially positive margins to "clear" based on FS guidance does not equate to an initially negative margin and does not significantly improve local control. These findings call into question the effectiveness of the current methodology of intraoperative FS in OCC resections and call for a prospective study to determine what system of resected specimen analysis best predicts completeness of resection.
Authors: B C Yoon; M D Bulbul; P M Sadow; W C Faquin; H D Curtin; M A Varvares; A F Juliano Journal: AJNR Am J Neuroradiol Date: 2020-06-18 Impact factor: 3.825
Authors: Mustafa G Bulbul; Osama Tarabichi; Anuraag S Parikh; Byung C Yoon; Amy Juliano; Peter M Sadow; William Faquin; Matthew Gropler; Ronald Walker; Sidharth V Puram; Mark A Varvares Journal: Oral Oncol Date: 2021-09-23 Impact factor: 5.972
Authors: Elvis Duran-Sierra; Shuna Cheng; Rodrigo Cuenca; Beena Ahmed; Jim Ji; Vladislav V Yakovlev; Mathias Martinez; Moustafa Al-Khalil; Hussain Al-Enazi; Yi-Shing Lisa Cheng; John Wright; Carlos Busso; Javier A Jo Journal: Cancers (Basel) Date: 2021-09-23 Impact factor: 6.575
Authors: Eder da Silva Dolens; Mauricio Rocha Dourado; Alhadi Almangush; Tuula A Salo; Clarissa Araujo Gurgel Rocha; Sabrina Daniela da Silva; Peter A Brennan; Ricardo D Coletta Journal: Front Oncol Date: 2021-11-10 Impact factor: 6.244