Literature DB >> 30912728

Joint Encoding of Auditory Timing and Location in Visual Cortex.

John Plass1, EunSeon Ahn1, Vernon L Towle2, William C Stacey1, Vibhangini S Wasade3, James Tao2, Shasha Wu2, Naoum P Issa2, David Brang1.   

Abstract

Co-occurring sounds can facilitate perception of spatially and temporally correspondent visual events. Separate lines of research have identified two putatively distinct neural mechanisms underlying two types of crossmodal facilitations: Whereas crossmodal phase resetting is thought to underlie enhancements based on temporal correspondences, lateralized occipital evoked potentials (ERPs) are thought to reflect enhancements based on spatial correspondences. Here, we sought to clarify the relationship between these two effects to assess whether they reflect two distinct mechanisms or, rather, two facets of the same underlying process. To identify the neural generators of each effect, we examined crossmodal responses to lateralized sounds in visually responsive cortex of 22 patients using electrocorticographic recordings. Auditory-driven phase reset and ERP responses in visual cortex displayed similar topography, revealing significant activity in pericalcarine, inferior occipital-temporal, and posterior parietal cortex, with maximal activity in lateral occipitotemporal cortex (potentially V5/hMT+). Laterality effects showed similar but less widespread topography. To test whether lateralized and nonlateralized components of crossmodal ERPs emerged from common or distinct neural generators, we compared responses throughout visual cortex. Visual electrodes responded to both contralateral and ipsilateral sounds with a contralateral bias, suggesting that previously observed laterality effects do not emerge from a distinct neural generator but rather reflect laterality-biased responses in the same neural populations that produce phase-resetting responses. These results suggest that crossmodal phase reset and ERP responses previously found to reflect spatial and temporal facilitation in visual cortex may reflect the same underlying mechanism. We propose a new unified model to account for these and previous results.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2019        PMID: 30912728      PMCID: PMC6551606          DOI: 10.1162/jocn_a_01399

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Cogn Neurosci        ISSN: 0898-929X            Impact factor:   3.225


  50 in total

1.  Involuntary orienting to sound improves visual perception.

Authors:  J J McDonald; W A Teder-Sälejärvi; S A Hillyard
Journal:  Nature       Date:  2000-10-19       Impact factor: 49.962

2.  Location changes enhance hemispheric asymmetry of magnetic fields evoked by lateralized sounds in humans.

Authors:  J Kaiser; W Lutzenberger
Journal:  Neurosci Lett       Date:  2001-11-13       Impact factor: 3.046

3.  Spatial attention to central and peripheral auditory stimuli as indexed by event-related potentials.

Authors:  W A Teder-Sälejärvi; S A Hillyard; B Röder; H J Neville
Journal:  Brain Res Cogn Brain Res       Date:  1999-10-25

4.  Multisensory convergence in calcarine visual areas in macaque monkey.

Authors:  Kathleen S Rockland; Hisayuki Ojima
Journal:  Int J Psychophysiol       Date:  2003-10       Impact factor: 2.997

5.  Visual illusion induced by sound.

Authors:  Ladan Shams; Yukiyasu Kamitani; Shinsuke Shimojo
Journal:  Brain Res Cogn Brain Res       Date:  2002-06

6.  Anatomical evidence of multimodal integration in primate striate cortex.

Authors:  Arnaud Falchier; Simon Clavagnier; Pascal Barone; Henry Kennedy
Journal:  J Neurosci       Date:  2002-07-01       Impact factor: 6.167

7.  AUDITORY FLUTTER-DRIVING OF VISUAL FLICKER.

Authors:  T SHIPLEY
Journal:  Science       Date:  1964-09-18       Impact factor: 47.728

Review 8.  Is neocortex essentially multisensory?

Authors:  Asif A Ghazanfar; Charles E Schroeder
Journal:  Trends Cogn Sci       Date:  2006-05-18       Impact factor: 20.229

Review 9.  Are event-related potential components generated by phase resetting of brain oscillations? A critical discussion.

Authors:  P Sauseng; W Klimesch; W R Gruber; S Hanslmayr; R Freunberger; M Doppelmayr
Journal:  Neuroscience       Date:  2007-04-24       Impact factor: 3.590

10.  Organization of auditory cortical areas in man.

Authors:  G G Celesia
Journal:  Brain       Date:  1976-09       Impact factor: 13.501

View more
  6 in total

1.  Stochastic resonance model of synaesthesia.

Authors:  Poortata Lalwani; David Brang
Journal:  Philos Trans R Soc Lond B Biol Sci       Date:  2019-10-21       Impact factor: 6.237

2.  Visual cortex responds to sound onset and offset during passive listening.

Authors:  David Brang; John Plass; Aleksandra Sherman; William C Stacey; Vibhangini S Wasade; Marcia Grabowecky; EunSeon Ahn; Vernon L Towle; James X Tao; Shasha Wu; Naoum P Issa; Satoru Suzuki
Journal:  J Neurophysiol       Date:  2022-05-04       Impact factor: 2.974

3.  Electrocorticography Evidence of Tactile Responses in Visual Cortices.

Authors:  Anna Gaglianese; Mariana P Branco; Iris I A Groen; Noah C Benson; Mariska J Vansteensel; Micah M Murray; Natalia Petridou; Nick F Ramsey
Journal:  Brain Topogr       Date:  2020-07-13       Impact factor: 3.020

4.  Anatomy and activity patterns in a multifunctional motor neuron and its surrounding circuits.

Authors:  Mária Ashaber; Yusuke Tomina; Pegah Kassraian; Eric A Bushong; William B Kristan; Mark H Ellisman; Daniel A Wagenaar
Journal:  Elife       Date:  2021-02-15       Impact factor: 8.140

Review 5.  Synchronisation of Neural Oscillations and Cross-modal Influences.

Authors:  Anna-Katharina R Bauer; Stefan Debener; Anna C Nobre
Journal:  Trends Cogn Sci       Date:  2020-04-18       Impact factor: 20.229

6.  Multisensory stimuli shift perceptual priors to facilitate rapid behavior.

Authors:  John Plass; David Brang
Journal:  Sci Rep       Date:  2021-11-29       Impact factor: 4.379

  6 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.