| Literature DB >> 30912463 |
Rheanna E Platt1, Andrea E Spencer2, Matthew D Burkey3, Carol Vidal1, Sarah Polk4, Amie F Bettencourt1, Sonal Jain5, Julia Stratton6, Lawrence S Wissow1.
Abstract
Several studies have demonstrated clinical benefits of integrated care for a range of child and adolescent mental health outcomes. However, there is a significant gap between the evidence for efficacy of integrated care interventions vs their implementation in practice. While several studies have examined large-scale implementation of co-located integrated care for adults, much less is known for children. The goal of this scoping review was to understand how co-located mental health interventions targeting children and adolescents have been implemented and sustained. The literature was systematically searched for interventions targeting child and adolescent mental health that involved a mental health specialist co-located in a primary care setting. Studies reporting on the following implementation outcomes were included: acceptability, adoption, appropriateness, feasibility, fidelity, implementation cost, penetration, and sustainability. This search identified 34 unique studies, including randomized controlled trials, observational studies, and survey/mixed method approaches. Components facilitating implementation of on-site integrated behavioural healthcare included interprofessional communication and collaboration at all stages of implementation; clear protocols to facilitate intervention delivery; and co-employment of integrated care providers by specialty clinics. Some studies found differences in service use by demographic factors, and others reported funding challenges affecting sustainability, warranting further study.Entities:
Keywords: Integrated care; co-location; implementation; paediatric; primary care; utilization
Mesh:
Year: 2019 PMID: 30912463 PMCID: PMC6499629 DOI: 10.1080/09540261.2018.1563530
Source DB: PubMed Journal: Int Rev Psychiatry ISSN: 0954-0261