Erin J Aiello Bowles1, Paul K Crane2, Rod L Walker1, Jessica Chubak1,3, Andrea Z LaCroix1,4, Melissa L Anderson1, Dori Rosenberg1, C Dirk Keene5, Eric B Larson1,2. 1. Kaiser Permanente Washington Health Research Institute, Kaiser Permanente Washington, Seattle, WA, USA. 2. Department of Medicine, Division of General Internal Medicine, University of Washington, Seattle, WA, USA. 3. Department of Epidemiology, University of Washington, Seattle, WA, USA. 4. Department of Family Medicine and Public Health, Division of Epidemiology, University of California San Diego, La Jolla, CA, USA. 5. Department of Pathology, University of Washington, Seattle, WA, USA.
Abstract
BACKGROUND: Past research has focused on risk factors for developing dementia, with increasing recognition of "resilient" people who live to old age with intact cognitive function despite pathological features of Alzheimer's disease (AD). OBJECTIVE: To evaluate demographic factors, mid-life characteristics, and non-AD neuropathology findings that may be associated with cognitive resilience to AD pathology. METHODS: We analyzed data from 276 autopsy cases with intermediate or high levels of AD pathology from the Adult Changes in Thought study. We defined cognitive resilience as having Cognitive Abilities Screening Instrument scores ≥86 within two years of death and no clinical dementia diagnosis; non-resilient people had dementia diagnoses from AD or other causes before death. We compared mid-life characteristics, demographics, and additional neuropathology findings between resilient and non-resilient people. We used multivariable logistic regression to estimate odds ratios (ORs) with 95% confidence intervals (CIs) for being resilient compared to not being resilient adjusting for demographic and neuropathology factors. RESULTS: We classified 68 (25%) people as resilient and 208 (75%) as not resilient. A greater proportion of resilient people had a college degree (50%) compared with non-resilient (32%, p = 0.01). The odds of being resilient were significantly increased among people with a college education (OR = 2.01, 95% CI = 1.01-3.99) and significantly reduced among people with additional non-AD neuropathology findings such as hippocampal sclerosis (OR = 0.28, 95% CI = 0.09-0.89) and microinfarcts (OR = 0.34, 95% CI = 0.15-0.78). CONCLUSION: Increased education and absence of non-AD pathology may be independently associated with cognitive resilience, highlighting the importance of evaluating co-morbid factors in future research on mechanisms of cognitive resilience.
BACKGROUND: Past research has focused on risk factors for developing dementia, with increasing recognition of "resilient" people who live to old age with intact cognitive function despite pathological features of Alzheimer's disease (AD). OBJECTIVE: To evaluate demographic factors, mid-life characteristics, and non-AD neuropathology findings that may be associated with cognitive resilience to AD pathology. METHODS: We analyzed data from 276 autopsy cases with intermediate or high levels of AD pathology from the Adult Changes in Thought study. We defined cognitive resilience as having Cognitive Abilities Screening Instrument scores ≥86 within two years of death and no clinical dementia diagnosis; non-resilient people had dementia diagnoses from AD or other causes before death. We compared mid-life characteristics, demographics, and additional neuropathology findings between resilient and non-resilient people. We used multivariable logistic regression to estimate odds ratios (ORs) with 95% confidence intervals (CIs) for being resilient compared to not being resilient adjusting for demographic and neuropathology factors. RESULTS: We classified 68 (25%) people as resilient and 208 (75%) as not resilient. A greater proportion of resilient people had a college degree (50%) compared with non-resilient (32%, p = 0.01). The odds of being resilient were significantly increased among people with a college education (OR = 2.01, 95% CI = 1.01-3.99) and significantly reduced among people with additional non-AD neuropathology findings such as hippocampal sclerosis (OR = 0.28, 95% CI = 0.09-0.89) and microinfarcts (OR = 0.34, 95% CI = 0.15-0.78). CONCLUSION: Increased education and absence of non-AD pathology may be independently associated with cognitive resilience, highlighting the importance of evaluating co-morbid factors in future research on mechanisms of cognitive resilience.
Authors: Ramon Casanova; Sarah A Gaussoin; Robert Wallace; Laura D Baker; Jiu-Chiuan Chen; JoAnn E Manson; Victor W Henderson; Bonnie C Sachs; Jamie N Justice; Eric A Whitsel; Kathleen M Hayden; Stephen R Rapp Journal: J Alzheimers Dis Date: 2021 Impact factor: 4.472
Authors: Douglas Barthold; Laura E Gibbons; Zachary A Marcum; Shelly L Gray; C Dirk Keene; Thomas J Grabowski; Nadia Postupna; Eric B Larson; Paul K Crane Journal: J Alzheimers Dis Date: 2021 Impact factor: 4.472
Authors: Ryan A Townley; Hugo Botha; Jonathan Graff-Radford; Jennifer Whitwell; Bradley F Boeve; Mary M Machulda; Julie A Fields; Daniel A Drubach; Rodolfo Savica; Ronald C Petersen; Matthew L Senjem; David S Knopman; Val J Lowe; Clifford R Jack; Keith A Josephs; David T Jones Journal: Brain Commun Date: 2021-08-19
Authors: Jinkuk Hong; Robert S Dembo; Leann Smith DaWalt; Murray Brilliant; Elizabeth M Berry-Kravis; Marsha Mailick Journal: SSM Popul Health Date: 2022-10-05
Authors: Cecilia S Lee; Caitlin S Latimer; Jonathan C Henriksen; Marian Blazes; Eric B Larson; Paul K Crane; C Dirk Keene; Aaron Y Lee Journal: Brain Pathol Date: 2021-05-19 Impact factor: 6.508