Literature DB >> 30908695

A Definition and Categorization System for Advanced Materials: The Foundation for Risk-Informed Environmental Health and Safety Testing.

Alan Kennedy1, Jonathon Brame1, Taylor Rycroft1, Matthew Wood1,2, Valerie Zemba3, Charles Weiss4, Matthew Hull5,6, Cary Hill5, Charles Geraci7, Igor Linkov1.   

Abstract

Novel materials with unique or enhanced properties relative to conventional materials are being developed at an increasing rate. These materials are often referred to as advanced materials (AdMs) and they enable technological innovations that can benefit society. Despite their benefits, however, the unique characteristics of many AdMs, including many nanomaterials, are poorly understood and may pose environmental safety and occupational health (ESOH) risks that are not readily determined by traditional risk assessment methods. To assess these risks while keeping up with the pace of development, technology developers and risk assessors frequently employ risk-screening methods that depend on a clear definition for the materials that are to be assessed (e.g., engineered nanomaterial) as well as a method for binning materials into categories for ESOH risk prioritization. The term advanced material lacks a consensus definition and associated categorization or grouping system for risk screening. In this study, we aim to establish a practitioner-driven definition for AdMs and a practitioner-validated framework for categorizing AdMs into conceptual groupings based on material characteristics. Results from multiple workshops and interviews with practitioners provide consistent differentiation between AdMs and conventional materials, offer functional nomenclature for application science, and provide utility for future ESOH risk assessment prioritization. The definition and categorization framework established here serve as a first step in determining if and when there is a need for specific ESOH and regulatory screening for an AdM as well as the type and extent of risk-related information that should be collected or generated for AdMs and AdM-enabled technologies.
© 2019 Society for Risk Analysis. This article has been contributed to by US Government employees and their work is in the public domain in the USA.

Entities:  

Keywords:  Advanced materials; definition and categorization; environmental safety and occupational health; grouping; risk prioritization

Mesh:

Year:  2019        PMID: 30908695      PMCID: PMC6675647          DOI: 10.1111/risa.13304

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Risk Anal        ISSN: 0272-4332            Impact factor:   4.000


  13 in total

1.  Debating the precautionary principle: "guilty until proven innocent" or "innocent until proven guilty"?

Authors:  Henk van den Belt
Journal:  Plant Physiol       Date:  2003-07       Impact factor: 8.340

2.  Balancing research and funding using value of information and portfolio tools for nanomaterial risk classification.

Authors:  Matthew E Bates; Jeffrey M Keisler; Niels P Zussblatt; Kenton J Plourde; Ben A Wender; Igor Linkov
Journal:  Nat Nanotechnol       Date:  2015-11-09       Impact factor: 39.213

3.  Probabilistic environmental risk assessment of five nanomaterials (nano-TiO2, nano-Ag, nano-ZnO, CNT, and fullerenes).

Authors:  Claudia Coll; Dominic Notter; Fadri Gottschalk; Tianyin Sun; Claudia Som; Bernd Nowack
Journal:  Nanotoxicology       Date:  2015-11-10       Impact factor: 5.913

4.  Nanotoxicology ten years later: Lights and shadows.

Authors:  Anna Shvedova; Antonio Pietroiusti; Valerian Kagan
Journal:  Toxicol Appl Pharmacol       Date:  2016-02-18       Impact factor: 4.219

Review 5.  A decision-making framework for the grouping and testing of nanomaterials (DF4nanoGrouping).

Authors:  Josje H E Arts; Mackenzie Hadi; Muhammad-Adeel Irfan; Athena M Keene; Reinhard Kreiling; Delina Lyon; Monika Maier; Karin Michel; Thomas Petry; Ursula G Sauer; David Warheit; Karin Wiench; Wendel Wohlleben; Robert Landsiedel
Journal:  Regul Toxicol Pharmacol       Date:  2015-03-26       Impact factor: 3.271

Review 6.  Diverse Applications of Nanomedicine.

Authors:  Beatriz Pelaz; Christoph Alexiou; Ramon A Alvarez-Puebla; Frauke Alves; Anne M Andrews; Sumaira Ashraf; Lajos P Balogh; Laura Ballerini; Alessandra Bestetti; Cornelia Brendel; Susanna Bosi; Monica Carril; Warren C W Chan; Chunying Chen; Xiaodong Chen; Xiaoyuan Chen; Zhen Cheng; Daxiang Cui; Jianzhong Du; Christian Dullin; Alberto Escudero; Neus Feliu; Mingyuan Gao; Michael George; Yury Gogotsi; Arnold Grünweller; Zhongwei Gu; Naomi J Halas; Norbert Hampp; Roland K Hartmann; Mark C Hersam; Patrick Hunziker; Ji Jian; Xingyu Jiang; Philipp Jungebluth; Pranav Kadhiresan; Kazunori Kataoka; Ali Khademhosseini; Jindřich Kopeček; Nicholas A Kotov; Harald F Krug; Dong Soo Lee; Claus-Michael Lehr; Kam W Leong; Xing-Jie Liang; Mei Ling Lim; Luis M Liz-Marzán; Xiaowei Ma; Paolo Macchiarini; Huan Meng; Helmuth Möhwald; Paul Mulvaney; Andre E Nel; Shuming Nie; Peter Nordlander; Teruo Okano; Jose Oliveira; Tai Hyun Park; Reginald M Penner; Maurizio Prato; Victor Puntes; Vincent M Rotello; Amila Samarakoon; Raymond E Schaak; Youqing Shen; Sebastian Sjöqvist; Andre G Skirtach; Mahmoud G Soliman; Molly M Stevens; Hsing-Wen Sung; Ben Zhong Tang; Rainer Tietze; Buddhisha N Udugama; J Scott VanEpps; Tanja Weil; Paul S Weiss; Itamar Willner; Yuzhou Wu; Lily Yang; Zhao Yue; Qian Zhang; Qiang Zhang; Xian-En Zhang; Yuliang Zhao; Xin Zhou; Wolfgang J Parak
Journal:  ACS Nano       Date:  2017-03-14       Impact factor: 15.881

7.  Nanomaterials for energy conversion and storage.

Authors:  Qifeng Zhang; Evan Uchaker; Stephanie L Candelaria; Guozhong Cao
Journal:  Chem Soc Rev       Date:  2013-04-07       Impact factor: 54.564

8.  Trends in worldwide nanotechnology patent applications: 1991 to 2008.

Authors:  Yan Dang; Yulei Zhang; Li Fan; Hsinchun Chen; Mihail C Roco
Journal:  J Nanopart Res       Date:  2009-12-29       Impact factor: 2.253

9.  A decision analytic approach to exposure-based chemical prioritization.

Authors:  Jade Mitchell; Nicolas Pabon; Zachary A Collier; Peter P Egeghy; Elaine Cohen-Hubal; Igor Linkov; Daniel A Vallero
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2013-08-05       Impact factor: 3.240

10.  TSCA 2.0: A New Era in Chemical Risk Management.

Authors:  Charles W Schmidt
Journal:  Environ Health Perspect       Date:  2016-10-01       Impact factor: 9.031

View more
  4 in total

1.  Nanomaterial Inhalation During Pregnancy Alters Systemic Vascular Function in a Cyclooxygenase-Dependent Manner.

Authors:  Julie A Griffith; Krista L Garner; Elizabeth C Bowdridge; Evan DeVallance; Kallie J Schafner; Kevin J Engles; Thomas P Batchelor; William T Goldsmith; Kimberley Wix; Salik Hussain; Timothy R Nurkiewicz
Journal:  Toxicol Sci       Date:  2022-07-28       Impact factor: 4.109

Review 2.  Translating Scientific Advances in the AOP Framework to Decision Making for Nanomaterials.

Authors:  James D Ede; Vladimir Lobaskin; Ulla Vogel; Iseult Lynch; Sabina Halappanavar; Shareen H Doak; Megan G Roberts; Jo Anne Shatkin
Journal:  Nanomaterials (Basel)       Date:  2020-06-24       Impact factor: 5.076

Review 3.  Towards safe and sustainable innovation in nanotechnology: State-of-play for smart nanomaterials.

Authors:  Stefania Gottardo; Agnieszka Mech; Jana Drbohlavová; Aleksandra Małyska; Søren Bøwadt; Juan Riego Sintes; Hubert Rauscher
Journal:  NanoImpact       Date:  2021-01

Review 4.  Too advanced for assessment? Advanced materials, nanomedicine and the environment.

Authors:  Silvia Berkner; Kathrin Schwirn; Doris Voelker
Journal:  Environ Sci Eur       Date:  2022-08-16       Impact factor: 5.481

  4 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.