Literature DB >> 26554717

Probabilistic environmental risk assessment of five nanomaterials (nano-TiO2, nano-Ag, nano-ZnO, CNT, and fullerenes).

Claudia Coll1, Dominic Notter1, Fadri Gottschalk2, Tianyin Sun1, Claudia Som1, Bernd Nowack1.   

Abstract

The environmental risks of five engineered nanomaterials (nano-TiO2, nano-Ag, nano-ZnO, CNT, and fullerenes) were quantified in water, soils, and sediments using probabilistic Species Sensitivity Distributions (pSSDs) and probabilistic predicted environmental concentrations (PECs). For water and soil, enough ecotoxicological endpoints were found for a full risk characterization (between 17 and 73 data points per nanomaterial for water and between 4 and 20 for soil) whereas for sediments, the data availability was not sufficient. Predicted No Effect Concentrations (PNECs) were obtained from the pSSD and used to calculate risk characterization ratios (PEC/PNEC). For most materials and environmental compartments, exposure and effect concentrations were separated by several orders of magnitude. Nano-ZnO in freshwaters and nano-TiO2 in soils were the combinations where the risk characterization ratio was closest to one, meaning that these are compartment/ENM combinations to be studied in more depth with the highest priority. The probabilistic risk quantification allows us to consider the large variability of observed effects in different ecotoxicological studies and the uncertainty in modeled exposure concentrations. The risk characterization results presented in this work allows for a more focused investigation of environmental risks of nanomaterials by consideration of material/compartment combinations where the highest probability for effects with predicted environmental concentrations is likely.

Entities:  

Keywords:  Environmental risk assessment; probabilistic modeling; species sensitivity distributions

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2015        PMID: 26554717     DOI: 10.3109/17435390.2015.1073812

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Nanotoxicology        ISSN: 1743-5390            Impact factor:   5.913


  20 in total

1.  Early ecotoxic effects of ZnO nanoparticle chronic exposure in Mytilus galloprovincialis revealed by transcription of apoptosis and antioxidant-related genes.

Authors:  Jiji Li; Simona Schiavo; Dong Xiangli; Gabriella Rametta; Maria Lucia Miglietta; Maria Oliviero; Wu Changwen; Sonia Manzo
Journal:  Ecotoxicology       Date:  2018-02-13       Impact factor: 2.823

2.  A Definition and Categorization System for Advanced Materials: The Foundation for Risk-Informed Environmental Health and Safety Testing.

Authors:  Alan Kennedy; Jonathon Brame; Taylor Rycroft; Matthew Wood; Valerie Zemba; Charles Weiss; Matthew Hull; Cary Hill; Charles Geraci; Igor Linkov
Journal:  Risk Anal       Date:  2019-03-25       Impact factor: 4.000

Review 3.  A Systematic Review on the Hazard Assessment of Amorphous Silica Based on the Literature From 2013 to 2018.

Authors:  Harald F Krug
Journal:  Front Public Health       Date:  2022-06-15

4.  Probabilistic modelling of prospective environmental concentrations of gold nanoparticles from medical applications as a basis for risk assessment.

Authors:  Indrani Mahapatra; Tian Yin Sun; Julian R A Clark; Peter J Dobson; Konrad Hungerbuehler; Richard Owen; Bernd Nowack; Jamie Lead
Journal:  J Nanobiotechnology       Date:  2015-12-22       Impact factor: 10.435

Review 5.  Behavior and Potential Impacts of Metal-Based Engineered Nanoparticles in Aquatic Environments.

Authors:  Cheng Peng; Wen Zhang; Haiping Gao; Yang Li; Xin Tong; Kungang Li; Xiaoshan Zhu; Yixiang Wang; Yongsheng Chen
Journal:  Nanomaterials (Basel)       Date:  2017-01-22       Impact factor: 5.076

6.  Environmental Risk Assessment Strategy for Nanomaterials.

Authors:  Janeck J Scott-Fordsmand; Willie J G M Peijnenburg; Elena Semenzin; Bernd Nowack; Neil Hunt; Danail Hristozov; Antonio Marcomini; Muhammad-Adeel Irfan; Araceli Sánchez Jiménez; Robert Landsiedel; Lang Tran; Agnes G Oomen; Peter M J Bos; Kerstin Hund-Rinke
Journal:  Int J Environ Res Public Health       Date:  2017-10-19       Impact factor: 3.390

Review 7.  Current Knowledge on the Use of Computational Toxicology in Hazard Assessment of Metallic Engineered Nanomaterials.

Authors:  Guangchao Chen; Willie Peijnenburg; Yinlong Xiao; Martina G Vijver
Journal:  Int J Mol Sci       Date:  2017-07-12       Impact factor: 5.923

8.  Multilaboratory evaluation of 15 bioassays for (eco)toxicity screening and hazard ranking of engineered nanomaterials: FP7 project NANOVALID.

Authors:  Olesja M Bondarenko; Margit Heinlaan; Mariliis Sihtmäe; Angela Ivask; Imbi Kurvet; Elise Joonas; Anita Jemec; Marika Mannerström; Tuula Heinonen; Rohit Rekulapelly; Shashi Singh; Jing Zou; Ilmari Pyykkö; Damjana Drobne; Anne Kahru
Journal:  Nanotoxicology       Date:  2016-06-28       Impact factor: 5.913

9.  Risks, Release and Concentrations of Engineered Nanomaterial in the Environment.

Authors:  Bernd Giese; Fred Klaessig; Barry Park; Ralf Kaegi; Michael Steinfeldt; Henning Wigger; Arnim von Gleich; Fadri Gottschalk
Journal:  Sci Rep       Date:  2018-01-25       Impact factor: 4.379

10.  TiO₂, SiO₂ and ZrO₂ Nanoparticles Synergistically Provoke Cellular Oxidative Damage in Freshwater Microalgae.

Authors:  Yinghan Liu; Se Wang; Zhuang Wang; Nan Ye; Hao Fang; Degao Wang
Journal:  Nanomaterials (Basel)       Date:  2018-02-08       Impact factor: 5.076

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.