Literature DB >> 30907724

Comparative Analysis of Whole-Genome Sequence of African Swine Fever Virus Belgium 2018/1.

Jan H Forth, Marylène Tignon, Ann Brigitte Cay, Leonie F Forth, Dirk Höper, Sandra Blome, Martin Beer.   

Abstract

We analyzed the whole-genome sequence of African swine fever virus Belgium 2018/1. The strain fits into the European genotype II (>99.98% identity). The high-coverage sequence revealed 15 differences compared with an improved African swine fever virus Georgia 2007/1 sequence. However, in the absence of genetic markers, no spatial or temporal correlations could be defined.

Entities:  

Keywords:  African swine fever virus; molecular epidemiology; viruses; whole-genome sequencing

Mesh:

Year:  2019        PMID: 30907724      PMCID: PMC6537744          DOI: 10.3201/eid2506.190286

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Emerg Infect Dis        ISSN: 1080-6040            Impact factor:   6.883


African swine fever (ASF) is one of the most pathogenic viral diseases of swine leading to clinical and pathomorphological signs of a viral hemorrhagic fever (). In 2007, ASF was introduced into Georgia () and thereafter into numerous eastern European and European Union (EU) countries (), as well as Asia (China, Mongolia, and Vietnam) (World Organization for Animal Health–World Animal Health Information database, http://www.oie.int/wahis_2/public/wahid.php/Wahidhome/Home/indexcontent, 2019 Feb 21). In September 2018, the African swine fever virus (ASFV) was introduced into Belgium (,); as of April 28, 2019, 719 cases have been reported by Belgium’s Federal Agency for the Safety of the Food Chain (http://www.afsca.be/ppa/actualite/belgique). Samples from the first 2 cases were taken for analysis to the Belgium National Reference Laboratory for ASF at Sciensano, Brussels, and were later confirmed by the ASF EU Reference Laboratory (EURL) in Valdeolmos, Spain. Partial sequencing at the EURL revealed a p72 genotype II with CVR-1, IGR-2, and MGF1 variants. Initial assessments of virus type and epidemiology were published by Garigliany et al. () to share the data without delay. Subsequently, samples were transferred to the Friedrich-Loeffler-Institut, Greifswald, Germany, for whole-genome sequencing. We prepared samples and sequenced them on an Illumina MiSeq (https://www.illumina.com), as previously described (). In addition, we enriched DNA libraries for Illumina sequencing for ASFV specific target sequences using an ASFV-specific myBaits kit (Arbor Biosciences, https://arborbiosci.com). We analyzed the resulting sequence data by mapping against an improved ASFV Georgia 2007/1 sequence (International Nucleotide Sequence Database Collaboration accession no. FR682468.2) using Newbler 3.0 software (); we assembled the identified ASFV-specific reads using SPAdes 3.13.0 (). For the assembly of the inverted terminal repeat (ITR) regions, we mapped the reads against the individual ASFV-Georgia 2007/1 ITR regions using Newbler and manually assembled them with the ASFV Belgium 2018/1 sequence in Geneious 11.1.5 (Biomatters, https://www.geneious.com). For validation, we mapped all reads along the final contig using Newbler; the result was a median unique depth of 292 with an interquartile range of 42. We annotated the sequence according to the improved ASFV Georgia 2007/1 sequence, using Glimmer3 in Geneious. We aligned different available ASFV whole-genome sequences using MAFFT 7.388, and we performed a phylogenetic analysis using IQ-TREE v1.6.5 (,). The whole-genome sequence is available from the International Nucleotide Sequence Database Collaboration databases under study accession no. PRJEB31287 and sequence accession no. LR536725. The ASFV Belgium 2018/1 whole-genome sequence has a length of 190,599 bp. Comparison with the improved ASFV Georgia 2007/1 sequence revealed 15 differences, for an overall sequence identity of 99.98% at the nucleotide level. The detected differences included 4 nucleotide transitions, 5 nucleotide transversions, 5 changes in homopolymer regions, and 1 integration of a repeat into a previously described variable intergenic region () (Table).
Table

Differences in the whole-genome sequence of ASFV-Belgium2018/1 and the improved ASFV-Georgia2007/1 reference genome (indicated in bold and underlined)*

PositionTypeDifferenceASFV Georgia 2007/1†ASFV Belgium 2018/1†CoverageGeneSynonymous/ nonsynonymousORF change
121TransversionG121CAAGATAACAT44ITRNANA
129TransversionA129TAAATAAATTA47ITRNANA
479Variation+T9 × T10 × T767ITRNANA
1393Variation+C9 × C10 × C1375NANANA
6786Variation–T9 × T8 × T1755NANANA
7061TransitionC7061TCCCAGCCTAG1556MGF 110–1LTrp197StopShortened by 18 codons
15688Variation+3C17 × C20 × C127MGF 110–13LbFrameshiftEnlarged by 1 codon
17640Variation+2G10 × G12 × G1117NANANA
17854Variation+G9 × G10 × G1304NANANA
19807Variation–G7 × G6 × G1238NANANA
20017Variation–2G16 x G14 × G832ASFV G ACD 00350FrameshiftTruncation
21815Variation+2G9 × G11 × G1184NA NANA
27439Variation–T10 × T9 × T1895NANANA
44586TransitionA44586GTGAAATGGAA1292MGF 505–9RLys323GluNA
73282Variation–T9 × T8 × T1241NANANA
134524TransitionT134524CCATTTCACTT1665NP419LAsp414SerNA
145080TransitionG145080AGAGGCGAAGC1266D117LPro84LeuNA
170827TransversionT170827AGATGGGAAGG1263I267LIle195PheNA
190138Variation+A9 × A10 × A3021DP60RFrameshift22 changed codons
173402Repeat integration+TATATAGGAANA+TATATAGGAA1731NANANA
190478TransversionT190478ATATTTTAATT49ITRNANA
190486TransversionC190486GATCTTATGTT49ITRNANA

*Differences are show in bold and underlined. ASFV, African swine fever virus; ITR, inverted terminal repeat; NA, not applicable; ORF, open reading frame.
†International Nucleotide Sequence Database Collaboration accession nos: ASFV Georgia 2007/1, FR682468.2; ASFV Belgium 2018/1, LR536725.

*Differences are show in bold and underlined. ASFV, African swine fever virus; ITR, inverted terminal repeat; NA, not applicable; ORF, open reading frame.
†International Nucleotide Sequence Database Collaboration accession nos: ASFV Georgia 2007/1, FR682468.2; ASFV Belgium 2018/1, LR536725. Altogether, 4 differences in annotated genes are nonsynonymous; 2 cause a frameshift, thereby truncating the MGF 110–1L gene and changing the amino acid sequence of the DP60R protein; and 9 differences were identified in noncoding regions (Table). The differences in the ITR regions must be viewed carefully because of the low coverage in these particular parts of the genome, but the differences in the core regions are well supported by the sequencing data (Table). The differences at the specific positions 7,061; 44,586; 134,524; and 170,827 were also identified in the ASFV-SY2018 (China), Estonia 2014, Kashino 04/13 (Russia), and Pol 16/17 (Poland) sequences, and position 170,827 also in ASFV strain Odintsovo_02/14 (Russia). Further genetic differences could be identified in 7 so-called poly G/C regions. Whether these are artifacts originating from sequencing any of the analyzed genomes or pose real differences remains to be determined by the analysis of further sequences from Belgium and other countries, which is in progress. Finally, the alignment of all publicly available eastern European whole-genome sequences, as well as ASFV-China, shows that all these genomes are nearly identical with identities of more than 99.9% (Appendix Figure). In conclusion, we provide a whole-genome analysis of ASFV from Belgium, which could show a high overall identity to recent ASFV strains from eastern Europe and China. We also identified locations showing differences from ASFV Georgia 2007/1 in single nucleotides, as well as a previously described repeat insertion. However, because the low mutation rate and the corresponding high genetic stability of the eastern European ASFV strains have hindered the definition of reliable genetic markers thus far, the currently available whole-genome information does not allow for further statements regarding correlations in space and time, and does not provide enough evidence for a more detailed mapping of strain origin. Although MGF110 was assigned a possible function in preparing the endoplasmic reticulum for viral morphogenesis (), in the absence of any observations regarding virus attenuation in the field, no conclusion can be drawn on the effect of the observed differences. Therefore, further in vitro and in vivo characterizations using the ASFV Belgium 2018/1 isolate are needed. In the future, more high-quality whole-genome ASFV sequences might allow identification of genetic markers that could aid high-resolution molecular epidemiology. Coordinated efforts to improve data sharing, together with harmonized protocols under quality assurance, are of utmost importance to interpret results correctly and aid the fight against ASF.

Appendix

Phylogenetic tree of all available African swine fever virus whole-genome sequences.
  10 in total

1.  hybridSPAdes: an algorithm for hybrid assembly of short and long reads.

Authors:  Dmitry Antipov; Anton Korobeynikov; Jeffrey S McLean; Pavel A Pevzner
Journal:  Bioinformatics       Date:  2015-11-20       Impact factor: 6.937

2.  Genome sequencing in microfabricated high-density picolitre reactors.

Authors:  Marcel Margulies; Michael Egholm; William E Altman; Said Attiya; Joel S Bader; Lisa A Bemben; Jan Berka; Michael S Braverman; Yi-Ju Chen; Zhoutao Chen; Scott B Dewell; Lei Du; Joseph M Fierro; Xavier V Gomes; Brian C Godwin; Wen He; Scott Helgesen; Chun Heen Ho; Chun He Ho; Gerard P Irzyk; Szilveszter C Jando; Maria L I Alenquer; Thomas P Jarvie; Kshama B Jirage; Jong-Bum Kim; James R Knight; Janna R Lanza; John H Leamon; Steven M Lefkowitz; Ming Lei; Jing Li; Kenton L Lohman; Hong Lu; Vinod B Makhijani; Keith E McDade; Michael P McKenna; Eugene W Myers; Elizabeth Nickerson; John R Nobile; Ramona Plant; Bernard P Puc; Michael T Ronan; George T Roth; Gary J Sarkis; Jan Fredrik Simons; John W Simpson; Maithreyan Srinivasan; Karrie R Tartaro; Alexander Tomasz; Kari A Vogt; Greg A Volkmer; Shally H Wang; Yong Wang; Michael P Weiner; Pengguang Yu; Richard F Begley; Jonathan M Rothberg
Journal:  Nature       Date:  2005-07-31       Impact factor: 49.962

3.  Summer 2018: African swine fever virus hits north-western Europe.

Authors:  Annick Linden; Alain Licoppe; Rosario Volpe; Julien Paternostre; Christophe Lesenfants; Dominique Cassart; Mutien Garigliany; Marylène Tignon; Thierry van den Berg; Daniel Desmecht; Ann B Cay
Journal:  Transbound Emerg Dis       Date:  2018-11-12       Impact factor: 5.005

4.  ICTV Virus Taxonomy Profile: Asfarviridae.

Authors:  Covadonga Alonso; Manuel Borca; Linda Dixon; Yolanda Revilla; Fernando Rodriguez; Jose M Escribano
Journal:  J Gen Virol       Date:  2018-03-22       Impact factor: 3.891

5.  The subcellular distribution of multigene family 110 proteins of African swine fever virus is determined by differences in C-terminal KDEL endoplasmic reticulum retention motifs.

Authors:  Christopher Netherton; Isabelle Rouiller; Thomas Wileman
Journal:  J Virol       Date:  2004-04       Impact factor: 5.103

6.  Tandem repeat insertion in African swine fever virus, Russia, 2012.

Authors:  Katja V Goller; Alexander S Malogolovkin; Sergey Katorkin; Denis Kolbasov; Ilya Titov; Dirk Höper; Martin Beer; Günther M Keil; Raquel Portugal; Sandra Blome
Journal:  Emerg Infect Dis       Date:  2015-04       Impact factor: 6.883

7.  IQ-TREE: a fast and effective stochastic algorithm for estimating maximum-likelihood phylogenies.

Authors:  Lam-Tung Nguyen; Heiko A Schmidt; Arndt von Haeseler; Bui Quang Minh
Journal:  Mol Biol Evol       Date:  2014-11-03       Impact factor: 16.240

8.  ModelFinder: fast model selection for accurate phylogenetic estimates.

Authors:  Subha Kalyaanamoorthy; Bui Quang Minh; Thomas K F Wong; Arndt von Haeseler; Lars S Jermiin
Journal:  Nat Methods       Date:  2017-05-08       Impact factor: 28.547

9.  A Versatile Sample Processing Workflow for Metagenomic Pathogen Detection.

Authors:  Claudia Wylezich; Anna Papa; Martin Beer; Dirk Höper
Journal:  Sci Rep       Date:  2018-08-30       Impact factor: 4.379

10.  Phylogeographic Analysis of African Swine Fever Virus, Western Europe, 2018.

Authors:  Mutien Garigliany; Daniel Desmecht; Marylène Tignon; Dominique Cassart; Christophe Lesenfant; Julien Paternostre; Rosario Volpe; Ann Brigitte Cay; Thierry van den Berg; Annick Linden
Journal:  Emerg Infect Dis       Date:  2019-01-17       Impact factor: 6.883

  10 in total
  11 in total

1.  Genotyping of African Swine Fever Virus.

Authors:  Paulina Rajko-Nenow; Carrie Batten
Journal:  Methods Mol Biol       Date:  2022

2.  A Deep-Sequencing Workflow for the Fast and Efficient Generation of High-Quality African Swine Fever Virus Whole-Genome Sequences.

Authors:  Jan H Forth; Leonie F Forth; Jacqueline King; Oxana Groza; Alexandra Hübner; Ann Sofie Olesen; Dirk Höper; Linda K Dixon; Christopher L Netherton; Thomas Bruun Rasmussen; Sandra Blome; Anne Pohlmann; Martin Beer
Journal:  Viruses       Date:  2019-09-11       Impact factor: 5.048

3.  A Simple Method for Sample Preparation to Facilitate Efficient Whole-Genome Sequencing of African Swine Fever Virus.

Authors:  Ferenc Olasz; István Mészáros; Szilvia Marton; Győző L Kaján; Vivien Tamás; Gabriella Locsmándi; Tibor Magyar; Ádám Bálint; Krisztián Bányai; Zoltán Zádori
Journal:  Viruses       Date:  2019-12-06       Impact factor: 5.048

4.  A Long-Term Study of the Biological Properties of ASF Virus Isolates Originating from Various Regions of the Russian Federation in 2013-2018.

Authors:  Andrei Pershin; Ivan Shevchenko; Alexey Igolkin; Ivan Zhukov; Ali Mazloum; Elena Aronova; Natalia Vlasova; Alexander Shevtsov
Journal:  Vet Sci       Date:  2019-12-06

5.  A theoretical and generalized approach for the assessment of the sample-specific limit of detection for clinical metagenomics.

Authors:  Arnt Ebinger; Susanne Fischer; Dirk Höper
Journal:  Comput Struct Biotechnol J       Date:  2020-12-26       Impact factor: 7.271

6.  African Swine Fever Re-Emerging in Estonia: The Role of Seropositive Wild Boar from an Epidemiological Perspective.

Authors:  Katja Schulz; Jana Schulz; Christoph Staubach; Sandra Blome; Imbi Nurmoja; Franz J Conraths; Carola Sauter-Louis; Arvo Viltrop
Journal:  Viruses       Date:  2021-10-21       Impact factor: 5.048

7.  The first genotype II African swine fever virus isolated in Africa provides insight into the current Eurasian pandemic.

Authors:  Emma P Njau; Jean-Baka Domelevo Entfellner; Eunice M Machuka; Edwina N Bochere; Sarah Cleaveland; Gabriel M Shirima; Lughano J Kusiluka; Chris Upton; Richard P Bishop; Roger Pelle; Edward A Okoth
Journal:  Sci Rep       Date:  2021-06-22       Impact factor: 4.379

8.  Half-Life of African Swine Fever Virus in Shipped Feed.

Authors:  Ana M M Stoian; Jeff Zimmerman; Ju Ji; Trevor J Hefley; Scott Dee; Diego G Diel; Raymond R R Rowland; Megan C Niederwerder
Journal:  Emerg Infect Dis       Date:  2019-12-17       Impact factor: 6.883

Review 9.  Risk and Mitigation of African Swine Fever Virus in Feed.

Authors:  Megan C Niederwerder
Journal:  Animals (Basel)       Date:  2021-03-18       Impact factor: 2.752

Review 10.  African Swine Fever in Wild Boar in Europe-A Review.

Authors:  Carola Sauter-Louis; Franz J Conraths; Carolina Probst; Ulrike Blohm; Katja Schulz; Julia Sehl; Melina Fischer; Jan Hendrik Forth; Laura Zani; Klaus Depner; Thomas C Mettenleiter; Martin Beer; Sandra Blome
Journal:  Viruses       Date:  2021-08-30       Impact factor: 5.048

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.