Literature DB >> 15617592

Simple decompression versus anterior submuscular transposition of the ulnar nerve in severe cubital tunnel syndrome: a prospective randomized study.

Olga Gervasio1, Giuseppe Gambardella, Claudio Zaccone, Damiano Branca.   

Abstract

OBJECTIVE: The authors report the results of a clinical series of selected patients with severe cubital tunnel syndrome. The degree of ulnar nerve compression was evaluated by use of a grading system that includes measurements of motor and sensitive function. The submuscular transposition with flexor-pronator mass Z lengthening was compared with simple decompression through a prospective randomized study.
METHODS: From February 1998 to June 2003, 70 patients with severe cubital tunnel syndrome were included in this study: 35 patients were submitted to simple decompression (Group A), and 35 patients were treated by anterior deep submuscular transposition (Group B). The preoperative status was determined by use of Dellon's classification. The selected patients had Dellon's Grade 3 (severe syndrome). The mean follow-up period after surgery was 47 months for Group A and 46.94 months for Group B.
RESULTS: Postoperative clinical and electrophysiological outcomes were assessed 6 months after surgery in all 70 patients. According to the Bishop scoring system, 19 patients (54.3%) of Group A were clinically graded as excellent, 9 (25.7%) were graded as good, and 7 (20%) were graded as fair; in Group B, 18 patients (51.43%) were graded as excellent, 11 (31.43%) as good, and 6 (17.14%) as fair. Neither severe complications nor recurrences were observed in the two groups.
CONCLUSION: No statistically significant difference was found between the two groups with regard to the clinical or the electrophysiological outcome. The surgical treatment gains in Group A and B were 80% and 82.86%, respectively (good to excellent results).

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2005        PMID: 15617592     DOI: 10.1227/01.neu.0000145854.38234.81

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Neurosurgery        ISSN: 0148-396X            Impact factor:   4.654


  35 in total

1.  The effect of operative technique on ulnar nerve strain following surgery for cubital tunnel syndrome.

Authors:  Justin Mitchell; John C Dunn; Nicholas Kusnezov; Julia Bader; Derek F Ipsen; Christopher L Forthman; Aaron Dykstra
Journal:  Hand (N Y)       Date:  2015-05-22

2.  Surgical options for ulnar nerve entrapment: an example of individualized decision analysis.

Authors:  Jaime Gasco
Journal:  Hand (N Y)       Date:  2009-02-25

3.  Decision-Making Factors for Ulnar Nerve Transposition in Cubital Tunnel Surgery.

Authors:  Brent R DeGeorge; Sanjeev Kakar
Journal:  J Wrist Surg       Date:  2018-07-02

4.  Cross-Palm Nerve Grafts to Enhance Sensory Recovery in Severe Ulnar Neuropathy.

Authors:  John M Felder; Elspeth J R Hill; Hollie A Power; Jessica Hasak; Susan E Mackinnon
Journal:  Hand (N Y)       Date:  2019-01-24

Review 5.  Endoscopic Versus Open Cubital Tunnel Release: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis.

Authors:  Salah Aldekhayel; Alexander Govshievich; James Lee; Youssef Tahiri; Mario Luc
Journal:  Hand (N Y)       Date:  2016-01-14

Review 6.  Minimal-incision in situ ulnar nerve decompression at the elbow.

Authors:  Joshua M Adkinson; Kevin C Chung
Journal:  Hand Clin       Date:  2013-11-09       Impact factor: 1.907

7.  Treatment of ulnar nerve compression at the elbow.

Authors:  Kevin C Chung
Journal:  J Hand Surg Am       Date:  2008-11       Impact factor: 2.230

8.  Endoscopic detection of compressing fascial bands around the ulnar nerve within the FCU.

Authors:  Daniel J Nagle; Ronak M Patel; Sonya Paisley
Journal:  Hand (N Y)       Date:  2011-11-17

9.  Simple decompression of the ulnar nerve for cubital tunnel syndrome.

Authors:  Yong-Jun Cho; Sung-Min Cho; Seung-Hoon Sheen; Jong-Hun Choi; Dong-Hwa Huh; Joon-Ho Song
Journal:  J Korean Neurosurg Soc       Date:  2007-11-20

10.  Effects of tendon transfer to restore index finger abduction for severe cubital tunnel syndrome.

Authors:  Shingo Nobuta; Katsumi Sato; Kenji Kanazawa; Masahito Hatori; Eiji Itoi
Journal:  Ups J Med Sci       Date:  2009       Impact factor: 2.384

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.