| Literature DB >> 30907127 |
C Li1, C Lan2,3, X Zhang1,4, L Yin5, X Hao1, J Tian6, L Lin1, H Sun1, Z Yao1, X Feng1, J Jia2,7, Y Yang1,7.
Abstract
Stroke is a serious worldwide medical condition that causes neurological function disability. Diffusional kurtosis imaging, which measures the non-Gaussianity of water diffusion, has been demonstrated to be a sensitive biomarker in many neuro-pathologies. This study explores the relationship between neural function recovery and transformation of the ischemic lesion and/or corticospinal tract during the sub-acute phase after stroke by using diffusional kurtosis imaging. We performed a prospective study of function recovery and K metrics of 43 patients with sub-acute ischemic stroke in the middle cerebral artery territory. The effect of rehabilitation treatment was evaluated using both the Fugl-Meyer motor function score and modified Barthel index score at post-treatment compared with admission, and patients were allocated to two groups: good and poor rehabilitation effect (GRE and PRE). Metrics of diffusional kurtosis imaging within ischemic lesion and along the corticospinal tract were acquired, respectively. All three relative axial diffusional kurtoses (rKas) along the corticospinal tract in the GRE group (n = 21) were significantly larger than those of the PRE group (n = 22), including rKa in the posterior limb of internal capsule, rKa in the cerebral peduncle, and rKa in the basal part of the pons (p = 0.014, 0.005, and 0.021, respectively). This multi-parametric magnetic resonance imaging study showed that diffusional kurtosis imaging has the potential to complement existing stroke imaging techniques and revealed its own advantages in elucidating the possible biophysical mechanism of functional restoration underlying ischemic stroke.Entities:
Keywords: K metrics; Stroke; diffusional kurtosis imaging; functional recovery; magnetic resonance imaging
Year: 2019 PMID: 30907127 PMCID: PMC6728709 DOI: 10.1177/0963689719837919
Source DB: PubMed Journal: Cell Transplant ISSN: 0963-6897 Impact factor: 4.064
Group Comparison of Good and Poor Rehabilitation Effects.
| GRE group | PRE group |
|
| |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Age, years | 58.9 ± 14.11 | 61.1 ± 11.2 | 0.258 | 0.085 |
| Women | 10 (48) | 10 (45) | 0.572 | |
| Arterial hypertension | 14 (67) | 16 (73) | 0.208 | |
| Hyperlipidemia | 4 (19) | 3 (14) | 0.933 | |
| Diabetes | 6 (29) | 9 (41) | 0.265 | |
| Coronary heart disease | 5 (24) | 4 (18) | 0.367 | |
| Atrial fibrillation | 1 (5) | 1 (5) | 1 | |
| C-reactive protein increase | 7 (33) | 8 (36) | 0.661 | |
| History of myocardial infarction | 1 (5) | 0 | 1 | |
| Family history of stroke | 4 (19) | 5 (23) | 0.427 | |
| Admission NIHSS score | 11.5 ± 2.1 | 11.4 ± 3.1 | 0.103 | 0.731 |
| Infarct volume, mm3 | 22.6 ± 3.9 | 26.8 ± 4.1 | 0.669 | 0.122 |
Age, admission NIHSS score and infarct volume are expressed as mean ± SD. All other data are expressed as number (percentage).
GRE: good rehabilitation effect; PRE: poor rehabilitation effect; NIHSS: National Institutes of Health Stroke Scale.
Figure 1.The FA, MD, Da, Dr, MK, Ka, Kr and FAK maps within the ischemic lesion and along the corticospinal tract of a sub-acute ischemic stoke patient.
PLIC: posterior limb of internal capsule; CP: cerebral peduncle; BPP: basal part of the pons; FA: fractional anisotropy; MD; mean diffusivity; Da: axial diffusivity; Dr: radial diffusivity; MK: mean diffusional kurtosis; Ka: axial diffusional kurtosis; Kr: radial diffusional kurtosis; FAK: fractional anisotropy kurtosis.
Figure 2.Parameters (rFA, rMD, rDa, rDr, rMK, rKa, rKr and rFAK) within the ischemic lesion of the sub-acute ischemic stroke. There was no statistically significant difference between the GRE and PRE groups in terms of rFA, rMD, rDa, rDr, rMK, rKa, rKr and rFAK.
rFA: relative fractional anisotropy; rMD: relative mean diffusivity; rDa: relative axial diffusivity; rDr: relative radial diffusivity; rMK: relative mean diffusional kurtosis; rKa: relative axial diffusional kurtosis; rKr: relative radial diffusional kurtosis; rFAK: relative fractional anisotropy kurtosis; GRE: good rehabilitation effect; PRE: poor rehabilitation effect.
Figure 3.The relative parameters (rFA, rMD, rDa, rDr, rMK, rKa, rKr and rFAK) along the corticospinal tract of the sub-acute ischemic stroke. Statistically significant differences between groups are shown.
*p < 0.05.
rFA: relative fractional anisotropy; rMD: relative mean diffusivity; rDa: relative axial diffusivity; rDr: relative radial diffusivity; rMK: relative mean diffusional kurtosis; rKa: relative axial diffusional kurtosis; rKr: relative radial diffusional kurtosis; rFAK: relative fractional anisotropy kurtosis; PLIC: posterior limb of internal capsule; CP: cerebral peduncle; BPP: basal part of the pons; GRE: good rehabilitation effect; PRE: poor rehabilitation effect.