Literature DB >> 22810403

The benefits of implant removal from the foot and ankle.

Ariel A Williams1, Daniela M Witten, Rosanna Duester, Loretta B Chou.   

Abstract

BACKGROUND: Following successful orthopaedic surgical procedures, implant removal is generally not necessary or recommended. However, patients with pain related to implants may benefit from this elective procedure. The foot and ankle may be more symptomatic from retained implants because of weight-bearing activities, shoe wear, and limited soft-tissue cushioning. In such cases, implant removal may provide good and reliable relief of symptoms.
METHODS: A prospective study of sixty-nine patients who underwent elective removal of symptomatic implants from the foot and ankle was undertaken to evaluate the patients' pain experience. The short-form McGill pain questionnaire was administered preoperatively and six weeks postoperatively. Postoperatively, patients were also asked whether they would repeat the procedure and whether they were satisfied with the results.
RESULTS: Patients reported significantly less pain following the procedure, with the average rating of pain on the visual analog scale (VAS) decreasing from 3.06 to 0.88 and the average rating of present pain intensity decreasing from 2.03 to 0.58 (p < 0.05 for both). Sixty-five percent of the patients reported no pain on either measure at six weeks postoperatively. Preoperative pain was correlated with postoperative pain (r = 0.24 and p < 0.05 for VAS, and r = 0.16 and p > 0.05 for present pain intensity).With the small sample size, preoperative and postoperative pain did not show a significant difference on the basis of implant location or patient age or sex. Ninety-four percent of patients said they would repeat the procedure under the same circumstances, and 91% of patients were satisfied with the results.
CONCLUSIONS: Following successful orthopaedic surgical procedures, removal of implants causing symptoms can result in pain relief and a high rate of patient satisfaction. LEVEL OF EVIDENCE: Therapeutic Level IV. See Instructions for Authors for a complete description of levels of evidence.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2012        PMID: 22810403     DOI: 10.2106/JBJS.J.01756

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Bone Joint Surg Am        ISSN: 0021-9355            Impact factor:   5.284


  9 in total

1.  Inpatient orthopaedic hardware removal in children: A cross-Sectional study.

Authors:  Alexandre Boulos; Steven F DeFroda; Justin E Kleiner; Nathan Thomas; Joseph A Gil; Aristides I Cruz
Journal:  J Clin Orthop Trauma       Date:  2017-07-01

2.  Conversion of arthrodesis to total hip arthroplasty: clinical outcome, complications, and prognostic factors of 21 consecutive cases.

Authors:  Manuel Villanueva; Francisco Borja Sobrón; Javier Parra; Jose Manuel Rojo; Francisco Chana; Javier Vaquero
Journal:  HSS J       Date:  2013-06-21

3.  Indications for implant removal after fracture healing: a review of the literature.

Authors:  D I Vos; M H J Verhofstad
Journal:  Eur J Trauma Emerg Surg       Date:  2013-04-12       Impact factor: 3.693

4.  Complications of implant removal in ankle fractures.

Authors:  Taro Kasai; Takumi Matsumoto; Toru Iga; Sakae Tanaka
Journal:  J Orthop       Date:  2019-02-28

5.  Wound Infections Following Implant removal below the knee: the effect of antibiotic prophylaxis; the WIFI-trial, a multi-centre randomized controlled trial.

Authors:  Manouk Backes; Siem A Dingemans; Niels W L Schep; Frank W Bloemers; Bart Van Dijkman; Frank P Garssen; Robert Haverlag; Jochem M Hoogendoorn; Pieter Joosse; Boj Mirck; Victor Postma; Ewan Ritchie; W Herbert Roerdink; Jan Bernard Sintenie; Nicolaj M R Soesman; Nico L Sosef; Bas A Twigt; Ruben N Van Veen; Alexander H Van der Veen; Romuald Van Velde; Dagmar I Vos; Mark R De Vries; Jasper Winkelhagen; J Carel Goslings; Tim Schepers
Journal:  BMC Surg       Date:  2015-02-06       Impact factor: 2.102

6.  High Rates of Postoperative Wound Infection Following Elective Implant Removal.

Authors:  M Backes; N W L Schep; J S K Luitse; J C Goslings; T Schepers
Journal:  Open Orthop J       Date:  2015-08-31

7.  Is Hardware Removal Recommended after Ankle Fracture Repair?

Authors:  Hong-Geun Jung; Jin-Il Kim; Jae-Yong Park; Jong-Tae Park; Joon-Sang Eom; Dong-Oh Lee
Journal:  Biomed Res Int       Date:  2016-10-13       Impact factor: 3.411

8.  Reduced incidence and economic cost of hardware removal after ankle fracture surgery: a 20-year nationwide registry study.

Authors:  Nikke Partio; Tuomas T Huttunen; Heikki M Mäenpää; Ville M Mattila
Journal:  Acta Orthop       Date:  2020-02-28       Impact factor: 3.717

9.  Improvement in Functional Outcomes After Elective Symptomatic Orthopaedic Implant Removal.

Authors:  Benjamin R Williams; Dylan L McCreary; Harsh R Parikh; Melissa S Albersheim; Brian P Cunningham
Journal:  J Am Acad Orthop Surg Glob Res Rev       Date:  2020-09
  9 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.