| Literature DB >> 30905238 |
O Atolani1, H Oguntoye1, E T Areh1, O S Adeyemi2, L Kambizi3.
Abstract
CONTEXT: Cola gigantea A. Chev. (Sterculiaceae) is an important medicinal tropical flora.Entities:
Keywords: ABTS; DPPH; Fatty acid; cell membrane stabilization; fibroblast; sterolic acid; stigmasterol; β-sitosterol
Mesh:
Substances:
Year: 2019 PMID: 30905238 PMCID: PMC6442224 DOI: 10.1080/13880209.2019.1577468
Source DB: PubMed Journal: Pharm Biol ISSN: 1388-0209 Impact factor: 3.503
The physiochemical characteristics of the oil.
| Parameters | Value |
|---|---|
| Colours | Yellow |
| % yield of soxhlet oil (w/w) | ≈1.0 |
| % yield of the trans-esterified oil (w/w) | 30.37 |
| Saponification value (mgKOH/g) | 45.63 |
| Acid value (mgKOH/g) | 0.2 5 |
IC50 values of the radical scavenging activity of the seed oil.
| IC50 (µg/mL) | Ascorbic acid | Quercertin | |
|---|---|---|---|
| ABTS | 75.15 ± 4.32 | 76.71 ± 0.40 | 44.19 ± 6.27 |
| DPPH | 13.55 ± 0.56 | ND | ≥50* |
ND: Not determined. Data are expressed as Mean ± Standard Error of Mean of triplicate determinations. *Values are Significant at p < 0.05.
Figure 1.Membrane stabilization potential of C. gigantea seed oil.
Fatty acids composition of C. gigantea seed oil.
| S/N | RT (Min) | Name of Compound | Mol. Formula | % Composition |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | 8.84 | Lauric acid | C12H24O2 | 0.65 |
| 2 | 10.72 | Myristic acid | C14H28O2 | 0.39 |
| 3 | Palmitic acid | C16H32O2 | 20.26 | |
| Stearolic acid | C18H32O2 | 11.69 | ||
| C16H28O2 | 13.45 | |||
| C18H32O2 | 40.67 | |||
| C18H36O2 | 9.33 | |||
| C19H36O2 | 3.34 | |||
| C23H46O2 | 0.22 | |||
| Total Saturates | 10.59 | |||
| Total Unsaturates | 89.41 |
Chemical composition of the non-fatty acids constituent of C. gigantea seed oil.
| S/N | Retention Time (Min) | Sterol | Relative Abundance (%) |
|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | 28.82 | Cholesterol | 2.12 |
| 2 | 29.54 | Campesterol | 14.12 |
| 3 | 29.76 | Stigmasterol | 34.07 |
| 4 | 30.26 | Beta-Sitosterol | 49.68 |
Figure 2.Anti-Toxoplasma gondii activity of C. gigantea oil.
Figure 3.(A,B) Anti-T. gondii activity of C. gigantea in the absence/presence of α-tocopherol (Trolox). Values are expressed as the Mean ± SEM (n = 3). Each experiment was in triplicates and performed three times independently. γ is significant at p < 0.0001 versus control.
Figure 4.ROS level and mitoRed fluorescence intensity following 24 h treatment with C. gigantea; (A) In the absence of T. gondii infection; (B) In the presence of T. gondii infection; (C) In the absence of T. gondii infection; (D) In the presence of T. gondii infection. Values are expressed as the Mean ± SEM (n = 3). Each experiment was done in triplicates and performed three times independently. γ is significant at p < 0.0001 versus control.
Figure 5.Cell viability of C. gigantea oil using HFF monolayers. Cell viability values were calculated relative to background values (0% viability) and the untreated negative control (100% viability). Staurosporine (1 µM) was included as positive control to validate the assay. Values are expressed as the Mean ± SEM (n = 3). Each experiment was in triplicates and performed three times independently.
Selectivity Index of C. gigantea seed oil.
| Sample | Anti-parasite activity EC50 (µg/mL) | Host cell cytotoxicity IC50 (µg/mL) | Selectivity index: IC50/EC50 |
|---|---|---|---|
| ≤15 | ≤10 | <1* | |
| Sulfadiazine | ≤150 | ≤500 | <4 |
ND: Not determined. Data are expressed as Mean ± Standard Error of Mean of triplicate determinations. *Values are Significant at p < 0.05.