| Literature DB >> 32099925 |
O Atolani1, N Adamu2, O S Oguntoye1, M F Zubair2, O A Fabiyi3, R A Oyegoke4, O S Adeyemi5, E T Areh1, D E Tarigha1, L Kambizi6, G A Olatunji1,2.
Abstract
There are growing concerns about the chronic and acute effects of synthetic additives such as antibacterial, fragrances, colourants and stabilizing agents used in the production of various household products. Many household products and materials including cosmetic products are reportedly suspected to be carcinogenic with some acting as endocrine disruptors among other effects. Thus, environmental-friendly alternatives such as products that are rich in bioactive phytochemicals are becoming consumers' preferred choice especially in the beauty and cosmetic sector. 'Green' preparation of medicinal soaps devoid of any synthetic additives was made from underutilized tropical seed of Citrus sinensis seed oil and some natural additives comprising of natural honey, Ocimum gratissimum leaves extract, Moringa oleifera seed oil and coconut oil. Precisely, the seed oil of the underexplored C. sinensis was obtained via soxhlet extraction and saponified with natural lye solution at different ratios to produce soaps of varying characteristics. The incorporation of honey and Ocimum gratissimum leaf extract provided additional antimicrobial, antioxidant and fragrance properties. Physico-chemical parameters of the oil and soaps were determined following standard procedures while the fatty acid profile of the trans-esterified oil was determined using GC-MS. The antimicrobial potential of the oil and soaps were assessed using agar diffusion method at concentrations 200 mg/mL and below. Linoleic acid (36%) and oleic acid (27%) were the most prominent in C. sinensis seed oil. The soap had antimicrobial potential comparable to commercial product. The soap samples recorded highest anti-bacteria activities (22.0 ± 1.0-23.0 ± 1.0) against Staphylococcus aureus and Bacillus subtilis and notable anti-fungi activities (18.0 ± 1.0) against Penicillium notatum and Candida albicans. Additionally, the oil showed moderate anti-parasite (anit-toxoplasma gondii) activity (EC50 ≤ 500 μg/mL) but with improved selectivity that precludes oxidative stress while the prepared medicinal soaps exhibited remarkable antioxidant property. The utilization of these locally sourced resources will prevent the daily introduction of synthetic antimicrobial and antioxidant chemicals into the environment. The initiative avail a sustainable production of environmentally-benign cosmetic products besides conversion of waste to wealth agrees which aligns with the Sustainable Development Goals (SDGs).Entities:
Keywords: Antimicrobial; Citrus sinensis; Fatty acids; Food science; Green chemistry; Green cosmetic; Medicinal chemistry; Natural product chemistry; Organic chemistry; Toxoplasma gondii
Year: 2020 PMID: 32099925 PMCID: PMC7031391 DOI: 10.1016/j.heliyon.2020.e03399
Source DB: PubMed Journal: Heliyon ISSN: 2405-8440
Physicochemical characteristics of C. sinensis seed oil.
| Parameters | Results |
|---|---|
| Percentage yield (%) | 34.54 |
| Colour | Golden-yellow |
| State at ambient temperature | Liquid |
| Saponification value (mgKOH/g) | 193.55 |
| % Free fatty acid | 20.02 |
| Iodine value (I2g/100 g) | 83.45 |
| %Yield of the trans-esterified oil | 91.85 |
| Acid value (mgKOH/g) | 7.59 |
XRF spectroscopy result of lye.
| Elements | Conc. Value (wt%) ± SD |
|---|---|
| Ca | 0.2435 ± 0.0083 |
| K | 5.4347 ± 0.0723 |
| Ba | 0.0027 ± 0.0018 |
| Cu | 0.001 ± 0.0001 |
| Fe | 0.0093 ± 0.001 |
| Mn | 0.001 ± 0.0004 |
| Sr | 0.0034 ± 0.0005 |
| Zn | 0.0009 ± 0.0001 |
Conductivity and Turbidity Result of Lye (wood ash).
| Parameter | Lye |
|---|---|
| Conductivity | 0.1 μS/cm |
| Turbidity | 199 NTU |
Fatty acid compositions of C. sinensis.
| Peak No. | Fatty Acids | Short Name | Saturation | %Abundance |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | Palmitic acid | C16:0 | 16:0 | 21.10 |
| 2 | Palmitolinoleic acid | C16:1 | 16:1 | 0.39 |
| 3 | Heptadecenoic acid | C17:1 | 17:1 | 0.41 |
| 4 | Stearic acid | C18:0 | 18:0 | 4.80 |
| 5 | Elaidic acid | C18:1n9t | 18:1 | 1.11 |
| 6 | Oleic acid | C18:1n9c | 18:1 | 27.35 |
| 7 | Linoleic acid | C18:2n6c | 18:2 | 36.23 |
| 8 | α-Linolenic acid | C18:3n3 | 18:3 | 3.52 |
| 9 | Arachidic acid | C20:0 | 20:0 | 0.50 |
| 10 | Eicosadienoic acid | C20:2 | 20:2 | 0.35 |
| 11 | Heneicosylic acid | C21:0 | 21:0 | 0.36 |
| 12 | Arachidonic acid | C20:4n6 | 20:4 | 0.36 |
| 13 | Cis-11,14,17-eicosatrienoic acid | C20:3n3 | 20:3 | 0.36 |
| 14 | Behenic Acid | C22:0 | 22:0 | 0.34 |
| 15 | Cis-13,16-docosadienoic acid | C22:2n6 | 22:2 | 0.62 |
| 16 | Tricosylic acid | C23:0 | 23:0 | 1.05 |
| 17 | Lignoceric acid | C24:0 | 24:0 | 0.36 |
| 18 | Nervonic acid | C24:1 | 24:1 | 0.39 |
| 19 | Docosahexaenoic acid | C22:6n3 | 22:6 | 0.40 |
| 28.49 | ||||
| 71.50 | ||||
| 29.65 | ||||
| 41.84 |
Mixing ratio of the component used for the saponification.
| Soap Samples | Oil and Additives | Mixing Ratios | Colour | Washing Efficiency |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| CS1 | CSO | 1 | Cream | Excellent |
| CS2 | CSO + Additives | 0.8:0.2 | Brown | Very good |
| CS3 | CSO + CO + MO + Additives | 0.6:0.1:0.1:0.2 | Brown | Very good |
Where: CSO = C. sinensis Oil, CO = Coconut Oil, MO = M. oleifera Seed Oil, Additives = Ocimum gratissimum extract and Honey (1:1).
Physical characteristics of the soap samples.
| Soaps | CS1 | CS2 | CS3 | Septol |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| pH (Day1) | 9.85 | 9.83 | 9.86 | - |
| pH (Week12) | 8.93 | 9.10 | 9.30 | 9.01 |
| Foam Height (cm) | 5.8 | 5.0 | 6.9 | 4.1 |
| Dissolution time (sec) | 300 | 380 | 310 | 540 |
| Texture | Hard | Soft | Soft | Hard |
| Total Fatty Matter | 0.55 | 0.95 | 0.75 | 0.65 |
| Free Caustic Alkali | 0.31 | 0.47 | 0.16 | 0.12 |
| Total Alkali | 0.50 | 0.34 | 0.31 | 0.11 |
Where; CS1 = C. sinensis Oil, CS2 = C. Sinensis + Ocimum gratissimum extract + Honey, CS3 = C. sinensis Oil + Coconut Oil + Moringa oleifera seed Oil + Ocimum gratissimum extract + Honey.
DPPH scavenging activities of the oil and soaps.
| Percentage Reduction (%) | |||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Conc. (μg/mg) | CS1 | CS3 | Septol | Ascorbic Acid | |
| 10 | 46.05 ± 8.35 | 56.82 ± 2.75 | 45.79 ± 4.81 | 44.42 ± 5.46 | 49.42 ± 1.74 |
| 50 | 43.97 ± 1.56 | 47.89 ± 3.36 | 49.54 ± 2.17 | 42.41 ± 1.14 | 56.12 ± 4.12 |
| 100 | 54.44 ± 0.69 | 55.30 ± 1.36 | 49.44 ± 1.52 | 46.05 ± 6.26 | 60.96 ± 10.08 |
| 200 | 54.07 ± 7.18 | 53.93 ± 4.58 | 52.53 ± 10.21 | 46.02 ± 1.77 | 65.01 ± 7.69 |
| 500 | 52.36 ± 0.80 | 54.59 ± 4.25 | 51.12 ± 0.74 | 45.96 ± 5.58 | 72.27 ± 0.53 |
| IC50 (μg/mg) | 12.3 ± 1.01 | 14.9 ± 0.65 | 11.4 ± 0.56 | 7.0 ± 0.34 | 35.9 ± 4.04 |
Mean of triplicate determinations ± SEM.
Figure 1In vitro anti-parasite efficacy of Citrus senensis oil following after 72 h treatment post infection. Data presented as mean of nine replicates ± standard error of mean (SEM).
Figure 2Cytotoxicity of Citrus senensis oil in mammalian host cells (HFF) after 72 h treatment. Data presented as mean of nine replicates ± standard error of mean (SEM).
Antimicrobial activities of C. Sinensis seed oil.
| Diameter Zone of Inhibition (mm) | |||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Tested Organisms | 200 | 100 | 50 | 25 | 12.5 | Gent. | MIC |
| 17.0 ± 1.0 | 14.0 ± 0.0 | 10.0 ± 0.0 | - | - | 35.0 | 50.0 | |
| 18.0 ± 0.0 | 15.0 ± 0.0 | 12.0 ± 0.0 | 10.0 ± 0.0 | - | 35.0 | 25.0 | |
| 16.0 ± 0.0 | 14.0 ± 0.0 | 12.0 ± 0.0 | 10.0 ± 0.0 | - | 36.0 | 25.0 | |
| 18.0 ± 0.0 | 16.0 ± 0.0 | 14.0 ± 0.0 | 12.0 ± 0.0 | 10.0 ± 0.0 | 35.0 | 12.5 | |
| 20.0 ± 0.0 | 18.0 ± 0.0 | 16.0 ± 0.0 | 14.0 ± 0.0 | 10.0 ± 0.0 | 36.0 | 12.5 | |
| 16.0 ± 0.0 | 14.0 ± 0.0 | 12.0 ± 0.0 | 10.0 ± 0.0 | - | 35.0 | 25.0 | |
| Fungi | Tioc. | ||||||
| 16.0 ± 0.0 | 14.0 ± 0.0 | 12.0 ± 0.0 | 10.0 ± 0.0 | - | 28.0 | 25.0 | |
| 14.0 ± 0.0 | 12.0 ± 0.0 | 10.0 ± 0.0 | - | - | 27.0 | 50.0 | |
| 15.0 ± 1.0 | 13.0 ± 1.0 | 10.0 ± 0.0 | - | - | 26.0 | 50.0 | |
| 14.0 ± 0.0 | 12.0 ± 0.0 | 10.0 ± 0.0 | - | - | 26.0 | 50.0 | |
Mean of triplicate determinations with SEM; Gent. means Gentamicin; Tioc means tioconazole. Sample was measure in mg/mL.
Figure 3In vitro anti-parasite efficacy of Citrus senensis oil following addition of antioxidant TROLOX. Data presented as mean of nine replicates ± standard error of mean (SEM). α at p < 0.05 versus control and γ at p < 0.0001 versus Citrus senensis.
Figure 4Cellular ROS level after 24 h treatment with Citrus senensis oil in the absence or presence of Toxoplasma gondii infection. Data presented as mean of nine replicates ± standard error of mean (SEM). γ at p < 0.0001 versus control.
Figure 5Cellular mitochondria membrane potential (MMP) after 24 h treatment with Citrus senensis oil in the absence or presence of Toxoplasma gondii infection. Data presented as mean of nine replicates ± standard error of mean (SEM).
Antimicrobial activities of soap, CS1.
| Diameter Zone of Inhibition (mm) | |||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Tested Organisms | 200 | 100 | 50 | 25 | 12.5 | Gent. | MIC |
| 23.0 ± 1.0 | 19.0 ± 1.0 | 16.0 ± 0.0 | 13.0 ± 1.0 | 11.0 ± 1.0 | 35.0 | 12.5 | |
| 21.0 ± 1.0 | 18.0 ± 0.0 | 15.0 ± 1.0 | 13.0 ± 1.0 | 11.0 ± 1.0 | 35.0 | 12.5 | |
| 23.0 ± 1.0 | 19.0 ± 1.0 | 17.0 ± 1.0 | 14.0 ± 0.0 | 10.0 ± 0.0 | 36.0 | 12.5 | |
| 18.0 ± 0.0 | 16.0 ± 0.0 | 14.0 ± 0.0 | 12.0 ± 0.0 | 10.0 ± 0.0 | 35.0 | 12.5 | |
| 18.0 ± 0.0 | 16.0 ± 0.0 | 14.0 ± 0.0 | 12.0 ± 0.0 | 10.0 ± 0.0 | 36.0 | 12.5 | |
| 20.0 ± 0.0 | 18.0 ± 0.0 | 16.0 ± 0.0 | 14.0 ± 0.0 | 10.0 ± 0.0 | 35.0 | 12.5 | |
| Fungi | Tioc. | ||||||
| 18.0 ± 0.0 | 16.0 ± 0.0 | 14.0 ± 0.0 | 12.0 ± 0.0 | 10.0 ± 0.0 | 28.0 | 12.5 | |
| 15.0 ± 1.0 | 13.0 ± 1.0 | 10.0 ± 0.0 | - | - | 27.0 | 50.0 | |
| 15.0 ± 1.0 | 13.0 ± 1.0 | 10.0 ± 0.0 | - | - | 26.0 | 50.0 | |
| 13.0 ± 1.0 | 10.0 ± 0.0 | - | - | - | 26.0 | 100.0 | |
Mean of triplicate determinations with SEM; Gent. means Gentamicin; Tioc means tioconazole. Sample was measure in mg/mL.
Antimicrobial Activities of CS3 soap.
| Diameter Zone of Inhibition (mm) | |||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Tested Organisms | 200 | 100 | 50 | 25 | 12.5 | Gent. | MIC |
| 23.0 ± 1.0 | 19.0 ± 1.0 | 17.0 ± 1.0 | 13.0 ± 1.0 | 11.0 ± 1.0 | 34.0 | 12.5 | |
| 18.0 ± 0.0 | 16.0 ± 0.0 | 14.0 ± 0.0 | 12.0 ± 0.0 | 10.0 ± 0.0 | 34.0 | 12.5 | |
| 18.0 ± 0.0 | 16.0 ± 0.0 | 14.0 ± 0.0 | 10.0 ± 0.0 | - | 36.0 | 25.0 | |
| 20.0 ± 0..0 | 18.0 ± 0.0 | 15.0 ± 1.0 | 12.0 ± 0.0 | 10.0 ± 0.0 | 35.0 | 12.5 | |
| 21.0 ± 1.0 | 18.0 ± 0.0 | 16.0 ± 0.0 | 14.0 ± 0.0 | 10.0 ± 0.0 | 37.0 | 12.5 | |
| 19.0 ± 1.0 | 17.0 ± 1.0 | 14.0 ± 0.0 | 12.0 ± 0.0 | 10.0 ± 0.0 | 36. | 12.5 | |
| Fungi | Tioc. | ||||||
| 15.0 ± 1.0 | 13.0 ± 1.0 | 10.0 ± 0.0 | - | - | 26.0 | 50.0 | |
| 15.0 ± 1.0 | 13.0 ± 1.0 | 10.0 ± 0.0 | - | - | 27.0 | 50.0 | |
| 18.0 ± 0.0 | 15.0 ± 1.0 | 13.0 ± 1.0 | 10.0 ± 0.0 | - | 27.0 | 12.5 | |
| 16.0 ± 0.0 | 14.0 ± 0.0 | 12.0 ± 0.0 | - | - | 27.0 | 50.0 | |
Mean of triplicate determinations with SEM; Gent. means Gentamicin; Tioc means tioconazole.
Antimicrobial activities of septol (standard soap).
| Diameter Zone of Inhibition (mm) | |||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Tested Organisms | 200 | 100 | 50 | 25 | 12.5 | Gent. | MIC |
| 25.0 ± 1.0 | 21.0 ± 1.0 | 17.0 ± 1.0 | 14.0 ± 0.0 | 11.0 ± 1.0 | 35.0 | 12.5 | |
| 23.0 ± 1.0 | 18.0 ± 0.0 | 16.0 ± 0.0 | 11.0 ± 1 .0 | 10.0 ± 0.0 | 35.0 | 12.5 | |
| 22.0 ± 0.0 | 18.0 ± 0.0 | 16.0 ± 0.0 | 14.0 ± 0.0 | 10.0 ± 0.0 | 36.0 | 12.5 | |
| 22.0 ± 0.0 | 19.0 ± 1.0 | 17.0 ± 1.0 | 15.0 ± 1.0 | 11.0 ± 1.0 | 35.0 | 12.5 | |
| 21.0 ± 1.0 | 19.0 ± 1.0 | 15.0 ± 1.0 | 11.0 ± 1.0 | 10.0 ± 0.0 | 36.0 | 12.5 | |
| 21.0 ± 1.0 | 18.0 ± 0.0 | 16.0 ± 0.0 | 14.0 ± 0.0 | 10.0 ± 0.0 | 35.0 | 12.5 | |
| Fungi | Tioc. | ||||||
| 20.0 ± 0.0 | 18.0 ± 0.0 | 16.0 ± 0.0 | 13.0 ± 00 | 10.0 ± 0.0 | 28.0 | 12.5 | |
| 19.0 ± 1.0 | 16.0 ± 0.0 | 14.0 ± 0.0 | 12.0 ± 0.0 | 10.0 ± 0.0 | 27.0 | 12.5 | |
| 19.0 ± 1.0 | 16.0 ± 0.0 | 14.0 ± 0.0 | 12.0 ± 0.0 | 10.0 ± 0.0 | 26.0 | 12.5 | |
| 19.0 ± 1.0 | 17.0 ± 1.0 | 15 ± 1.0 | 12.0 ± 0. 0 | 10 ± 0.0 | 26.0 | 12.5 | |
Mean of triplicate determinations with SEM; Gent. means Gentamicin; Tioc means tioconazole. Sample was measure in mg/mL.
Fold activity against Toxoplasma gondii versus host cell (human foreskin fibroblast- HFF).
| Identifier | Anti-parasite activity EC50 (μg/mL) | Host cell cytotoxicity IC50 (μg/mL) | Selectivity index: IC50/EC50 |
|---|---|---|---|
| ≤500 | ≤350 | <1 | |
| Sulfadiazine | ≤139 | ≤480 | <4 |
Values are expressed as Mean of replicates (n = 9).