Literature DB >> 30905037

Accounting for inter-correlation between enzyme abundance: a simulation study to assess implications on global sensitivity analysis within physiologically-based pharmacokinetics.

Nicola Melillo1,2, Adam S Darwich3, Paolo Magni4, Amin Rostami-Hodjegan3,5.   

Abstract

Physiologically based pharmacokinetic (PBPK) models often include several sets of correlated parameters, such as organ volumes and blood flows. Because of recent advances in proteomics, it has been demonstrated that correlations are also present between abundances of drug-metabolising enzymes in the liver. As the focus of population PBPK has shifted the emphasis from the average individual to theoretically conceivable extremes, reliable estimation of the extreme cases has become paramount. We performed a simulation study to assess the impact of the correlation between the abundances of two enzymes on the pharmacokinetics of drugs that are substrate of both, under assumptions of presence or lack of such correlations. We considered three semi-physiological models representing the cases of: (1) intravenously administered drugs metabolised by two enzymes expressed in the liver; (2) orally administered drugs metabolised by CYP3A4 expressed in the liver and gut wall; (3) intravenously administered drugs that are substrates of CYP3A4 and OATP1B1 in the liver. Finally, the impact of considering or ignoring correlation between enzymatic abundances on global sensitivity analysis (GSA) was investigated using variance based GSA on a reduced PBPK model for repaglinide, substrate of CYP3A4 and CYP2C8. Implementing such correlations can increase the confidence interval for population pharmacokinetic parameters (e.g., AUC, bioavailability) and impact the GSA results. Ignoring these correlations could lead to the generation of implausible parameters combinations and to an incorrect estimation of pharmacokinetic related parameters. Thus, known correlations should always be considered in building population PBPK models.

Entities:  

Keywords:  Correlation; Enzymes; Global sensitivity analysis; Physiologically based pharmacokinetics; Simulation

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2019        PMID: 30905037     DOI: 10.1007/s10928-019-09627-6

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Pharmacokinet Pharmacodyn        ISSN: 1567-567X            Impact factor:   2.745


  25 in total

1.  Time course of recovery of cytochrome p450 3A function after single doses of grapefruit juice.

Authors:  David J Greenblatt; Lisa L von Moltke; Jerold S Harmatz; Gengsheng Chen; James L Weemhoff; Cheng Jen; Charles J Kelley; Barbara W LeDuc; Miguel A Zinny
Journal:  Clin Pharmacol Ther       Date:  2003-08       Impact factor: 6.875

2.  Simultaneous assessment of uptake and metabolism in rat hepatocytes: a comprehensive mechanistic model.

Authors:  Karelle Ménochet; Kathryn E Kenworthy; J Brian Houston; Aleksandra Galetin
Journal:  J Pharmacol Exp Ther       Date:  2011-12-21       Impact factor: 4.030

3.  Global sensitivity analysis for systems with independent and/or correlated inputs.

Authors:  Genyuan Li; Herschel Rabitz; Paul E Yelvington; Oluwayemisi O Oluwole; Fred Bacon; Charles E Kolb; Jacqueline Schoendorf
Journal:  J Phys Chem A       Date:  2010-05-20       Impact factor: 2.781

4.  Physiologically based pharmacokinetic modeling 1: predicting the tissue distribution of moderate-to-strong bases.

Authors:  Trudy Rodgers; David Leahy; Malcolm Rowland
Journal:  J Pharm Sci       Date:  2005-06       Impact factor: 3.534

Review 5.  A literature review of enzyme kinetic parameters for CYP3A4-mediated metabolic reactions of 113 drugs in human liver microsomes: structure-kinetics relationship assessment.

Authors:  H-Z Bu
Journal:  Curr Drug Metab       Date:  2006-04       Impact factor: 3.731

6.  Metabolism of repaglinide by CYP2C8 and CYP3A4 in vitro: effect of fibrates and rifampicin.

Authors:  Lauri I Kajosaari; Jouko Laitila; Pertti J Neuvonen; Janne T Backman
Journal:  Basic Clin Pharmacol Toxicol       Date:  2005-10       Impact factor: 4.080

7.  PhRMA CPCDC initiative on predictive models of human pharmacokinetics, part 2: comparative assessment of prediction methods of human volume of distribution.

Authors:  Rhys Do Jones; Hannah M Jones; Malcolm Rowland; Christopher R Gibson; James W T Yates; Jenny Y Chien; Barbara J Ring; Kimberly K Adkison; M Sherry Ku; Handan He; Ragini Vuppugalla; Punit Marathe; Volker Fischer; Sandeep Dutta; Vikash K Sinha; Thorir Björnsson; Thierry Lavé; Patrick Poulin
Journal:  J Pharm Sci       Date:  2011-03-30       Impact factor: 3.534

8.  Cytochrome P450 3A4 and P-glycoprotein expression in human small intestinal enterocytes and hepatocytes: a comparative analysis in paired tissue specimens.

Authors:  Oliver von Richter; Oliver Burk; Martin F Fromm; Klaus P Thon; Michel Eichelbaum; Kari T Kivistö
Journal:  Clin Pharmacol Ther       Date:  2004-03       Impact factor: 6.875

Review 9.  A framework for assessing inter-individual variability in pharmacokinetics using virtual human populations and integrating general knowledge of physical chemistry, biology, anatomy, physiology and genetics: A tale of 'bottom-up' vs 'top-down' recognition of covariates.

Authors:  Masoud Jamei; Gemma L Dickinson; Amin Rostami-Hodjegan
Journal:  Drug Metab Pharmacokinet       Date:  2009       Impact factor: 3.614

10.  Development of a physiology-based whole-body population model for assessing the influence of individual variability on the pharmacokinetics of drugs.

Authors:  Stefan Willmann; Karsten Höhn; Andrea Edginton; Michael Sevestre; Juri Solodenko; Wolfgang Weiss; Jörg Lippert; Walter Schmitt
Journal:  J Pharmacokinet Pharmacodyn       Date:  2007-03-13       Impact factor: 2.410

View more
  7 in total

1.  Global Sensitivity Analysis of the Rodgers and Rowland Model for Prediction of Tissue: Plasma Partitioning Coefficients: Assessment of the Key Physiological and Physicochemical Factors That Determine Small-Molecule Tissue Distribution.

Authors:  Estelle Yau; Andrés Olivares-Morales; Michael Gertz; Neil Parrott; Adam S Darwich; Leon Aarons; Kayode Ogungbenro
Journal:  AAPS J       Date:  2020-02-03       Impact factor: 4.009

Review 2.  In Silico Modeling and Simulation to Guide Bioequivalence Testing for Oral Drugs in a Virtual Population.

Authors:  Fan Zhang; Ranran Jia; Huitao Gao; Xiaofei Wu; Bo Liu; Hongyun Wang
Journal:  Clin Pharmacokinet       Date:  2021-06-30       Impact factor: 5.577

3.  A Novel Physiologically Based Model of Creatinine Renal Disposition to Integrate Current Knowledge of Systems Parameters and Clinical Observations.

Authors:  Daniel Scotcher; Vikram Arya; Xinning Yang; Ping Zhao; Lei Zhang; Shiew-Mei Huang; Amin Rostami-Hodjegan; Aleksandra Galetin
Journal:  CPT Pharmacometrics Syst Pharmacol       Date:  2020-05-22

4.  Inter-compound and Intra-compound Global Sensitivity Analysis of a Physiological Model for Pulmonary Absorption of Inhaled Compounds.

Authors:  Nicola Melillo; Silvia Grandoni; Nicola Cesari; Giandomenico Brogin; Paola Puccini; Paolo Magni
Journal:  AAPS J       Date:  2020-08-30       Impact factor: 4.009

5.  Quantitative Proteomics of Clinically Relevant Drug-Metabolizing Enzymes and Drug Transporters and Their Intercorrelations in the Human Small Intestine.

Authors:  Narciso Couto; Zubida M Al-Majdoub; Stephanie Gibson; Pamela J Davies; Brahim Achour; Matthew D Harwood; Gordon Carlson; Jill Barber; Amin Rostami-Hodjegan; Geoffrey Warhurst
Journal:  Drug Metab Dispos       Date:  2020-01-20       Impact factor: 3.922

6.  Role of Glucuronidation Pathway in Quetiapine Metabolism: An In vivo Drug-Drug Interaction Study between Quetiapine and Probenecid.

Authors:  Haseeb Sattar; Sarmad Sheraz Jadoon; Ni Yang; Shihong Li; Mingzhen Xu; Yong Han; Adil Ramzan; Weiyong Li
Journal:  Saudi J Med Med Sci       Date:  2020-08-20

7.  A latent variable approach to account for correlated inputs in global sensitivity analysis.

Authors:  Nicola Melillo; Adam S Darwich
Journal:  J Pharmacokinet Pharmacodyn       Date:  2021-05-25       Impact factor: 2.745

  7 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.