Literature DB >> 30905010

Deep neural maps for unsupervised visualization of high-grade cancer in prostate biopsies.

Alireza Sedghi1, Mehran Pesteie2, Golara Javadi2, Shekoofeh Azizi2, Pingkun Yan3, Jin Tae Kwak4, Sheng Xu5, Baris Turkbey5, Peter Choyke5, Peter Pinto5, Bradford Wood5, Robert Rohling2, Purang Abolmaesumi2, Parvin Mousavi6.   

Abstract

Prostate cancer (PCa) is the most frequent noncutaneous cancer in men. Early detection of PCa is essential for clinical decision making, and reducing metastasis and mortality rates. The current approach for PCa diagnosis is histopathologic analysis of core biopsies taken under transrectal ultrasound guidance (TRUS-guided). Both TRUS-guided systematic biopsy and MR-TRUS-guided fusion biopsy have limitations in accurately identifying PCa, intraoperatively. There is a need to augment this process by visualizing highly probable areas of PCa. Temporal enhanced ultrasound (TeUS) has emerged as a promising modality for PCa detection. Prior work focused on supervised classification of PCa verified by gold standard pathology. Pathology labels are noisy, and data from an entire core have a single label even when significantly heterogeneous. Additionally, supervised methods are limited by data from cores with known pathology, and a significant portion of prostate data is discarded without being used. We provide an end-to-end unsupervised solution to map PCa distribution from TeUS data using an innovative representation learning method, deep neural maps. TeUS data are transformed to a topologically arranged hyper-lattice, where similar samples are closer together in the lattice. Therefore, similar regions of malignant and benign tissue in the prostate are clustered together. Our proposed method increases the number of training samples by several orders of magnitude. Data from biopsy cores with known labels are used to associate the clusters with PCa. Cancer probability maps generated using the unsupervised clustering of TeUS data help intuitively visualize the distribution of abnormal tissue for augmenting TRUS-guided biopsies.

Entities:  

Keywords:  Cancer diagnosis; Deep learning; Deep neural maps; Prostate cancer; Self-organizing maps; Temporal enhanced ultrasound

Mesh:

Year:  2019        PMID: 30905010      PMCID: PMC8258684          DOI: 10.1007/s11548-019-01950-0

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Int J Comput Assist Radiol Surg        ISSN: 1861-6410            Impact factor:   2.924


  19 in total

1.  Tissue typing using ultrasound RF time series: experiments with animal tissue samples.

Authors:  Mehdi Moradi; Purang Abolmaesumi; Parvin Mousavi
Journal:  Med Phys       Date:  2010-08       Impact factor: 4.071

2.  Topology preservation in self-organizing feature maps: exact definition and measurement.

Authors:  T Villmann; R Der; M Herrmann; T M Martinetz
Journal:  IEEE Trans Neural Netw       Date:  1997

3.  EAU guidelines on prostate cancer. part 1: screening, diagnosis, and local treatment with curative intent-update 2013.

Authors:  Axel Heidenreich; Patrick J Bastian; Joaquim Bellmunt; Michel Bolla; Steven Joniau; Theodor van der Kwast; Malcolm Mason; Vsevolod Matveev; Thomas Wiegel; F Zattoni; Nicolas Mottet
Journal:  Eur Urol       Date:  2013-10-06       Impact factor: 20.096

Review 4.  Deep learning in neural networks: an overview.

Authors:  Jürgen Schmidhuber
Journal:  Neural Netw       Date:  2014-10-13

5.  Modernizing the diagnostic and decision-making pathway for prostate cancer.

Authors:  Thomas J Polascik; Niccolo' M Passoni; Arnauld Villers; Peter L Choyke
Journal:  Clin Cancer Res       Date:  2014-10-14       Impact factor: 12.531

6.  Clinical application of a 3D ultrasound-guided prostate biopsy system.

Authors:  Shyam Natarajan; Leonard S Marks; Daniel J A Margolis; Jiaoti Huang; Maria Luz Macairan; Patricia Lieu; Aaron Fenster
Journal:  Urol Oncol       Date:  2011 May-Jun       Impact factor: 3.498

Review 7.  Diagnostic value of systematic biopsy methods in the investigation of prostate cancer: a systematic review.

Authors:  Klaus Eichler; Susanne Hempel; Jennifer Wilby; Lindsey Myers; Lucas M Bachmann; Jos Kleijnen
Journal:  J Urol       Date:  2006-05       Impact factor: 7.450

8.  Value of targeted prostate biopsy using magnetic resonance-ultrasound fusion in men with prior negative biopsy and elevated prostate-specific antigen.

Authors:  Geoffrey A Sonn; Edward Chang; Shyam Natarajan; Daniel J Margolis; Malu Macairan; Patricia Lieu; Jiaoti Huang; Frederick J Dorey; Robert E Reiter; Leonard S Marks
Journal:  Eur Urol       Date:  2013-03-17       Impact factor: 20.096

Review 9.  Ultrasound elastography of the prostate: state of the art.

Authors:  J-M Correas; A-M Tissier; A Khairoune; G Khoury; D Eiss; O Hélénon
Journal:  Diagn Interv Imaging       Date:  2013-04-19       Impact factor: 4.026

10.  Critical evaluation of magnetic resonance imaging targeted, transrectal ultrasound guided transperineal fusion biopsy for detection of prostate cancer.

Authors:  Timur H Kuru; Matthias C Roethke; Jonas Seidenader; Tobias Simpfendörfer; Silvan Boxler; Khalid Alammar; Philip Rieker; Valentin I Popeneciu; Wilfried Roth; Sascha Pahernik; Heinz-Peter Schlemmer; Markus Hohenfellner; Boris A Hadaschik
Journal:  J Urol       Date:  2013-04-19       Impact factor: 7.450

View more
  5 in total

1.  Improving detection of prostate cancer foci via information fusion of MRI and temporal enhanced ultrasound.

Authors:  Alireza Sedghi; Alireza Mehrtash; Amoon Jamzad; Amel Amalou; William M Wells; Tina Kapur; Jin Tae Kwak; Baris Turkbey; Peter Choyke; Peter Pinto; Bradford Wood; Sheng Xu; Purang Abolmaesumi; Parvin Mousavi
Journal:  Int J Comput Assist Radiol Surg       Date:  2020-05-05       Impact factor: 2.924

2.  Topology preserving stratification of tissue neoplasticity using Deep Neural Maps and microRNA signatures.

Authors:  Emily Kaczmarek; Jina Nanayakkara; Alireza Sedghi; Mehran Pesteie; Thomas Tuschl; Neil Renwick; Parvin Mousavi
Journal:  BMC Bioinformatics       Date:  2022-01-13       Impact factor: 3.169

3.  Image-guided Raman spectroscopy navigation system to improve transperineal prostate cancer detection. Part 1: Raman spectroscopy fiber-optics system and in situ tissue characterization.

Authors:  Fabien Picot; Roozbeh Shams; Frédérick Dallaire; Guillaume Sheehy; Tran Trang; David Grajales; Mirela Birlea; Dominique Trudel; Cynthia Ménard; Samuel Kadoury; Frédéric Leblond
Journal:  J Biomed Opt       Date:  2022-09       Impact factor: 3.758

Review 4.  A review of artificial intelligence in prostate cancer detection on imaging.

Authors:  Indrani Bhattacharya; Yash S Khandwala; Sulaiman Vesal; Wei Shao; Qianye Yang; Simon J C Soerensen; Richard E Fan; Pejman Ghanouni; Christian A Kunder; James D Brooks; Yipeng Hu; Mirabela Rusu; Geoffrey A Sonn
Journal:  Ther Adv Urol       Date:  2022-10-10

5.  Current status of deep learning applications in abdominal ultrasonography.

Authors:  Kyoung Doo Song
Journal:  Ultrasonography       Date:  2020-09-02
  5 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.