Literature DB >> 25316814

Modernizing the diagnostic and decision-making pathway for prostate cancer.

Thomas J Polascik1, Niccolo' M Passoni2, Arnauld Villers3, Peter L Choyke4.   

Abstract

PSA has led to a drastic increase in the detection of prostate cancer, rendering this biomarker the gateway for the diagnostic pathway of prostatic neoplasms. However, the increase in incidence has not been mirrored by a similar reduction in mortality. Widespread PSA testing has facilitated the overdiagnosis and overtreatment of indolent disease. To reduce this phenomenon and avoid negative repercussions on the quality of life of men undergoing unnecessary therapies, the diagnostic pathway of prostate cancer needs to be improved. Multiparametric MRI (mp-MRI) can enhance the sensitivity and specificity of PSA, as well as the shortcomings of random biopsy sampling. This novel imaging technique has been proven to identify larger and more aggressive cancer foci, which should be targeted for treatment. New technological developments now allow for fusion of mp-MRI images with real-time ultrasound, opening the way to lesion-targeted biopsies. Furthermore, mp-MRI and targeted biopsies can also improve active surveillance protocols and permit more conservative focal therapy strategies. By implementing targeted biopsies, the diagnostic pathway will focus on clinically significant disease, consequently reducing overdiagnosis and overtreatment. Before this novel protocol becomes the new gold standard, mp-MRI acquisition and interpretation need to be standardized and targeted-biopsy strategies need to be further validated prior to abandoning random-sampling ones. Several multidisciplinary consortiums are already working on the standardization of prostate MRI, and there are ongoing prospective trials on targeted biopsies and MRI. Soon, imaging of prostatic lesions and selected biopsies will modify the diagnostic evaluation of prostate cancer, reducing overtreatment and therapy-derived complications that negatively affect quality of life. ©2014 American Association for Cancer Research.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2014        PMID: 25316814      PMCID: PMC6330107          DOI: 10.1158/1078-0432.CCR-14-0247

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Clin Cancer Res        ISSN: 1078-0432            Impact factor:   12.531


  9 in total

1.  Detection of Clinically Significant Prostate Cancer: Short Dual-Pulse Sequence versus Standard Multiparametric MR Imaging-A Multireader Study.

Authors:  Borna K Barth; Pieter J L De Visschere; Alexander Cornelius; Carlos Nicolau; Hebert Alberto Vargas; Daniel Eberli; Olivio F Donati
Journal:  Radiology       Date:  2017-03-27       Impact factor: 11.105

2.  Updated prostate imaging reporting and data system (PIRADS v2) recommendations for the detection of clinically significant prostate cancer using multiparametric MRI: critical evaluation using whole-mount pathology as standard of reference.

Authors:  H A Vargas; A M Hötker; D A Goldman; C S Moskowitz; T Gondo; K Matsumoto; B Ehdaie; S Woo; S W Fine; V E Reuter; E Sala; H Hricak
Journal:  Eur Radiol       Date:  2015-09-22       Impact factor: 5.315

3.  Deep neural maps for unsupervised visualization of high-grade cancer in prostate biopsies.

Authors:  Alireza Sedghi; Mehran Pesteie; Golara Javadi; Shekoofeh Azizi; Pingkun Yan; Jin Tae Kwak; Sheng Xu; Baris Turkbey; Peter Choyke; Peter Pinto; Bradford Wood; Robert Rohling; Purang Abolmaesumi; Parvin Mousavi
Journal:  Int J Comput Assist Radiol Surg       Date:  2019-03-23       Impact factor: 2.924

4.  PSA Testing Use and Prostate Cancer Diagnostic Stage After the 2012 U.S. Preventive Services Task Force Guideline Changes.

Authors:  Christopher J Magnani; Kevin Li; Tina Seto; Kathryn M McDonald; Douglas W Blayney; James D Brooks; Tina Hernandez-Boussard
Journal:  J Natl Compr Canc Netw       Date:  2019-07-01       Impact factor: 11.908

5.  Engaging the primary care community to encourage appropriate prostate cancer screening.

Authors:  Malhar P Patel; Ariel Schulman; Kevin P Shah; John B Anderson; Thomas J Polascik
Journal:  Ther Adv Urol       Date:  2017-10-16

6.  Improvement of Prostate Cancer Diagnosis by Detecting PSA Glycosylation-Specific Changes.

Authors:  Esther Llop; Montserrat Ferrer-Batallé; Sílvia Barrabés; Pedro Enrique Guerrero; Manel Ramírez; Radka Saldova; Pauline M Rudd; Rosa N Aleixandre; Josep Comet; Rafael de Llorens; Rosa Peracaula
Journal:  Theranostics       Date:  2016-05-24       Impact factor: 11.556

7.  Comparative Study of Blood-Based Biomarkers, α2,3-Sialic Acid PSA and PHI, for High-Risk Prostate Cancer Detection.

Authors:  Montserrat Ferrer-Batallé; Esther Llop; Manel Ramírez; Rosa Núria Aleixandre; Marc Saez; Josep Comet; Rafael de Llorens; Rosa Peracaula
Journal:  Int J Mol Sci       Date:  2017-04-17       Impact factor: 5.923

8.  Evolution of a CDC Public Health Research Agenda for Low-Risk Prostate Cancer.

Authors:  Ingrid J Hall; Judith Lee Smith
Journal:  Am J Prev Med       Date:  2015-12       Impact factor: 5.043

9.  Observation versus treatment among men with favorable risk prostate cancer in a community-based integrated health care system: a retrospective cohort study.

Authors:  Furaha Kariburyo; Yuexi Wang; I-Ning Elaine Cheng; Lisa Wang; David Morgenstern; Lin Xie; Eric Meadows; John Danella; Michael L Cher
Journal:  BMC Urol       Date:  2018-06-04       Impact factor: 2.264

  9 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.