Literature DB >> 30903834

Accounting for individual differences in the response to tDCS with baseline levels of neurochemical excitability.

Hannah L Filmer1, Shane E Ehrhardt2, Saskia Bollmann3, Jason B Mattingley4, Paul E Dux2.   

Abstract

There is now considerable evidence that applying a small electrical current to the cerebral cortex can have wide ranging effects on cognition and performance, and may provide substantial benefit as a treatment for conditions such as depression. However, there is variability across subjects in the extent to which stimulation modulates behaviour, providing a challenge for the development of applications. Here, we employed an individual differences approach to test if baseline concentrations of the neurochemicals GABA and glutamate are associated with an individual's response to transcranial direct current stimulation (tDCS). Using a previously replicated response selection training paradigm, we applied tDCS to the left prefrontal cortex part-way through the learning of a six-alternative-forced-choice task. Across three sessions, subjects received anodal, cathodal, or sham stimulation. Pre-tDCS baseline measures of GABA and glutamate, acquired using magnetic resonance spectroscopy (MRS), correlated with the extent to which stimulation modulated behaviour. Specifically, relative concentrations of GABA and glutamate (used as an index of neurochemical excitability) in the prefrontal cortex were associated with the degree to which active stimulation disrupted response selection training. This work represents an important step forward in developing models to predict stimulation efficacy, and provides a unique insight into how trait-based properties of the targeted cortex interact with stimulation.
Copyright © 2019 Elsevier Ltd. All rights reserved.

Entities:  

Keywords:  Brain stimulation; Individual differences; Neurochemicals; Prefrontal cortex; tDCS

Year:  2019        PMID: 30903834     DOI: 10.1016/j.cortex.2019.02.012

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Cortex        ISSN: 0010-9452            Impact factor:   4.027


  14 in total

1.  Cortical excitability controls the strength of mental imagery.

Authors:  Rebecca Keogh; Johanna Bergmann; Joel Pearson
Journal:  Elife       Date:  2020-05-05       Impact factor: 8.140

2.  Reconciling psychological and neuroscientific accounts of reduced motivation in aging.

Authors:  Alexander Soutschek; Alexandra Bagaïni; Todd A Hare; Philippe N Tobler
Journal:  Soc Cogn Affect Neurosci       Date:  2022-04-01       Impact factor: 3.436

3.  Transcranial Direct Current Stimulation Provides no Additional Benefit to Improvements in Self-Reported Craving Following Mindfulness-Based Relapse Prevention.

Authors:  Benjamin C Gibson; Victoria R Votaw; Elena R Stein; Vincent P Clark; Eric Claus; Katie Witkiewitz
Journal:  Mindfulness (N Y)       Date:  2021-11-26

4.  The effect of transcranial direct current stimulation (tDCS) combined with cognitive training on EEG spectral power in adolescent boys with ADHD: A double-blind, randomized, sham-controlled trial.

Authors:  Samuel J Westwood; Natali Bozhilova; Marion Criaud; Sheut-Ling Lam; Steve Lukito; Sophie Wallace-Hanlon; Olivia S Kowalczyk; Afroditi Kostara; Joseph Mathew; Bruce E Wexler; Roi Cohen Kadosh; Philip Asherson; Katya Rubia
Journal:  IBRO Neurosci Rep       Date:  2021-12-24

5.  Bilateral Motor Cortex tDCS Effects on Post-Stroke Pain and Spasticity: A Three Cases Study.

Authors:  Andrés Molero-Chamizo; Ángeles Salas Sánchez; Belén Álvarez Batista; Carlos Cordero García; Rafael Andújar Barroso; G Nathzidy Rivera-Urbina; Michael A Nitsche; José R Alameda Bailén
Journal:  Front Pharmacol       Date:  2021-04-21       Impact factor: 5.810

6.  Stimulating the parietal cortex by transcranial direct current stimulation (tDCS): no effects on attention and memory.

Authors:  Mirela Dubravac; Beat Meier
Journal:  AIMS Neurosci       Date:  2020-11-18

7.  Cerebellar Transcranial Direct Current Stimulation in Children with Autism Spectrum Disorder: A Pilot Study on Efficacy, Feasibility, Safety, and Unexpected Outcomes in Tic Disorder and Epilepsy.

Authors:  Giordano D'Urso; Elena Toscano; Veronica Sanges; Anne Sauvaget; Christine E Sheffer; Maria Pia Riccio; Roberta Ferrucci; Felice Iasevoli; Alberto Priori; Carmela Bravaccio; Andrea de Bartolomeis
Journal:  J Clin Med       Date:  2021-12-28       Impact factor: 4.241

8.  Effects of tDCS on the attentional blink revisited: A statistical evaluation of a replication attempt.

Authors:  Leon C Reteig; Lionel A Newman; K Richard Ridderinkhof; Heleen A Slagter
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2022-01-27       Impact factor: 3.240

9.  A Short-Term Intervention of High-Intensity Exercise and Anodal-tDCS on Motor Learning in Middle-Aged Adults: An RCT.

Authors:  Clare Quinlan; Ben Rattray; Disa Pryor; Joseph M Northey; James Coxon; Nicolas Cherbuin; Sophie C Andrews
Journal:  Front Hum Neurosci       Date:  2021-06-16       Impact factor: 3.169

10.  Baseline sensorimotor GABA levels shape neuroplastic processes induced by motor learning in older adults.

Authors:  Bradley R King; Jost-Julian Rumpf; Elvire Verbaanderd; Kirstin F Heise; Nina Dolfen; Stefan Sunaert; Julien Doyon; Joseph Classen; Dante Mantini; Nicolaas A J Puts; Richard A E Edden; Geneviève Albouy; Stephan P Swinnen
Journal:  Hum Brain Mapp       Date:  2020-06-25       Impact factor: 5.399

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.