Literature DB >> 30903796

Effect of Additional Oral Semaglutide vs Sitagliptin on Glycated Hemoglobin in Adults With Type 2 Diabetes Uncontrolled With Metformin Alone or With Sulfonylurea: The PIONEER 3 Randomized Clinical Trial.

Julio Rosenstock1, Dale Allison2, Andreas L Birkenfeld3,4, Thalia Marie Blicher5, Srikanth Deenadayalan5, Jacob Bonde Jacobsen5, Pierre Serusclat6, Rafael Violante7, Hirotaka Watada8, Melanie Davies9.   

Abstract

Importance: Phase 3 trials have not compared oral semaglutide, a glucagon-like peptide 1 receptor agonist, with other classes of glucose-lowering therapy. Objective: To compare efficacy and assess long-term adverse event profiles of once-daily oral semaglutide vs sitagliptin, 100 mg added on to metformin with or without sulfonylurea, in patients with type 2 diabetes. Design, Setting, and Participants: Randomized, double-blind, double-dummy, parallel-group, phase 3a trial conducted at 206 sites in 14 countries over 78 weeks from February 2016 to March 2018. Of 2463 patients screened, 1864 adults with type 2 diabetes uncontrolled with metformin with or without sulfonylurea were randomized. Interventions: Patients were randomized to receive once-daily oral semaglutide, 3 mg (n = 466), 7 mg (n = 466), or 14 mg (n = 465), or sitagliptin, 100 mg (n = 467). Semaglutide was initiated at 3 mg/d and escalated every 4 weeks, first to 7 mg/d then to 14 mg/d, until the randomized dosage was achieved. Main Outcomes and Measures: The primary end point was change in glycated hemoglobin (HbA1c), and the key secondary end point was change in body weight, both from baseline to week 26. Both were assessed at weeks 52 and 78 as additional secondary end points. End points were tested for noninferiority with respect to HbA1c (noninferiority margin, 0.3%) prior to testing for superiority of HbA1c and body weight.
Results: Among 1864 patients randomized (mean age, 58 [SD, 10] years; mean baseline HbA1c, 8.3% [SD, 0.9%]; mean body mass index, 32.5 [SD, 6.4]; n=879 [47.2%] women), 1758 (94.3%) completed the trial and 298 prematurely discontinued treatment (16.7% for semaglutide, 3 mg/d; 15.0% for semaglutide, 7 mg/d; 19.1% for semaglutide, 14 mg/d; and 13.1% for sitagliptin). Semaglutide, 7 and 14 mg/d, compared with sitagliptin, significantly reduced HbA1c (differences, -0.3% [95% CI, -0.4% to -0.1%] and -0.5% [95% CI, -0.6% to -0.4%], respectively; P < .001 for both) and body weight (differences, -1.6 kg [95% CI, -2.0 to -1.1 kg] and -2.5 kg [95% CI, -3.0 to -2.0 kg], respectively; P < .001 for both) from baseline to week 26. Noninferiority of semaglutide, 3 mg/d, with respect to HbA1c was not demonstrated. Week 78 reductions in both end points were statistically significantly greater with semaglutide, 14 mg/d, vs sitagliptin. Conclusions and Relevance: Among adults with type 2 diabetes uncontrolled with metformin with or without sulfonylurea, oral semaglutide, 7 mg/d and 14 mg/d, compared with sitagliptin, resulted in significantly greater reductions in HbA1c over 26 weeks, but there was no significant benefit with the 3-mg/d dosage. Further research is needed to assess effectiveness in a clinical setting. Trial Registration: ClinicalTrials.gov Identifier: NCT02607865.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2019        PMID: 30903796      PMCID: PMC6484814          DOI: 10.1001/jama.2019.2942

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  JAMA        ISSN: 0098-7484            Impact factor:   56.272


  27 in total

1.  Saxagliptin and cardiovascular outcomes in patients with type 2 diabetes mellitus.

Authors:  Benjamin M Scirica; Deepak L Bhatt; Eugene Braunwald; P Gabriel Steg; Jaime Davidson; Boaz Hirshberg; Peter Ohman; Robert Frederich; Stephen D Wiviott; Elaine B Hoffman; Matthew A Cavender; Jacob A Udell; Nihar R Desai; Ofri Mosenzon; Darren K McGuire; Kausik K Ray; Lawrence A Leiter; Itamar Raz
Journal:  N Engl J Med       Date:  2013-09-02       Impact factor: 91.245

2.  Comments on 'Current issues in non-inferiority trials' by Thomas R. Fleming, Statistics in Medicine, DOI: 10.1002/sim.2855.

Authors:  Gary G Koch
Journal:  Stat Med       Date:  2008-02-10       Impact factor: 2.373

3.  Effect of Linagliptin vs Placebo on Major Cardiovascular Events in Adults With Type 2 Diabetes and High Cardiovascular and Renal Risk: The CARMELINA Randomized Clinical Trial.

Authors:  Julio Rosenstock; Vlado Perkovic; Odd Erik Johansen; Mark E Cooper; Steven E Kahn; Nikolaus Marx; John H Alexander; Michael Pencina; Robert D Toto; Christoph Wanner; Bernard Zinman; Hans Juergen Woerle; David Baanstra; Egon Pfarr; Sven Schnaidt; Thomas Meinicke; Jyothis T George; Maximilian von Eynatten; Darren K McGuire
Journal:  JAMA       Date:  2019-01-01       Impact factor: 56.272

4.  Transcellular stomach absorption of a derivatized glucagon-like peptide-1 receptor agonist.

Authors:  Stephen T Buckley; Tine A Bækdal; Andreas Vegge; Stine J Maarbjerg; Charles Pyke; Jonas Ahnfelt-Rønne; Kim G Madsen; Susanne G Schéele; Tomas Alanentalo; Rikke K Kirk; Betty L Pedersen; Rikke B Skyggebjerg; Andrew J Benie; Holger M Strauss; Per-Olof Wahlund; Simon Bjerregaard; Erzsébet Farkas; Csaba Fekete; Flemming L Søndergaard; Jeanett Borregaard; Marie-Louise Hartoft-Nielsen; Lotte Bjerre Knudsen
Journal:  Sci Transl Med       Date:  2018-11-14       Impact factor: 17.956

5.  Efficacy and safety of once-weekly semaglutide monotherapy versus placebo in patients with type 2 diabetes (SUSTAIN 1): a double-blind, randomised, placebo-controlled, parallel-group, multinational, multicentre phase 3a trial.

Authors:  Christopher Sorli; Shin-Ichi Harashima; George M Tsoukas; Jeffrey Unger; Julie Derving Karsbøl; Thomas Hansen; Stephen C Bain
Journal:  Lancet Diabetes Endocrinol       Date:  2017-01-17       Impact factor: 32.069

6.  Efficacy and Safety of Once-Weekly Dulaglutide Versus Insulin Glargine in Patients With Type 2 Diabetes on Metformin and Glimepiride (AWARD-2).

Authors:  Francesco Giorgino; Marian Benroubi; Jui-Hung Sun; Alan G Zimmermann; Valeria Pechtner
Journal:  Diabetes Care       Date:  2015-06-18       Impact factor: 19.112

7.  Efficacy and Safety of Once-Weekly Semaglutide Versus Exenatide ER in Subjects With Type 2 Diabetes (SUSTAIN 3): A 56-Week, Open-Label, Randomized Clinical Trial.

Authors:  Andrew J Ahmann; Matthew Capehorn; Guillaume Charpentier; Francesco Dotta; Elena Henkel; Ildiko Lingvay; Anders G Holst; Miriam P Annett; Vanita R Aroda
Journal:  Diabetes Care       Date:  2017-12-15       Impact factor: 19.112

8.  World Medical Association Declaration of Helsinki: ethical principles for medical research involving human subjects.

Authors: 
Journal:  JAMA       Date:  2013-11-27       Impact factor: 56.272

9.  Liraglutide and Cardiovascular Outcomes in Type 2 Diabetes.

Authors:  Steven P Marso; Gilbert H Daniels; Kirstine Brown-Frandsen; Peter Kristensen; Johannes F E Mann; Michael A Nauck; Steven E Nissen; Stuart Pocock; Neil R Poulter; Lasse S Ravn; William M Steinberg; Mette Stockner; Bernard Zinman; Richard M Bergenstal; John B Buse
Journal:  N Engl J Med       Date:  2016-06-13       Impact factor: 176.079

10.  Management of Hyperglycemia in Type 2 Diabetes, 2018. A Consensus Report by the American Diabetes Association (ADA) and the European Association for the Study of Diabetes (EASD).

Authors:  Melanie J Davies; David A D'Alessio; Judith Fradkin; Walter N Kernan; Chantal Mathieu; Geltrude Mingrone; Peter Rossing; Apostolos Tsapas; Deborah J Wexler; John B Buse
Journal:  Diabetes Care       Date:  2018-10-04       Impact factor: 19.112

View more
  58 in total

Review 1.  The development of oral semaglutide, an oral GLP-1 analog, for the treatment of type 2 diabetes.

Authors:  Mads Frederik Rasmussen
Journal:  Diabetol Int       Date:  2020-01-04

2.  Semaglutide and Diabetic Retinopathy Risk in Patients with Type 2 Diabetes Mellitus: A Meta-Analysis of Randomized Controlled Trials.

Authors:  Feiyu Wang; Yinjun Mao; Hang Wang; Yiwei Liu; Pinfang Huang
Journal:  Clin Drug Investig       Date:  2021-12-11       Impact factor: 2.859

3.  Choosing clinically interpretable summary measures and robust analytic procedures for quantifying the treatment difference in comparative clinical studies.

Authors:  Zachary R McCaw; Lu Tian; Jiawei Wei; Brian Lee Claggett; Frank Bretz; Garrett Fitzmaurice; Lee-Jen Wei
Journal:  Stat Med       Date:  2021-12-10       Impact factor: 2.373

4.  Oral glucagon-like peptide 1 analogue ameliorates glucose intolerance in db/db mice.

Authors:  Hanlin Zhang; Meng Dong; Shouli Yuan; Wanzhu Jin
Journal:  Biotechnol Lett       Date:  2022-08-25       Impact factor: 2.716

5.  Optimizing Therapeutic Outcomes With Oral Semaglutide: A Patient-Centered Approach.

Authors:  Diana M Isaacs; Davida F Kruger; Geralyn R Spollett
Journal:  Diabetes Spectr       Date:  2021-01

Review 6.  A Pharmacological and Clinical Overview of Oral Semaglutide for the Treatment of Type 2 Diabetes.

Authors:  Andreas Andersen; Filip Krag Knop; Tina Vilsbøll
Journal:  Drugs       Date:  2021-05-08       Impact factor: 9.546

Review 7.  A Review on the Efficacy and Safety of Oral Semaglutide.

Authors:  Stephanie Niman; Jennifer Hardy; Rebecca F Goldfaden; Jessica Reid; Mae Sheikh-Ali; David Sutton; Rushab Choksi
Journal:  Drugs R D       Date:  2021-03-26

Review 8.  Efficacy of Semaglutide in a Subcutaneous and an Oral Formulation.

Authors:  Juris J Meier
Journal:  Front Endocrinol (Lausanne)       Date:  2021-06-25       Impact factor: 5.555

Review 9.  Contemporary Classification of Glucagon-Like Peptide 1 Receptor Agonists (GLP1RAs).

Authors:  Sanjay Kalra; Saptarshi Bhattacharya; Nitin Kapoor
Journal:  Diabetes Ther       Date:  2021-07-15       Impact factor: 2.945

Review 10.  Safety of Semaglutide.

Authors:  Mark M Smits; Daniël H Van Raalte
Journal:  Front Endocrinol (Lausanne)       Date:  2021-07-07       Impact factor: 5.555

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.