Julio Rosenstock1, Dale Allison2, Andreas L Birkenfeld3,4, Thalia Marie Blicher5, Srikanth Deenadayalan5, Jacob Bonde Jacobsen5, Pierre Serusclat6, Rafael Violante7, Hirotaka Watada8, Melanie Davies9. 1. Dallas Diabetes Research Center at Medical City, Dallas, Texas. 2. Hillcrest Family Health Center, Waco, Texas. 3. Department of Medicine III, Carl Gustav Carus University Hospital, Technische Universität Dresden, Dresden, Germany. 4. Paul Langerhans Institute Dresden, Helmholtz Center Munich at Technische Universität Dresden, Dresden, Germany. 5. Novo Nordisk A/S, Søborg, Denmark. 6. Endocrinology, Diabetology and Nutrition, Clinique Portes du Sud, Venissieux, France. 7. Departamento Endocrinología, Instituto Mexicano del Seguro Social, Ciudad Madero, Mexico. 8. Department of Metabolism and Endocrinology, Juntendo University Graduate School of Medicine, Tokyo, Japan. 9. Diabetes Research Centre, University of Leicester, Leicester, England.
Abstract
Importance: Phase 3 trials have not compared oral semaglutide, a glucagon-like peptide 1 receptor agonist, with other classes of glucose-lowering therapy. Objective: To compare efficacy and assess long-term adverse event profiles of once-daily oral semaglutide vs sitagliptin, 100 mg added on to metformin with or without sulfonylurea, in patients with type 2 diabetes. Design, Setting, and Participants: Randomized, double-blind, double-dummy, parallel-group, phase 3a trial conducted at 206 sites in 14 countries over 78 weeks from February 2016 to March 2018. Of 2463 patients screened, 1864 adults with type 2 diabetes uncontrolled with metformin with or without sulfonylurea were randomized. Interventions: Patients were randomized to receive once-daily oral semaglutide, 3 mg (n = 466), 7 mg (n = 466), or 14 mg (n = 465), or sitagliptin, 100 mg (n = 467). Semaglutide was initiated at 3 mg/d and escalated every 4 weeks, first to 7 mg/d then to 14 mg/d, until the randomized dosage was achieved. Main Outcomes and Measures: The primary end point was change in glycated hemoglobin (HbA1c), and the key secondary end point was change in body weight, both from baseline to week 26. Both were assessed at weeks 52 and 78 as additional secondary end points. End points were tested for noninferiority with respect to HbA1c (noninferiority margin, 0.3%) prior to testing for superiority of HbA1c and body weight. Results: Among 1864 patients randomized (mean age, 58 [SD, 10] years; mean baseline HbA1c, 8.3% [SD, 0.9%]; mean body mass index, 32.5 [SD, 6.4]; n=879 [47.2%] women), 1758 (94.3%) completed the trial and 298 prematurely discontinued treatment (16.7% for semaglutide, 3 mg/d; 15.0% for semaglutide, 7 mg/d; 19.1% for semaglutide, 14 mg/d; and 13.1% for sitagliptin). Semaglutide, 7 and 14 mg/d, compared with sitagliptin, significantly reduced HbA1c (differences, -0.3% [95% CI, -0.4% to -0.1%] and -0.5% [95% CI, -0.6% to -0.4%], respectively; P < .001 for both) and body weight (differences, -1.6 kg [95% CI, -2.0 to -1.1 kg] and -2.5 kg [95% CI, -3.0 to -2.0 kg], respectively; P < .001 for both) from baseline to week 26. Noninferiority of semaglutide, 3 mg/d, with respect to HbA1c was not demonstrated. Week 78 reductions in both end points were statistically significantly greater with semaglutide, 14 mg/d, vs sitagliptin. Conclusions and Relevance: Among adults with type 2 diabetes uncontrolled withmetformin with or without sulfonylurea, oral semaglutide, 7 mg/d and 14 mg/d, compared with sitagliptin, resulted in significantly greater reductions in HbA1c over 26 weeks, but there was no significant benefit with the 3-mg/d dosage. Further research is needed to assess effectiveness in a clinical setting. Trial Registration: ClinicalTrials.gov Identifier: NCT02607865.
RCT Entities:
Importance: Phase 3 trials have not compared oral semaglutide, a glucagon-like peptide 1 receptor agonist, with other classes of glucose-lowering therapy. Objective: To compare efficacy and assess long-term adverse event profiles of once-daily oral semaglutide vs sitagliptin, 100 mg added on to metformin with or without sulfonylurea, in patients with type 2 diabetes. Design, Setting, and Participants: Randomized, double-blind, double-dummy, parallel-group, phase 3a trial conducted at 206 sites in 14 countries over 78 weeks from February 2016 to March 2018. Of 2463 patients screened, 1864 adults with type 2 diabetes uncontrolled with metformin with or without sulfonylurea were randomized. Interventions: Patients were randomized to receive once-daily oral semaglutide, 3 mg (n = 466), 7 mg (n = 466), or 14 mg (n = 465), or sitagliptin, 100 mg (n = 467). Semaglutide was initiated at 3 mg/d and escalated every 4 weeks, first to 7 mg/d then to 14 mg/d, until the randomized dosage was achieved. Main Outcomes and Measures: The primary end point was change in glycated hemoglobin (HbA1c), and the key secondary end point was change in body weight, both from baseline to week 26. Both were assessed at weeks 52 and 78 as additional secondary end points. End points were tested for noninferiority with respect to HbA1c (noninferiority margin, 0.3%) prior to testing for superiority of HbA1c and body weight. Results: Among 1864 patients randomized (mean age, 58 [SD, 10] years; mean baseline HbA1c, 8.3% [SD, 0.9%]; mean body mass index, 32.5 [SD, 6.4]; n=879 [47.2%] women), 1758 (94.3%) completed the trial and 298 prematurely discontinued treatment (16.7% for semaglutide, 3 mg/d; 15.0% for semaglutide, 7 mg/d; 19.1% for semaglutide, 14 mg/d; and 13.1% for sitagliptin). Semaglutide, 7 and 14 mg/d, compared with sitagliptin, significantly reduced HbA1c (differences, -0.3% [95% CI, -0.4% to -0.1%] and -0.5% [95% CI, -0.6% to -0.4%], respectively; P < .001 for both) and body weight (differences, -1.6 kg [95% CI, -2.0 to -1.1 kg] and -2.5 kg [95% CI, -3.0 to -2.0 kg], respectively; P < .001 for both) from baseline to week 26. Noninferiority of semaglutide, 3 mg/d, with respect to HbA1c was not demonstrated. Week 78 reductions in both end points were statistically significantly greater with semaglutide, 14 mg/d, vs sitagliptin. Conclusions and Relevance: Among adults with type 2 diabetes uncontrolled with metformin with or without sulfonylurea, oral semaglutide, 7 mg/d and 14 mg/d, compared with sitagliptin, resulted in significantly greater reductions in HbA1c over 26 weeks, but there was no significant benefit with the 3-mg/d dosage. Further research is needed to assess effectiveness in a clinical setting. Trial Registration: ClinicalTrials.gov Identifier: NCT02607865.
Authors: Benjamin M Scirica; Deepak L Bhatt; Eugene Braunwald; P Gabriel Steg; Jaime Davidson; Boaz Hirshberg; Peter Ohman; Robert Frederich; Stephen D Wiviott; Elaine B Hoffman; Matthew A Cavender; Jacob A Udell; Nihar R Desai; Ofri Mosenzon; Darren K McGuire; Kausik K Ray; Lawrence A Leiter; Itamar Raz Journal: N Engl J Med Date: 2013-09-02 Impact factor: 91.245
Authors: Julio Rosenstock; Vlado Perkovic; Odd Erik Johansen; Mark E Cooper; Steven E Kahn; Nikolaus Marx; John H Alexander; Michael Pencina; Robert D Toto; Christoph Wanner; Bernard Zinman; Hans Juergen Woerle; David Baanstra; Egon Pfarr; Sven Schnaidt; Thomas Meinicke; Jyothis T George; Maximilian von Eynatten; Darren K McGuire Journal: JAMA Date: 2019-01-01 Impact factor: 56.272
Authors: Stephen T Buckley; Tine A Bækdal; Andreas Vegge; Stine J Maarbjerg; Charles Pyke; Jonas Ahnfelt-Rønne; Kim G Madsen; Susanne G Schéele; Tomas Alanentalo; Rikke K Kirk; Betty L Pedersen; Rikke B Skyggebjerg; Andrew J Benie; Holger M Strauss; Per-Olof Wahlund; Simon Bjerregaard; Erzsébet Farkas; Csaba Fekete; Flemming L Søndergaard; Jeanett Borregaard; Marie-Louise Hartoft-Nielsen; Lotte Bjerre Knudsen Journal: Sci Transl Med Date: 2018-11-14 Impact factor: 17.956
Authors: Christopher Sorli; Shin-Ichi Harashima; George M Tsoukas; Jeffrey Unger; Julie Derving Karsbøl; Thomas Hansen; Stephen C Bain Journal: Lancet Diabetes Endocrinol Date: 2017-01-17 Impact factor: 32.069
Authors: Francesco Giorgino; Marian Benroubi; Jui-Hung Sun; Alan G Zimmermann; Valeria Pechtner Journal: Diabetes Care Date: 2015-06-18 Impact factor: 19.112
Authors: Andrew J Ahmann; Matthew Capehorn; Guillaume Charpentier; Francesco Dotta; Elena Henkel; Ildiko Lingvay; Anders G Holst; Miriam P Annett; Vanita R Aroda Journal: Diabetes Care Date: 2017-12-15 Impact factor: 19.112
Authors: Steven P Marso; Gilbert H Daniels; Kirstine Brown-Frandsen; Peter Kristensen; Johannes F E Mann; Michael A Nauck; Steven E Nissen; Stuart Pocock; Neil R Poulter; Lasse S Ravn; William M Steinberg; Mette Stockner; Bernard Zinman; Richard M Bergenstal; John B Buse Journal: N Engl J Med Date: 2016-06-13 Impact factor: 176.079
Authors: Melanie J Davies; David A D'Alessio; Judith Fradkin; Walter N Kernan; Chantal Mathieu; Geltrude Mingrone; Peter Rossing; Apostolos Tsapas; Deborah J Wexler; John B Buse Journal: Diabetes Care Date: 2018-10-04 Impact factor: 19.112
Authors: Zachary R McCaw; Lu Tian; Jiawei Wei; Brian Lee Claggett; Frank Bretz; Garrett Fitzmaurice; Lee-Jen Wei Journal: Stat Med Date: 2021-12-10 Impact factor: 2.373
Authors: Stephanie Niman; Jennifer Hardy; Rebecca F Goldfaden; Jessica Reid; Mae Sheikh-Ali; David Sutton; Rushab Choksi Journal: Drugs R D Date: 2021-03-26