Literature DB >> 28110911

Efficacy and safety of once-weekly semaglutide monotherapy versus placebo in patients with type 2 diabetes (SUSTAIN 1): a double-blind, randomised, placebo-controlled, parallel-group, multinational, multicentre phase 3a trial.

Christopher Sorli1, Shin-Ichi Harashima2, George M Tsoukas3, Jeffrey Unger4, Julie Derving Karsbøl5, Thomas Hansen5, Stephen C Bain6.   

Abstract

BACKGROUND: Despite a broad range of pharmacological options for the treatment of type 2 diabetes, optimum glycaemic control remains challenging for many patients and new therapies are necessary. Semaglutide is a glucagon-like peptide-1 (GLP-1) analogue in phase 3 development for type 2 diabetes. We assessed the efficacy, safety, and tolerability of semaglutide monotherapy, compared with placebo, in treatment-naive patients with type 2 diabetes who had insufficient glycaemic control with diet and exercise alone.
METHODS: We did a double-blind, randomised, parallel-group, international, placebo-controlled phase 3a trial (SUSTAIN 1) at 72 sites in Canada, Italy, Japan, Mexico, Russia, South Africa, UK, and USA (including hospitals, clinical research units, and private offices). Eligible participants were treatment-naive individuals aged 18 years or older with type 2 diabetes treated with only diet and exercise alone for at least 30 days before screening, with a baseline HbA1c of 7·0%-10·0% (53-86 mmol/mol). We randomly assigned participants (2:2:1:1) to either once-weekly subcutaneously injected semaglutide (0·5 mg or 1·0 mg), or volume-matched placebo (0·5 mg or 1·0 mg), for 30 weeks via prefilled PDS290 pen-injectors. Participants did their own injections and were encouraged to administer them on the same day of each week in the same area of their body; the time of day and proximity of meal times was not specified. We did the randomisation with an interactive voice or web response system. Investigators, participants, and the funder of the study remained masked throughout the trial. The primary endpoint was the change in mean HbA1c from baseline to week 30, and the confirmatory secondary endpoint was the change in mean bodyweight from baseline to week 30. We assessed efficacy and safety in the modified intention-to-treat population (ie, all participants who were exposed to at least one dose of study drug); both placebo groups were pooled for assessment. This trial was registered with ClinicalTrials.gov, number NCT02054897.
FINDINGS: Between February 3, 2014, and August 21, 2014, we randomly assigned 388 participants to treatment; 387 received at least one dose of study medication (128 0·5 mg semaglutide, 130 1·0 mg semaglutide, 129 placebo). 17 (13%) of those assigned to 0·5 mg semaglutide, 16 (12%) assigned to 1·0 mg semaglutide, and 14 (11%) assigned to placebo discontinued treatment; the main reason for discontinuation was gastrointestinal adverse events such as nausea. Mean baseline HbA1c was 8·05% (SD 0·85); at week 30, HbA1c significantly decreased by 1·45% (95% CI -1·65 to -1·26) with 0·5 mg semaglutide (estimated treatment difference vs placebo -1·43%, 95% CI -1·71 to -1·15; p<0·0001), significantly decreased by 1·55% (-1·74 to -1·36) with 1·0 mg semaglutide (estimated treatment difference vs placebo -1·53%, -1·81 to -1·25; p<0·0001), and non-significantly decreased by 0·02% (-0·23 to 0·18) with placebo. Mean baseline bodyweight was 91·93 kg (SD 23·83); at week 30, bodyweight significantly decreased by 3·73 kg (95% CI -4·54 to -2·91) with 0·5 mg semaglutide (estimated treatment difference vs placebo -2·75 kg, 95% CI -3·92 to -1·58; p<0·0001), significantly decreased by 4·53 kg (-5·34 to -3·72) with 1·0 mg semaglutide (estimated treatment difference vs placebo -3·56 kg, -4·74 to -2·38; p<0·0001), and non-significantly decreased by 0·98 kg (-1·82 to -0·13) with placebo. No deaths were reported in any of the study groups and most reported adverse events were of mild or moderate severity. The most frequently reported adverse events in both semaglutide groups were gastrointestinal in nature: nausea was reported in 26 (20%) who received 0·5 mg semaglutide, 31 (24%) who received 1·0 mg semaglutide, and 10 (8%) who received placebo, and diarrhoea was reported in 16 (13%) who received 0·5 mg semaglutide, 14 (11%) who received 1·0 mg semaglutide, and three (2%) who received placebo.
INTERPRETATION: Semaglutide significantly improved HbA1c and bodyweight in patients with type 2 diabetes compared with placebo, and showed a similar safety profile to currently available GLP-1 receptor agonists, representing a potential treatment option for such patients. FUNDING: Novo Nordisk A/S, Denmark.
Copyright © 2017 Elsevier Ltd. All rights reserved.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2017        PMID: 28110911     DOI: 10.1016/S2213-8587(17)30013-X

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Lancet Diabetes Endocrinol        ISSN: 2213-8587            Impact factor:   32.069


  108 in total

1.  SUSTAINable management of type 2 diabetes: feasibility of use and safety of semaglutide.

Authors:  Jun Shirakawa; Yasuo Terauchi
Journal:  Ann Transl Med       Date:  2018-04

Review 2.  Pharmacokinetics and Clinical Implications of Semaglutide: A New Glucagon-Like Peptide (GLP)-1 Receptor Agonist.

Authors:  Sylvie Hall; Diana Isaacs; Jennifer N Clements
Journal:  Clin Pharmacokinet       Date:  2018-12       Impact factor: 6.447

Review 3.  Benefit-Risk Assessment of Obesity Drugs: Focus on Glucagon-like Peptide-1 Receptor Agonists.

Authors:  Rasmus M Christensen; Christian R Juhl; Signe S Torekov
Journal:  Drug Saf       Date:  2019-08       Impact factor: 5.606

Review 4.  Semaglutide: First Global Approval.

Authors:  Sohita Dhillon
Journal:  Drugs       Date:  2018-02       Impact factor: 9.546

Review 5.  The development of oral semaglutide, an oral GLP-1 analog, for the treatment of type 2 diabetes.

Authors:  Mads Frederik Rasmussen
Journal:  Diabetol Int       Date:  2020-01-04

6.  Semaglutide-the "new kid on the block" in the field of glucagon-like peptide-1 receptor agonists?

Authors:  Cristian Guja; Rucsandra Dănciulescu Miulescu
Journal:  Ann Transl Med       Date:  2017-12

7.  Semaglutide seems to be more effective the other GLP-1Ras.

Authors:  Jens Juul Holst; Sten Madsbad
Journal:  Ann Transl Med       Date:  2017-12

Review 8.  Review of Advances in Anti-obesity Pharmacotherapy: Implications for a Multimodal Treatment Approach with Metabolic Surgery.

Authors:  Alexis C Sudlow; Carel W le Roux; Dimitri J Pournaras
Journal:  Obes Surg       Date:  2019-12       Impact factor: 4.129

9.  Management of hyperglycaemia in type 2 diabetes, 2018. A consensus report by the American Diabetes Association (ADA) and the European Association for the Study of Diabetes (EASD).

Authors:  Melanie J Davies; David A D'Alessio; Judith Fradkin; Walter N Kernan; Chantal Mathieu; Geltrude Mingrone; Peter Rossing; Apostolos Tsapas; Deborah J Wexler; John B Buse
Journal:  Diabetologia       Date:  2018-12       Impact factor: 10.122

Review 10.  Battle of GLP-1 delivery technologies.

Authors:  Minzhi Yu; Mason M Benjamin; Santhanakrishnan Srinivasan; Emily E Morin; Ekaterina I Shishatskaya; Steven P Schwendeman; Anna Schwendeman
Journal:  Adv Drug Deliv Rev       Date:  2018-07-21       Impact factor: 15.470

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.