| Literature DB >> 30903723 |
Dalial Freitak1,2, Toomas Tammaru3, Siiri-Lii Sandre3, Hendrik Meister3, Toomas Esperk3.
Abstract
Seasonal polyphenism constitutes a specific type of phenotypic plasticity in which short-lived organisms produce different phenotypes in different times of the year. Seasonal generations of such species frequently differ in their overall lifespan and in the values of traits closely related to fitness. Seasonal polyphenisms provide thus excellent, albeit underused model systems for studying trade-offs between life-history traits. Here, we compare immunological parameters between the two generations of the European map butterfly (Araschnia levana), a well-known example of a seasonally polyphenic species. To reveal possible costs of immune defence, we also examine the concurrent differences in several life-history traits. Both in laboratory experiments and in the field, last instar larvae heading towards the diapause (overwintering) had higher levels of both phenoloxidase (PO) activity and lytic activity than directly developing individuals. These results suggest that individuals from the diapausing generation with much longer juvenile (pupal) period invest more in their immune system than those from the short-living directly developing generation. The revealed negative correlation between pupal mass and PO activity may be one of the reasons why, in this species, the diapausing generation has a smaller body size than the directly developing generation. Immunological parameters may thus well mediate trade-offs between body size-related traits.Entities:
Keywords: zzm321990Araschnia levanazzm321990; immunity; insect; life history; longevity; seasonality; trade-offs
Mesh:
Year: 2019 PMID: 30903723 PMCID: PMC6850579 DOI: 10.1111/jeb.13445
Source DB: PubMed Journal: J Evol Biol ISSN: 1010-061X Impact factor: 2.411
Figure 1Schematic presentation of the life cycle of Araschnia levana in the study region (Estonia, Northern Europe). The range covered by images of different life stages (eggs, caterpillar, pupa and adult) represents the approximate occurrence time of the particular stage in the field during an average year. The individuals of the directly developing generation (marked with green‐coloured background and “DD”) are typically present from the end of May until the beginning of August, whereas diapausing/overwintering generation (marked with grey background and “OW”) occurs from August to May. The arrows indicate the sampling times of field‐collected caterpillars in 2015 (27–29 June for directly developing generation and 25–27 August for overwintering generation). Note the markedly long duration of the pupal stage in overwintering generation and the larger size of the directly developing individuals.
Collection sites and sample sizes in the experiment. Maximum distance between the collection sites was ~70 km (Arisvere and Reolasoo) in the field trial and ~100 km (Laeva and Vastseliina) in the laboratory trial
| Trial | Collection site | Coordinates (°) | Developmental pathway | Number collected | Number surviving until pupation | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Females | Males | |||||
| Field | Arisvere | N: 58.77; E: 26.03 | Direct | 78 | 33 | 34 |
| Diapausing | 45 | 14 | 12 | |||
| Ilmatsalu | N: 58.40; E: 26.52 | Diapausing | 18 | 10 | 7 | |
| Laeva | N: 58.48; E: 26.49 | Diapausing | 23 | 9 | 10 | |
| Pangodi | N: 58.20; E: 26.57 | Direct | 16 | 7 | 9 | |
| Reolasoo | N: 58.26; E: 26.75 | Direct | 10 | 5 | 5 | |
| Tartu | N: 58.39; E: 26.70 | Direct | 10 | 4 | 6 | |
| N: 58.36; E: 26.69 | Diapausing | 34 | 8 | 9 | ||
| Laboratory | Laeva | N: 58.48; E: 26.49 | Direct | 3 | 9 | 23 |
| Diapausing | 3 | 5 | 14 | |||
| Tartu | N: 58.39; E: 26.70 | Direct | 2 | 21 | 37 | |
| Diapausing | 2 | 28 | 25 | |||
| Tsooru | N: 57.74; E: 26.65 | Direct | 1 | 5 | 5 | |
| Diapausing | 1 | 4 | 5 | |||
| Vastseliina | N: 57.73; E: 27.33 | Direct | 3 | 5 | 9 | |
| Diapausing | 3 | 21 | 11 | |||
aAverage temperature during the larval period of the directly developing generation (presumed to last from 1st of June until 10th of July) in Tartu in 2015 was 15.5°C (maximum 26.7°C, minimum 5.5°C). For the larval period of the overwintering generation (from 1st of August until 10th of September), the average temperature was 16.8° (maximum 30.5°C, minimum 8.1°C). Data from https://meteo.physic.ut.ee. bNumber of collected larvae (in the field trial) and number of female adults that laid eggs (i.e., number of broods, in the laboratory trial). cNumber of individuals that survived until pupation, different broods from the same collection site are pooled in the laboratory trial.
Results of the generalized linear mixed model (SAS, PROC GLIMMIX, type 3 sums of squares, logit link function) on the binary lytic activity (individuals with no lytic activity compared to those showing at least some lytic activity) and binary PO activity approximately at the time of attainment of maximum body mass in the last instar Araschnia levana larvae. Collection site was incorporated as a random effect. Individuals that died before pupation were excluded. Only the interactions that were statistically significant at 0.05 level were included in the model
| Effect | Lytic activity | PO activity | ||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| |
| (D)evelopmental pathway | 1, 394 | 6.9 | 0.0089 | 1, 395 | 7.9 | 0.0051 |
| (T)rial | 1, 394 | 9.4 | 0.0024 | 1, 395 | 3.2 | 0.076 |
| Sex | 1, 394 | 6.4 | 0.012 | 1, 395 | 0.0 | 0.99 |
| Mass at haemolymph sampling | 1, 394 | 6.6 | 0.011 | 1, 395 | 0.1 | 0.71 |
| Time to pupation | 1, 394 | 2.5 | 0.12 | 1, 395 | 2.9 | 0.087 |
| D*T | 1, 394 | 9.0 | 0.0029 | |||
aDirectly developing versus diapausing individuals, non‐zero lytic activity and PO activity were more frequent in diapausing ones. bField‐collected (field trial) versus laboratory‐reared (lab‐trial) individuals. Non‐zero lytic activity was more frequent in the field than in the lab trial. cMore frequent in females than in males. dMass approximately at the time of achieving maximum body mass in the last instar. Larvae that showed some lytic activity were heavier than those with zero lytic activity. eSince haemolymph sampling in the last instar. fHigh proportion of individuals that showed zero lytic activity among field collected larvae that developed directly.
Figure 2Lytic activities (log10 transformed, (a)) and PO activities (square‐root transformed, (b)) of the last instar Araschnia levana larvae as dependent on developmental pathway (directly developing vs. diapausing) and trial (field‐collected vs. lab‐reared individuals). Symbols indicate means ± 1 . The values are corrected for the effects of sex, body mass at the haemolymph sampling in the last instar and time from haemolymph sampling until pupation by the SAS, PROC MIXED, least square mean option. Letters represent significant differences based on Tukey–Kramer post hoc multiple comparisons: groups marked with the same letter are not significantly different at the p = 0.05 level. Numbers are sample sizes
Results of the general linear mixed model (SAS, PROC MIXED, type 3 sums of squares) on lytic activity (log10 transformed) and PO activity (square‐root transformed) of last instar Araschnia levana larvae. Individuals that died before pupation were excluded from both analysis and those that had zero lytic activity or zero PO activity were omitted from the respective analysis. Collection site was incorporated as a random effect. Degrees of freedom were estimated by the Satterthwaite method. See Table 2 for further details
| Effect | Lytic activity | PO activity | ||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| |
| (D)ev. pathway | 1, 304 | 89.0 | <0.0001 | 1, 225 | 42.8 | <0.0001 |
| (T)rial | 1, 92.3 | 31.0 | <0.0001 | 1, 16 | 6.4 | 0.022 |
| Sex | 1, 345 | 0.8 | 0.39 | 1, 370 | 1.8 | 0.18 |
| Mass at haemolymph sampling | 1, 347 | 1.6 | 0.2 | 1, 365 | 5.6 | 0.019 |
| Time to pupation | 1, 346 | 9.3 | 0.0024 | 1, 362 | 31.3 | <0.0001 |
| D*T | 1, 282 | 9.3 | 0.0025 | 1, 154 | 2.8 | 0.094 |
aHigher lytic activity and PO activity in diapausing than in directly developing individuals. bHigher lytic and PO activity in the laboratory than in the field trial. cLarvae with lower body mass at haemolymph sampling showed higher PO activities. dLytic activity correlated positively but PO activity correlated negatively with time from sampling to pupation. eThe difference between developmental pathways was larger in the field trial than in the laboratory trial.
Figure 3Relationship between lytic activity and PO activity (both log10 transformed) in directly developing (solid line) and diapausing (dashed line) Araschnia levana in the last larval instar
Results of the general linear mixed model (SAS, PROC MIXED, type 3 sums of squares) on Araschnia levana pupal and adult mass. Collection site was incorporated as a random effect. Degrees of freedom were estimated by the Satterthwaite method. See Table 2 for further details
| Pupal mass | Adult mass | |||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| |
| (D)ev. pathway | 1, 252 | 53.5 | <0.0001 | 1, 199 | 37.9 | <0.0001 |
| (T)rial | 1, 47.8 | 13.3 | 0.0007 | 1, 59.6 | 6.7 | 0.012 |
| (S)ex | 1, 366 | 193.4 | <0.0001 | 1, 251 | 505.7 | <0.0001 |
| Lytic activity | 1, 364 | 3.1 | 0.08 | 1, 251 | 3.0 | 0.086 |
| PO activity | 1, 368 | 12.3 | 0.0005 | 1, 256 | 1.9 | 0.17 |
| D*T | 1, 238 | 17.3 | <0.0001 | 1, 196 | 21.9 | <0.0001 |
| D*S | 1, 365 | 9.6 | 0.0021 | 1, 251 | 3.5 | 0.063 |
aPupal mass and adult mass higher in directly developing than in diapausing individuals. bMasses higher in the field than in the laboratory trial. cMasses higher in females than in males. dPO activity correlated negatively with pupal mass. eLarger size difference between directly developing and diapausing individuals in the field trial compared to the laboratory trial. fSexual size dimorphism in pupal mass was larger in directly developing than in diapausing generation.
Figure 4Log10 transformed lytic activities (±1 ) and PO activities (±1 ) of Araschnia levana larvae that either survived or died during the period from haemolymph sampling until pupation in the last larval instar. Values are corrected for the effects of sex, body mass at the haemolymph sampling in the last instar and time from haemolymph sampling until pupation by the SAS, PROC MIXED, least square mean option. Numbers indicate sample sizes
Results of the general linear mixed model (SAS, PROC MIXED, type 3 sums of squares) on Araschnia levana relative mass loss during the pupal stage (calculated as (pupal mass − adult mass)/pupal mass). Collection site was incorporated as a random effect. Degrees of freedom were estimated by the Satterthwaite method. See Table 2 for further details
|
|
|
| |
|---|---|---|---|
| (D)evelopmental pathway | 1, 180 | 18.6 | <0.0001 |
| (T)rial | 1, 36.8 | 1.2 | 0.28 |
| Sex | 1, 252 | 703.2 | <0.0001 |
| Lytic activity | 1, 253 | 2.1 | 0.15 |
| PO activity | 1, 257 | 1.4 | 0.23 |
| D*T | 1, 177 | 24.3 | <0.0001 |
aHigher mass loss in diapausing than in directly developing individuals. bHigher in males than in females. cDifference between the mass loss of diapausing and directly developing individuals was larger in the field trial than in the laboratory trial.
Results of the generalized linear mixed model (SAS, PROC GLIMMIX, type 3 sums of squares, logit link function) on survival of Araschnia levana larvae and pupae. Collection site was incorporated as a random effect
| Effect | Larval survival | Pupal survival | ||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| |
| Developmental pathway | 1, 485 | 8.3 | 0.0041 | 1, 359 | 6.3 | 0.012 |
| Trial | 1, 485 | 3.5 | 0.061 | 1, 359 | 0.2 | 0.65 |
| Lytic activity | 1, 485 | 0.1 | 0.8 | 1, 359 | 1.2 | 0.28 |
| PO activity | 1, 485 | 5.4 | 0.021 | 1, 359 | 0.3 | 0.58 |
| Mass at haemolymph sampling | 1, 485 | 6.6 | 0.01 | 1, 359 | 0.4 | 0.55 |
| Pupal mass | 1, 359 | 22.6 | <0.0001 | |||
| Time to pupation | 1, 359 | 3.9 | 0.049 | |||
| Sex | 1, 359 | 0.5 | 0.47 | |||
aAfter haemolymph sampling in the last instar. bLarval and pupal survival were both higher in directly developing than in diapausing individuals. cThe larvae that survived to pupation had lower PO activity than larvae that died. dThe larvae that survived were heavier at the time of haemolymph sampling. eThe pupae which produced adults were heavier than those that died before adult emergence. fIndividuals that were closer to pupation at the time of haemolymph sampling had higher survival during the pupal stage.