Literature DB >> 30903259

Small soft tissue masses indeterminate at imaging: histological diagnoses at a tertiary orthopedic oncology clinic.

Kevin Pham1, Nisreen S Ezuddin1, Juan Pretell-Mazzini2,3, Ty K Subhawong4,5.   

Abstract

OBJECTIVE: To review histologic diagnoses of soft-tissue masses (STMs) ≤ 2 cm with indeterminate imaging features encountered in musculoskeletal oncology clinic at a tertiary referral center.
MATERIALS AND METHODS: This was an IRB-approved retrospective review of patients with STMs ≤ 2 cm, referred to our tertiary care orthopedic oncology clinic over 4.75 consecutive years. Maximum diameter was based on imaging measurement by a fellowship-trained musculoskeletal radiologist. Simple lipomas, synovial cysts, metastases, and cases without histologic confirmation were excluded. Patient demographics, tumor imaging features (location, depth, size, and tumor:muscle enhancement and T2 signal ratios), and histology were recorded and compared.
RESULTS: Mean maximum diameter for 42 trunk/extremity STMs was 1.5 cm (range, 0.7 to 2 cm). Mean age was 48 years (range, 18-83 years). Nine (21%) of the masses were malignant, while 33 (79%) were non-malignant. Thirty-nine (93%) of masses were superficial; 7/39 (18%) of these superficial tumors were malignant. Malignancy was not associated with underlying vessels, tendon, or fascia (p = 0.19). The non-malignant vs. malignant tumor:muscle enhancement ratio was 2.15 vs. 2.32 (p = 0.58) and enhancement coefficient of variation was 0.14 vs. 0.10 (p = 0.29). Most common malignant histologic subtypes were synovial sarcoma (n = 3), fibroblastic/myofibroblastic sarcoma (n = 2), leiomyosarcoma (n = 2), myxofibrosarcoma (n = 1), and angiomatoid fibrous histiocytoma (n = 1). The majority (67%) of non-malignant lesions were: leiomyoma (n = 6), angiomyoma (n = 5), schwannoma (n = 4), benign fibrous histiocytoma (n = 4), and hemangioma (n = 3).
CONCLUSIONS: At a tertiary musculoskeletal oncology referral clinic, primary STMs ≤ 2 cm with indeterminate imaging features should be managed cautiously despite their small size and/or superficial location.

Entities:  

Keywords:  Indeterminate; MRI; Sarcoma; Soft tissue mass; Ultrasound

Mesh:

Year:  2019        PMID: 30903259     DOI: 10.1007/s00256-019-03205-0

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Skeletal Radiol        ISSN: 0364-2348            Impact factor:   2.199


  4 in total

Review 1.  A bump: what to do next? Ultrasound imaging of superficial soft-tissue palpable lesions.

Authors:  Orlando Catalano; Carlo Varelli; Carolina Sbordone; Antonio Corvino; Dario De Rosa; Gianfranco Vallone; Ximena Wortsman
Journal:  J Ultrasound       Date:  2019-11-30

2.  The safety of primary surgical excision of small deep indeterminate musculoskeletal soft tissue masses.

Authors:  Michèle Calleja; Qasim Afzaal; Asif Saifuddin
Journal:  Br J Radiol       Date:  2020-10-30       Impact factor: 3.039

3.  Soft tissue masses: distribution of entities and rate of malignancy in small lesions.

Authors:  Felix G Gassert; Florian T Gassert; Katja Specht; Carolin Knebel; Ulrich Lenze; Marcus R Makowski; Rüdiger von Eisenhart-Rothe; Alexandra S Gersing; Klaus Woertler
Journal:  BMC Cancer       Date:  2021-01-22       Impact factor: 4.430

4.  The incidence and diagnostic relevance of chemical shift artefact in the magnetic resonance imaging characterisation of superficial soft tissue masses.

Authors:  Asif Saifuddin; Shuaib Siddiqui; Ian Pressney; Michael Khoo
Journal:  Br J Radiol       Date:  2019-12-19       Impact factor: 3.039

  4 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.