Literature DB >> 30902431

Correcting astigmatism at the time of cataract surgery: Toric IOLs and corneal relaxing incisions planned with an image-guidance system and intraoperative aberrometer versus manual planning and surgery.

Kerry D Solomon1, Helga P Sandoval2, Richard Potvin3.   

Abstract

PURPOSE: To compare the outcomes of the combination of an image-guided system and intraoperative aberrometer with the surgeon's standard of care in correcting astigmatism using toric intraocular lenses (IOLs) or corneal incisions.
SETTING: Single site in United States.
DESIGN: Prospective case series.
METHODS: Contralateral eyes of patients having uncomplicated bilateral cataract surgery and astigmatism correction were randomly assigned to Group A or Group B. Group A received the surgeon's preferred standard of care. Group B had preoperative planning using an image-guidance system (VERION), intraoperative aberrometry (ORA System with VerifEye+), and femtosecond laser-assisted cataract surgery. The primary endpoint was the residual refractive astigmatism at 3 months.
RESULTS: Thirty-eight eyes were treated with toric IOLs and 40 eyes with corneal astigmatic incisions. On average, toric IOLs resulted in almost 0.25 diopter (D) less cylinder than corneal astigmatic incisions (P < .01), with no difference between groups (P = .41). There was no statistically significant difference in the mean spherical equivalent refraction by group (P = .51). At 3 months, the IOL in 4 eyes (11%) (2 in Group A and Group B each) was more than 10 degrees of absolute orientation from the intended orientation. The mean keratometry was 0.16 D higher with the image-guided system compared with optical biometry (Lenstar). The vector difference between the 2 measurements was 0.5 D or lower in all eyes.
CONCLUSIONS: The combined use of an image-guided system and intraoperative aberrometer did not significantly improve outcomes compared with the surgeon's standard of care. Based on keratometry, there was good agreement in corneal astigmatism measurements between the image-guided system and the optical biometer.
Copyright © 2018 ASCRS and ESCRS. Published by Elsevier Inc. All rights reserved.

Entities:  

Year:  2019        PMID: 30902431     DOI: 10.1016/j.jcrs.2018.12.002

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Cataract Refract Surg        ISSN: 0886-3350            Impact factor:   3.351


  4 in total

1.  Toric intraocular lens versus limbal relaxing incisions for corneal astigmatism after phacoemulsification.

Authors:  Jonathan C Lake; Gustavo Victor; Gerry Clare; Gustavo Jm Porfírio; Ashleigh Kernohan; Jennifer R Evans
Journal:  Cochrane Database Syst Rev       Date:  2019-12-17

2.  Astigmatism Management with Astigmatism-Correcting Intraocular Lens Using Two Toric Calculators - A Comparative Case Series.

Authors:  Chun-Ju Lin; Chun-Ting Lai; Yu-Te Huang; Ning-Yi Hsia; Peng-Tai Tien; Henry Bair; Huan-Sheng Chen; Chun-Chi Chiang; Jane-Ming Lin; Wen-Lu Chen; Wen-Chuan Wu; Yi-Yu Tsai
Journal:  Clin Ophthalmol       Date:  2021-08-05

3.  Retrospective analysis of an intraoperative aberrometry database: a study investigating absolute prediction in eyes implanted with low cylinder power toric intraocular lenses.

Authors:  Robert J Cionni; Michael Breen; Cody Hamilton; Ravaughn Williams
Journal:  Clin Ophthalmol       Date:  2019-08-06

4.  Clinical Outcomes of Toric Intraocular Lenses: Differences in Expected Outcomes When Using a Calculator That Considers Effective Lens Position and the Posterior Cornea vs One That Does Not.

Authors:  Elizabeth Yeu; Albert Y Cheung; Richard Potvin
Journal:  Clin Ophthalmol       Date:  2020-03-16
  4 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.