| Literature DB >> 30898812 |
Rajat Das Gupta1,2, Ibrahim Hossain Sajal2, Mehedi Hasan1,2, Ipsita Sutradhar1,2, Mohammad Rifat Haider3,4, Malabika Sarker1,2,5.
Abstract
OBJECTIVES: This study aimed to discern the association between the frequency of television viewing and overweight and obesity among reproductive age women of Myanmar.Entities:
Keywords: Myanmar; non-communicable disease; obesity; overweight
Year: 2019 PMID: 30898812 PMCID: PMC6475159 DOI: 10.1136/bmjopen-2018-024680
Source DB: PubMed Journal: BMJ Open ISSN: 2044-6055 Impact factor: 2.692
Figure 1Flow chart showing the process of selecting the participants in the survey.
List of variables considered for the study
| Name of the variables | Categories |
| Outcome variables | |
| Body mass index (BMI) |
0=Normal weight or underweight (BMI<23 kg/m2) 1=Overweight (BMI 23.0 kg/m2 to <27.5 kg/m2) 2=Obesity (BMI≥27.5 kg/m2) |
| Explanatory variable | |
| Frequency of viewing television |
0=Not at all 1=Less than once a week 2=At least once a week |
| Covariates | |
| 1. Age groups |
0=15–24 years 1=25–34 years 2=35–49 years |
| 2. Place of residence |
0=Urban 1=Rural |
| 3. Region of residence |
0=Kachin 1=Kayah 2=Kayin 3=Chin 4=Sagaing 5=Taninthayi 6=Bago 7=Magway 8=Mandalay 9=Mon 10=Rakhine 11=Yangon 12=Shan 13=Ayeyarwaddy 14=Naypyitaw |
| 4. Education |
0=No education 1=Primary education 2=Secondary education 3=Higher education |
| 5. Wealth quintile |
0=Poorest 1=Poorer 2=Middle 3=Richer 4=Richest |
| 6. Current working status |
0=Yes 1=No |
| 7. Parity |
0=0 (nullipara) 1=1 (primipara) 2=2 3=3 4=>3 |
| 8. Number of household members |
0=≤5 1=>5 |
Figure 2Distribution of the respondents by body mass index (BMI) status.
Sociodemographic characteristics of the study participants and prevalence of overweight and obesity across the independent variables, MDHS 2015–2016 (n=12 021)
| Variable | Frequency (%) | Body mass index (BMI) status (%) | χ2 | P value | ||
| BMI<23 kg/m2 | 23 kg/m2≥BMI <27.5 kg/m2 | BMI ≥27.5 kg/m2 | ||||
| Age group (years) | ||||||
| 15–24 | 3433 (28.6) | 82.4 | 14.3 | 3.3 | 173.9 |
|
| 25–34 | 3504 (29.1) | 60.4 | 27.6 | 12.0 | ||
| 35–49 | 5084 (42.3) | 47.7 | 34.0 | 18.3 | ||
| Place of residence | ||||||
| Urban | 3505 (29.2) | 51.0 | 31.1 | 17.9 | 258.4 |
|
| Rural | 8516 (70.8) | 65.6 | 24.6 | 9.8 | ||
| Region of residence | ||||||
| Kachin | 334 (2.8) | 54.6 | 30.0 | 15.4 | 240.1 |
|
| Kayah | 60 (0.5) | 63.3 | 27.1 | 9.6 | ||
| Kayin | 274 (2.3) | 59.1 | 27.1 | 13.8 | ||
| Chin | 90 (0.8) | 71.7 | 23.9 | 4.4 | ||
| Sagaing | 1351 (11.3) | 58.7 | 27.7 | 13.6 | ||
| Taninthayi | 265 (2.2) | 57.0 | 28.6 | 14.4 | ||
| Bago | 1197 (9.9) | 64.5 | 25.9 | 9.6 | ||
| Magway | 1030 (8.6) | 67.7 | 24.0 | 8.3 | ||
| Mandalay | 1462 (12.2) | 64.2 | 25.4 | 10.5 | ||
| Mon | 432 (3.6) | 59.7 | 25.0 | 15.3 | ||
| Rakhine | 695 (5.8) | 75.3 | 19.2 | 5.5 | ||
| Yangon | 1822 (15.1) | 49.7 | 33.8 | 16.5 | ||
| Shan | 1216 (10.1) | 60.2 | 25.7 | 14.1 | ||
| Ayeyarwaddy | 1508 (12.5) | 64.8 | 23.3 | 11.8 | ||
| Naypyitaw | 285 (2.3) | 63.3 | 26.0 | 10.7 | ||
| Highest educational status | ||||||
| No formal education | 1485 (12.4) | 65.4 | 25.3 | 9.3 | 40.5 |
|
| Primary | 4966 (41.3) | 59.8 | 27.6 | 12.6 | ||
| Secondary | 4345 (36.1) | 63.1 | 25.3 | 11.6 | ||
| Higher | 1225 (10.2) | 56.6 | 28.1 | 15.3 | ||
| Currently employed | ||||||
| Yes | 8184 (68.1) | 61.2 | 26.6 | 12.2 | 0.2 | 0.9348 |
| No | 3837 (32.9) | 61.6 | 26.4 | 12.0 | ||
| Wealth index | ||||||
| Poorest | 2052 (17.1) | 75.2 | 18.6 | 6.2 | 427.7 |
|
| Poorer | 2252 (18.7) | 66.8 | 25.0 | 8.2 | ||
| Middle | 2509 (20.9) | 61.5 | 28.0 | 10.5 | ||
| Richer | 2533 (21.1) | 57.2 | 28.2 | 14.6 | ||
| Richest | 2675 (22.2) | 49.9 | 30.9 | 19.2 | ||
| Marital status | ||||||
| Single | 4191 (34.9) | 76.8 | 17.4 | 5.8 | 120.1 |
|
| Currently married | 7021 (58.4) | 52.1 | 31.9 | 16.0 | ||
| Separated/divorced/widowed | 809 (6.7) | 61.1 | 27.4 | 11.5 | ||
| Parity | ||||||
| 0 | 5010 (41.7) | 75.2 | 18.4 | 6.4 | 759.6 |
|
| 1 | 1844 (15.3) | 55.5 | 30.8 | 13.7 | ||
| 2 | 1903 (15.8) | 49.4 | 32.7 | 17.9 | ||
| 3 | 1405 (11.7) | 45.6 | 36.1 | 18.3 | ||
| >3 | 1859 (15.5) | 54.0 | 30.4 | 15.6 | ||
| Number of household members | ||||||
| ≤5 | 7402 (61.6) | 59.8 | 27.2 | 13.0 | 7.4 |
|
| >5 | 4620 (38.4) | 63.9 | 25.5 | 10.6 | ||
| Frequency of viewing television | ||||||
| Not at all | 2779 (23.1) | 67.2 | 24.5 | 8.3 | 89.7 |
|
| Less than once a week | 2015 (16.8) | 63.3 | 25.9 | 10.8 | ||
| At least once a week | 7227 (60.1) | 58.5 | 27.5 | 14.0 | ||
*p-value<0.05.
Figure 3Distribution of the respondents by place of residence with frequency of watching television.
Association between the frequency of viewing television and overweight and obesity among reproductive age women of Myanmar, MDHS 2015–2016
| Frequency of viewing Television | COR (95% CI) | P value | AOR (95% CI) | P value |
|
| ||||
| Not at all | Ref | Ref | ||
| Less than once a week | 1.20 (1.03 to 1.40) |
| 1.01 (0.87 to 1.19) | 0.870 |
| At least once a week | 1.49 (1.32 to 1.69) |
| 1.16 (1.02 to 1.32) |
|
|
| ||||
| Not at all | Ref | Ref | ||
| Less than once a week | 1.15 (0.80 to 1.67) | 0.441 | 1.05 (0.73 to 1.51) | 0.779 |
| At least once a week | 1.25 (0.93 to 1.69) | 0.144 | 1.14 (0.85 to 1.52) | 0.389 |
|
| ||||
| Not at all | Ref | Ref | ||
| Less than once a week | 1.11 (0.93 to 1.32) | 0.242 | 0.98 (0.82 to 1.17) | 0.829 |
| At least once a week | 1.26 (1.10 to 1.44) |
| 1.16 (1.01 to 1.34) |
|
Results are based on ordered logistics regression and adjusted for age, place of residence, region of residence, highest educational status, current employment status, wealth index, parity and number of household members. The BMI <23 kg/m2 group was held as the reference group.
AOR, adjusted OR; COR, crude OR; MDHS, Myanmar Demographic and Health Survey.
*p-value<0.05.