Literature DB >> 30898381

Artificial intelligence in breast imaging.

E P V Le1, Y Wang2, Y Huang3, S Hickman4, F J Gilbert5.   

Abstract

This article reviews current limitations and future opportunities for the application of computer-aided detection (CAD) systems and artificial intelligence in breast imaging. Traditional CAD systems in mammography screening have followed a rules-based approach, incorporating domain knowledge into hand-crafted features before using classical machine learning techniques as a classifier. The first commercial CAD system, ImageChecker M1000, relies on computer vision techniques for pattern recognition. Unfortunately, CAD systems have been shown to adversely affect some radiologists' performance and increase recall rates. The Digital Mammography DREAM Challenge was a multidisciplinary collaboration that provided 640,000 mammography images for teams to help decrease false-positive rates in breast cancer screening. Winning solutions leveraged deep learning's (DL) automatic hierarchical feature learning capabilities and used convolutional neural networks. Start-ups Therapixel and Kheiron Medical Technologies are using DL for breast cancer screening. With increasing use of digital breast tomosynthesis, specific artificial intelligence (AI)-CAD systems are emerging to include iCAD's PowerLook Tomo Detection and ScreenPoint Medical's Transpara. Other AI-CAD systems are focusing on breast diagnostic techniques such as ultrasound and magnetic resonance imaging (MRI). There is a gap in the market for contrast-enhanced spectral mammography AI-CAD tools. Clinical implementation of AI-CAD tools requires testing in scenarios mimicking real life to prove its usefulness in the clinical environment. This requires a large and representative dataset for testing and assessment of the reader's interaction with the tools. A cost-effectiveness assessment should be undertaken, with a large feasibility study carried out to ensure there are no unintended consequences. AI-CAD systems should incorporate explainable AI in accordance with the European Union General Data Protection Regulation (GDPR).
Copyright © 2019 The Royal College of Radiologists. Published by Elsevier Ltd. All rights reserved.

Entities:  

Year:  2019        PMID: 30898381     DOI: 10.1016/j.crad.2019.02.006

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Clin Radiol        ISSN: 0009-9260            Impact factor:   2.350


  41 in total

Review 1.  The overview of the deep learning integrated into the medical imaging of liver: a review.

Authors:  Kailai Xiang; Baihui Jiang; Dong Shang
Journal:  Hepatol Int       Date:  2021-07-15       Impact factor: 6.047

Review 2.  Radiomics with artificial intelligence: a practical guide for beginners.

Authors:  Burak Koçak; Emine Şebnem Durmaz; Ece Ateş; Özgür Kılıçkesmez
Journal:  Diagn Interv Radiol       Date:  2019-11       Impact factor: 2.630

Review 3.  CAD and AI for breast cancer-recent development and challenges.

Authors:  Heang-Ping Chan; Ravi K Samala; Lubomir M Hadjiiski
Journal:  Br J Radiol       Date:  2019-12-16       Impact factor: 3.039

4.  Prediction of pathological complete response after neoadjuvant chemotherapy in breast cancer: comparison of diagnostic performances of dedicated breast PET, whole-body PET, and dynamic contrast-enhanced MRI.

Authors:  Yukiko Tokuda; Masahiro Yanagawa; Yuka Fujita; Keiichiro Honma; Tomonori Tanei; Masafumi Shimoda; Tomohiro Miyake; Yasuto Naoi; Seung Jin Kim; Kenzo Shimazu; Seiki Hamada; Noriyuki Tomiyama
Journal:  Breast Cancer Res Treat       Date:  2021-03-17       Impact factor: 4.872

5.  Association of machine learning ultrasound radiomics and disease outcome in triple negative breast cancer.

Authors:  Haoyu Wang; Xiaokang Li; Ying Yuan; Yiwei Tong; Siyi Zhu; Renhong Huang; Kunwei Shen; Yi Guo; Yuanyuan Wang; Xiaosong Chen
Journal:  Am J Cancer Res       Date:  2022-01-15       Impact factor: 6.166

6.  A Warning about Warning Signals for Interpreting Mammograms.

Authors:  Solveig Hofvind; Christoph I Lee
Journal:  Radiology       Date:  2021-11-09       Impact factor: 11.105

7.  Machine Learning for Workflow Applications in Screening Mammography: Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis.

Authors:  Sarah E Hickman; Ramona Woitek; Elizabeth Phuong Vi Le; Yu Ri Im; Carina Mouritsen Luxhøj; Angelica I Aviles-Rivero; Gabrielle C Baxter; James W MacKay; Fiona J Gilbert
Journal:  Radiology       Date:  2021-10-19       Impact factor: 11.105

Review 8.  Artificial Intelligence: A Primer for Breast Imaging Radiologists.

Authors:  Manisha Bahl
Journal:  J Breast Imaging       Date:  2020-06-19

9.  Differential diagnosis between small breast phyllodes tumors and fibroadenomas using artificial intelligence and ultrasound data.

Authors:  Sihua Niu; Jianhua Huang; Jia Li; Xueling Liu; Dan Wang; Yingyan Wang; Huiming Shen; Min Qi; Yi Xiao; Mengyao Guan; Diancheng Li; Feifei Liu; Xiuming Wang; Yu Xiong; Siqi Gao; Xue Wang; Ping Yu; Jia'an Zhu
Journal:  Quant Imaging Med Surg       Date:  2021-05

Review 10.  Adoption of artificial intelligence in breast imaging: evaluation, ethical constraints and limitations.

Authors:  Sarah E Hickman; Gabrielle C Baxter; Fiona J Gilbert
Journal:  Br J Cancer       Date:  2021-03-26       Impact factor: 7.640

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.