Literature DB >> 35141010

Association of machine learning ultrasound radiomics and disease outcome in triple negative breast cancer.

Haoyu Wang1, Xiaokang Li2, Ying Yuan3, Yiwei Tong1, Siyi Zhu1, Renhong Huang1, Kunwei Shen1, Yi Guo2, Yuanyuan Wang2, Xiaosong Chen1.   

Abstract

Triple negative breast cancer (TNBC) is a breast cancer subtype with unfavorable prognosis. We aimed to establish a machine learning-based ultrasound radiomics model to predict disease-free survival (DFS) in TNBC. Invasive TNBC>T1b between January 2009 and June 2018 with preoperative ultrasound were enrolled and assigned to training and independent test cohort. Radiomics and clinicopathological features related with DFS were selected by univariate and multivariate regression analysis. Training cohort of combined features was resampled with SMOTEENN to balance distribution and put into classifiers. Areas Under Curves (AUCs) of models were compared by DeLong's test. 562 women were included with 68 DFS events observed. Twenty prognostic radiomics features were extracted. Machine learning model by Naïve Bayes combining radiomics, clinicopathological features, and SMOTEENN had an AUC of 0.86 (95% CI 0.84-0.88), with sensitivity of 74.7% and specificity of 80.1% in training cohort. In independent test cohort, this three-combination model delivered an AUC of 0.90 (95% CI 0.83-0.95), higher than models based on radiomics (AUC=0.69, P=0.016) or radiomics + SMOTEENN (AUC=0.73, P=0.019). Integrating machine learning radiomics model based on ultrasound and clinicopathological features can predict DFS events for TNBC patients. AJCR
Copyright © 2022.

Entities:  

Keywords:  Triple negative breast cancer; machine learning; prognosis; radiomics; ultrasonography

Year:  2022        PMID: 35141010      PMCID: PMC8822271     

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Am J Cancer Res        ISSN: 2156-6976            Impact factor:   6.166


  34 in total

1.  Comparing the areas under two or more correlated receiver operating characteristic curves: a nonparametric approach.

Authors:  E R DeLong; D M DeLong; D L Clarke-Pearson
Journal:  Biometrics       Date:  1988-09       Impact factor: 2.571

Review 2.  Pathological and molecular diagnosis of triple-negative breast cancer: a clinical perspective.

Authors:  F Penault-Llorca; G Viale
Journal:  Ann Oncol       Date:  2012-08       Impact factor: 32.976

3.  Breast Cancer Screening and Diagnosis, Version 3.2018, NCCN Clinical Practice Guidelines in Oncology.

Authors:  Therese B Bevers; Mark Helvie; Ermelinda Bonaccio; Kristine E Calhoun; Mary B Daly; William B Farrar; Judy E Garber; Richard Gray; Caprice C Greenberg; Rachel Greenup; Nora M Hansen; Randall E Harris; Alexandra S Heerdt; Teresa Helsten; Linda Hodgkiss; Tamarya L Hoyt; John G Huff; Lisa Jacobs; Constance Dobbins Lehman; Barbara Monsees; Bethany L Niell; Catherine C Parker; Mark Pearlman; Liane Philpotts; Laura B Shepardson; Mary Lou Smith; Matthew Stein; Lusine Tumyan; Cheryl Williams; Mary Anne Bergman; Rashmi Kumar
Journal:  J Natl Compr Canc Netw       Date:  2018-11       Impact factor: 11.908

Review 4.  Breast ultrasonography: state of the art.

Authors:  Regina J Hooley; Leslie M Scoutt; Liane E Philpotts
Journal:  Radiology       Date:  2013-09       Impact factor: 11.105

5.  Deep Learning to Improve Breast Cancer Detection on Screening Mammography.

Authors:  Li Shen; Laurie R Margolies; Joseph H Rothstein; Eugene Fluder; Russell McBride; Weiva Sieh
Journal:  Sci Rep       Date:  2019-08-29       Impact factor: 4.996

6.  A deep learning image-based intrinsic molecular subtype classifier of breast tumors reveals tumor heterogeneity that may affect survival.

Authors:  Mustafa I Jaber; Bing Song; Clive Taylor; Charles J Vaske; Stephen C Benz; Shahrooz Rabizadeh; Patrick Soon-Shiong; Christopher W Szeto
Journal:  Breast Cancer Res       Date:  2020-01-28       Impact factor: 6.466

7.  Personalizing the treatment of women with early breast cancer: highlights of the St Gallen International Expert Consensus on the Primary Therapy of Early Breast Cancer 2013.

Authors:  A Goldhirsch; E P Winer; A S Coates; R D Gelber; M Piccart-Gebhart; B Thürlimann; H-J Senn
Journal:  Ann Oncol       Date:  2013-08-04       Impact factor: 32.976

8.  Radiomics: Images Are More than Pictures, They Are Data.

Authors:  Robert J Gillies; Paul E Kinahan; Hedvig Hricak
Journal:  Radiology       Date:  2015-11-18       Impact factor: 11.105

9.  Association of sonographic features and molecular subtypes in predicting breast cancer disease outcomes.

Authors:  Haoyu Wang; Jiejie Yao; Ying Zhu; Weiwei Zhan; Xiaosong Chen; Kunwei Shen
Journal:  Cancer Med       Date:  2020-07-13       Impact factor: 4.452

10.  Image analysis with deep learning to predict breast cancer grade, ER status, histologic subtype, and intrinsic subtype.

Authors:  Heather D Couture; Lindsay A Williams; Joseph Geradts; Sarah J Nyante; Ebonee N Butler; J S Marron; Charles M Perou; Melissa A Troester; Marc Niethammer
Journal:  NPJ Breast Cancer       Date:  2018-09-03
View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.