Literature DB >> 30897559

Impact of machine log-files uncertainties on the quality assurance of proton pencil beam scanning treatment delivery.

S Toscano1, K Souris, C Gomà, A Barragán-Montero, S Puydupin, F Vander Stappen, G Janssens, A Matic, X Geets, E Sterpin.   

Abstract

Irradiation log-files store useful information about the plan delivery, and together with independent Monte Carlo dose engine calculations can be used to reduce the time needed for patient-specific quality assurance (PSQA). Nonetheless, machine log-files carry an uncertainty associated to the measurement of the spot position and intensity that can influence the correct evaluation of the quality of the treatment delivery. This work addresses the problem of the inclusion of these uncertainties for the final verification of the treatment delivery. Dedicated measurements performed in an IBA Proteus Plus gantry with a pencil beam scanning (PBS) dedicated nozzle have been carried out to build a 'room-dependent' model of the spot position uncertainties. The model has been obtained through interpolation of the look-up tables describing the systematic and random uncertainties, and it has been tested for a clinical case of a brain cancer patient irradiated in a dry-run. The delivered dose has been compared with the planned dose with the inclusion of the errors obtained applying the model. Our results suggest that the accuracy of the treatment delivery is higher than the spot position uncertainties obtained from the log-file records. The comparison in terms of DVHs shows that the log-reconstructed dose is compatible with the planned dose within the 95% confidence interval obtained applying our model. The initial mean dose difference between the calculated dose to the patient based on the plan and recorded data is around 1%. The difference is essentially due to the log-file uncertainties and it can be removed with a correct treatment of these errors. In conclusion our new PSQA protocol allows for a fast verification of the dose delivered after every treatment fraction through the use of machine log-files and an independent Monte Carlo dose engine. Moreover, the inclusion of log-file uncertainties in the dose calculation allows for a correct evaluation of the quality of the treatment plan delivery.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2019        PMID: 30897559     DOI: 10.1088/1361-6560/ab120c

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Phys Med Biol        ISSN: 0031-9155            Impact factor:   3.609


  3 in total

Review 1.  Online daily adaptive proton therapy.

Authors:  Francesca Albertini; Michael Matter; Lena Nenoff; Ye Zhang; Antony Lomax
Journal:  Br J Radiol       Date:  2019-11-11       Impact factor: 3.039

2.  Compact Method for Proton Range Verification Based on Coaxial Prompt Gamma-Ray Monitoring: a Theoretical Study.

Authors:  F Hueso-González; T Bortfeld
Journal:  IEEE Trans Radiat Plasma Med Sci       Date:  2019-07-23

Review 3.  Adaptive proton therapy.

Authors:  Harald Paganetti; Pablo Botas; Gregory C Sharp; Brian Winey
Journal:  Phys Med Biol       Date:  2021-11-15       Impact factor: 3.609

  3 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.