Literature DB >> 30896544

Comparison of PERCIST and RECIST criteria for evaluation of therapy response after yttrium-90 microsphere therapy in patients with hepatocellular carcinoma and those with metastatic colorectal carcinoma.

Sait Sager1, Elife Akgün1, Lebriz Uslu-Beşli1, Sertaç Asa1, Burak Akovali1, Onur Sahin1, Nami Yeyin1, Mustafa Demir1, Mohammad Abuqbeitah1, Fatih Gülsen2, Haluk Sayman1, Kerim Sönmezoglu1.   

Abstract

OBJECTIVE: Yttrium-90 (Y) microsphere therapy has been increasingly used to treat hepatocellular carcinoma (HCC) and liver metastasis of colorectal cancer (mCRC). This study aims to compare two different criterias used for therapy response evaluation following Y therapy within the same group of patients. PATIENTS AND METHODS: A total of 21 patients with HCC and 19 patients with mCRC were included in this study, with 36 and 42 liver lesions, respectively. The lesions were evaluated before and after therapy by CT or MRI and fluorine-18 fluorodeoxyglucose (F-FDG) PET/CT. Several metabolic parameters were analyzed including maximum and mean standardized uptake values, peak standardized uptake value, metabolic tumor volume (MTV), and total lesion glycolysis. Tumor volume was determined using CT or MRI images for all lesions, and the applied activity was estimated to deliver 120±20 Gy for the treated lobe. Six weeks after Y microsphere therapy, F-FDG PET/CT scan was performed to evaluate tumor response using PERCIST and RECIST criteria. Overall survival was calculated using Kaplan-Meier method.
RESULTS: A total of 78 liver lesions were treated without any major complication. The mean tumor volumes of HCC lesions calculated by CT or MRI before and after therapy were 84.38 and 86.62 cm, respectively. The average MTV of these lesions on PET images was calculated as 68.142 mm before therapy and 56.945 mm after treatment. In patients with mCRC, the mean tumor volume was 52.32 cm before therapy and 54.52 cm after therapy. The average MTV was calculated as 41.720 mm before and 44.967 mm after therapy for the same patient group. Response Evaluation Criteria In Solid Tumors (RECIST) and PET Response Criteria In Solid Tumors incompatibility was seen in seven of 36 lesions in HCC-diagnosed patients and seven of 42 lesions in patients with mCRC. The mean overall survival was calculated as 13.09 months in patients with HCC and 10.6 months in patients with mCRC.
CONCLUSION: Y therapy response can be evaluated by both RECIST and European Organization for Research and Treatment of Cancer criteria. However, RECIST and European Organization for Research and Treatment of Cancer incompatibility can be seen. The anatomic methods for evaluating HCC response is relatively more accurate, whereas the metabolic parameters guided by PET/CT scan showed greater importance in response to evaluation of liver mCRC.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2019        PMID: 30896544     DOI: 10.1097/MNM.0000000000001014

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Nucl Med Commun        ISSN: 0143-3636            Impact factor:   1.690


  4 in total

1.  Comparison of the safety and prognosis of sequential regorafenib after sorafenib and lenvatinib treatment failure in patients with unresectable hepatocellular carcinoma: a retrospective cohort study.

Authors:  Jian Zhai; Jianwei Liu; Zhigang Fu; Shilei Bai; Xiaowei Li; Zengqiang Qu; Yanfu Sun; Ruiliang Ge; Feng Xue
Journal:  J Gastrointest Oncol       Date:  2022-06

2.  A Comprehensive Prognostic Model for Colorectal Cancer Liver Metastasis Recurrence After Neoadjuvant Chemotherapy.

Authors:  Zhenyuan Zhou; Xin Han; Diandian Sun; Zhiying Liang; Wei Wu; Haixing Ju
Journal:  Front Oncol       Date:  2022-06-16       Impact factor: 5.738

Review 3.  Molecular Imaging of Tumor Microenvironment to Assess the Effects of Locoregional Treatment for Hepatocellular Carcinoma.

Authors:  Quan Chen; Austin Z Chen; Guorong Jia; Jindian Li; Chuansheng Zheng; Kai Chen
Journal:  Hepatol Commun       Date:  2021-11-05

Review 4.  The Value of 18F-FDG-PET-CT Imaging in Treatment Evaluation of Colorectal Liver Metastases: A Systematic Review.

Authors:  Okker D Bijlstra; Maud M E Boreel; Sietse van Mossel; Mark C Burgmans; Ellen H W Kapiteijn; Daniela E Oprea-Lager; Daphne D D Rietbergen; Floris H P van Velden; Alexander L Vahrmeijer; Rutger-Jan Swijnenburg; J Sven D Mieog; Lioe-Fee de Geus-Oei
Journal:  Diagnostics (Basel)       Date:  2022-03-15
  4 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.