Literature DB >> 30896249

A sparse principal component analysis of Class III malocclusions.

Tae-Joo Kang, Soo-Heang Eo, HyungJun Cho, Richard E Donatelli, Shin-Jae Lee.   

Abstract

OBJECTIVES: To identify the most characteristic variables out of a large number of anatomic landmark variables on three-dimensional computed tomography (CT) images. A modified principal component analysis (PCA) was used to identify which anatomic structures would demonstrate the major variabilities that would most characterize the patient.
MATERIALS AND METHODS: Data were collected from 217 patients with severe skeletal Class III malocclusions who had undergone orthognathic surgery. The input variables were composed of a total of 740 variables consisting of three-dimensional Cartesian coordinates and their Euclidean distances of 104 soft tissue and 81 hard tissue landmarks identified on the CT images. A statistical method, a modified PCA based on the penalized matrix decomposition, was performed to extract the principal components.
RESULTS: The first 10 (8 soft tissue, 2 hard tissue) principal components from the 740 input variables explained 63% of the total variance. The most conspicuous principal components indicated that groups of soft tissue variables on the nose, lips, and eyes explained more variability than skeletal variables did. In other words, these soft tissue components were most representative of the differences among the Class III patients.
CONCLUSIONS: On three-dimensional images, soft tissues had more variability than the skeletal anatomic structures. In the assessment of three-dimensional facial variability, a limited number of anatomic landmarks being used today did not seem sufficient. Nevertheless, this modified PCA may be used to analyze orthodontic three-dimensional images in the future, but it may not fully express the variability of the patients.

Entities:  

Keywords:  Principal component analysis; three-dimensional image

Mesh:

Year:  2019        PMID: 30896249      PMCID: PMC8111842          DOI: 10.2319/100518-717.1

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Angle Orthod        ISSN: 0003-3219            Impact factor:   2.079


  16 in total

1.  Classification of the skeletal variation in normal occlusion.

Authors:  Ji-Young Kim; Shin-Jae Lee; Tae-Woo Kim; Dong-Seok Nahm; Young-Ii Chang
Journal:  Angle Orthod       Date:  2005-05       Impact factor: 2.079

2.  Classification of facial asymmetry by cluster analysis.

Authors:  Hyeon-Shik Hwang; Il-Sun Youn; Ki-Heon Lee; Hoi-Jeong Lim
Journal:  Am J Orthod Dentofacial Orthop       Date:  2007-09       Impact factor: 2.650

3.  A penalized matrix decomposition, with applications to sparse principal components and canonical correlation analysis.

Authors:  Daniela M Witten; Robert Tibshirani; Trevor Hastie
Journal:  Biostatistics       Date:  2009-04-17       Impact factor: 5.899

4.  Face processing: human perception and principal components analysis.

Authors:  P J Hancock; A M Burton; V Bruce
Journal:  Mem Cognit       Date:  1996-01

5.  Correlation between the cross-sectional morphology of the mandible and the three-dimensional facial skeletal pattern: A structural equation modeling approach.

Authors:  Mi So Ahn; Sang Min Shin; Te-Ju Wu; Dong Joon Lee; Ching-Chang Ko; Chooryung J Chung; Yong-Il Kim
Journal:  Angle Orthod       Date:  2018-08-03       Impact factor: 2.079

6.  Reproducibility of the lip position at rest: A 3-dimensional perspective.

Authors:  Furkan Dindaroğlu; Gökhan Serhat Duran; Serkan Görgülü
Journal:  Am J Orthod Dentofacial Orthop       Date:  2016-05       Impact factor: 2.650

7.  Genetic polymorphisms underlying the skeletal Class III phenotype.

Authors:  Christiane Vasconcellos Cruz; Claudia Trindade Mattos; José Calasans Maia; José Mauro Granjeiro; Maria Fernanda Reis; José Nelson Mucha; Beatriz Vilella; Antonio Carlos Ruellas; Ronir Raggio Luiz; Marcelo Castro Costa; Alexandre Rezende Vieira
Journal:  Am J Orthod Dentofacial Orthop       Date:  2017-04       Impact factor: 2.650

8.  Morphometric correlation between facial soft-tissue profile shape and skeletal pattern in children and adolescents.

Authors:  Demetrios J Halazonetis
Journal:  Am J Orthod Dentofacial Orthop       Date:  2007-10       Impact factor: 2.650

9.  Reproducibility of maxillofacial anatomic landmarks on 3-dimensional computed tomographic images determined with the 95% confidence ellipse method.

Authors:  Atsushi Muramatsu; Hiroyuki Nawa; Momoko Kimura; Kazuhito Yoshida; Masahito Maeda; Akitoshi Katsumata; Eiichiro Ariji; Shigemi Goto
Journal:  Angle Orthod       Date:  2008-05       Impact factor: 2.079

10.  Morphometric evaluation of soft-tissue profile shape.

Authors:  Demetrios J Halazonetis
Journal:  Am J Orthod Dentofacial Orthop       Date:  2007-04       Impact factor: 2.650

View more
  7 in total

1.  Automated identification of cephalometric landmarks: Part 1-Comparisons between the latest deep-learning methods YOLOV3 and SSD.

Authors:  Ji-Hoon Park; Hye-Won Hwang; Jun-Ho Moon; Youngsung Yu; Hansuk Kim; Soo-Bok Her; Girish Srinivasan; Mohammed Noori A Aljanabi; Richard E Donatelli; Shin-Jae Lee
Journal:  Angle Orthod       Date:  2019-07-08       Impact factor: 2.079

2.  Automated identification of cephalometric landmarks: Part 2- Might it be better than human?

Authors:  Hye-Won Hwang; Ji-Hoon Park; Jun-Ho Moon; Youngsung Yu; Hansuk Kim; Soo-Bok Her; Girish Srinivasan; Mohammed Noori A Aljanabi; Richard E Donatelli; Shin-Jae Lee
Journal:  Angle Orthod       Date:  2019-07-22       Impact factor: 2.079

3.  Predicting soft tissue changes after orthognathic surgery: The sparse partial least squares method.

Authors:  Hee-Yeon Suh; Ho-Jin Lee; Yun-Sic Lee; Soo-Heang Eo; Richard E Donatelli; Shin-Jae Lee
Journal:  Angle Orthod       Date:  2019-05-31       Impact factor: 2.079

4.  Evaluation of automated cephalometric analysis based on the latest deep learning method.

Authors:  Hye-Won Hwang; Jun-Ho Moon; Min-Gyu Kim; Richard E Donatelli; Shin-Jae Lee
Journal:  Angle Orthod       Date:  2021-05-01       Impact factor: 2.079

5.  Evaluation of an automated superimposition method for computer-aided cephalometrics.

Authors:  Jun-Ho Moon; Hye-Won Hwang; Shin-Jae Lee
Journal:  Angle Orthod       Date:  2020-05-01       Impact factor: 2.079

6.  How much deep learning is enough for automatic identification to be reliable?

Authors:  Jun-Ho Moon; Hye-Won Hwang; Youngsung Yu; Min-Gyu Kim; Richard E Donatelli; Shin-Jae Lee
Journal:  Angle Orthod       Date:  2020-11-01       Impact factor: 2.079

7.  Evaluation of an automated superimposition method based on multiple landmarks for growing patients.

Authors:  Min-Gyu Kim; Jun-Ho Moon; Hye-Won Hwang; Sung Joo Cho; Richard E Donatelli; Shin-Jae Lee
Journal:  Angle Orthod       Date:  2022-03-01       Impact factor: 2.079

  7 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.