Literature DB >> 30896218

Clinical decisions and time since rest break: An analysis of decision fatigue in nurses.

Julia L Allan1, Derek W Johnston1, Daniel J H Powell1, Barbara Farquharson2, Martyn C Jones3, George Leckie4, Marie Johnston1.   

Abstract

OBJECTIVE: The present study investigates whether nurses working for a national medical telephone helpline show evidence of "decision fatigue," as measured by a shift from effortful to easier and more conservative decisions as the time since their last rest break increases.
METHOD: In an observational, repeated-measures study, data from approximately 4,000 calls to 150 nurses working for the Scottish NHS 24 medical helpline (37% of the national workforce) were modeled to determine whether the likelihood of a nurse's decision to refer a patient to another health professional the same day (the clinically safest but most conservative and resource inefficient decision) varied according to the number of calls taken/time elapsed since a nurse's last rest break and/or since the start of shift. Analyses used mixed-effect logistic regression.
RESULTS: For every consecutive call taken since last rest break, the odds of nurses making a conservative management decision (i.e., arranging for callers to see another health professional the same day) increased by 5.5% (p = .001, 95% confidence interval [CI: 2.2, 8.8]), an increase in odds of 20.5% per work hour (p < .001, 95% CI [9.1, 33.2]) or 49.0% (on average) from immediately after 1 break to immediately before the next. Decision-making was not significantly related to general or cumulative workload (calls or time elapsed since start of shift).
CONCLUSIONS: Every consecutive decision that nurses make since their last break produces a predictable shift toward more conservative, and less resource-efficient, decisions. Theoretical models of cognitive fatigue can elucidate how and why this shift occurs, helping to identify potentially modifiable determinants of patient care. (PsycINFO Database Record (c) 2019 APA, all rights reserved).

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2019        PMID: 30896218     DOI: 10.1037/hea0000725

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Health Psychol        ISSN: 0278-6133            Impact factor:   4.267


  7 in total

1.  Decision fatigue: less is more when making choices with patients.

Authors:  Alexandra Moorhouse
Journal:  Br J Gen Pract       Date:  2020-07-30       Impact factor: 5.386

2.  Decision Fatigue in nurses in the COVID-19 pandemic: A commentary.

Authors:  Zahra Hatami; Naeimeh Sarkhani; Nasrin Nikpeyma
Journal:  Nurs Open       Date:  2021-09-21

3.  Quantifying the cost of decision fatigue: suboptimal risk decisions in finance.

Authors:  Tobias Baer; Simone Schnall
Journal:  R Soc Open Sci       Date:  2021-05-05       Impact factor: 2.963

4.  Quality in Clinical Consultations: A Cross-Sectional Study.

Authors:  Anneke Graf; Chan Hee Koh; Gordon Caldwell; Joan Grieve; Melissa Tan; Jasmine Hassan; Kaushiki Bakaya; Hani J Marcus; Stephanie E Baldeweg
Journal:  Clin Pract       Date:  2022-07-14

5.  Fuzzy constraint-based agent negotiation framework for doctor-patient shared decision-making.

Authors:  Kaibiao Lin; Yong Liu; Ping Lu; Yimin Yang; Haiting Fan; Feiping Hong
Journal:  BMC Med Inform Decis Mak       Date:  2022-08-13       Impact factor: 3.298

6.  How the Lagged and Accumulated Effects of Stress, Coping, and Tasks Affect Mood and Fatigue during Nurses' Shifts.

Authors:  Fermín Martínez-Zaragoza; Jordi Fernández-Castro; Gemma Benavides-Gil; Rosa García-Sierra
Journal:  Int J Environ Res Public Health       Date:  2020-10-05       Impact factor: 3.390

7.  Decision fatigue among clinical nurses during the COVID-19 pandemic.

Authors:  Grant A Pignatiello; Emily Tsivitse; Julia O'Brien; Noa Kraus; Ronald L Hickman
Journal:  J Clin Nurs       Date:  2021-07-21       Impact factor: 4.423

  7 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.