BACKGROUND: The predictive efficacies of parameters related to P-wave amplitude (PWA) for atrial fibrillation (AF) recurrence after catheter ablation are unclear. METHODS: We measured multiple PWA parameters using an automated system in 126 consecutive patients with persistent and long-standing persistent AF who underwent catheter ablation. The relationships between AF recurrence and various PWA parameters were examined, including the association with P-wave vector magnitude (calculated as the square root of the sum of lead II PWA squared, lead V6 PWA squared, and a one-half lead V2 PWA squared). RESULTS: Atrial fibrillation did not recur in 87 patients (69%) during 32 ± 15 months of follow-up. The maximum PWA, mean PWA, and P-wave vector magnitude were lower in patients with AF recurrence than those without (maximum PWA, 0.14 ± 0.05 mV vs. 0.16 ± 0.05 mV, p = 0.017; mean PWA, 0.05 ± 0.02 mV vs. 0.06 ± 0.02 mV, p = 0.003; P-wave vector magnitude, 0.09 ± 0.03 mV vs. 0.13 ± 0.04 mV, p < 0.001). A multivariate Cox regression analysis revealed that the predictive ability of P-wave vector magnitude for AF recurrence was independent of other clinical properties (hazard ratio: 0.153, 95% confidence interval: 0.046-0.507, p = 0.002). Atrial fibrillation freedom rates of patients with P-wave vector magnitude higher and lower than 0.13 mV were 93% and 57%, respectively. P-wave vector magnitude weakly correlated with left atrial dimension (R = -0.280, p = 0.004). CONCLUSIONS: P-wave vector magnitude can predict AF recurrence after catheter ablation in patients with persistent AF.
BACKGROUND: The predictive efficacies of parameters related to P-wave amplitude (PWA) for atrial fibrillation (AF) recurrence after catheter ablation are unclear. METHODS: We measured multiple PWA parameters using an automated system in 126 consecutive patients with persistent and long-standing persistent AF who underwent catheter ablation. The relationships between AF recurrence and various PWA parameters were examined, including the association with P-wave vector magnitude (calculated as the square root of the sum of lead II PWA squared, lead V6 PWA squared, and a one-half lead V2 PWA squared). RESULTS:Atrial fibrillation did not recur in 87 patients (69%) during 32 ± 15 months of follow-up. The maximum PWA, mean PWA, and P-wave vector magnitude were lower in patients with AF recurrence than those without (maximum PWA, 0.14 ± 0.05 mV vs. 0.16 ± 0.05 mV, p = 0.017; mean PWA, 0.05 ± 0.02 mV vs. 0.06 ± 0.02 mV, p = 0.003; P-wave vector magnitude, 0.09 ± 0.03 mV vs. 0.13 ± 0.04 mV, p < 0.001). A multivariate Cox regression analysis revealed that the predictive ability of P-wave vector magnitude for AF recurrence was independent of other clinical properties (hazard ratio: 0.153, 95% confidence interval: 0.046-0.507, p = 0.002). Atrial fibrillation freedom rates of patients with P-wave vector magnitude higher and lower than 0.13 mV were 93% and 57%, respectively. P-wave vector magnitude weakly correlated with left atrial dimension (R = -0.280, p = 0.004). CONCLUSIONS: P-wave vector magnitude can predict AF recurrence after catheter ablation in patients with persistent AF.
Authors: P E Dilaveris; E J Gialafos; S K Sideris; A M Theopistou; G K Andrikopoulos; M Kyriakidis; J E Gialafos; P K Toutouzas Journal: Am Heart J Date: 1998-05 Impact factor: 4.749
Authors: Craig T January; L Samuel Wann; Joseph S Alpert; Hugh Calkins; Joaquin E Cigarroa; Joseph C Cleveland; Jamie B Conti; Patrick T Ellinor; Michael D Ezekowitz; Michael E Field; Katherine T Murray; Ralph L Sacco; William G Stevenson; Patrick J Tchou; Cynthia M Tracy; Clyde W Yancy Journal: J Am Coll Cardiol Date: 2014-03-28 Impact factor: 24.094
Authors: Hugh Calkins; Gerhard Hindricks; Riccardo Cappato; Young-Hoon Kim; Eduardo B Saad; Luis Aguinaga; Joseph G Akar; Vinay Badhwar; Josep Brugada; John Camm; Peng-Sheng Chen; Shih-Ann Chen; Mina K Chung; Jens Cosedis Nielsen; Anne B Curtis; D Wyn Davies; John D Day; André d'Avila; N M S Natasja de Groot; Luigi Di Biase; Mattias Duytschaever; James R Edgerton; Kenneth A Ellenbogen; Patrick T Ellinor; Sabine Ernst; Guilherme Fenelon; Edward P Gerstenfeld; David E Haines; Michel Haissaguerre; Robert H Helm; Elaine Hylek; Warren M Jackman; Jose Jalife; Jonathan M Kalman; Josef Kautzner; Hans Kottkamp; Karl Heinz Kuck; Koichiro Kumagai; Richard Lee; Thorsten Lewalter; Bruce D Lindsay; Laurent Macle; Moussa Mansour; Francis E Marchlinski; Gregory F Michaud; Hiroshi Nakagawa; Andrea Natale; Stanley Nattel; Ken Okumura; Douglas Packer; Evgeny Pokushalov; Matthew R Reynolds; Prashanthan Sanders; Mauricio Scanavacca; Richard Schilling; Claudio Tondo; Hsuan-Ming Tsao; Atul Verma; David J Wilber; Teiichi Yamane Journal: Europace Date: 2018-01-01 Impact factor: 5.214
Authors: Antti Eranti; Aapo L Aro; Tuomas Kerola; Olli Anttonen; Harri A Rissanen; Jani T Tikkanen; M Juhani Junttila; Tuomas V Kenttä; Paul Knekt; Heikki V Huikuri Journal: Circ Arrhythm Electrophysiol Date: 2014-11-07
Authors: M Haïssaguerre; P Jaïs; D C Shah; A Takahashi; M Hocini; G Quiniou; S Garrigue; A Le Mouroux; P Le Métayer; J Clémenty Journal: N Engl J Med Date: 1998-09-03 Impact factor: 91.245
Authors: L C Malcolme-Lawes; C Juli; R Karim; W Bai; R Quest; P B Lim; S Jamil-Copley; P Kojodjojo; B Ariff; D W Davies; D Rueckert; D P Francis; R Hunter; D Jones; R Boubertakh; S E Petersen; R Schilling; P Kanagaratnam; N S Peters Journal: Heart Rhythm Date: 2013-05-16 Impact factor: 6.343