Literature DB >> 30895081

Comparison of factors affecting orthodontic treatment motivation of Taiwanese and Thai patients in two hospitals.

Wariya Laothong1,2, Hsin-Chung Cheng1,2.   

Abstract

BACKGROUND/
PURPOSE: Many factors, including economic, psychosocial statuses and ethnicity, affect patients' decision to seek orthodontic treatment. The present study compared orthodontic patients' motivation, attitude and the factors affecting this motivation in Taiwanese and Thai patients. We investigated the association between the aforementioned variables and patient characteristics.
MATERIALS AND METHODS: We enrolled 250 Thai and 250 Taiwanese patients (age ≥ 20 years) from Sunprasitthiprasong and Taipei Medical University Hospitals, respectively, by using self-administered questionnaires. Demographic characteristics were analyzed using Pearson's chi-square test, patients' motivation, attitude and the factors affecting this motivation were analyzed using the sample t-test. The association among the variables was investigated by multiple regression analysis.
RESULTS: In both hospitals, the main motivation for seeking orthodontic treatment was esthetic concerns; the patients believed that treatment could make them more beautiful. Taiwanese and Thai patients rejected treatment because of high treatment costs and long treatment periods, respectively. A significant association was observed between household income and Thai patients' motivation (p < 0.05). Sex was significantly associated with Thai patients' attitude (p < 0.05). Age, sex, active treatment duration, and marital status were associated with Taiwanese attitude toward treatment (p < 0.05). In addition, age, household income, and information resources were significantly associated with the factors affecting Taiwanese patients' motivation (p < 0.05).
CONCLUSION: Ethnicity influenced patients' motivation. Economic status was the main factor affecting Thai patients, whereas many factors affected Taiwanese patients' decision to seek orthodontic treatment. However, esthetic concerns were a crucial motivation for both groups.

Entities:  

Keywords:  factors affecting; motivation; orthodontic treatment

Year:  2017        PMID: 30895081      PMCID: PMC6395353          DOI: 10.1016/j.jds.2017.06.003

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Dent Sci        ISSN: 1991-7902            Impact factor:   2.080


Introduction

Recently, the need for the physical and psychological aspects of evaluation in orthodontic treatment has been widely discussed because psychological factors are conducive to treatment success and failure. Psychological factors include patients' motivation and ability to cope with pain and discomfort during treatment.2, 3 Patients can be motivated by their peers or by their own desire. Daniels et al. investigated patients' motivation and reported esthetic concerns as the key motivational factor to undergo orthodontic treatment. Other studies have reported the desire to have straightened teeth and improved smile appearance as the main factors. Furthermore, teasing, dentists' advice, and speech problems encourage patients to seek treatment.5, 6 In addition, health is not a motivational factor for seeking treatment. With respect to patients' attitude toward orthodontic treatment, a study reported that patients believed that orthodontic treatment can improve their quality of life, ensure a more successful career, and offer higher chances of finding a romantic partner. Similarly, another study stated that the orthodontic treatment can improve their social life, offer more opportunities at work, and improve their dental health. Treatment cost is a factor associated with the treatment desire in Brazilian adolescents. In addition, pain and discomfort, appearance on placement of braces, and treatment duration are the reasons for treatment rejection. Studies have reported that women are more concerned about esthetics and are less satisfied with their dental appearance than men.11, 12, 13 Studies have found no significant association between the treatment desire and age or sex.4, 8 Many studies have analyzed the association between patients' motivation and successful orthodontic treatment.6, 14 Each study revealed varying results and conducted analyses by using different variables, such as site, ethnicity, and age. However, no study has directly compared orthodontic patients' motivation and their ethnicity. We hypothesize that patients' motivation and the associated factors vary with ethnicity. Therefore, our study determined and compared patients' motivation, attitude toward orthodontic treatment, and the factors affecting this motivation in patients of different ethnicities. Furthermore, we explored the associations among the factors affecting patients' motivation. We tried to enable orthodontists to formulate an appropriate treatment plan and reinforce patients' motivation during treatment on the basis of biological, psychosocial, and economic aspects.

Material and methods

The study was approved by the Joint Institutional Review Board of Taipei Medical University and the Ethics Committee in Human Research of Sunprasitthiprasong Hospital. Two hundred and fifty orthodontic patients were collected from each hospital with a total of 500 orthodontic patients. They included patients aged ≥20 years, those undergoing orthodontic treatment with upper and lower fixed orthodontic appliances but not in the retention stage, those with no craniofacial anomalies, and those willing to participate. A visual analog scale was used in the questionnaire, wherein the patients responded on a 10-cm line between dis strongly agree anchor and a patient's mark providing a scale from 0 – 10. The test–retest method was used to assess the reliability of the questionnaire; the reliability coefficient of the questionnaire was 0.93. The questionnaires were distributed at the first regular appointment during the data collection period from May to August 2016. The differences between Taiwanese and Thai patients' motivation, attitude toward treatment, and the factors affecting this motivation were evaluated using a sample t-test and Pearson's chi-square test. Multiple regression analysis was performed to evaluate the association of each variable with demographic characteristics. Data from Thai and Taiwanese patients were analyzed separately. All analyses were conducted using STATA Version 13.1 (MP-Parallel Edition, 2013; Texas, USA). Statistical significance was set at p < 0.05.

Results

A total of 500 patients participated in this study; all demographic characteristics except the age and sex had significant differences between Thai and Taiwanese patients (Table 1).
Table 1

Demographic characteristics.

VariablesThai patients
Taiwanese patients
p Value
FrequencyPercentageFrequencyPercentage
Sex0.650
 Male11947.611445.6
 Female13152.413654.4
Age (means ± SD)26.4 ± 6.7525.23 ± 5.330.360
Marital status0.003**
 Single20180.422690.4
 Married4116.441.6
 Divorced31.200
 Separated5200
Religion0.000***
 Buddhism24698.48734.8
 Christianity41.6197.6
 Islam0000
 Others0014457.6
Educational level0.000***
 Elementary0000
 High school2811.2145.6
 Vocational/college4919.6218.4
 Bachelor's degree16264.818674.4
 Master's degree or higher114.42911.6
Occupation0.000***
 Student9337.211847.2
 Government officer4116.420.8
 Agriculturist0000
 Self-employed3212.893.6
 Employee3614.46224.8
 Unidentified4819.25923.6
Responsibility of medical expenses0.000***
 Themselves16264.811646.4
 Parents8734.813052
 Other10.441.6
Household income<0.001***
 <10,0003112.493.6
 10,000–20,00010742.87228.8
 >20,000–30,0003915.67429.6
 >30,000–40,0002710.85321.2
 >40,000–50,000208218.4
 >50,0002610.4218.4
Information resources<0.001***
 Family members4819.28634.4
 Friends14357.28433.6
 General dentist30124317.2
 Media (television)2710.8239.2
 Other20.8145.6
Active treatment duration<0.001**
 <6 months228.83012
 6 months–1 year3112.49337.2
 >1 year–1.5 years3915.65321.2
 More than 1.5 years15863.27429.6

Active treatment duration = Treatment period from the beginning until the survey date.

*p < 0.05, **p < 0.01, ***p < 0.001.

Demographic characteristics. Active treatment duration = Treatment period from the beginning until the survey date. *p < 0.05, **p < 0.01, ***p < 0.001. The patients were asked about their motivation to seek orthodontic treatment (Fig. 1). An improved smile was the crucial motivational factor for Taiwanese patients (6.76 ± 2.58), and this was not significantly different from Thai patients (p > 0.05). The main motivational factor for Thai patients was the desire to have straightened teeth, which differed significantly from Taiwanese patients' motivation (6.18 ± 2.41, p < 0.01).
Figure 1

Patient's motivation for seeking orthodontic treatment.

Patient's motivation for seeking orthodontic treatment. Considering patients' attitude toward orthodontic treatment (Fig. 2), both Thai (6.76 ± 2.26) and Taiwanese (8.19 ± 1.69) patients believed that orthodontic treatment could make them more beautiful; the results differed significantly between the two groups of patients (p < 0.01).
Figure 2

Patient's attitude toward orthodontic treatment.

Patient's attitude toward orthodontic treatment. A long treatment period and high treatment costs were the noteworthy factors affecting Thai (6.20 ± 2.52, p > 0.5) and Taiwanese (6.25 ± 2.60, p < 0.01) patients' motivation, respectively (Fig. 3).
Figure 3

The factors affecting patient motivation.

The factors affecting patient motivation. The association between patients' characteristics and their motivation was determined through multiple regression analysis (Table 2). Only household income was significantly associated with the motivation of Thai patients to get straightened teeth (p < 0.05), overcome teasing (p < 0.05), and close the space caused by tooth loss (p < 0.05). By contrast, several factors, except the household income, were significantly associated with Taiwanese patients' motivation.
Table 2

Correlation between patient characteristics and motivation, as assessed using multiple regression analysis.

Sex
Age
Marital status
Religion
Educational level
Occupation
Responsibility of medical expenses
Household income
Information resources
Active treatment duration
THTWTHTWTHTWTHTWTHTWTHTWTHTWTHTWTHTWTHTW
Straightened teeth###(−)***######NS(−)**#(−)*(−)*###NS*
Overcome the negative attitude of colleagues##NSNS#######*#*####NS*
Overcome teasing#####*#####(−)*##*NS###*
Treat chewing problem####NSNS####NSNS######NSNS
Suggestion from family members#########*######NS(−)**##
Desire to close the space caused by tooth loss#*NS*NSNS####NSNS##(−)*####NS
My favorite actor or actress##NSNSNS***##############

# = Variable not included in the final model; NS = Statistically nonsignificant; (−) = Negative correlation; *p < 0.05, **p < 0.01, ***p < 0.001.

Correlation between patient characteristics and motivation, as assessed using multiple regression analysis. # = Variable not included in the final model; NS = Statistically nonsignificant; (−) = Negative correlation; *p < 0.05, **p < 0.01, ***p < 0.001. A significant association was observed between sex and the attitude of Thai patients who believed that the treatment could make them more beautiful (p < 0.05; Table 3). By contrast, various factors were significantly associated in Taiwanese patients. In both Thai and Taiwanese patients, no association was observed between the factors and attitude of patients who believed that the treatment could make cleaning teeth easier.
Table 3

Correlation between patient characteristics and attitude toward treatment, as assessed using multiple regression analysis.

Sex
Age
Marital status
Religion
Educational level
Occupation
Responsibility of medical expenses
Household income
Information resources
Active treatment duration
THTWTHTWTHTWTHTWTHTWTHTWTHTWTHTWTHTWTHTW
Makes me more beautiful*#NS(−)***#######NS##NSNSNSNS##
Makes it easier to clean my teeth##NSNS################
Makes it easier to bite and eat##################NS*
Makes it easier to get job##NS(−)***##############NS***
Makes it easier to find a partner#(−)***NS(−)***NS(−)***##############

# = Variable not included in the final model; NS = Statistically nonsignificant; (−) = Negative correlation; *p < 0.05, **p < 0.01, ***p < 0.001.

Correlation between patient characteristics and attitude toward treatment, as assessed using multiple regression analysis. # = Variable not included in the final model; NS = Statistically nonsignificant; (−) = Negative correlation; *p < 0.05, **p < 0.01, ***p < 0.001. With respect to the correlation between demographic characteristics and the factors affecting motivation, a significant correlation was observed between household income and Thai patients who felt ugly with braces (p < 0.01). By contrast, numerous factors were significantly associated in Taiwanese patients (Table 4).
Table 4

Correlation between patient characteristics and factors affecting the treatment motivation, as assessed using multiple regression analysis.

Sex
Age
Marital status
Religion
Educational level
Occupation
Responsibility of medical expenses
Household income
Information resources
Active treatment duration
THTWTHTWTHTWTHTWTHTWTHTWTHTWTHTWTHTWTHTW
High treatment costs############NSNSNSNSNS*##
Inconvenience in visiting the clinic##NSNS##########NS(−)**####
Pain and discomfort during treatment###############(−)*NS*##
Looks ugly with braces##NS*######NSNS##(−)**NSNS*##

# = Variable not included in the final model; NS = Statistically nonsignificant; (−) = Negative correlation; *p < 0.05, **p < 0.01, ***p < 0.001.

Correlation between patient characteristics and factors affecting the treatment motivation, as assessed using multiple regression analysis. # = Variable not included in the final model; NS = Statistically nonsignificant; (−) = Negative correlation; *p < 0.05, **p < 0.01, ***p < 0.001.

Discussion

The present study analyzed the economic, psychosocial, and racial influences on orthodontic patients' motivation. Various variables showed high significant differences between Thai and Taiwanese patients. In our study, most patients were women, and most Thai patients followed Buddhism. The National Statistical Office of Thailand reported in 2011 that 96.4% of Thailand's population followed Buddhism. By contrast, more than a half of Taiwan's population did not have any religion, even when the questionnaire allowed this identification. This may be because of a diverse range of religions in Taiwan and the freedom to follow any religion. In addition, more than half of the Thai population pay by themselves for their medical expenses, which is consistent with the results that more than two-thirds of Thailand's population are in the working age group. Question one in our questionnaire assessed patients' motivation to receive orthodontic treatment; The responses revealed that for Thai and Taiwanese patients, the desire to obtain straightened teeth and an improved smile were the motivational factors, respectively. Differences were found in the results, but both groups had esthetic concerns. This result was consistent with that reported by Pabari et al. Both Thai and Taiwanese patients selected “made them more beautiful” as the main attitude toward treatment. This is probably because facial and smile esthetics are traditionally considered to improve the attractiveness of an individual, a perception by others of higher cognitive ability, intelligence, and social skills.4, 16 Furthermore, attractive individuals were considered to be more successful in achieving higher socioeconomic status and greater marital happiness than those whose faces were judged as unattractive. The present findings revealed the factors affecting patients' treatment motivation or reasons for treatment rejection. A long treatment period and high costs were the factors affecting Thai and Taiwanese patients' motivation, respectively. A long treatment period was one of the reasons for treatment rejection in a previous study. Moreover, an explanation may be that long-term treatment duration requires a high number of visits, leading to increased travelling expenses and frequent leaves from work or study. High treatment costs were one of the main reasons for treatment rejection, which was consistent with that reported by Marques et al. This is probably related to patients' income or unclear value of the treatment investment. We analyzed the association between patients' characteristics and their motivation. Household income, which was often considered an economic indicator, showed a negative association in Thai patients earning less than 40,000 baht. Thai patients had esthetic concerns, which included obtaining straightened teeth and overcoming teasing. Studies have supported teasing as a common reaction to malocclusion and dental appearance.10, 17 Based on these data, patients desired treating crooked teeth or malocclusion, but these treatments may not be affordable. In concordance with these data, the National Statistical Officer of Thailand reported that in 2015, the average monthly household income was 26,915 baht per household, whereas the average monthly expenditure was 21,157 baht per household. Compared with the data from Taiwan, we observed that this result may be related to Thailand's gross domestic product (GDP) per capita being 3.8 times less than that of Taiwan's GDP per capita.18, 19 Typically, a higher GDP is associated with higher health care expenditure per capita. In 2009, Thailand's and Taiwan's health care expenditure accounted for 4.112% and 6.9% of their GDP, respectively. These results indicate that the ability of Thailand's population to pay for their living and health care is lower than that of Taiwan's population. In addition, income showed a negative association in Thai patients desiring to improve their function by closing the space caused by tooth loss. The explanation can be similar to that previously stated. Age, occupation, responsibility of medical expenses, and active treatment duration showed significant associations in Taiwanese patients having esthetic concerns. It might be because our patients were aged ≥20 years and could distinguish between regular beautiful and contemplate improving their attractiveness or becoming more successful. These were nonpaying patients, but even their parents were concerned about the esthetics and affordability of their treatment. Active treatment duration was probably related to patients' adaptability to fixed appliances, which made them feel acceptable to have braces. These results verify that esthetics influence the patients, irrespective of their occupation. In our study, Taiwanese patients desired to close their space, indicating that they were concerned about their dental function increasing with age; this result is in concordance with previous studies that reported increased tooth loss with age.21, 22 Taiwanese patients who were influenced by their peers had a significant negative association with educational level and information resources. A possible explanation is that patients who have higher educational level having the ability to think and make a decision by themselves. In addition, married Taiwanese patients were less likely to be motivated by actors. Both male and female Thai patients believed that the treatment made them more beautiful. According to Roth's philosophy, orthodontic treatment can influence esthetics. Studies have reported that people who have a beautiful smile are considered more intelligent and successful.16, 23 In addition, women have been reported to be more concerned with appearance and facial attractiveness than are men. Taiwanese patients showed a negative correlation with the “made them beautiful” attitude. This result contradicts with that by Pabari et al. who found that an improved smile, which is related to esthetics, was the main motivation of adult patients for seeking treatment. Increasing active treatment duration had a significant correlation in Taiwanese patients who believed that the treatment could treat their biting and chewing problems. Moreover, active treatment duration was significantly associated in Taiwanese patients who believed that the treatment could facilitate securing a job. Based on these data, improved facial esthetics was found to contribute to high self-esteem and more success. Taiwanese patients' attitude had a significant negative correlation with their age. This can be explained by the fact that adults having work experiences and increased work ability because of the number of years worked can use those experiences to compensate for their appearance. The female sex had a significant negative correlation in Taiwanese patients who believed that the treatment could make finding a partner easier. One explanation is women were more likely to have esthetic concerns and possibly felt that braces placed during treatment affect their smile esthetics and might reduce their opportunity to find a romantic partner. We suggest that orthodontists introduce tooth-colored or invisible braces to their patients. Marital status had a significant negative correlation in Taiwanese patients who thought that the treatment could help them find a partner. It might be related to their experiences of never undergoing orthodontic treatment before marriage. Another possible reason is that married couples satisfied with their married life are more likely satisfied with their appearance. Age showed a significant negative correlation with this attitude, probably because the patients believed that irrespective of their age, they can date or find a romantic partner throughout their lives. High household income showed a significant negative correlation in Thai patients who felt they look ugly with braces. An explanation is that presently in Thailand, orthodontic treatment not only provides improved esthetics and health but has also become a fashion trend and sign of being wealthy. Taiwanese patients who felt that visiting a clinic is inconvenient had a significant negative correlation with household income. In addition, household income had a negative significant correlation with patients who stated pain and discomfort as the reason for rejecting treatment. Friends and family members showed a significant positive correlation with patients who felt pain and discomfort during treatment and hence denied treatment. Intimate relationships were found to be capable of influencing the patients because influencers may have experienced the same situation, and word-of-mouth communication is effective. In accordance with Oliveira et al., Taiwanese patients in our study who felt braces made them look ugly showed a significant correlation with age; friends and family members had a significant correlation with such patients. Information resources were significantly correlated in Taiwanese patients who reported high treatment costs as the reason for treatment rejection. In such cases, the patients and parents may still have doubts about the treatment benefits and treatment investment value. We suggest that orthodontists should explain the treatment procedures and benefits to patients. It was concluded that the ethnicity of patients had varying effects on their motivation to seek orthodontic treatment. Economic status was the predominant factor affecting Thai patients' motivation. However, many factors were correlated with Taiwanese patients' motivation. For both Thai and Taiwanese patients, esthetic concerns were the crucial motivational factors for seeking orthodontic treatment. Accordingly, patients' attitude was also related to esthetic improvement.

Conflicts of interest

The authors have no conflicts of interest relevant to this article.
  16 in total

Review 1.  Psychological aspects of orthodontics in clinical practice. Part one: treatment-specific variables.

Authors:  Ali Ukra; Florence Bennani; Mauro Farella
Journal:  Prog Orthod       Date:  2011-09-23       Impact factor: 2.750

2.  Assessment of motivation, expectations and satisfaction of adult patients submitted to orthodontic treatment.

Authors:  Patrícia Gomide de Souza Andrade Oliveira; Rubens Rodrigues Tavares; Jairo Curado Freitas
Journal:  Dental Press J Orthod       Date:  2013 Mar-Apr

3.  Expectations of treatment and satisfaction with dentofacial appearance in patients applying for orthodontic treatment.

Authors:  Naomi A van Wezel; Annemieke Bos; Charlotte Prahl
Journal:  Am J Orthod Dentofacial Orthop       Date:  2015-06       Impact factor: 2.650

4.  Assessment of motivation and psychological characteristics of adult orthodontic patients.

Authors:  Sona Pabari; David R Moles; Susan J Cunningham
Journal:  Am J Orthod Dentofacial Orthop       Date:  2011-12       Impact factor: 2.650

5.  Patient and parent motivation for orthodontic treatment--a questionnaire study.

Authors:  Barbara Wedrychowska-Szulc; Maria Syryńska
Journal:  Eur J Orthod       Date:  2009-12-11       Impact factor: 3.075

6.  Orthodontic treatment motivation and cooperation: a cross-sectional analysis of adolescent patients' and parents' responses.

Authors:  Adam S Daniels; Jason D Seacat; Marita Rohr Inglehart
Journal:  Am J Orthod Dentofacial Orthop       Date:  2009-12       Impact factor: 2.650

7.  Factors associated with the desire for orthodontic treatment among Brazilian adolescents and their parents.

Authors:  Leandro S Marques; Isabela A Pordeus; Maria L Ramos-Jorge; Cid A Filogônio; Cintia B Filogônio; Luciano J Pereira; Saul M Paiva
Journal:  BMC Oral Health       Date:  2009-12-18       Impact factor: 2.757

8.  Adolescent patients' treatment motivation and satisfaction with orthodontic treatment. Do possible selves matter?

Authors:  Lauren E Anderson; Airton Arruda; Marita Rohr Inglehart
Journal:  Angle Orthod       Date:  2009-09       Impact factor: 2.079

9.  Expectations of orthodontic treatment in adults: the conduct in orthodontist/patient relationship.

Authors:  Ricardo Alves de Souza; André Frutuoso de Oliveira; Suélem Maria Santana Pinheiro; Jefferson Paixão Cardoso; Maria Beatriz Borges de Araújo Magnani
Journal:  Dental Press J Orthod       Date:  2013 Mar-Apr

10.  Factors influencing patient satisfaction with dental appearance and treatments they desire to improve aesthetics.

Authors:  Mon Mon Tin-Oo; Norkhafizah Saddki; Nurhidayati Hassan
Journal:  BMC Oral Health       Date:  2011-02-23       Impact factor: 2.757

View more
  5 in total

1.  Quantitative and qualitative analyses of orthodontic-related videos on YouTube.

Authors:  Jun Guo; Xuefei Yan; Shiyang Li; Johanna Van der Walt; Guangzhao Guan; Li Mei
Journal:  Angle Orthod       Date:  2020-05-01       Impact factor: 2.079

2.  Factors Affecting the Duration of Fixed Orthodontic Treatment in Patients Treated in a University Department between 2016 and 2020.

Authors:  Zahra Kiyamehr; Mohammad Hossein Razeghinejad; Mahdi Rahbar; Sina Ghertasi Oskouei; Ali Vafaei
Journal:  Maedica (Bucur)       Date:  2022-06

3.  Factors influencing the desire for orthodontic treatment among patients and parents in Saudi Arabia: A cross-sectional study.

Authors:  Osama M Felemban; Naif T Alharabi; Roaa A A Alamoudi; Ghassan A Alturki; Narmin M Helal
Journal:  J Orthod Sci       Date:  2022-05-04

4.  Characteristics and Dental Indices of Orthodontic Patients Using Aligners or Brackets.

Authors:  Tzu-Han Liao; Jason Chen-Chieh Fang; I-Kuan Wang; Chiung-Shing Huang; Hui-Ling Chen; Tzung-Hai Yen
Journal:  Int J Environ Res Public Health       Date:  2022-05-27       Impact factor: 4.614

5.  Moral Hazard and the Demand for Dental Treatment: Evidence from a Nationally Representative Survey in Thailand.

Authors:  Krichkanok Srimuang; Piriya Pholphirul
Journal:  Int J Dent       Date:  2022-08-17
  5 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.