Literature DB >> 26038073

Expectations of treatment and satisfaction with dentofacial appearance in patients applying for orthodontic treatment.

Naomi A van Wezel1, Annemieke Bos2, Charlotte Prahl2.   

Abstract

INTRODUCTION: Satisfaction with dentofacial appearance and expectations of orthodontic treatment have been analyzed in many studies. In 2002, in a study in The Netherlands, significant correlations were found between dental satisfaction and orthodontic treatment expectations. Satisfaction significantly decreased with increasing age. The aim of this study was to compare the satisfaction and expectations of current patients with the results of a study 10 years ago.
METHODS: A questionnaire about dentofacial satisfaction and a questionnaire about the expectations of orthodontic treatment were completed by 146 subjects. The mean scores in the present study were compared with the mean scores 10 years ago.
RESULTS: The subjects in the present study were more satisfied with their dental appearance. Differences in expectations were found on the subscales of general well-being and self-image. As in the study in 2002, no significant correlations were found between sex, satisfaction, and expectations of orthodontic treatment. Dentofacial satisfaction predicts expectations about orthodontic treatment, especially in the group of subjects aged 17 years and above.
CONCLUSIONS: The subjects in this study had greater expectations of orthodontic treatment about general well-being and were more satisfied with their dental appearance than were the subjects studied 10 years ago.
Copyright © 2015 American Association of Orthodontists. Published by Elsevier Inc. All rights reserved.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2015        PMID: 26038073     DOI: 10.1016/j.ajodo.2015.01.024

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Am J Orthod Dentofacial Orthop        ISSN: 0889-5406            Impact factor:   2.650


  8 in total

1.  Cross-cultural adaptation of a questionnaire assessing the child and parents' expectations of orthodontic treatment in Brazil.

Authors:  Mariana Gonzaga Erthal Ribeiro; Emanuelle de Fátima Ferreira Oliveira; Mariele Cristina Garcia Pantuzo; Maria Ilma de Souza Gruppioni Côrtes; Ildeu Andrade
Journal:  Dental Press J Orthod       Date:  2022-06-10

2.  Comparison of factors affecting orthodontic treatment motivation of Taiwanese and Thai patients in two hospitals.

Authors:  Wariya Laothong; Hsin-Chung Cheng
Journal:  J Dent Sci       Date:  2017-08-03       Impact factor: 2.080

3.  Nonsurgical Orthodontic Intervention of a Severe Class II Case Accompanied by Posterior Crossbite Using a Miniscrew-Assisted Straight Wire Technique.

Authors:  Abdulkarim A Hatrom; Ahmed R Afify; Ali H Hassan
Journal:  Case Rep Dent       Date:  2019-10-03

4.  Esthetic Dentistry on Twitter: Benefits and Dangers.

Authors:  Nesreen A Salim; Fahed Jubair; Yazan M Hassona; Sarah Izriqi; Dana Al-Fuqaha'a
Journal:  Int J Dent       Date:  2021-12-08

5.  Patient-Reported Outcome Measures on Oral Hygiene, Periodontal Health, and Treatment Satisfaction of Orthodontic Retention Patients up to Ten Years after Treatment-A Cross-Sectional Study.

Authors:  Barbro Fostad Salvesen; Jostein Grytten; Gunnar Rongen; Vaska Vandevska-Radunovic
Journal:  Int J Environ Res Public Health       Date:  2022-04-15       Impact factor: 4.614

Review 6.  What are patients' expectations of orthodontic treatment: a systematic review.

Authors:  Jie Yao; Dan-Dan Li; Yan-Qi Yang; Colman Patrick Joseph McGrath; Nikos Mattheos
Journal:  BMC Oral Health       Date:  2016-02-17       Impact factor: 2.757

7.  Retrospective analysis of jaw biopsies in young adults. A study of 1599 cases in Southern Brazil.

Authors:  K Silva; A Alves; M Correa; A Etges; A-C Vasconcelos; A-P Gomes; S Tarquinio
Journal:  Med Oral Patol Oral Cir Bucal       Date:  2017-11-01

8.  Long-term effects of functional appliances in treated versus untreated patients with Class II malocclusion: A systematic review and meta-analysis.

Authors:  Giorgio Cacciatore; Alessandro Ugolini; Chiarella Sforza; Oghenekome Gbinigie; Annette Plüddemann
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2019-09-06       Impact factor: 3.240

  8 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.