Literature DB >> 30893534

Pregnancy-Adapted YEARS Algorithm for Diagnosis of Suspected Pulmonary Embolism.

Liselotte M van der Pol1, Cecile Tromeur1, Ingrid M Bistervels1, Fionnuala Ni Ainle1, Thomas van Bemmel1, Laurent Bertoletti1, Francis Couturaud1, Yordi P A van Dooren1, Antoine Elias1, Laura M Faber1, Herman M A Hofstee1, Tom van der Hulle1, Marieke J H A Kruip1, Maxime Maignan1, Albert T A Mairuhu1, Saskia Middeldorp1, Mathilde Nijkeuter1, Pierre-Marie Roy1, Olivier Sanchez1, Jeannot Schmidt1, Marije Ten Wolde1, Frederikus A Klok1, Menno V Huisman1.   

Abstract

BACKGROUND: Pulmonary embolism is one of the leading causes of maternal death in the Western world. Because of the low specificity and sensitivity of the d-dimer test, all pregnant women with suspected pulmonary embolism undergo computed tomographic (CT) pulmonary angiography or ventilation-perfusion scanning, both of which involve radiation exposure to the mother and fetus. Whether a pregnancy-adapted algorithm could be used to safely avoid diagnostic imaging in pregnant women with suspected pulmonary embolism is unknown.
METHODS: In a prospective study involving pregnant women with suspected pulmonary embolism, we assessed three criteria from the YEARS algorithm (clinical signs of deep-vein thrombosis, hemoptysis, and pulmonary embolism as the most likely diagnosis) and measured the d-dimer level. Pulmonary embolism was ruled out if none of the three criteria were met and the d-dimer level was less than 1000 ng per milliliter or if one or more of the three criteria were met and the d-dimer level was less than 500 ng per milliliter. Adaptation of the YEARS algorithm for pregnant women involved compression ultrasonography for women with symptoms of deep-vein thrombosis; if the results were positive (i.e., a clot was present), CT pulmonary angiography was not performed. All patients in whom pulmonary embolism had not been ruled out underwent CT pulmonary angiography. The primary outcome was the incidence of venous thromboembolism at 3 months. The secondary outcome was the proportion of patients in whom CT pulmonary angiography was not indicated to safely rule out pulmonary embolism.
RESULTS: A total of 510 women were screened, of whom 12 (2.4%) were excluded. Pulmonary embolism was diagnosed in 20 patients (4.0%) at baseline. During follow-up, popliteal deep-vein thrombosis was diagnosed in 1 patient (0.21%; 95% confidence interval [CI], 0.04 to 1.2); no patient had pulmonary embolism. CT pulmonary angiography was not indicated, and thus was avoided, in 195 patients (39%; 95% CI, 35 to 44). The efficiency of the algorithm was highest during the first trimester of pregnancy and lowest during the third trimester; CT pulmonary angiography was avoided in 65% of patients who began the study in the first trimester and in 32% who began the study in the third trimester.
CONCLUSIONS: Pulmonary embolism was safely ruled out by the pregnancy-adapted YEARS diagnostic algorithm across all trimesters of pregnancy. CT pulmonary angiography was avoided in 32 to 65% of patients. (Funded by Leiden University Medical Center and 17 other participating hospitals; Artemis Netherlands Trial Register number, NL5726.).
Copyright © 2019 Massachusetts Medical Society.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2019        PMID: 30893534     DOI: 10.1056/NEJMoa1813865

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  N Engl J Med        ISSN: 0028-4793            Impact factor:   91.245


  35 in total

Review 1.  Acute Pulmonary Embolism–Its Diagnosis and Treatment From a Multidisciplinary Viewpoint.

Authors:  Hannah C Kulka; Andreas Zeller; Jürgen Fornaro; Walter A Wuillemin; Stavros Konstantinides; Michael Christ
Journal:  Dtsch Arztebl Int       Date:  2021-09-17       Impact factor: 5.594

2.  Update in the diagnosis and management of acute pulmonary embolism for the non-respiratory physician.

Authors:  Sheila Ramjug; Gerrard Phillips
Journal:  Clin Med (Lond)       Date:  2021-11       Impact factor: 2.659

3.  Determining the diagnostic value of three clinical criteria Wells', YEARS and modified Geneva in pregnant women with suspected pulmonary thromboembolism.

Authors:  Somayeh Sadeghi; Parvin Bahrami; Sareh Kimiyaee Far; Zahra Arabi
Journal:  Am J Cardiovasc Dis       Date:  2022-08-15

Review 4.  Illustrated State-of-the-Art Capsules of the ISTH 2022 Congress.

Authors:  Robert A Ariëns; Beverley J Hunt; Ejaife O Agbani; Josefin Ahnström; Robert Ahrends; Raza Alikhan; Alice Assinger; Zsuzsa Bagoly; Alessandra Balduini; Elena Barbon; Christopher D Barrett; Paul Batty; Jorge David Aivazoglou Carneiro; Wee Shian Chan; Moniek de Maat; Kerstin de Wit; Cécile Denis; Martin H Ellis; Renee Eslick; Hongxia Fu; Catherine P M Hayward; Benoit Ho-Tin-Noé; Frederikus A Klok; Riten Kumar; Karin Leiderman; Rustem I Litvinov; Nigel Mackman; Zoe McQuilten; Matthew D Neal; William A E Parker; Roger J S Preston; Julie Rayes; Alireza R Rezaie; Lara N Roberts; Bianca Rocca; Susan Shapiro; Deborah M Siegal; Lirlândia P Sousa; Katsue Suzuki-Inoue; Tahira Zafar; Jiaxi Zhou
Journal:  Res Pract Thromb Haemost       Date:  2022-07-06

Review 5.  Risk stratification for pregnancy-associated venous thromboembolism: Potential role for global coagulation assays.

Authors:  David O'Keefe; Hui Yin Lim; Lisa Hui; Prahlad Ho
Journal:  Obstet Med       Date:  2021-08-05

Review 6.  Predicting the Risk of Recurrent Venous Thromboembolism: Current Challenges and Future Opportunities.

Authors:  Hannah Stevens; Karlheinz Peter; Huyen Tran; James McFadyen
Journal:  J Clin Med       Date:  2020-05-22       Impact factor: 4.241

7.  Accuracy of PE rule-out strategies in pregnancy: secondary analysis of the DiPEP study prospective cohort.

Authors:  Steve Goodacre; Catherine Nelson-Piercy; Beverley J Hunt; Gordon Fuller
Journal:  Emerg Med J       Date:  2020-04-09       Impact factor: 2.740

Review 8.  Management of acute pulmonary embolism 2019: what is new in the updated European guidelines?

Authors:  Stavros Konstantinides; Guy Meyer
Journal:  Intern Emerg Med       Date:  2020-05-26       Impact factor: 3.397

9.  Validation and impact of a simplified clinical decision rule for diagnosing pulmonary embolism in primary care: design of the PECAN prospective diagnostic cohort management study.

Authors:  Rosanne van Maanen; Frans H Rutten; Frederikus A Klok; Menno V Huisman; Jeanet W Blom; Karel G M Moons; Geert-Jan Geersing
Journal:  BMJ Open       Date:  2019-10-10       Impact factor: 2.692

10.  New guidelines for the diagnosis and management of pulmonary embolism: Key changes.

Authors:  Anastasia Erythropoulou-Kaltsidou; Stelina Alkagiet; Konstantinos Tziomalos
Journal:  World J Cardiol       Date:  2020-05-26
View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.