Literature DB >> 36147790

Determining the diagnostic value of three clinical criteria Wells', YEARS and modified Geneva in pregnant women with suspected pulmonary thromboembolism.

Somayeh Sadeghi1,2, Parvin Bahrami3, Sareh Kimiyaee Far4, Zahra Arabi4.   

Abstract

BACKGROUND: Diagnosis of pulmonary thromboembolism (PTE) during pregnancy is a challenging medical issue due to complications of X-ray-based imaging studies such as Ct-angiography for neonates and pregnant women. Here we aimed to assess the predictive values of three clinical criteria for diagnosing PTE during pregnancy.
METHODS: This is a retrospective cohort study performed in 2018-2020 on 166 pregnant women suspected of PTE. We reviewed the documents of all patients referred to our medical center with suspected symptoms of PTE. The demographic characteristics of the patients, signs and clinical findings upon the arrival of patients as well as their laboratory tests including D-dimer with a history of abortion or delivery and leg symptoms were entered into the data collection form. Then, according to the information extracted from the patient's files, each patient was evaluated by all clinical PTE criteria, including Wells, YEARS and modified Geneva. For each patient according to clinical criteria and all three algorithms, clinical suspicion for PTE and treatment or non-treatment was determined were compared to the final MDCT result of patients.
RESULTS: The Well's criteria had 100% sensitivity, 6.47% specificity, a positive predictive value of 7.8% and a negative predictive value of 100%. In patients with Well's score of more than four, the sensitivity and specificity of PTE diagnosis were 100% and 6% respectively. The modified Geneva criteria had 100% sensitivity, 8.89% specificity, a positive predictive value of 8.21% and a negative predictive value of 100%. The modified Geneva criteria had 100% sensitivity, 7.74% specificity, positive predictive value of 8.44% and a negative predictive value of 100%.
CONCLUSION: Wells, YEARS and modified Geneva criteria could significantly rule out PTE in pregnancy with 100% sensitivity. AJCD
Copyright © 2022.

Entities:  

Keywords:  Thromboembolism; clinical criteria; pregnancy

Year:  2022        PMID: 36147790      PMCID: PMC9490165     

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Am J Cardiovasc Dis        ISSN: 2160-200X


  25 in total

Review 1.  Comparison of the Wells score with the revised Geneva score for assessing suspected pulmonary embolism: a systematic review and meta-analysis.

Authors:  Jun-Hua Shen; Hong-Lin Chen; Jian-Rong Chen; Jia-Li Xing; Peng Gu; Bao-Feng Zhu
Journal:  J Thromb Thrombolysis       Date:  2016-04       Impact factor: 2.300

2.  External validation of the YEARS diagnostic algorithm for suspected pulmonary embolism.

Authors:  Maggie Eddy; Helia Robert-Ebadi; Lydia Richardson; Marta Bellesini; Frank Verschuren; Thomas Moumneh; Guy Meyer; Marc Righini; Grégoire Le Gal
Journal:  J Thromb Haemost       Date:  2020-10-23       Impact factor: 5.824

3.  The YEARS algorithm for suspected pulmonary embolism: shorter visit time and reduced costs at the emergency department.

Authors:  L M van der Pol; C E A Dronkers; T van der Hulle; P L den Exter; C Tromeur; C Heringhaus; A T A Mairuhu; M V Huisman; W B van den Hout; F A Klok
Journal:  J Thromb Haemost       Date:  2018-03-13       Impact factor: 5.824

4.  Diagnosis of venous thromboembolism in pregnancy.

Authors:  Wee-Shian Chan
Journal:  Thromb Res       Date:  2017-09-05       Impact factor: 3.944

Review 5.  Diagnosing pulmonary thromboembolism: Concerns and controversies.

Authors:  Jyotindu Debnath; Vivek Sharma
Journal:  Med J Armed Forces India       Date:  2021-07-31

6.  Comparison of the D-dimer concentration in pregnant women with or without pulmonary thromboembolism.

Authors:  Seyed H Borsi; Maryam H Shoushtari; Mehrdad D MalAmir; Kambiz A Angali; Maryam S Mavalizadeh
Journal:  J Family Med Prim Care       Date:  2020-08-25

7.  Pulmonary embolism during pregnancy: a 17-year single-center retrospective MDCT pulmonary angiography study.

Authors:  David C Rotzinger; Vincent Dunet; Vesna Ilic; Olivier W Hugli; Reto A Meuli; Sabine Schmidt
Journal:  Eur Radiol       Date:  2019-11-14       Impact factor: 5.315

8.  New cut-off point for D-dimer in the diagnosis of pulmonary embolism during pregnancy.

Authors:  Somayeh Sadeghi; Marjan Golshani; Bahareh Safaeian
Journal:  Blood Res       Date:  2021-09-30

9.  Radiation Exposure From Pediatric CT Scans and Subsequent Cancer Risk in the Netherlands.

Authors:  Johanna M Meulepas; Cécile M Ronckers; Anne M J B Smets; Rutger A J Nievelstein; Patrycja Gradowska; Choonsik Lee; Andreas Jahnen; Marcel van Straten; Marie-Claire Y de Wit; Bernard Zonnenberg; Willemijn M Klein; Johannes H Merks; Otto Visser; Flora E van Leeuwen; Michael Hauptmann
Journal:  J Natl Cancer Inst       Date:  2019-03-01       Impact factor: 13.506

10.  Pregnancy-adapted YEARS algorithm: can YEARS do more for pregnant women?

Authors:  Aleksandar Bokan; Jovan Matijasevic; Jadranka Vucicevic Trobok
Journal:  Breathe (Sheff)       Date:  2020-03
View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.