Literature DB >> 30891576

LasDB: A collective database for laboratory animal strain resources.

Qi Kong1,2,3,4, Chuan Qin1,2,3,4.   

Abstract

BACKGROUND: With the aim of establishing the most comprehensive database of laboratory animal strains, the "laboratory animal strain resources database" (LasDB) was constructed as a searchable online database of all laboratory animal strains, stocks and mutant embryonic stem-cell lines available worldwide, including inbred, outbred, mutant and genetically engineered strains.
METHODS: MySQL database software was used to construct the LasDB, offering an easy-to-use interface.
RESULTS: To date, LasDB has a collection covering data for 21 596 mouse strains, 2062 rat strains, 13 monkey strains, 2 hamster strains, 5 dog strains, 5 rabbit strains and more than 50 other laboratory animal strains. LasDB will be continually improved with regular updates of new laboratory animal strains from all over the world.
CONCLUSION: To the best of our knowledge, this is the first database that attempts to systematically integrate all available laboratory animal strain data with the aim of supporting open usage and full resource sharing.

Entities:  

Keywords:  comparative medicine; database; laboratory animal; resource; strain

Year:  2018        PMID: 30891576      PMCID: PMC6388089          DOI: 10.1002/ame2.12044

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Animal Model Exp Med        ISSN: 2576-2095


INTRODUCTION

Laboratory animals are commonly used in biomedical research to understand disease mechanisms and develop potential therapies. Because of this, a large and ever‐increasing number of animal strains have been developed. The construction of a laboratory animal strain resource database could effectively promote further biomedical research and assist new developments in bio‐pharmaceutical industries.1, 2 The present work reports the establishment of a laboratory animal strain database, named LasDB, which was constructed by collecting all the available laboratory animal strain data from China and overseas. The laboratory animal strains collected from overseas databases or networks are described with a brief introduction and links or references to the original owners. Our aim was to build the largest and most complete database of laboratory animal species and strains, which would be an invaluable resource for researchers or users in the fields of science, biology, medicine, agriculture, etc. In this database, we have collected more than 2000 laboratory animal species or strains made or used in China and also some published data that are not included in foreign databases, such as the International Mouse Strain Resource (IMSR), which is limited to mouse strains and does not include other laboratory animal species and contains little data from China.

MATERIAL AND METHODS

The database was constructed following three major steps: (a) data collection (including a data survey of peer researchers in China, a web search, database mining, a literature search, the records of the Institute of Laboratory Animal Science, Chinese Academy of Medical Sciences (ILAS), and author donations), (b) data annotation and analysis, and (c) database construction of a MySQL relational database with a web interface for data storage and usage (Figure 1).
Figure 1

Database construction method. For website searches, the web engine Baidu (http://www.baidu.com) was used to retrieve information, and we searched the China National Knowledge Infrastructure (CNKI) database (http://www.cnki.net), and PubMed (http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/) for published Papers. The website interface is linked to ILAS and CALAS as referred in the text. IMSR, International Mouse Strain Resource; RGD, Rat Genome Database; NSTR, National Natural Science & Technology Resources; CNKI, China National Knowledge Infrastructure; ILAS, Institute of Laboratory Animal Science, Chinese Academy of Medical Sciences

Database construction method. For website searches, the web engine Baidu (http://www.baidu.com) was used to retrieve information, and we searched the China National Knowledge Infrastructure (CNKI) database (http://www.cnki.net), and PubMed (http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/) for published Papers. The website interface is linked to ILAS and CALAS as referred in the text. IMSR, International Mouse Strain Resource; RGD, Rat Genome Database; NSTR, National Natural Science & Technology Resources; CNKI, China National Knowledge Infrastructure; ILAS, Institute of Laboratory Animal Science, Chinese Academy of Medical Sciences

Data collection

Data survey

In order to collect data from other researchers and peers in China, we asked 2000 Chinese laboratory animal units to supply their laboratory animal strains. The results were incorporated in the metadata design.

Data sources

In addition to the comprehensive data survey, we also collected data from websites, databases, and published papers and ILAS's own records, etc. We searched the strain's name and reviewed the interpretation in the metadata.

Web search

Using the web engine Baidu (http://www.baidu.com) to retrieve information, we searched various relevant laboratory animal websites.

Database mining

We retrieved laboratory animal strain information from the United States, Europe, Japan and other countries having laboratory animal strain‐associated databases, and extracted the strain names along with related information in the metadata.

Literature search

We searched the China National Knowledge Infrastructure (CNKI) database (http://www.cnki.net), Wanfang database (http://www.wanfangdata.com.cn) and PubMed (http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/) and captured laboratory animal strain information from all the published papers.

ILAS's own records

The Institute of Laboratory Animal Science (ILAS), Chinese Academy of Medical Sciences (CAMS) has more than 1000 laboratory animal strains, including genetically engineered animals, which are not included in other databases.

Author donations

A data entry window for submissions from our domestic and foreign counterparts was provided. Information was filled in using the online form or emailed to the administrator of the database.

Data annotation and analysis

We retrieved the names of laboratory animal strains from the above data sources and reviewed the interpretation in the metadata from these databases, published papers, online websites or author donations by data annotation and analysis.

Database construction

The database was constructed using the MySQL database software, which offers an easy‐to‐use interface containing search facilities, and to this we added a tailored input interface.

RESULTS

Metadata table

We developed a metadata table, including information about the data format, content, etc., as shown in Table 1.
Table 1

Metadata table of the laboratory animal strain resources database (LasDB)

Field nameField contentsHeaderOptional field
Serial number of laboratory animal strainsThe number of lines in the database, according to the data entry order, is automatically formedSN_ASNo
Accession number of laboratory animal strainsThe number of numbered lines in the whole laboratory animal strains, numbered according to our code described in Section 3.2AC_ ASNo
Name of laboratory animal strains unique identificationThe laboratory animal strain's Chinese name, the formal name of the developed strain in accordance with Chinese naming rulesUIDYes
English nameThe laboratory animal strain's name in English, in accordance with international naming rulesENYes
Name_OtherOther common names or aliasesNOYes
Description of speciesSpecies described according to the principle of the strainsDSYes
GenerationHow many generations at present when collected by the databaseGenerationYes
AppearanceCoat colour and other exterior features, can be furnished with a photo or illustrationAppearanceYes
Genetics statusGenetic status of the strainGSYes
OriginLists origin as abroad or domestic cultivationOriginYes
Other related substrainsThe next of kin or branch linesORSYes
Biology statusUnique biological characteristics of the strains, physiology, biochemistry, blood factors, immune status, anatomy, eg, average life expectancyBSYes
Lifespan and diseaseNatural life and spontaneous disease, pathology, cancer prevalence rates.LDYes
Research fieldUse of a range of applicationsRAYes
Breeding and reproductionBreeding characteristics and considerations, breeding conditions, feed, habitsBRYes
Institute of colony maintenanceCan provide provenance or sell unitsInst_CMYes
ReferenceReference literatures or websitesREFYes
Input timeTime of data entry or update in the database can be automatically generatedInput_TimeNo
RemarksDescription of other mattersRMYes
Metadata table of the laboratory animal strain resources database (LasDB)

Naming of the laboratory animal strains

The laboratory animal strains in the database were coded as accession numbers, using a six‐code format, eg, 31‐11‐001‐0‐00‐0001. The meaning of the six codes joined by a hyphen (‐) is as follows, based on the example code: 31 represents the experimental materials; 11 represents the laboratory animal species; 001 is the code of the laboratory animal species as shown in Table 2; 0, A or Z: is the first number or character of the laboratory animal strain; 00 is the subspecies number; 0001 is the line number.3, 4, 5, 6, 7 Table 2 shows the laboratory animal strains included in the database at present. The database includes all laboratory animal strains such as inbred strains outbred strains and GM mutants.
Table 2

Information on the laboratory animal species collected in LasDB

NoNameIncluded strainsTotal strainsNoNameIncluded strainsTotal strains
001Mouse21 80026 000040Chicken15
002Rat22002300041Duck12
003Hamster638042Goose11
004Guinea pig312043Pigeon11
005Rabbit38044Quail120
006Dog15045Pika11
007Rhesus monkey11046Dasyure11
008Cynomolgus monkeys11047Rainbow trout11
009Marmoset11048Deer11
010Squirrel monkey11049Cow110
011Green monkey11050Sheep210
012Cotton‐top tamarin11051Horse11
013Titi monkey11052Ass11
014Japanese snow monkey11053Mule11
015Vervet monkey11054Drosophila15
016Taiwan monkey11055C. elegans111
017Sooty mangabey15056Aplysia11
018E. patas11057Thermophila11
019Pigtailed macaque11058Silkworm11
020M.arctoides11059Kangaroo11
021M.leonine11060Hedgehog11
022M.thibetana11061Armadillo11
023Cebus capucinus11062Bat11
024M.assamensis11063Toad11
025Leaf monkey11064Frog11
026Baboon15065Earthworm11
027Gibbon15066Shrew11
028Chimpanzee110067Porpoise11
029Tree shrew120068Goldfish11
030Hamster13069Zebra fish120
031Vole22070Xiphophorus13
032Gerbil22071Medaka11
033Marmot11072Gobiocypris rarus11
034Peromyscus11073Red carp11
035Cotton rat12074Electric eel11
036Cat12075Crucian carp11
037Pig512Other0130
038Ferret15
039Chinchilla12

“Included strains” means the strains included in LasDB at present. “Total strains” means the strains published as we planned to be included.

Information on the laboratory animal species collected in LasDB “Included strains” means the strains included in LasDB at present. “Total strains” means the strains published as we planned to be included.

Database name

Laboratory animal strains database (LasDB).

Database URL

http://www.cnilas.org/plus/list.php?tid=158.

Database usage

Website interface

There is one quick search method for performing a search of the laboratory animal strains held in the LasDB. Users can search the English name of any laboratory animal strains or any other keywords by quick search. At present, the database is only available in Chinese, and the data can be translated by Google (http://translate.google.com/) tools or some web browser. We will try to make an English Version of the database in the future.

Networking linkages

The database is affiliated with the website of the Institute of Laboratory Animal Science (ILAS), the Chinese Academy of Medical Sciences (CAMS) (http://www.cnilas.org), and the website of the Chinese Association for Laboratory Animal Sciences (CALAS) (http://www.calas.org.cn), which offers a free search service.

Providing data updates

To date, LasDB has a collection covering data for 21 596 mouse strains, 2062 rat strains, 13 monkey strains, 2 hamster strains, 5 dog strains, 5 rabbit strains and more than 50 other laboratory animal strains (Figure 2). The database is open, and professionals can contributed the data of laboratory animal species or strains that are not already included in the database, although they will not be uploaded as an official data release on to the database until they have first been reviewed and verified. As such, the size of the database can be expected to continue to increase over time.
Figure 2

Overview of the laboratory animal strains in LasDB. The percentage breakdown of laboratory animals from each species in LasDB at present

Overview of the laboratory animal strains in LasDB. The percentage breakdown of laboratory animals from each species in LasDB at present

DISCUSSION

Laboratory animal resources are increasingly important for life science research. In this work, we describe the construction of a laboratory animal strain database (LasDB). The data resources in the LasDB are free for biomedical‐related scientific and technical personnel to use, and it is envisaged will particularly be vital in promoting and implementing bio‐industry research. A large number of laboratory animal resources have been collected from China and abroad, in order to facilitate information sharing among the scientific community. Examples of resources include a series of databases for mice strains constructed by The Jackson Laboratory in the United States, the Rat Genome Database (RGD) constructed by The National Heart Lung and Blood Institute (NHLBI) in the USA, which gathers information together on rat strains,8 and the Rodent Genome Database, Mouse Cells Genetic Map and Freak Mouse Homology Database built in the UK. Some other databases storing the genetic information of laboratory animals like mice, rats, and related disease models have also been constructed, and are important resources for biomedical systems and related research. The sharing of laboratory animal information is a global trend. Several information‐sharing‐based non‐profit coalition laboratory animal resources have been formed, mainly related to laboratory rodents, including the International Mouse Strain Resource (IMSR), the Federation of International Mouse Resources (FIMRe) and the International Knockout Mouse Consortium (IKMC),9 but they are limited to mouse strains, while other species are also useful and commonly used. Researchers are not finding it easy to get information about other species. The LasDB aims the meet the requirement of including all laboratory animal species and strains. In 1997, the Chinese government started moves to establish a laboratory animal information network and databases. To date, we have established a national laboratory animal statistical reporting system, including the construction of a database on laboratory animal production, supply, information exchange networks and related databases. In 2001‐2003 we built an animal model of human diseases database, holding about 100 data samples. In 2008, the National Natural Science & Technology Resources (NSTR) set up a laboratory animal resource database, with a data collection of 188 strains from eight species. The Model Animal Research Institute and Nanjing University together set up the China Resource Sharing Alliance, which mainly provides a genetically engineered mouse strains “one‐stop” inquiry and communication sharing platform for alliance members. With the development of its economy and science base, China has become one of the biggest communities using laboratory animals, with 25 million laboratory animals currently produced and with more than 200 000 professionals in the field of laboratory animal science.2 The need for laboratory animal strain resources is growing, and this is the greatest stimulus for the construction of LasDB. In China, laboratory animal databases generally contain information about the biological characteristics of the domestic laboratory animal strains, but provide little information on practical applications. A global database though could include all laboratory animal strain resources. Consequently, construction of a worldwide database of laboratory animal strains is essential for domestic researchers and will help them make more efficient use of the existing laboratory animal resources. The LasDB is now open to researchers and also provides consulting services for the public.

CONFLICT OF INTEREST

None.

AUTHOR CONTRIBUTIONS

QK contributed to the database design, collection of the data‐set, and the analysis of the data and in the editing of the manuscript. CQ also contributed to the database design. Both the authors read and approved the final manuscript.
  9 in total

1.  Laboratory animal science in China: current status and potential for adoption of Three R alternatives.

Authors:  Qi Kong; Chuan Qin
Journal:  Altern Lab Anim       Date:  2010-03       Impact factor: 1.303

2.  Rules and guidelines for genetic nomenclature in mice: excerpted version. Committee on Standardized Genetic Nomenclature for Mice.

Authors:  M T Davisson
Journal:  Transgenic Res       Date:  1997-09       Impact factor: 2.788

3.  Rules and guidelines for mouse gene nomenclature: a condensed version. International Committee on Standardized Genetic Nomenclature for Mice.

Authors:  L J Maltais; J A Blake; J T Eppig; M T Davisson
Journal:  Genomics       Date:  1997-10-15       Impact factor: 5.736

4.  FELASA guidelines for the production and nomenclature of transgenic rodents.

Authors:  Th Rülicke; X Montagutelli; B Pintado; R Thon; H J Hedrich
Journal:  Lab Anim       Date:  2007-07       Impact factor: 2.471

5.  Mouse Models of Human Cancers Consortium (MMHCC) from the NCI.

Authors:  Cheryl Marks
Journal:  Dis Model Mech       Date:  2009 Mar-Apr       Impact factor: 5.758

6.  Analysis of current laboratory animal science policies and administration in China.

Authors:  Qi Kong; Chuan Qin
Journal:  ILAR J       Date:  2009

7.  Using standard nomenclature to adequately name transgenes, knockout gene alleles and any mutation associated to a genetically modified mouse strain.

Authors:  Lluís Montoliu; C Bruce A Whitelaw
Journal:  Transgenic Res       Date:  2010-07-15       Impact factor: 2.788

8.  Analysis of disease-associated objects at the Rat Genome Database.

Authors:  Shur-Jen Wang; Stanley J F Laulederkind; G T Hayman; Jennifer R Smith; Victoria Petri; Timothy F Lowry; Rajni Nigam; Melinda R Dwinell; Elizabeth A Worthey; Diane H Munzenmaier; Mary Shimoyama; Howard J Jacob
Journal:  Database (Oxford)       Date:  2013-06-21       Impact factor: 3.451

9.  The Rat Genome Database 2015: genomic, phenotypic and environmental variations and disease.

Authors:  Mary Shimoyama; Jeff De Pons; G Thomas Hayman; Stanley J F Laulederkind; Weisong Liu; Rajni Nigam; Victoria Petri; Jennifer R Smith; Marek Tutaj; Shur-Jen Wang; Elizabeth Worthey; Melinda Dwinell; Howard Jacob
Journal:  Nucleic Acids Res       Date:  2014-10-29       Impact factor: 19.160

  9 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.