Literature DB >> 30890856

Clinical outcomes of arthroscopic assissted fixation of acute high grade acromioclavicular joint disruption.

Fahmy Samir Fahmy1, Hossam Fathi1, Mohammad ElAttar1.   

Abstract

BACKGROUND: Management of high grade acute acromioclavicular (AC) joint dislocation is considered a surgical dilemma. Open methods of fixation are the gold standard but the morbidities are frequent. The goal of this study was to evaluate the results of arthroscopic fixation of acute high grade (AC) joint dislocation.
METHODS: A series of 24 patients with acute high grade acromioclavicular joint dislocation were fixed arthroscopically using TightRope device. The study was done between February 2013 and February 2017. The functional outcomes were assessed using Constant-Murley score and University of California at Los Angeles shoulder (UCLA) scale. The preoperative and postoperative means of coraco-clavicular distance were calculated and used for radiological assessment. P-value < o.o5 was statistically significant.
RESULTS: The mean followed up time was 23.25 ± 7.1 (12-35) months. There was highly significant improvement in the Constant-Murley score and (UCLA) scale at the end of the follow up period. The coraco-clavicular distance was improved from 21.7 ± 3.1 mm preoperative to 10.17 ± 2.3 mm postoperative. There were two complications, one case had over correction and the other had mild transient post-operative burning pain along the course of ulnar nerve.
CONCLUSION: Arthroscopic fixation of acute high grade (AC) joint dislocation is safe, minimally invasive technique with satisfactory functional outcomes and low morbidities provided that it is done by surgeons skilled in shoulder arthroscopy.

Entities:  

Keywords:  Arthroscopic; High grade; Minimal invasive; TightRope

Year:  2019        PMID: 30890856      PMCID: PMC6403419          DOI: 10.1016/j.jor.2019.02.005

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Orthop        ISSN: 0972-978X


  25 in total

1.  [Tossy III injuries of the acromioclavicular joint. In what circumstances is surgery still justified? Personal results and literature review].

Authors:  A Prokop; H J Helling; J Andermahr; S Mönig; K E Rehm
Journal:  Orthopade       Date:  2003-05       Impact factor: 1.087

2.  A biomechanical evaluation of an anatomical coracoclavicular ligament reconstruction.

Authors:  Augustus D Mazzocca; Stephen A Santangelo; Sean T Johnson; Clifford G Rios; Mark L Dumonski; Robert A Arciero
Journal:  Am J Sports Med       Date:  2005-11-10       Impact factor: 6.202

3.  Rockwood type III acromioclavicular dislocation: surgical versus conservative treatment.

Authors:  C Gstettner; M Tauber; W Hitzl; H Resch
Journal:  J Shoulder Elbow Surg       Date:  2008-02-04       Impact factor: 3.019

4.  The use of a hook-plate in the management of acromioclavicular injuries. Report of ten cases.

Authors:  A A Faraj; B Ketzer
Journal:  Acta Orthop Belg       Date:  2001-12       Impact factor: 0.500

5.  Coracoclavicular screw fixation for unstable fractures of the distal clavicle. A report of five cases.

Authors:  F T Ballmer; C Gerber
Journal:  J Bone Joint Surg Br       Date:  1991-03

6.  Surgical treatment of acute acromioclavicular joint injuries using a modified Weaver-Dunn procedure and clavicular hook plate.

Authors:  Hsin-Hua Liu; Yi-Jiun Chou; Chi-Hui Chen; Wei-Tso Chia; Chi-Yin Wong
Journal:  Orthopedics       Date:  2010-08-11       Impact factor: 1.390

7.  Coracoclavicular ligament repair and screw fixation in acromioclavicular dislocations.

Authors:  Cem Zeki Esenyel; Kahraman Oztürk; Murat Bülbül; Semih Ayanoğlu; Hasan Hüseyin Ceylan
Journal:  Acta Orthop Traumatol Turc       Date:  2010       Impact factor: 1.511

Review 8.  Treatment of the acute traumatic acromioclavicular separation.

Authors:  Julie Y Bishop; Christopher Kaeding
Journal:  Sports Med Arthrosc Rev       Date:  2006-12       Impact factor: 1.985

9.  Acromioclavicular Dislocation: Conservative or Surgical Therapy.

Authors:  Jennifer M. Hootman
Journal:  J Athl Train       Date:  2004-03       Impact factor: 2.860

10.  Acromioclavicular dislocation Rockwood III-V: results of early versus delayed surgical treatment.

Authors:  Olaf Rolf; Andreas Hann von Weyhern; Alexander Ewers; Thomas Dirk Boehm; Frank Gohlke
Journal:  Arch Orthop Trauma Surg       Date:  2007-11-22       Impact factor: 3.067

View more
  3 in total

1.  Arthroscopically assisted single tunnel reconstruction for acute high-grade acromioclavicular joint dislocation with an additional acromioclavicular joint cerclage.

Authors:  Gunnar Jensen; Rony-Orijit Dey Hazra; Mireille Al-Ibadi; Katharina Salmoukas; Jan Christoph Katthagen; Helmut Lill; Alexander Ellwein
Journal:  Eur J Orthop Surg Traumatol       Date:  2022-05-07

Review 2.  Biologic and synthetic ligament reconstructions achieve better functional scores compared to osteosynthesis in the treatment of acute acromioclavicular joint dislocation.

Authors:  Maristella F Saccomanno; Giuseppe Sircana; Valentina Cardona; Valeria Vismara; Alessandra Scaini; Andrea G Salvi; Stefano Galli; Giacomo Marchi; Giuseppe Milano
Journal:  Knee Surg Sports Traumatol Arthrosc       Date:  2020-08-14       Impact factor: 4.342

Review 3.  Treatment of acute high-grade acromioclavicular joint dislocation.

Authors:  Jeung Yeol Jeong; Yong-Min Chun
Journal:  Clin Shoulder Elb       Date:  2020-09-01
  3 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.