Endophytic Fungal Volatile Compounds as Solution for Sustainable Agriculture.

Endophytic fungi produce various mixtures of carbon-based compounds, which are known as volatile organic compounds (VOCs). Research regarding the use of VOCs as pesticide substitutes has garnered much attention. This review summarizes the recent knowledge about VOCs regarding their origin and chemical properties and emphasizes their antimicrobial potential against a wide variety of agricultural pathogens. Several studies have highlighted the importance of VOCs as antimicrobial agents. Nevertheless, the application of VOCs in biofumigation methods still requires the advanced evaluation of their phytotoxicity.

1. Introduction

The control of pre- and post-harvest diseases is essential to maintain the quality of crops and agricultural products. Currently, while the application of pesticides is the most popular way to control several pathogens, there is irrefutable evidence that the use of these products is harmful to humans and the environment, besides causing the proliferation of pathogen-resistant strains [1,2]. In this context, the development of a biopesticide strategy, as an alternative to conventional pesticides, has become a research topic of great interest. Biocontrol methods are based on the use of either living organisms or natural substances produced by these organisms (pheromones, plant extract) [3]. The exploitation of natural substances, such as essential oils, seems to be a promising approach for controlling post-harvest diseases caused by different micro-organisms, producing safe foods, and reducing environmental pollution. Moreover, natural substances could effectively control the growth of certain pesticide-resistant microorganisms [4]. In the context of biocontrol methods, it has been reported that several endophytic fungi are able to produce volatile organic compounds (VOCs) [5,6]. Endophytic fungi are defined as fungi that spend the whole or part of their lifecycle colonizing inter-and/or intra-cellular systems, especially leaves, stems, and roots, without causing any apparent disease symptoms in their hosts [7,8]. Endophytic fungi play important roles in plant micro-ecosystems. Reports have revealed that over 1 million fungal endophytes have been found in various plant micro-ecosystems [9]. Endophytic fungi provide many benefits to their hosts by enhancing host growth and defense against pathogens. In addition, many endophytic fungal strains, such as Trichoderma, Noduliosporium, and Muscodor sp., can modulate the plant defense systems by inhibiting and reducing the load of fungal pathogens [10]. These benefits are principally attributed to the mixture of VOCs produced by endophytic fungi. In fact, there is an estimated 322 identified secondary metabolites secreted by endophytic fungi. These metabolites are derived from different fungal metabolism pathways and consist of a diverse range of compounds, including alkaloids, terpenoids, quinones, peptides, xanthones, and phenols [11,12]. Owing to their small size and high vapor pressure, VOCs can diffuse easily through the atmosphere and soil [13]. It is known that these compounds play an important role in communication between fungi and other organisms in the ecosystem. In addition, these molecules have shown promising bioactivity potential against a wide range of pathogens [14,15]. Hence, these molecules are used as part of biocontrol strategies, in what is termed mycofumigation, to inhibit the growth of numerous plant pathogens [16,17].

As a single review cannot discuss the findings of the different studies on fungal VOCs, this review focuses only on endophytic fungal VOCs, with an emphasis on their structure, properties, production, and biological activities.

2. Volatile Organic Compounds (VOCs)

VOCs are hydrophobic, organic molecules with a low molecular weight (<300 Da) and high vapor pressure (≥0.01 kPa at 20 °C) [18]. Due to their physico-chemical properties, these molecules can cross plant cell membranes; therefore, they play a very important role in the functioning of soil ecosystems [13,19,20]. VOCs are of anthropic (refining, evaporation of organic solvents, unburned, etc.,) or natural origins (emissions by plants, animals, and microorganisms). The majority belong to five chemical groups—terpenoids, fatty acid derivatives, benzenoid compounds, phenylpropanoids, and amino acid derivatives. They play a very important role in the control of several fungal pathogens [20,21].

Their biosynthesis is highly dependent on the availability of carbon, nitrogen, sulfur, and energy provided by primary metabolism. Four precursors are known to be implicated in these biosynthetic pathways—PEP, E4P, pyruvate, and acetyl-coA. The four major metabolic pathways, namely the shikimate/phenylalanine, the mevalonic acid (MVA), the methylerythritol phosphate (MEP), and lipoxygenase (LOX) pathways, involve different enzymatic reactions and lead to the production of benzenoids/phenylpropanoids, sesquiterpenes, monoterpenes, hemiterpenes, diterpenes, volatile carotenoid derivatives, and methyl jasmonate/green leaf volatiles (Figure 1) [20].

Figure 1

General overview of the major metabolic pathways inducing the synthesis of volatile organic compounds (VOCs.) [20]. DAHP, 3-deoxy-D-arabinoheptulosonate-7 phosphate; DMAPP, dimethylallyl pyrophosphate; E4P, erythrose 4-phosphate; FPP, farnesyl pyrophosphate; GGPP, geranylgeranyl pyrophosphate; GPP, geranyl pyrophosphate; IPP, isopentenyl pyrophosphate; NPP, neryl pyrophosphate; PEP, phosphoenolpyruvate; Phe, phenylalanine.

As mentioned above, VOCs are secreted by endophytic fungi. In fact, these microorganisms are able to interact with their host plants and produce a mixture of VOCs molecules. The mixture constitutes “sentences” that allow plants to transmit complex signals and, thus, communicate with their environment. The main functions that can be performed by VOCs emitted by plants or fungi are defense against herbivores and pathogens, communication between different organs of the plant or with other plants, and attraction of beneficial agents (for example pollinators, seed dispersers, and microorganisms) [15,21,22]. Therefore, this review is only focused on the current state of knowledge on endophytic fungal VOCs with regard to their potential bioactivity for use against fungal plant pathogens.

3. Antifungal Effect of Volatile Organic Compounds Produced by Endophytic Fungi

Several studies highlight the important antifungal role of VOCs compounds. These molecules could have different chemical structures and play a potential role in plant defense against fungal diseases. In their report, Lee et al. [23] demonstrated that, during in vitro and in vivo assays, an antifungal volatile compound produced by Oxyporus latemarginatus was found to have inhibitory action against a broad spectrum of pathogenic fungi, including Alternaria alternata, Colletotrichum gloeosporioides, and Fusarium oxysporum f. sp. Lycopesici. The antifungal compound was identified through Gas Chromatography-Mass Spectrometry (GC-MS) as 5-pentyl-2-furaldehyde [23]. Moreover, O. latemarginatus EF069 was capable of inhibiting the growth of Botrytis cinerea and Rhizoctonia solani, which can cause post-harvest apple decay and root rot of moth orchids, respectively. Similarly, Lee et al. [23] revealed that 50 g of wheat bran/rice inoculated with O. latemarginatus EF069 effectively reduced the development of post-harvest apple rot caused by B. cinerea. In their study, Malmeirca et al. [24] established direct confrontation assays between Trichoderma strains and the pathogen B. cinerea. For this purpose, agar plug cuts of each fungi were placed in potato dextrose agar plates and incubated at 28 °C in the dark. The radial growth of Trichoderma. arundinaceum was observed until it surrounded the pathogen colony. Results revealed that the growth of B. cinerea was controlled by T. arundinaceum, using trichodiene. This indicates VOCs indirectly inhibits B.cinerea by inducing the expression of defense genes encoding the production of salicylic and jasmonic acids and by interacting with hydrolytic enzymes [24]. Trichoderma sp. have also been widely used as biological control agents for the control of soil-borne pathogens. VOCs emitted by Trichoderma harzianum resulted in 67% growth inhibition of Colletotrichum capsici, whereas Trichoderma saturnisporum and Trichoderma reesei inhibited 59.3% and 30.4% of C. capsici, respectively [25]. In the same context, F. oxysporum can inhibit the growth of B. cinerea. It is also responsible for the total inhibition of three fungal species, Rhizoctonia solani, Penicillium digitatum, and Aspergillus niger. This has been confirmed by inhibition of pectin methylesterase, cellulase, and polyphenols oxidase secretions [26]. This antifungal activity could be attributed to terpenes, principally limonene, β-phellondrene, and 1,8-cineole (synonym: eucalyptol) secreted by the microorganism. In addition to terpene VOCs secretion, endophytic fungi can emit alcohols and carboxylic acids. For example, Phomopsis sp. produce a unique blend of VOCs, which is composed of sabinene, 1-butanol, phenethyl alcohol, 1-propanol, and acetone. This fungus has been isolated as an endophyte associated with Odontoglossum sp. (Orchidaceae) in a forest in northern Ecuador. It has been shown that these molecules inhibit a broad spectrum of fungi from different taxonomic groups, such as Deuteromycetes, Ascomycetes, and Oomycetes.

This section emphasizes the description of VOCs compounds secreted by two important endophytic fungi species, Muscodor and Noduliosporium. Muscodor has been the focus of many studies since it produces VOCs known for having lethal effects against a wide variety of pathogenic fungi. Currently, the mixture of VOCs, produced by Muscodor albus is used as a primary screening tool to discover new Muscodor species with potent VOCs production. To date, 14 Muscodor species have been described: Muscodor albus, Muscodor roseus [27,28], Muscodor vitigenus [29], Muscodor crispans [30], Muscodor yucatanensis [31], Muscodor fengyangensis [32], Muscodor cinnanomi [33], Muscodor sutura [34], Muscodor musae, Muscodor oryzae, Muscodor equiseti, Muscodor suthepensis [35], and recently Muscodor kashayum [36] and Muscodor tigerii [37]. Muscodor species have been isolated in South America, the USA, and southeast Asian countries, including Thailand, China, and, most recently, India. The genus Muscodor effectively controls several pathogenic fungi. M. albus inhibits the growth of Rhizoctonia solani and Phytophthora capsici responsible for pepper root rot. These species also inhibit the germination of teliospores Tilletia horrida, Tilletia indica, and Tilletia tritici. Mercier et al. [38] showed that the VOCs spectrum emitted by two strains, Muscudor CZ-620 and strain MFC2, effectively controlled fungal rot of multiple fruits. The VOCs mixture was analyzed by GC with Flame Ionization Detector and results showed that it was mainly composed of isobutyl alcohol, 2-methyl-1-butanol, and isobutyric acid [38]. Other Muscodor species have been the subject of several studies. Muscodor cinnamomi CMU-Cib461 inhibited the growth of Rhizoctonia solani, which could induce leaf blight, leaf spot, damping-off, and leaf rot [39]. In the same context, M. kashayum inhibited the growth of Cercosporabeticola, Colletotrichum gloesporioides, Mycosphaerella fijiensis, Chaetomium heterosperum, and Fusarium oxysporum. The analysis of volatiles compounds emitted by M. kashayum was carried out by a solid phase microextraction coupled with GC-MS. For this purpose, a solid phase microextraction syringe was used to trap the volatile compounds emitted by a 10-day-old culture of Muscodor following the method of Ezra et al. [36,40]. Subsequently, VOCs were analyzed by GC-MS. Results revealed that the mixture contains 23 volatile compounds which were identified by comparing the GC-MS spectra. The most abundant of all the volatile compounds produced were cyclohex-3-en-1-ol and β-bisabolol.

These volatiles produced by M. kashayum are unique, and have not been previously reported by any other Muscodor species, which predominantly produce esters of isobutyric acid, methyl acetate, ethyl-2-methylbutyrate, and alcohol [34,36].

To highlight the antifungal potential of VOCs emitted by endophytic fungi, Strobel et al. [41] introduced the concept of mycofumigation. Mycofumigation is a new biological control alternative for post-harvest diseases of fruit and vegetable rots. However, its effectiveness depends on the fungal species, the amount of inoculum used, and the type of post-harvest disease. Actually, this method is used for the treatment of fruits in storage rather than controlling soil borne pathogens. In this context, soils are inoculated with a M. albus preparation in order to preclude the growth of pathogens [17,42]. Field bioassays for the evaluation of Muscodor albus efficacy against three pathogenic fungi of sugar beets, Rhizoctonia solani, Pythium ultimum, and Aphanomyces cochlioides, have been established. Briefly, sterilized barley seeds were inoculated with M. albus. After incubation at 25 °C for three weeks, the inoculated grains of barley were dried and ground to a sawdust texture. After that, the preparation was spread over the surface of the soil and covered with black plastic mulch and loose soil. After one week, the soil preparation containing Muscodor was added as a top layer onto pots inoculated with pathogens. Sugar beet seeds were planted in different plots and placed in a greenhouse. The amount of healthy sugar beet seedlings was estimated after 14, 21, and 28 days of plantation. Results revealed that mycofumigation of infested soil with M. albus improved the healthy seedling establishment of sugar beets [17]. On the basis of several reports highlighting the potential antifungal activity of Muscodor, the industrial company AgraQuest, of Davis, CA, USA, is currently undertaking full-scale development of M. albus for several agricultural applications [43]. Different aspects related to the optimization of the formulation, cost-effectiveness ratio, and scale-up of mycofumigation with Muscodor are underway. This may limit the utilization of others hazardous fumigants such as methyl bromide chloropicrin mixtures [44,45]. In their study, Suwannarach et al. [35] established an in vivo assay for investigating fumigation activity of M. suthepensis. Briefly, the sterilized surface of tangerine fruits was inoculated with spore suspensions of the pathogenic fungi P. digitatum. Next, the infected fruits were stored at 25 °C in plastic boxes containing inoculum of M. suthepensis. After 24 h, the fungal inoculum was removed, and boxes were kept at 25 °C for nine days. The diameters of decay lesions were measured during the incubation period. Results showed that a 12 h fumigation with 30 g per 4 L of a M. suthepensis inoculum completely controlled mandarin fruit rot caused by the pathogenic fungi P. digitatum [39]. Similarly, a 24 h fumigation with 30 g per 11.4 L of rye grains of M. albus was required for the complete control of P. digitatum. Moreover, 24 h of fumigation with 30 g per 11.4 L of M. albus inoculum controlled blue mold caused by Penicillium expansum and gray mold caused by B. cinerea of apples. Fumigation with 140 g per 11.4 L of M. albus inoculum controlled brown rot caused by Monilinia fructicola. In their report, Saxena et al. [37] revealed that growth of Alternaria alternans and Cercospora beticola were totally inhibited by volatile compounds secreted by Muscodor tigerii. In other studies, it has been demonstrated that the VOCS mixture produced by Muscodor CZ-620 and MFC2 limited fungi rot in a wide range of fruits. Recently, Hutchings et al. [46] identified a novel VOC molecule, N-methyl-N-nitrosoisobutyramide (MNIBA). This thermolabile molecule was identified by GC-MS analysis when a low-injection temperature (140 °C) was applied. It has been reported that the toxicity of M. albus is directly correlated to the MNIBA concentration in the VOCs mixture produced by this fungal strain. MNIBA is known to cause DNA damage by methylation. The spontaneous decomposition of MNIBA compounds generates, principally, iso-butyric acid and methyl-diazohydroxide, which could be converted, in a second step, to methyl-diazonium. This compound induces DNA methylation and, therefore, the generation of NO radicals, which are responsible for the chemical nitrosylation of amides. GC-MS analysis of COVs produced by Muscodor revealed a high amount of a volatile compound derived from isobutyric acid. The higher bioactivity of MNIBA is attributed to the presence of this compound. Hence, Muscodor species are considered as potential agents that could be used in biofumigation.

Nodulisporium sp. are characterized by their resistance to VOCs emitted by M. albus. This resistance is assigned to the ability of these fungi to produce VOCs with important antifungal properties [47]. Suwannarach et al. [48] showed that the strain Nodulisporium sp. CMU-UPE34 was able to produce 31 VOCs. Analyses of the VOCs mixture by GC-MS revealed that it consisted mainly of alcohols, acids, esters, and monoterpenes. Among these molecules, eucalyptol (synonym: 1,8-cineole) was the most abundant volatile compound. In the second part of this work, an in vivo assay for fumigation activity of volatile compounds produced by Nodulisporium was carried out. For this purpose, sterilized surfaces of citrus fruits were inoculated with different pathogenic fungi and incubated in plastic boxes. Next, boxes were inoculated with Nodulisporium sp. CMU-UPE34. After 48h of incubation at 25 °C, the fungal inoculum was removed, and the boxes were re-stored in the same conditions. After one week, the diameters of decay lesions by each pathogen were measured. Results revealed that the mixture of VOCs inhibited the growth of different pathogenic fungi with the inhibition yield ranging from 47%–93% [48]. In addition, in vivo tests have shown that Nodulisporium sp. CMU-UPE34 controlled the growth of Penicillium digitatum and Penicillium expansum and caused completely inhibition of Aspergillus fumigatus and Rhizoctonia solani [49]. Other studies demonstrated that the strain Nodulisporium sp. CMU-UPE34 efficiently inhibited the proliferation of P. digitatum, P. expansum, Aspergillus fumigatus, and R. solani [50]. Analysis of the VOCS mixture secreted by this fungal strain revealed that it was mainly composed of 1,8-cineole and terpinen-4-ol. The compound 1,8-cineole can cross cellular membranes and induce damage in different cellular organelles. Moreover, it has been shown that there is a synergistic effect between 1,8-cineole and terpinen-4-ol. In fact, 1,8-cineole can easily cross the cellular membrane and, therefore, facilitate the entry of terpinen-4-ol into the intracellular medium [51]. Other studies have reported that the fumigation of jasmine rice, which is a variety of Oryzaindica, with 50 g and 60 g of Nodulisporium sp. CMU-UPE34 culture and the fumigation of wheat/rice bran with 50 g of Nodulisporium sp. CF016 controls cabbage green mold completely and suppresses the development of gray and blue mold lesions by 88% and 76%, respectively [39,52,53].

To better understand the antifungal effect of VOCs on pathogenic fungi, researchers have used artificial molecules. They compared them with VOCs secreted directly from fungi. According to the study established by Syed et al. [54], in comparison with fungal VOCs, a mixture of synthetic VOCs consisting of pentan-2-one, hexan-3-one, 1,8-cineole, β-farnesene, and propanoic acid was more effective against Phytophthora palmivora, Phytophthor cinnamomi, Pythium ultimum, R. solani, Sclerotinia sclerotiorum, and B. cinerea [54]. In addition, a comparative study between the natural thujospen emitted by Penicillium decumbens Thom C. and commercial thujospen showed that they had similar antifungal bioactivity against the five strains tested—Aspergillus sydowii, Eurotium herbariorum, Polytrichum macroclada, Penicillium hirsutum, and P. decumbens [55]. In addition, Singh et al. [56] showed that the use of the median effective concentration (EC50) of an artificial mixture similar to the VOCs emitted by Phomopsis sp. completely inhibited the growth of Colletotrichum lagenarium and Trichoderma viride [56]. However, natural VOCs showed no inhibitory effect on T. viride and C. lagenarium. This suggests that some VOCs emitted by Phomopsis sp. but not identified through GC-MS due to low concentrations that do not reach the detection threshold, may influence the inhibitory effect on the fungus [56]. In the same context, the use of a pure chemical or a mixture of several chemicals (butyl, ethyl acetate, and ethanol representing the VOCs spectrum naturally emitted by Ceratocystis fimbriata), in proportions calculated using GC-MS analysis, showed no inhibitory effect. According to the authors, the inhibition may be a synergistic effect of all VOCs of C. fimbriata, including molecules not detected using current identification methods [57]. A similar observation was recorded for another VOCs mixture produced by Muscodor sp.

4. Phytoxicity of Volatile Organic Compounds

Despite all the promising results, the question of phytotoxicity depended on the use of VOCs. Numerous studies have shown strong relationships between VOCs and phytotoxicity [58]. As early as 1965, Muller confirmed that terpenic VOCs of Sarracenia leucophylla reduced the number of rootlets and the germination of hypocotyl seeds of Cucumis sativus (L.) [59]. Inderjit et al. [60] revealed that species richness of plants was much lower due to VOCs produced by Ageratina adenophora litter. In the same context, He et al. [61] showed that dead leaf water and decomposition of residues around Eucalyptus urophylla contained VOCs of the sesquiterpenes 1,8-cineole and terpinene-4-ol, and, respectively, represented 19% and 39% of the water-soluble mixture. The synthetic forms of these two volatile compounds inhibited the germination of some cereals, and the growth of some weeds [61]. Lee et al. [62] studied the phytotoxicity of alcoholic VOCs. Exposure of Arabidopsis thaliana (L.) grains and plants to a concentration of 1 PPM 1-octanol, 2-octanol, 3-octanol, and 1-octen-3-ol synthetic forms showed no effect on germination. Nevertheless, these molecules caused a growth retardation of the radical part. In the same study, different plant and ethanol samples were examined, as well as their morphological changes or modifications. The chlorophyll concentration and root growth of treated plants was also measured. These results are confirmed by Ogura et al. [63] who tested the phytotoxicity of alcohols emitted by a non-endophytic fungi P. expansum. The results were analyzed with a concentration of 100 mg/L, completely inhibiting the germination of 15 types of Brassicaceae, including six radish varieties. This information could also be important when considering the phytotoxic effect of VOCs, including their dose, origin, chemical nature, and mode of application. Table 1 summarizes proprieties of the most important endophytic fungi VOCs.

Table 1

Overview of VOCs molecules, their origins, and antimicrobial effects.

Endophytic Fungi Producing VOCs	VOCs Effects	Microorganisms Inhibited by VOCs	VOCs/CAS Number	Molecular Formula	Hosts	References
Fusarium oxysporum can-* 46	Inhibition of mycelium	Aspergillus flavus Aspergillus parasiticus Botrytis cinerea Colletotrichum siamense Fusarium graminearum Fusarium oxysporum f.sp. vasinfectum Magnaporthe oryzae Monilinia fructicola	Farnesol (4602-84-0)β-caryophyllene (87-44-5)Limonene (138-86-3)Hexanoic acid (142-62-1)Octanoic acid (124-07-2)	C15H26OC15H24C10H16C6H12O2C8H16O2	Gossypium herbaceum	[64]
Hypoxylon sp.	Inhibition of mycelium	Botrytis cinerea Ceratocystis ulmi Cercospora beticola Colletotrichum lagenarium Fusarium solani Geotrichum candidum Mycosphaerella fijiensis Phytophthor apalmivora Phytophthor acinnamomi Rhizoctonia solani Sclerotinia sclerotiorum Trichoderma viride Verticillium dahliae	1,8-cineole (470-82-6)1-methyl-1,4-cyclohexadiene (4313-57-9)	C10H18OC7H10	Persea indica	[65]
Muscodor albus	Complete inhibition of mycelium growth	Pythium ultimum Rhizoctonia solani Tapesia yallundae	Methylacetate (79-20-9)	C3H6O2	Cinnamomum zeylanicum	[39]
	Inhibition of mycelium	Botrytis cinerea Monilinia fructicola Penicillium expansum	2-methyl-1-butanol (137-32-6)2-methylpropionic acid (79-31-2)	C5H12OC4H8O		[66]
	Inhibition of mycelium	Aspergillus ochraceus Fusarium solani Rhizoctonia solani Sclerotinia sclerotiorum	2-methylpropionic acid (79-31-2)	C4H8O2		[67]
	Inhibits the germination of teliospores	Tilletia horrida Tilletia indica Tilletia tritici	Unknown			[68]
	Inhibition of mycelium growth	Helminthosporium solani Fusarium sambucinum	2-methylpropionic acid (79-31-2)3-methyl-1-butanol (123-51-3)Ethyl alcohol (64-17-5)	C4H8O2C5H12OC2H6O		[69]
	Complete inhibition of mycelium growth	Aspergillus sp Colletotrichum sp Geotrichum sp.	N-methyl-N-nitrosoisobutyramide (1255641-06-5)	C5H10N2O2		[46]
Muscodor musae	Inhibition of mycelium	Alternaria porri Alternaria solani Aspergillus flavus Botrytis cinerea Colletotrichum capsic Colletotrichum gloeosporioides Colletotrichum musae Fusarium oxysporum Fusarium solani Nigrospora oryzae Penicillium digitatum Penicillium expansum Rhizoctonia solani Sclerotium rolfsii Candida albicans Cryptococcus neoformans Escherichia coli Enterococcus faecalis Proteus mirabilis Staphylococcus aureus Streptococcus pneumoniae	Isobutyric acid (79-31-2)3-methyl-1-butanol (123-51-3)Ethyl-2-methylbutyrate (7452-79-1)	C4H8O2	Musa acuminata	[35]
Muscodor equiseti				C5H12OC7H14O2	Equisetum debile
Muscodor oryzae					Oryza rufipogon
Muscodor cinnamomi					C. bejolghota
Muscodor suthepensis					C. bejolghota
Muscodor Darjeelingensis	Inhibition of mycelium	Alternaria alternata Arthrinium phaeospermum Aspergillus flavus Aspergillus niger Bionectria ochroleuca Botrytis cinerea MTCC 359 Cercospora beticola Colletotrichum gloeosporioides MTCC 9623 Fusarium solani Fusarium oxysporum Lasiodiplodia theobromae Muscodor albu scz620 Penicillium chrysogenum Rhizoctonia solani Talaromyces marneffei Candida glabrata Candida viswanathii Pseudomonas aeruginosa MTCC 3541 Pseudomonas aeruginosa MTCC 647r Staphylococcus epidermidis MTCC 2639	Isobutyric acid (79-31-2)3-methyl-1-butanol (123-51-3)Ethyl-2-methyl-butyrate (7452-79-1)	C4H8O2C5H12OC7H14O2	C. camphora	[70]
Muscodor kashyum	Inhibition of mycelium growth	Alternaria alternata MTCC5432 Agaricus bisporus Aspergillus japonicus Bionectria ochroleuca Candida albicans Cercospora beticola Chaetomium heterosporum Colletrotrichum gloeosporioides Curvularia lunata Fusarium equiseti Fusarium oxysporum Lasiodiplodia theobromae Muscodor albus CZ620 Mycosphaerella fijiensis Penicillium citreonigrum Penicillium marneffei Trichoderma viride Pleurotus flabellatus	cyclohex-3-en-1-ol (822-66-2)β-Bisabolol (15352-77-9)	C6H10OC15H26O	Aegle marmelos	[36]
Nodulisporium sp.	Inhibition of mycelium	Aspergillus fumigatus Aspergillus flavus Botrytis cinerea Colletotrichum lagenarium Ceratocystis ulmi Cercospora beticola Fusarium solani Geotrichumcandidum Phytophthor apalmivora Phytophthora cinnamoni Pythium ultimum Rhizoctonia solani Sclerotinias clerotiorum Trichoderma viridae Verticillium dahlia	1-methyl-1,4-cyclohexadiene (4313-57-9)2-methyl-1-pentanol (105-30-6)1-Heptanol (111-70-6)1-Octanol (111-87-5)	C7H10C6H14OC7H16OC8H18O		[54]
Nodulisporium sp. CMU-UPE34	Inhibition of mycelium growth	Alternaria porri Alternaria solani Colletotrichum capsici Colletotrichum musae Colletotrichum gloeosporioides Fusarium oxysporum Penicillium digitatum Penicillium expansum Nigrospora oryzae Rhizoctonia solani Sclerotium rolfsii	1,2,4-trimethylenecyclo-hexane (2234-75-5)3-methyl-1-butanol (123-51-3)Limonene (138-86-3)Eucalyptol (synonym: 1,8-cineole) (470-82-6)β-myrcene (123-35-3)Terpinen-4-ol (562-74-3)	C9H18C5H12OC10H16C10H18OC10H16C10H18O		[48]
Oxyporus latem arginatus EF069	Inhibition of mycelium growth	Alternaria alternata Botrytis cinerea Colletotrichum gloeosporioides Fusarium oxysporum f.sp. lycopersici	2-Furanmethanol (90200-14-9)	C8H12O4	Capsicum annum	[23]
Phomopsis sp.	Inhibition of mycelium growth	Aspergillus fumigatus Ceratocystis ulmi Colletotrichum lagenarium Geotrichum candidum Phytophthora palmivora Pythium ultimum Rhizoctonia solani Sclerotinia sclerotiorum	Sabinene (3387-41-5)3-methy-1-butanol (123-51-3)1-Propanol (71-23-8)2-Propanone (67-64-1)	C10H16C5H12OC3H8OC3H6O	Odontoglossum sp.	[56]
Trichoderma harzianum T-E5	Inhibition of mycelium growth	Fusarium oxysporum f.sp. cucumerinum (FOC)	Diterpene (146985-82-2)	C20H30O4	Cucumis sativus *	[26,71]
Trichoderma saturnisporum	Inhibition of mycelium growth	Colletotrichum capsici	Ethylene (74-85-1)Hydrogen cyanide (74-90-8)	C2H4CHN	Capsicum frutescence) *	[25]
Trichoderma reesei					Capsicum frutescence *
Trichoderma harzianum					Capsicum frutescence *
Trichoderma viride	Inhibition of mycelium growth	Botrytis cinerea Fusarium oxysporum	6-pentyl-2H-Pyran-2-one (27593-23-3)	C10H14O2	Capsicum frutescence *	[72]
Trichoderma harzianum	Induces the expression of tomato defense genes related to salicylic acid (SA)	Botrytis cinerea	Diterpene (146985-82-2)	C20H30O4	Solanum lycopersicum *	[73]

* Fusarium oxysporum and Trichoderma sp. were found in various plant. Examples of theses hosts are presented in the table.

5. Conclusions

This review summarizes literature regarding the bioactivity of volatile substances produced by endophytic fungi. There is a consensus that VOCs emitted by endophytic fungi lead to partial or total inhibition of pathogenic fungi growth. To this end, the emission of antifungal VOCs appears to be a promising way to limit the use of pesticides for controlling fungal plant pathogens. However, it is important to mention that the antimicrobial activity of VOCs depends closely on their origin, dose, and application form. Currently, the great bioactivity potential of these compounds is drawing the attention of industry to commercialize VOC products for agricultural applications. However, multiple efforts need to be launched for the industrial production of theses formulations. Fungal VOCs are emitted in small quantities which could prevent their commercialization. In order to promote VOCs products, more studies must focus on determining the appropriate methods to ensure the greatest cost-effectiveness ratio. Ultimately, by using genetic tools, key genes involved in VOCs biosynthetic pathways can be identified and over-expressed for large-scale production of these compounds. Since a number of reports highlighted the phytotoxicty of some VOCs, more studies need to be conducted to safely use these molecules for biofumigation. Moreover, the toxicity of VOCs for humans needs to be strictly evaluated before their use in biocontrol strategies.

As endophytic fungi are abundant and have high genetic diversity, the identification and characterization of novel VOCs is a current research topic.