| Literature DB >> 30887749 |
Sang Hyup Lee1,2, Soon Ho Yoon1,3, Ju Gang Nam1,2, Hyung Jin Kim1,2, Su Yeon Ahn4,5, Hee Kyung Kim1,2, Hyun Ju Lee1,2, Hwan Hee Lee6, Gi Jeong Cheon6, Jin Mo Goo1,2,7.
Abstract
OBJECTIVE: To investigate whether computed tomography (CT) and fluorine-18-labeled fluoro-2-deoxy-D-glucose (FDG) positron emission tomography (PET) may be applied to distinguish thymic epithelial tumors (TETs) from benign cysts in the anterior mediastinum.Entities:
Keywords: Computed tomography; Cystic mass; FDG-PET/CT; Mediastinum; Thymic tumor
Mesh:
Substances:
Year: 2019 PMID: 30887749 PMCID: PMC6424822 DOI: 10.3348/kjr.2018.0400
Source DB: PubMed Journal: Korean J Radiol ISSN: 1229-6929 Impact factor: 3.500
Fig. 1Study diagram for patient inclusion.
CT = computed tomography, TET = thymic epithelial tumor
Fig. 2Protrusion length and protrusion ratio on axial CT image.
A. 58-year-old female with 3.5-cm thymic cyst (arrow). Lesion abuts to adjacent mediastinal pleura but does not protrude: both protrusion length and protrusion ratio are 0. B. 64-year-old male with 3.4-cm thymic carcinoma (arrow), showing protrusion to mediastinal pleura. Protrusion length = 12.7 mm, protrusion ratio = (12.7 / 31.6) × 100 = 40.2%.
CT and 18F-FDG PET Findings of Benign Cysts And TETs in Anterior Mediastinum
| CT and 18F-FDG PET Findings | TETs (n = 132) | Benign Cysts (n = 130) | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Morphologic findings | |||
| Long-axis diameter (cm) | 3.4 ± 1.0 | 2.1 ± 0.9 | < 0.001 |
| Short-axis diameter (cm) | 2.6 ± 3.5 | 1.5 ± 0.6 | < 0.001 |
| Superior location above heart (vs. inferior location) (%) | 88 (116) | 96 (125) | 0.021 |
| Lobulating contour (vs. smooth) (%) | 63 (83) | 17 (22) | < 0.001 |
| Ill-defined margin (vs. well-defined) (%) | 20 (27) | 6 (8) | 0.001 |
| Oval/irregular shape (vs. round) (%) | 76 (100) | 69 (90) | 0.238 |
| Calcification (%) | 11 (14) | 2 (3) | 0.010 |
| Gross fat | 0 | 0 | N/A |
| Ancillary findings (%) | |||
| Adjacent organ invasion | 7 (9) | 0 | 0.003 |
| Pleural effusion | 2 (3) | 0 | 0.247 |
| Pericardial effusion | 0 | 0 | N/A |
| Lymphadenopathy | 4 (5) | 0 | 0.060 |
| Satellite nodule | 5 (6) | 2 (3) | 0.5 |
| Metastasis | 6 (8) | 0 | < 0.001 |
| Relationship between lesion and adjacent mediastinal pleura | |||
| Visual categorization (%) | |||
| No abutment | 6 (8) | 20 (26) | < 0.001 |
| Abutment | 11 (15) | 67 (88) | |
| Protrusion | 83 (109) | 13 (16) | |
| Protrusion length (mm) | 10.0 ± 8.7 | 0.8 ± 2.9 | < 0.001 |
| Protrusion ratio (%) | 32.3 ± 33.0 | 3.0 ± 8.9 | < 0.001 |
| CT attenuation (HU) | (n = 52) | (n = 45) | |
| Pre-contrast CT attenuation | 47.3 ± 12.1 | 31.4 ± 18.0 | < 0.001 |
| Post-contrast CT attenuation | 88.8 ± 28.0 | 44.1 ± 21.9 | < 0.001 |
| Absolute enhancement | 41.5 ± 27.8 | 12.8 ± 21.4 | < 0.001 |
| 18F-FDG PET/CT | (n = 28) | (n = 12) | |
| SUVmax | 5.3 ± 2.4 | 1.1 ± 0.3 | < 0.001 |
Data in parenthesis indicate number of patients. CT = computed tomography, HU = Hounsfield unit, N/A = not applicable, PET = positron emission tomography, SUVmax = maximum standardized uptake value, TET = thymic epithelial tumor, 18F-FDG = fluorine-18-labeled fluoro-2-deoxy-D-glucose
Fig. 3Proportion of TETs and benign cysts that showed protrusion from adjacent mediastinal pleura according to lesion size.
No TET was smaller than 1 cm. Protrusion was absent in 9 thymic cysts smaller than 1 cm.
Fig. 4Distribution of (A) pre- and (B) post-contrast CT attenuation of TETs and benign cysts.
HU = Hounsfield unit
Results of Subgroup Analysis on Benign Cysts according to Presence of Pseudoenhancement
| CT Findings | Pseudoenhancement (+)* (42%, n = 19) | Pseudoenhancement (-) (58%, n = 26) | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Pre-contrast CT attenuation (HU) | 22.1 ± 18.5 | 38.2 ± 15.0 | 0.003 |
| Post-contrast CT attenuation (HU) | 54.6 ± 25.4 | 36.4 ± 15.9 | 0.005 |
| Absolute enhancement (HU) | 32.5 ± 18.0 | -1.7 ± 8.7 | < 0.001 |
| Long-axis diameter (cm) | 2.0 ± 0.8 | 2.1 ± 0.8 | 0.724 |
| Presence of protrusion (%) | 16 (n = 3) | 4 (n = 1) | 0.295 |
*Pseudoenhancement was considered as positive for lesions with absolute enhancement ≥ 10 HU. Lt. = left, Rt. = right
Fig. 5Pseudoenhancement in thymic cysts.
A. 61-year-old male with 3.5-cm thymic cyst showing pseudoenhancement. Lesion is located at prevascular space, abutting left innominate vein. Pre-contrast study (left) shows round shaped, smooth-margined mass with internal fluid attenuation. After contrast enhancement (right), beam-hardening artifacts from left innominate vein with injected dense contrast medium create bright streaky high attenuations on mass, causing pseudoenhancement. Mean CT attenuation values measured at two phases were 14 HU and 49 HU, respectively, resulting in absolute enhancement of 35 HU. B. 52-year-old male with 2.2-cm thymic cyst without enhancement. Lesion is also abutting left innominate vein, but contrast medium is being injected through right upper extremity vein. Mean CT attenuation values measured at two phases were 44 HU and 42 HU, respectively.
Optimal Threshold Values for Each Continuous Parameter Obtained from Receiver Operating Characteristic Curve Analysis
| Parameters | Optimal Threshold Value | Area Under Curve | Sensitivity (%) | Specificity (%) |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Protrusion length (mm) | 1.7 | 0.875 | 83 | 89 |
| Protrusion ratio (%) | 13 | 0.879 | 81 | 89 |
| Pre-contrast attenuation (HU) | 35 | 0.756 | 83 | 58 |
| Post-contrast attenuation (HU) | 60 | 0.901 | 87 | 82 |
| Absolute enhancement (HU) | 17 | 0.805 | 83 | 71 |
| SUVmax | 1.43 | 1.000 | 100 | 100 |
Results of Multivariate Logistic Regression Analysis including Either (a) Presence of Protrusion or (b) Protrusion Ratio
| CT Findings | Odds Ratio | 95% CI | |
|---|---|---|---|
| (a)* | |||
| Long-axis diameter (cm) | 2.573 | 0.991–6.682 | 0.052 |
| Presence of protrusion | 9.855 | 1.749–55.535 | 0.009 |
| Lobulated contour | 5.598 | 0.761–41.194 | 0.091 |
| Pre-contrast attenuation ≥ 35 HU | 4.808 | 0.654–35.337 | 0.123 |
| Post-contrast attenuation ≥ 60 HU | 12.734 | 2.506–64.705 | 0.002 |
| (b)* | |||
| Long-axis diameter (cm) | 2.574 | 0.983–6.743 | 0.054 |
| Protrusion ratio ≥ 13% | 9.346 | 1.638–53.318 | 0.012 |
| Lobulated contour | 6.449 | 0.927–44.858 | 0.060 |
| Pre-contrast attenuation ≥ 35 HU | 5.329 | 0.731–38.837 | 0.099 |
| Post-contrast attenuation ≥ 60 HU | 13.145 | 2.602–66.417 | 0.002 |
*Other variables were removed from analysis using backward enter model, in which variables that show low significance level with p value larger than 0.1 are removed from regression model. CI = confidence interval
Fig. 6ROC curves of four radiologists before and after instruction of study results.
AUC = areas under ROC curve, ROC = receiver operating characteristic
Inter-Observer Agreement in Assessing Presence of Abutment and Protrusion to Mediastinal Pleura
| k value | Reader 1 vs. Reader 2 | Reader 1 vs. Reader 3 | Reader 1 vs. Reader 4 | Reader 2 vs. Reader 3 | Reader 2 vs. Reader 4 | Reader 3 vs. Reader 4 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Abutment | 0.523 (0.244–0.802) | 0.478 (0.206–0.750) | 0.893 (0.687–1.000) | 0.941 (0.827–1.000) | 0.444 (0.162–0.726) | 0.404 (0.134–0.675) |
| Protrusion | 0.767 (0.553–0.981) | 0.827 (0.641–1.000) | 0.700 (0.467–0.933) | 0.941 (0.827–1.000) | 0.683 (0.431–0.935) | 0.630 (0.370–0.891) |
Data in parenthesis indicates 95% CI.
ICC and Bland-Altman Analysis of Quantitative Measurements Across Four Readers
| CT Findings | ICC | Lower End of 95% CI | Upper End of 95% CI |
|---|---|---|---|
| Pre-contrast CT attenuation (HU) | 0.824 | 0.696 | 0.915 |
| Post-contrast CT attenuation (HU) | 0.908 | 0.853 | 0.948 |
| Abutment length (mm) | 0.828 | 0.736 | 0.899 |
| Protrusion length (mm) | 0.870 | 0.797 | 0.924 |
| Protrusion ratio (%) | 0.856 | 0.776 | 0.916 |
ICC = intraclass correlation coefficient