Mehrdad Bakhshayeshkaram1, Yalda Salehi2, Mehrshad Abbasi2, Razieh Hashemi Beni1, Sharareh Seifi3, Maryam Hassanzad4, Hamid Reza Jamaati5, Farahnaz Aghahosseini6. 1. Pediatric Respiratory Diseases Research Center, National Research Institute of Tuberculosis and Lung Diseases (NRITLD), Department of Radiology, Shahid Beheshti University of Medical Sciences, Daar-Abad, Niavaran Ave., 19575-154, Tehran, 1956944413, Iran. 2. Department of Nuclear Medicine, Vali-Asr Hospital, Tehran University of Medical Sciences, Tehran, Iran. 3. Pediatric Respiratory Diseases Research Centre, National Research Institute of Tuberculosis and Lung Diseases (NRITLD), Department of Oncology, Shahid Beheshti University of Medical Sciences, Tehran, Iran. 4. Pediatric Respiratory Diseases Research Centre, National Research Institute of Tuberculosis and Lung Diseases (NRITLD), Department of Paediatrics, Shahid Beheshti University of Medical Sciences, Tehran, Iran. 5. Chronic Respiratory Diseases Research Center, National Research Institute of Tuberculosis and Lung Diseases (NRITLD), Department of Pulmonology, Shahid Beheshti University of Medical Sciences, Tehran, Iran. 6. Pediatric Respiratory Diseases Research Center, National Research Institute of Tuberculosis and Lung Diseases (NRITLD), Department of Radiology, Shahid Beheshti University of Medical Sciences, Daar-Abad, Niavaran Ave., 19575-154, Tehran, 1956944413, Iran. kfaghahosseini@gmail.com.
Abstract
OBJECTIVES: To develop a diagnostic algorithm for positron emission tomography (PET)-detected incidental breast lesions using both breast imaging reporting and data system (BI-RADS) and maximum standardized uptake value (SUVmax) criteria. METHODS: Fifty-six PET-detected incidental breast lesions from 51 patients, which were subsequently investigated by breast ultrasound within 1 month of the PET study, constituted the study cohort and they were finally verified by tissue diagnosis or a 2-year follow-up. Based on the maximum specificity with sensitivity > 60.0% and maximum sensitivity with specificity > 60.0%, two SUVmax cutoff values were calculated at 2 and 3.7. BI-RADS ≥ 4 was considered as highly suspicious for malignancy. The diagnostic accuracies were estimated for SUVmax levels above or below the cutoff points combined with the BI-RADS suspicion level. RESULTS: Overall, 46 benign and 10 malignant lesions were studied. The diagnostic characteristics of SUVmax ≥ 2, SUVmax ≥ 3.7, and BI-RADS ≥ 4 were 80.0%, 60.0%, and 80.0% for sensitivity, 73.9%, 95.7%, and 92.7% for specificity, and 75.0%, 89.3%, and 90.2% for accuracy, respectively. When the SUVmax threshold was set at 2, combined with BI-RADS suspicion level, the sensitivity, specificity, and accuracy were 100.0%, 69.6%, and 75.0%, respectively. The results for SUVmax threshold set at 3.7 combined with BI-RADS were 90.0%, 91.3%, and 91.1% for the sensitivity, specificity, and accuracy, respectively. A diagnostic algorithm was accordingly generated. CONCLUSION: The need for biopsy should be justified in low BI-RADS lesions presenting with high SUVmax at 3.7 or higher. The biopsy of patients with high B-IRADS and low SUVmax could be preserved. KEY POINTS: • A diagnostic algorithm was developed for PET-detected incidental breast lesions using both BI-RADS and SUVmax criteria. • Diagnostic performance was calculated separately and conjunctively for SUVmax ≥ 2, SUVmax ≥ 3.7, and BI-RADS ≥ 4. • The need for biopsy can be justified in BI-RADS < 4 lesions with SUVmax ≥ 3.7. Lesions with BI-RADS < 4 and indeterminate SUVmax (2 < SUVmax < 3.7) benefit from a short-interval follow-up. BI-RADS < 4 lesions with SUVmax < 2 may confidently be scheduled for routine screening.
OBJECTIVES: To develop a diagnostic algorithm for positron emission tomography (PET)-detected incidental breast lesions using both breast imaging reporting and data system (BI-RADS) and maximum standardized uptake value (SUVmax) criteria. METHODS: Fifty-six PET-detected incidental breast lesions from 51 patients, which were subsequently investigated by breast ultrasound within 1 month of the PET study, constituted the study cohort and they were finally verified by tissue diagnosis or a 2-year follow-up. Based on the maximum specificity with sensitivity > 60.0% and maximum sensitivity with specificity > 60.0%, two SUVmax cutoff values were calculated at 2 and 3.7. BI-RADS ≥ 4 was considered as highly suspicious for malignancy. The diagnostic accuracies were estimated for SUVmax levels above or below the cutoff points combined with the BI-RADS suspicion level. RESULTS: Overall, 46 benign and 10 malignant lesions were studied. The diagnostic characteristics of SUVmax ≥ 2, SUVmax ≥ 3.7, and BI-RADS ≥ 4 were 80.0%, 60.0%, and 80.0% for sensitivity, 73.9%, 95.7%, and 92.7% for specificity, and 75.0%, 89.3%, and 90.2% for accuracy, respectively. When the SUVmax threshold was set at 2, combined with BI-RADS suspicion level, the sensitivity, specificity, and accuracy were 100.0%, 69.6%, and 75.0%, respectively. The results for SUVmax threshold set at 3.7 combined with BI-RADS were 90.0%, 91.3%, and 91.1% for the sensitivity, specificity, and accuracy, respectively. A diagnostic algorithm was accordingly generated. CONCLUSION: The need for biopsy should be justified in low BI-RADS lesions presenting with high SUVmax at 3.7 or higher. The biopsy of patients with high B-IRADS and low SUVmax could be preserved. KEY POINTS: • A diagnostic algorithm was developed for PET-detected incidental breast lesions using both BI-RADS and SUVmax criteria. • Diagnostic performance was calculated separately and conjunctively for SUVmax ≥ 2, SUVmax ≥ 3.7, and BI-RADS ≥ 4. • The need for biopsy can be justified in BI-RADS < 4 lesions with SUVmax ≥ 3.7. Lesions with BI-RADS < 4 and indeterminate SUVmax (2 < SUVmax < 3.7) benefit from a short-interval follow-up. BI-RADS < 4 lesions with SUVmax < 2 may confidently be scheduled for routine screening.
Authors: F Crippa; E Seregni; R Agresti; C Chiesa; C Pascali; A Bogni; D Decise; V De Sanctis; M Greco; M G Daidone; E Bombardieri Journal: Eur J Nucl Med Date: 1998-10
Authors: A Gil-Rendo; F Martínez-Regueira; G Zornoza; M J García-Velloso; C Beorlegui; N Rodriguez-Spiteri Journal: Br J Surg Date: 2009-02 Impact factor: 6.939