H Hille 1 , M Vetter , B J Hackelöer . Show Affiliations »
Abstract
PURPOSE: The aim was to evaluate the accuracy of BI-RADS categories 3 - 5 in breast ultrasound (US) as the first-line imaging method. MATERIALS AND METHODS: 5077 examinations of a consecutive, unselected and mixed collective of symptomatic and asymptomatic patients were performed. Of these examinations, 835 cases of BIRADS 3 - 5 could be analyzed. RESULTS: The PPV with respect to a malignant lesion for BI-RADS 3, 4, 5 was 0.03, 0.48, and 0.97, respectively. When BI-RADS 4 and 5 cases are considered to be suspicious, the ratio of benign to malignant findings corresponds to 1:1.8. Analyzing BIRADS 3 - 5 lesions, the sensitivity, specificity and accuracy are 0.92, 0.85, and 0.87, respectively. CONCLUSION: The data support the feasibility of US for discriminating malignant from benign findings corresponding to the ACR BI-RADS classification without excessively increasing the number of unnecessary biopsies. © Georg Thieme Verlag KG Stuttgart · New York.
PURPOSE: The aim was to evaluate the accuracy of BI-RADS categories 3 - 5 in breast ultrasound (US) as the first-line imaging method. MATERIALS AND METHODS: 5077 examinations of a consecutive, unselected and mixed collective of symptomatic and asymptomatic patients were performed. Of these examinations, 835 cases of BIRADS 3 - 5 could be analyzed. RESULTS: The PPV with respect to a malignant lesion for BI-RADS 3, 4, 5 was 0.03, 0.48, and 0.97, respectively. When BI-RADS 4 and 5 cases are considered to be suspicious, the ratio of benign to malignant findings corresponds to 1:1.8. Analyzing BIRADS 3 - 5 lesions, the sensitivity, specificity and accuracy are 0.92, 0.85, and 0.87, respectively. CONCLUSION: The data support the feasibility of US for discriminating malignant from benign findings corresponding to the ACR BI-RADS classification without excessively increasing the number of unnecessary biopsies. © Georg Thieme Verlag KG Stuttgart · New York.
Entities: Species
Mesh: See more »
Year: 2011
PMID: 21877320 DOI: 10.1055/s-0031-1281667
Source DB: PubMed Journal: Ultraschall Med ISSN: 0172-4614 Impact factor: 6.548